Advertisement

Aquatic Sciences

, 73:599 | Cite as

Preconditioning effects of intermittent stream flow on leaf litter decomposition

  • D. DieterEmail author
  • D. von Schiller
  • E. M. García-Roger
  • M. M. Sánchez-Montoya
  • R. Gómez
  • J. Mora-Gómez
  • F. Sangiorgio
  • J. Gelbrecht
  • K. Tockner
Recent Perspectives on Temporary River Ecology

Abstract

Autumnal input of leaf litter is a pivotal energy source in most headwater streams. In temporary streams, however, water stress may lead to a seasonal shift in leaf abscission. Leaves accumulate at the surface of the dry streambed or in residual pools and are subject to physicochemical preconditioning before decomposition starts after flow recovery. In this study, we experimentally tested the effect of photodegradation on sunlit streambeds and anaerobic fermentation in anoxic pools on leaf decomposition during the subsequent flowing phase. To mimic field preconditioning, we exposed Populus tremula leaves to UV–VIS irradiation and wet-anoxic conditions in the laboratory. Subsequently, we quantified leaf mass loss of preconditioned leaves and the associated decomposer community in five low-order temporary streams using coarse and fine mesh litter bags. On average, mass loss after approximately 45 days was 4 and 7% lower when leaves were preconditioned by irradiation and anoxic conditions, respectively. We found a lower chemical quality and lower ergosterol content (a proxy for living fungal biomass) in leaves from the anoxic preconditioning, but no effects on macroinvertebrate assemblages were detected for any preconditioning treatment. Overall, results from this study suggest a reduced processing efficiency of organic matter in temporary streams due to preconditioning during intermittence of flow leading to reduced substrate quality and repressed decomposer activity. These preconditioning effects may become more relevant in the future given the expected worldwide increase in the geographical extent of intermittent flow as a consequence of global change.

Keywords

Anoxic pond Drought Mediterranean Organic carbon dynamics Temporary stream UV radiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the major support by the staff of all chemical laboratories involved, and we particularly thank Angela Krüger of the Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries in Berlin for the analysis of ergosterol. We are grateful for the comments of T. Datry and three reviewers that helped to improve the manuscript. This study was funded by the EU-FP 7 project MIRAGE (FP7-ENV-2007-1, http://www.mirage-project.eu). We also acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Warmtemp project, CGL2008-05618-C02-01/BOS) for the experiments at the Fuirosos site. D. von Schiller was supported by a fellowship of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the “laCaixa” Foundation.

Supplementary material

27_2011_231_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 20.2 kb)

References

  1. Acuña V, Giorgi A, Munoz I, Sabater F, Sabater S (2007) Meteorological and riparian influences on organic matter dynamics in a forested Mediterranean stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 26:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrectsen BR, Bjorken L, Varad A, Hagner A, Wedin M, Karlsson J, Jansson S (2010) Endophytic fungi in European aspen (Populus tremula) leaves-diversity, detection, and a suggested correlation with herbivory resistance. Fungal Divers 41:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin AT, Vivanco L (2006) Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442:555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bärlocher F (2005) Leaf mass loss estimated by litter bag technique. In: Graça M, Bärlocher F, Gessner M (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bärlocher F, Graça M (2005) Total phenolics. In: Graça M, Bärlocher F, Gessner M (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battle J, Golladay S (2001) Hydroperiod influence on breakdown of leaf litter in cypress-gum wetlands. Am Midl Nat 146:128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benfield EF (2006) Decomposition of leaf material. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 711–720Google Scholar
  8. Boulton A, Boon P (1991) A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments—time to turn over an old leaf. Aust J Mar Fresh Res 42:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulton A, Lake PS (1990) The ecology of 2 intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia.1. Multivariate analyses of physicochemical features. Freshw Biol 24:123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boulton A, Lake PS (1992) Benthic organic-matter and detritivorous macroinvertebrates in two intermittent streams in South-Eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia 241:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canhoto C, Laranjeira C (2007) Leachates of Eucalyptus globulus in intermittent streams affect water parameters and invertebrates. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casas J, Gessner MO (1999) Leaf litter breakdown in a Mediterranean stream characterized by travertine precipitation. Freshw Biol 41:781–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dangles O, Gessner M, Guerold F, Chauvet E (2004) Impacts of stream acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning. J Appl Ecol 41:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Datry T, Corti R, Claret C, Philippe M (2011) Flow intermittence controls leaf litter breakdown in a French temporary alluvial river: the ‘‘drying memory’’. Aquat Sci. doi: 10.1007/s00027-011-0193-8
  15. Day TA, Zhang ET, Ruhland CT (2007) Exposure to solar UV-B radiation accelerates mass and lignin loss of Larrea tridentata litter in the Sonoran Desert. Plant Ecol 193:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudgeon D, Wu KKY (1999) Leaf litter in a tropical stream: food or substrate for macroinvertebrates? Arch Hydrobiol 146:65–82Google Scholar
  17. Fischer H, Mille-Lindblom C, Zwirnmann E, Tranvik L (2006) Contribution of fungi and bacteria to the formation of dissolved organic carbon from decaying common reed (Phragmites australis). Arch Hydrobiol 166:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gessner MO (2005a) Ergosterol as a measure of fungal biomass. In: Graça M, Bärlocher F, Gessner M (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gessner MO (2005b) Proximate lignin and cellulose. In: Graça M, Bärlocher F, Gessner M (eds) Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gessner MO, Chauvet E, Dobson M (1999) A perspective on leaf litter breakdown in streams. Oikos 85:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giorgi F, Bi X, Pal J (2004) Mean, interannual variability and trends in a regional climate change experiment over Europe. II: climate change scenarios (2071–2100). Clim Dynam 23:839–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glazebrook H, Robertson A (1999) The effect of flooding and flood timing on leaf litter breakdown rates and nutrient dynamics in a river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forest. Aust J Ecol 24:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graça M (2001) The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams—a review. Int Rev Hydrobiol 86:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henry HAL, Brizgys K, Field CB (2008) Litter decomposition in a California annual grassland: Interactions between photodegradation and litter layer thickness. Ecosystems 11:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hladyz S, Gessner MO, Giller PS, Pozo J, Woodward G (2009) Resource quality and stoichiometric constraints on stream ecosystem functioning. Freshw Biol 54:957–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Stat 5:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Küsel K, Drake H (1996) Anaerobic capacities of leaf litter. Appl Environ Microb 62:4216–4219Google Scholar
  28. Lake PS (2003) Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Biol 48:1161–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langhans S, Tockner K (2006) The role of timing, duration, and frequency of inundation in controlling leaf litter decomposition in a river-floodplain ecosystem (Tagliamento, northeastern Italy). Oecologia 147:501–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langhans SD, Tiegs SD, Gessner MO, Tockner K (2008) Leaf-decomposition heterogeneity across a riverine floodplain mosaic. Aquat Sci 70:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larned ST, Datry T, Arscott DB, Tockner K (2010) Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw Biol 55:717–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leopold AC, Musgrave ME, Williams KM (1981) Solute leakage resulting from leaf desiccation. Plant Physiol 68:1222–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leroy C, Marks J (2006) Litter quality, stream characteristics and litter diversity influence decomposition rates and macroinvertebrates. Freshw Biol 51:605–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maamri A, Chergui H, Pattee E (1997) Leaf litter processing in a temporary northeastern Moroccan river. Arch Hydrobiol 140:513–531Google Scholar
  35. Reith F, Drake HL, Küsel K (2002) Anaerobic activities of bacteria and fungi in moderately acidic conifer and deciduous leaf litter. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 41:27–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson JS (1992) Food, microhabitat, or both? Macroinvertebrate use of leaf accumulations in a montane stream. Freshw Biol 27:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Royer T, Minshall G (2001) Effects of nutrient enrichment and leaf quality on the breakdown of leaves in a hardwater stream. Freshw Biol 46:603–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salmanowicz B, Nylund J (1988) High-performance liquid-chromatography determination of ergosterol as a measure of ectomycorrhiza infection in Scots Pine. Eur J For Pathol 18:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlief J, Mutz M (2007) Response of aquatic leaf associated microbial communities to elevated leachate DOC: a microcosm study. Int Rev Hydrobiol 92:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmidt-Kloiber A, Graf W, Lorenz A, Moog O (2006) The AQEM/STAR taxa list—a pan-European macro-invertebrate ecological database and taxa inventory. Hydrobiologia 566:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanley E, Fisher S, Grimm N (1997) Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams. Bioscience 47:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT, Tonolla D, Siber R, Peter FD (2009) European rivers. In: Likens GE (ed) Encyclopedia of inland waters, 1st edn. Elsevier, Academic Press, Oxford, pp 366–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CW (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Von Schiller D, Acuña V, Graeber D, Martí E, Ribot M, Sabater S, Timoner X, Tockner K (2011) Contraction, fragmentation and expansion dynamics determine nutrient availability in a Mediterranean forest stream. Aquat Sci. doi: 10.1007/s00027-011-0195-6
  45. Webster JR, Benfield EF (1986) Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:567–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams DD (2006) The biology of temporary waters. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoshimura C, Gessner MO, Tockner K, Furumai H (2008) Chemical properties, microbial respiration, and decomposition of coarse and fine particulate organic matter. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:664–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young J (1995) Microwave-assisted extraction of the fungal metabolite ergosterol and total fatty-acids. J Agr Food Chem 43:2904–2910CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Dieter
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. von Schiller
    • 2
  • E. M. García-Roger
    • 3
  • M. M. Sánchez-Montoya
    • 4
  • R. Gómez
    • 4
  • J. Mora-Gómez
    • 5
  • F. Sangiorgio
    • 6
  • J. Gelbrecht
    • 2
  • K. Tockner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Chemistry, and PharmacyFree University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Department of EcologyUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and HydrologyUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
  5. 5.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  6. 6.Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and TechnologiesUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations