Skip to main content
Log in

Diameter Estimates for Graph Associahedra

  • Published:
Annals of Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graph associahedra are generalized permutohedra arising as special cases of nestohedra and hypergraphic polytopes. The graph associahedron of a graph G encodes the combinatorics of the search trees on G, defined recursively by a root r together with search trees on each of the connected components of \(G-r\). In particular, the 1-skeleton of the corresponding graph associahedron is the rotation graph of those search trees. We investigate the diameter of graph associahedra as a function of some graph parameters. We give a tight bound of \(\Theta (m)\) on the diameter of trivially perfect graph associahedra on m edges. We consider the maximum diameter of associahedra of graphs on n vertices and of given tree-depth, treewidth, or pathwidth, and give lower and upper bounds as a function of these parameters. We also prove that the maximum diameter of associahedra of graphs of pathwidth two is \(\Theta (n\log n)\). Finally, we give the exact diameter of the associahedra of complete split graphs and of unbalanced complete bipartite graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data availability is not applicable.

References

  1. Benjamin Aram Berendsohn. The diameter of caterpillar associahedra. arXiv:2110.12928, 2021.

  2. Benjamin Aram Berendsohn and László Kozma. Splay trees on trees. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2022.

  3. R. E. Bixby, W. H. Cunningham, and D. M. Topkis. The partial order of a polymatroid extreme point. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10(3):367–378, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hans L. Bodlaender, Jitender S. Deogun, Klaus Jansen, Ton Kloks, Dieter Kratsch, Haiko Müller, and Zsolt Tuza. Rankings of graphs. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 11(1):168–181, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Prosenjit Bose, Jean Cardinal, John Iacono, Grigorios Koumoutsos, and Stefan Langerman. Competitive online search trees on trees. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 1878–1891, 2020.

  6. Jean Cardinal, Stefan Langerman, and Pablo Pérez-Lantero. On the diameter of tree associahedra. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 25(4):P4.18, 2018.

  7. Jean Cardinal, Arturo Merino, and Torsten Mütze. Efficient generation of elimination trees and Hamilton paths on graph associahedra. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2022.

  8. Michael Carr and Satyan L. Devadoss. Coxeter complexes and graph-associahedra. Topology and its Applications, 153(12):2155–2168, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Michael W. Davis, Tadeusz Januszkiewicz, and Richard A. Scott. Fundamental groups of blow-ups. Advances in Mathematics, 177(1):115–179, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Erik D. Demaine, Dion Harmon, John Iacono, Daniel M. Kane, and Mihai Pătraşcu. The geometry of binary search trees. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, (SODA), pages 496–505, 2009.

  11. Erik D. Demaine, Dion. Harmon, John. Iacono, and Mihai. Pătraşcu. Dynamic optimality—almost. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(1):240–251, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhard Diestel. Graph Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2005.

  13. Pål Grønås Drange, Fedor V. Fomin, Michal Pilipczuk, and Yngve Villanger. Exploring the subexponential complexity of completion problems. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory, 7(4):14:1–14:38, 2015.

  14. Nikolai Yur’evich Erokhovets. Gal’s conjecture for nestohedra corresponding to complete bipartite graphs. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 266(1):120, 2009.

  15. Martin Farber and Robert E. Jamison. Convexity in graphs and hypergraphs. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 7(3):433–444, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefan Forcey, Aaron Lauve, and Frank Sottile. New Hopf Structures on Binary Trees. Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, January 2009.

  17. Światosław R. Gal. Real root conjecture fails for five- and higher-dimensional spheres. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 34:269–284, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin Charles Golumbic. Trivially perfect graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 24(1):105–107, 1978.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Alan H. Karp. Bit reversal on uniprocessors. SIAM Review, 38(1):1–26, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Meir Katchalski, William McCuaig, and Suzanne Seager. Ordered colourings. Discrete Mathematics, 142(1):141–154, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jean-Louis Loday. Realization of the Stasheff polytope. Archiv der Mathematik, 83(3):267–278, Sep 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Thibault Manneville, and Vincent Pilaud. Graph properties of graph associahedra. Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire, B73d, 2015.

  23. Jaroslav Nešetřil, and Patrice Ossona de Mendez. On low tree-depth decompositions. Graphs and Combinatorics, 31(6):1941–1963, 2015.

  24. Jaroslav Nešetřil, and Patrice Ossona de Mendez. Sparsity: Graphs, Structures, and Algorithms, chapter 6, pages 115–144. Springer, 2012.

  25. Alexander Postnikov. Permutohedra, associahedra, and beyond. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2009(6):1026–1106, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander Postnikov, Victor Reiner, and Lauren K. Williams. Faces of generalized permutohedra. Documenta Mathematica, 13:207–273, 2008.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Alex Pothen. The complexity of optimal elimination trees. Tech. Report CS-88-13, Pennsylvania State University, 1988.

  28. Lionel Pournin. The diameter of associahedra. Advances in Mathematics, 259:13–42, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lionel Pournin. The asymptotic diameter of cyclohedra. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 219(2):609–635, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Francisco Santos. A counterexample to the Hirsch conjecture. Annals of Mathematics, 176:383–412, 2012.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Alejandro A. Schäffer. Optimal node ranking of trees in linear time. Information Processing Letters, 33(2):91–96, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Petra Scheffler. Node ranking and searching on graphs. In Third Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization, 1993.

  33. Daniel Sleator, Robert Tarjan, and William Thurston. Rotation distance, triangulations, and hyperbolic geometry. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 1:647–681, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Daniel Dominic Sleator and Robert Endre Tarjan. Self-adjusting binary search trees. Journal of the ACM, 32(3):652–686, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. James Dillon Stasheff. Homotopy associativity of H-spaces. I. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 108(2):275–292, 1963.

  36. Dov Tamari. Monoïdes préordonnés et chaînes de Malcev. Thèse de Mathématiques, Paris, 1951.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Robert E. Wilber. Lower bounds for accessing binary search trees with rotations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 18(1):56–67, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Elliot S. Wolk. The comparability graph of a tree. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 13:789–795, 1962.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Jing-Ho Yan, Jer-Jeong Chen, and Gerard J. Chang. Quasi-threshold graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 69(3):247–255, 1996.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the referees for very helpful comments and suggestions. This work was partially supported by the French-Belgian PHC Project number 42703TD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel Pournin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Kolja Knauer.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cardinal, J., Pournin, L. & Valencia-Pabon, M. Diameter Estimates for Graph Associahedra. Ann. Comb. 26, 873–902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-022-00598-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-022-00598-z

Navigation