Advertisement

Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 72, Issue 4, pp 499–508 | Cite as

Evidence for ecosystem engineering in a lentic habitat by tadpoles of the western toad

  • Sylvia L. R. Wood
  • John S. Richardson
Research Article

Abstract

A number of aquatic organisms have demonstrated an ability to modulate sediment deposition in tropical and temperate stream systems, but little is known about the impact of similar benthic grazing processes in temperate pond systems. Using exclosure experiments in mesocosms, we used tadpoles of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) to investigate two questions: (1) can grazing activities of tadpoles of the western toad in ponds reduce sediment accrual on grazing surfaces (e.g. via bioturbation or ingestion); and (2) do these grazing activities contribute to enhanced periphyton biomass and chlorophyll a content of benthic matter. Mesocosms received pulses of fine sediment weekly over 8 weeks to simulate allochthonous surface inputs following rainstorms. Accumulated sediment and periphyton matter on exposed and grazing-restricted substrate surfaces were measured weekly. Tadpole grazing activity significantly reduced the standing stock of periphyton on open grazing surfaces by 80% in controls. Under sediment-additions, tadpoles effectively removed settled particulate matter from exposed grazing surfaces, but no corresponding increase in periphyton biomass was observed. These results suggest that tadpoles can impact the dynamics of sediment distribution in ponds as well as streams, providing support for a role as “ecosystem engineers” in these habitats.

Keywords

Anaxyrus boreas Ponds Benthic grazing Sediment Mesocosm 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thank you very much to Nancy Hofer, Aya Reiss, Isabelle Deguise, Mona Matson, Ashlee Alford and Dorota Klimek for their assistance in the field, and to Peter Arcese and Laurie Marczak for their valuable comments. We also thank British Columbia Provincial Parks, in particular Hugh Akroyd at Alice Lake Provincial Park, for permission and ready access to park facilities and to Mark Bomford for coordination at University of British Columbia South Campus. We would like to also thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. Animals involved in this study were handled in accordance with the Canadian Animal Care Committee, approved protocol A06-0080 from the University of British Columbia. We are grateful for funding supplied by the Forest Sciences Program (British Columbia) and a National Science and Engineering Research Council scholarship to S.Wood. All experiments carried out complied with the laws of Canada.

References

  1. Barnett HK, Richardson JS (2002) Predation risk and competition effects on the life-history characteristics of larval Oregon spotted frog and larval red-legged frog. Oecologia 132:436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beiswenger RE (1975) Structure and function in aggregations of tadpoles of the American toad, Bufo americanus. J Herpetol 31:222–233Google Scholar
  3. Blaustein AR (1988) Ecological correlates and potential functions of kin recognition and kin association in anuran larvae. Behav Genet 18:449–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cecil SG, Just JJ (1979) Survival rate, population density and development of a naturally occurring anuran larvae (Rana catesbeiana). Copeia 1979:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creed RP Jr, Reed JM (2004) Ecosystem engineering by crayfish in a headwater stream community. J N Am Benthol Soc 23:224–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Souza ML, Moulton TP (2005) The effects of shrimps on benthic material in a Brazilian island stream. Freshw Biol 50:592–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickman M (1968) The effect of grazing by tadpoles on the structure of a periphyton community. Ecology 49:1188–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flecker AS (1992) Fish trophic guild and the structure of a tropical stream: weak direct versus strong indirect effects. Ecology 73:927–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flecker AS (1996) Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77:1845–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flecker AS, Feifarek BP, Taylor BW (1999) Ecosystem engineering by a tropical tadpole: density-dependent effects on habitat structure and larval growth rates. Copeia 1999:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gyug L (1996) Part IV Amphibians. In: Timber harvesting effects on riparian wildlife and vegetation in the Okanagan Highlands of British Columbia. B.C. Environment, Penticton, BCGoogle Scholar
  12. Johannsson OE, Dermott RM, Feldkamp R, Moore JE (1985) Lake Ontario long term biological monitoring program: report for 1981 and 1982. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci No. 1414Google Scholar
  13. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organism as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz LC, Potel MJ, Wassersug RJ (1981) Structure and mechanisms of schooling in tadpoles of the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. Anim Behav 29:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ketcheson GL, Megahan WF, King JG (1999) “R1–R4” and “BOISED” sediment prediction model tests using forest roads in granitics. J Am Wat Res Assoc 35:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kupferberg S (1997) Facilitation of periphyton production by tadpole grazing: functional differences between species. Freshw Biol 37:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamberti GA, Gregory SV, Hawkins CP, Wildman RC, Ashkenas LR, Denicola DM (1992) Plant–herbivore interactions in streams near Mount St. Helens. Freshw Biol 27:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ (2002) SAS for linear models. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  19. Loman J (2001) Effects of tadpole grazing on periphytic algae in ponds. Wetlands Ecol Manage 9:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo HR, Smith LM, Allen BL, Haukos D (1997) Effects of sedimentation on playa wetland volume. Ecol Appl 7:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin DB, Hartman WA (1987) The effect of cultivation on sediment composition and deposition in prairie potholes. Water Air Soi Pollut 34:45–53Google Scholar
  22. Meredith MP, Stehman SV (1991) Repeated measures experiments in forestry: focus on analysis of response curves. Can J For Res 21:957–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moulton TP, de Souza ML, Silveira RML, Kruslovic FAM (2004) Effects of ephemeropterans and shrimps on periphyton and sediments in a coastal stream (Atlantic forest, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). J N Am Benthol Soc 3:868–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newcombe CP, MacDonald DD (1991) Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. N Am J Fish Manage 11:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paetzhold A, Schubert CJ, Tockner K (2005) Aquatic terrestrial linkages along a braided-river: riparian arthropods feeding on aquatic insects. Ecosystems 8:748–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Potvin C, Lechowicz MJ, Tardiff S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71:1389–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Power ME (1990) Resource enhancement by indirect effects of grazers: armoured catfish algae and sediment. Ecology 71:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pringle CM, Blake GA, Covich AP, Buzby KM, Finley A (1993) Effects of omnivorous shrimp in a montane tropical stream: sediment removal, disturbance of sessile invertebrates, and enhancement of understory algal biomass. Oecologia 93:1–11Google Scholar
  30. Ranvestel AW, Lips KR, Pringle CM, Whiles MR, Bixby RJ (2004) Neotropical tadpoles influence stream benthos: evidence for the ecological consequences of decline in amphibian populations. Freshw Biol 49:274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Relyea RA, Hoverman JT (2003) The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs. Oecologia 134:596–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson JS, Zhang Y, Marczak LB (2010) Resource subsidies across the land-freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities. River Res Appl 26:55–66. doi: 10.1002/rra.1283 Google Scholar
  33. Samollow PB (1980) Selective mortality and reproduction in a natural population of Bufo boreas. Evolution 34:18–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seale DB (1980) Influence of amphibian larvae on primary production, nutrient flux, and competition in a pond ecosystem. Ecology 61:1531–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaw EA, Richardson JS (2001) Effects of fine inorganic sediment on stream invertebrate assemblages and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) growth and survival: implications of exposure duration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2213–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Solomon CT, Flecker AS, Taylor BW (2004) Testing the role of sediment-mediated interactions between tadpoles and armored catfish in a neotropical stream. Copeia 2004:610–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sontag C, Sloan-Wilson D, Cox RS (2006) Social foraging in Bufo americanus tadpoles. Anim Behav 72:1451–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Swift LW Jr (1988) Forest access roads: design, maintenance, and soil loss. In: Swank WT, Crossley DA Jr (eds) Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta. Springer, New York, pp 313–324Google Scholar
  39. Thomas S, Gaiser EE, Tobias FA (2006) Effects of shading on calcareous benthic periphyton in a short-hydroperiod oligotrophic wetland (Everglades, FL, USA). Hydrobiol 569:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turnipseed G, Altig R (1975) Population density and age structure of three species of Hylid tadpoles. J Herpetol 9:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vadeboncoeur Y, Kalff J, Christoffersen K, Jeppesen E (2006) Substratum as a driver of variation in periphyton chlorophyll and productivity in lakes. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wassersug R (1973) Aspects of social behaviour in anuran larvae. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the Anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 273–297Google Scholar
  43. Waters TF (1995) Sediment in streams: sources, biological effects, and control. Am Fish Soc Monogr 7, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  44. Welch BL (1938) The significance of differences between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika 29:350–362Google Scholar
  45. Wood SLR, Richardson JS (2009) Impact of sediment and nutrient inputs on growth and survival of tadpoles of the Western Toad. Freshw Biol 54:1120–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang Y, Richardson JS, Negishi J (2004) Detritus processing, ecosystem engineering, and benthic diversity: a test of predator-omnivore interference. J Anim Ecol 73:756–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations