Advertisement

Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 557–571 | Cite as

Feeding and nutrient excretion of the New Zealand freshwater mussel Echyridella menziesii (Hyriidae, Unionida): implications for nearshore nutrient budgets in lakes and reservoirs

  • Hélène Cyr
  • Kevin J. Collier
  • Susan J. Clearwater
  • Brendan J. Hicks
  • Simon D. Stewart
Research Article

Abstract

Native freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) can represent a large portion of benthic biomass, but their functional role is still poorly understood. We sampled Echyridella menziesii (Hyriidae) in six lakes from two regions of the North Island of New Zealand to develop general allometric relationships for predicting filtration, excretion and biodeposition rates. Experimental containers were set up in the field (no-flow conditions) to measure filtration and biodeposition using natural phytoplankton communities, and excretion in filtered lake water. Filtration rates were 0.02–1.3 L mussel−1 h−1 and increased with increasing mussel size (R2 = 0.13, P = 0.023). Stable isotope analysis suggests that mussels also assimilate food from non-planktonic origins. Nitrogen excretion rates were 4–50 μg N mussel−1 h−1 and increased with mussel size (R2 = 0.70, P < 0.0001), with no difference between regions (ANCOVA, P > 0.3). In contrast, phosphorus excretion rates did not vary with mussel size, and were much lower in Rotorua than Waikato lakes (2 vs 5 μg P mussel−1 h−1). The reason for this regional difference is unclear, but suggests that mussels could contribute different N:P ratios to nearshore nutrient budgets in different types of lakes. Biodeposits represented 50–70% of the N, and 25–70% of the P recycled. Echyridella filters and excretes nutrients at rates similar to those measured in North American and European mussels (Unionidae, Margaritiferidae). Mussels could be important contributors of nutrients in areas where they are abundant, and their inclusion into nutrient budget models could improve the predictions of nearshore nutrient fluxes in lakes and reservoirs.

Keywords

Hyriidae Lake Filtration rate Nutrient excretion N:P ratio Ecological stoichiometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Garrett-Walker who provided field and laboratory assistance throughout the project, and J. Butterworth and M. Lehman for their help with field work. We also thank M. Pingram, C. McBride and D. Klee for use of unpublished stable isotope baseline data. Mussels were collected under MPI Special Collection permit 560 (Client No. 8770024). We thank the Te Arawa Lake Trust, Ngāti Tūwharetoa and Ngāti Korokī Kahukura who granted permission to sample these lakes. The study was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) programmes “Enhancing the Health and Resilience of New Zealand Lakes (UOWX1503) and “Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Aquatic Ecosystems (C01×1002)”, and by the Waikato Regional Council.

Supplementary material

27_2016_517_MOESM1_ESM.doc (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 18 KB)

References

  1. Ackerman JD, Loewen MR, Hamblin PF (2001) Benthic-pelagic coupling over a zebra mussel reef in western Lake Erie. Limnol Oceanogr 46:892–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arar EJ, Collins GB (1997) Method 445.0 In vitro determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson CL, Vaughn CC (2015) Biogeochemical hotspots: temporal and spatial scaling of the impact of freshwater mussels on ecosystem function. Freshwater Biol 60:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson CL, Vaughn CC, Forshay KJ, Cooper JT (2013) Aggregated filter-feeding consumers alter nutrient limitation: consequences for ecosystem and community dynamics. Ecology 94:1359–1369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker SM, Hornbach DJ (2001) Seasonal metabolism and biochemical composition of two unionid mussels, Actinonaias ligamentina and Amblema plicata. J Moll Stud 67:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker SM, Levinton JS (2003) Selective feeding by three native North American freshwater mussels implies food competition with zebra mussels. Hydrobiologia 505:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayne BL, Scullard C (1977) Rates of nitrogen excretion by species of Mytilus (Bivalvia: Mollusca). J Mar Biol Ass UK 57:355–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird DF, Prairie YT (1985) Practical guidelines for the use of zooplankton length-weight regression equations. J Plankton Res 7(955):960Google Scholar
  9. Bontes BM, Verschoor AM, Miguel Dionisio Pires L, van Donk E, Ibelings BW (2007) Functional response of Anodonta anatine feeding on a green alga and four strains of cyanobacteria, differing in shape, size and toxicity. Hydrobiologia 584:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brendelberger H, Klauke C (2007) Pedal feeding in freshwater unionid mussels: particle-size selectivity. Int Ver Theor Angew 30:1082–1084.Google Scholar
  11. Burger DF, Hamilton DP, Pilditch CA, Gibbs MM (2007) Benthic nutrient fluxes in a eutrophic, polymictic lake. Hydrobiologia 584:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Pennuto C, Mayer C (2014) Changes in Lake Erie benthos over the last 50 years: historical perspectives, current status, and main drivers. J Great Lakes Res 40:560–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnet AMR, Davis JM (1980) Primary production in lakes Rotorua, Rerewhakaaitu, and Rotoiti, North Island, New Zealand. 1973–1978. NZ J Mar Freshwat Res 14:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns N, McIntosh J, Scholes P (2005) Strategies for managing the lakes of the Rotorua district, New Zealand. Lake Reserv Manage 21:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byrne M, Vesk PA (2000) Elemental composition of mantle tissue granules in Hyridella depressa (Unionida) from the Hawkeesbury-Nepean River system, Australia: inferences from catchment chemistry. Mar Freshw Res 51:183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Raymond PA, Strayer DL, Pace ML, Findlay SEG, Fischer DT (1997) Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78:588–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chowdhury GW, Zieritz A, Aldridge DC (2016) Ecosystem engineering by mussels support biodiversity and water clarity in a heavily polluted lake in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Freshw Sci 35:188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christian AD, Crump BG, Berg DJ (2008) Nutrient release and ecological stoichiometry of freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionidae) in 2 small, regionally distinct streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collier KJ, Watene-Rawiri E, McCraw J (2010) Geography and history. In: Collier KJ, Hamilton DP, Vant WN, Howard-Williams C (eds) The waters of the Waikato: ecology of New Zealand’s longest river. Environment Waikato and the Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  20. Conroy JD, Edwards WJ, Pontius RA, Kane DD, Zhang H, Shea JF, Richey JN, Culver DA (2005) Soluble nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of exotic freshwater mussels (Dreissena spp.): potential impacts for nutrient remineralisation in western Lake Erie. Freshw Biol 50:1146–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummings KS, Graf DL (2010) Mollusca: Bivalvia. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Boston, pp 309–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cyr H (2008) Physical forces constrain the depth distribution of the abundant native mussel Elliptio complanata in lakes. Freshw Biol 53:2414–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cyr H (2009) Substrate and fetch affect the emergence of freshwater mussels from lake sediments. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cyr H, Storisteanu DML, Ridgway MS (2012) Sediment accumulation predicts the distribution of a unionid mussel (Elliptio complanata) in nearshore areas of a Canadian Shield Lake. Freshw Biol 57:2125–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cyr H, Phillips N, Butterworth J (submitted) Depth distribution of the native freshwater mussel (Echyridella menziesii) in warm monomictic lakes: towards a general predictive model for lakes. Freshw BiolGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis WR, Christian AD, Berg DJ (1999) Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling by freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream ecosystem. Proc Freshwater Moll Cons Soc 1:141–151Google Scholar
  27. Ganser AM, Newton TJ, Haro RJ (2015) Effects of elevated water temperature on physiological responses in adult freshwater mussels. Freshw Biol 60:1705–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grainger N, Collier K, Hitchmough R, Harding J, Smith B, Sutherland D (2014) Conservation status of New Zealand freshwater invertebrates, 2013. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 8, Department of Conservation, Wellington, p 28Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths NA, Cyr H (2006) Are there hot spots for Elliptio complanata in the shallow littoral zone of a large Canadian Shield lake? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2137–2147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton DP, Collier KJ, Howard-Williams C. (2016) Lake restoration in New Zealand. Ecol Manage Restor 17:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hatcher A (1994) Nitrogen and phosphorus turnover in some benthic marine invertebrates: implications for the use of C:N ratios to assess food quality. Mar Biol 121:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Higgins SN, Vander Zanden MJ (2010) What a difference a species makes: a meta-analysis of dreissenid mussel impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 80:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hinzmann MF, Lopes-Lima M, Bobos I, Ferreira J, Domingues B, Machado J (2015) Morphological and chemical characterization of mineral concretions in the freshwater bivalve Anodonta cygnea (Unionidae). J Morphol 276:65–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hosomi M, Sudo R (1986) Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in freshwater samples using persulfate digestion. Int J Environ Stud 27:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Howard JK, Cuffey KM (2006) The functional role of native freshwater mussels in the fluvial benthic environment. Freshw Biol 51:460–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. James MR (1985) Distribution, biomass and production of the freshwater mussel Hyridella menziesi (Gray), in Lake Taupo, New Zealand. Freshw Biol 15:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. James MR (1987) Ecology of the freshwater mussel Hyridella menziesi (Gray) in a small oligotrophic lake. Arch Hydrobiol 108:337–348Google Scholar
  38. Jørgensen CB (1996) Bivalve filter feeding revisited. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 142:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim BH, Lee JH, Hwang SJ (2011) Inter- and intra-specific differences in filtering activities between two unionids, Anodonta woodiana and Unio douglasiae, in ambient eutrophic lake waters. Ecol Eng 37:1957–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klee D (2006) Seasonal and depth dynamics of food webs in three Rotorua lakes using stable isotopes. MSc thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  41. Kryger J, Riisgård HU (1988) Filtration rate capacities in 6 species of European freshwater bivalves. Oecologia 77:34–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG (2004) The global decline of nonmarine molluscs. Bioscience 54:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Markich SJ, Brown PL, Jeffree RA (2001) Divalent metal accumulation in freshwater bivalves: an inverse relationship with metal phosphate solubility. Sci Total Environ 275:27–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall BA, Fenwick MC, Ritchie PA (2014) New Zealand recent Hyriidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida). Molluscan Res 34:181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matisoff G, Fisher JB, Matis S (1985) Effects of benthic macroinvertebrates on the exchange of solutes between sediments and freshwater. Hydrobiologia 122:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McBride CG (2005) Stable isotopes in the Rotorua lakes: food web structures and relationships to lake morphology and limnology. MSc thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  47. McCall PL, Tevesz MJS, Schwelgien SF (1995) Particle mixing rates of freshwater bivalves: Anodonta grandis (Unionidae) and Sphaerium striatinium (Pisidiidae). J Great Lakes Res 21:333–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDowall B (2002) Decline of the kakahi: identifying cause and effect. Water Atmos 10:8–9Google Scholar
  49. Morehouse RL, Dzialowski AR, Jeyasingh PD (2013) Impacts of excessive dietary phosphorus on zebra mussels. Hydrobiol 707:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P (2007) The effect of seasonal variation in selective feeding by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on phytoplankton community composition. Freshwat Biol 52:823–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naddafi R, Pettersson K, Eklöv P (2008) Effects of the zebra mussel, an exotic freshwater species, on seston sstoichiometry. Limnol Oceanogr 53:1973–1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nalepa TF, Gardner WS, Malczyk JM (1991) Phosphorus cycling by mussels (Unionidae: Bivalvia) in Lake St. Clair. Hydrobiologia 219:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newell RIE (2004) Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: a review. J Shellfish Res 23:51–61Google Scholar
  54. Nichols SJ, Garling D (2000) Food-web dynamics and trohic-level interactions in a multispecies community of freshwater unionids. Can J Zool 78:871–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nichols SJ, Silverman H, Dietz TH, Lynn JW, Garling DL (2005) Pathways of food uptake in native (Unionidae) and introduced (Corbiculidae and Dreissenidae) freshwater bivalves. J Great Lakes Res 31:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nobes RG (1980) Energetics of the freshwater mussel Hyridella menziesi (Gray). MSc thesis, University of Waikato, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  57. Ogilvie SC (1993) The effects of the freshwater mussel Hyridella menziesi on the phytoplankton of a shallow Otago lake. MSc thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  58. Ogilvie SC, Mitchell SF (1995) A model of mussel filtration in a shallow New Zealand lake, with reference to eutrophication control. Arch Hydrobiol 133:471–482Google Scholar
  59. Ozersky T, Evans DO, Ginn BK (2015) Invasive mussels modify the cycling, storage and distribution of nutrients and carbon in a large lake. Freshw Biol 60:827–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phillips N (2007) Review of the potential for biomanipulation of phytoplankton abundance by freshwater mussels (kakahi) in the Te Arawa lakes. Environment Bay of Plenty. NIWA Client Report: HAM2006-125, January 2007. http://www.boprc.govt.nz/media/34446/TechReports-070101-Reviewpotentialbiomanipulationphytoplanktonabundance.pdf
  61. Pingram MA, Collier KJ, Hamilton DP, Hicks BJ, David BO (2014) Spatial and temporal patterns of carbon flow in a temperate, large river food web. Hydrobiologia 729:107–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Post DM, Pace ML, Harston NG Jr (2000) Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes. Nature 405:1047–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Raikow DF, Hamilton SK (2001) Bivalve diets in a Midwestern US stream: a stable isotope enrichment study. Limnol Oceanogr 46:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rainforth HJ (2008) Tiakina kia ora – Protecting our freshwater mussels. MSc thesis. Victoria University, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  66. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS (eds) (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  67. Roditi HA, Strayer DL, Findlay SEG (1997) Characteristics of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) biodeposits in a tidal freshwater estuary. Arch Hydrobiol 140:207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roper DS, Hickey CW (1994) Population structure, shell morphology, age and condition of the freshwater mussel Hyridella menziesi (Unionacea: Hyriidae) from seven lake and river sites in the Waikato River system. Hydrobiol 284:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rowe MD, Obenour DR, Nalepa TF, Vanderploeg HA, Yousef F, Kerfoot WC (2015) Mapping the spatial distribution of the biomass and filter-feeding effect of invasive dreisssenid mussels on the winter-spring phytoplankton bloom in Lake Michigan. Freshw Biol 60:2270–2285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rueda FJ, Vidal J (2009) Currents in the upper mixed layer and in unstratified water bodies. In: Likens GE (ed) Encyclopedia of inland waters. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 568–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spooner DE, Vaughn CC (2008) A trait-based approach to species’ roles in stream ecosystems: climate change, community structure, and material cycling. Oecologia 158:307–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Spooner DE, Vaughn CC, Galbraith HS (2012) Species traits and environmental conditions govern the relationship between biodiversity effects across trophic levels. Oecologia 168:533–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Strayer DL (2014) Understanding how nutrient cycles and freshwater mussels (Unionoida) affect one another. Hydrobiologia 735:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strayer DL, Dudgeon D (2010) Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:344–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Strayer DL, Caraco NF, Cole JF, Findlay S, Pace ML (1999) Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. Bioscience 49:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Strayer DL, Pace ML, Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Findlay SEG (2008) Hydrology and grazing jointly control a large-river food web. Ecology 89:12–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tankersley RA, Dimock RV Jr (1993) The effect of larval brooding on the filtration rate and particle-retention efficiency of Pyganodon cataracta (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Can J Zool 71:1934–1944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Timperley MH (1987) Regional influences on lake water chemistry. In: Viner AB (ed) Inland waters of New Zealand, Vol. 241. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR), Wellington, pp 97–111Google Scholar
  79. vanden Byllaardt J, Ackerman JD (2014) Hydrodynamic habitat influences suspension feeding by unionid mussels in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 59:1187–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vander Zanden MJ, Shuter BJ, Lester N, Rasmussen JB (1999) Patterns of food chain length in lakes: a stable isotope study. Am Nat 154:406–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Vanderploeg HA, Liebig JR, Nalepa TF (1995) From picoplankton to microplankton: temperature-driven filtration by the unionid bivalve Lampsilis radiata siliquoidea in Lake St. Clair. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46:1431–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vaughn CC, Gido KB, Spooner DE (2004) Ecosystem processes performed by unionid mussels in stream mesocosms: species roles and effects of abundance. Hydrobiologia 527:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vaughn CC, Nichos SJ, Spooner DE (2008) Community and foodweb ecology of freshwater mussels. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:409–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Verburg P, Hickey CW, Phillips N (2014) Mercury biomagnification in three geothermally-influenced lakes differing in chemistry and algal biomass. Sci Total Environ 493:342–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Vincent WF (1983) Phytoplankton production and winter mixing: contrasting effects in two oligotrophic lakes. J Ecol 71:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Welker M, Walz N (1998) Can mussels control thee plankton in rivers? A planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnol Oceanogr 43:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wüest A, Lorke A (2003) Small-scale hydrodynamics in lakes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:373–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Environmental Research InstituteUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  3. 3.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations