Skip to main content
Log in

A Refined Energy Bound for Distinct Perpendicular Bisectors

  • Published:
Annals of Combinatorics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \({\mathcal {P}}\) be a set of n points in the Euclidean plane. We prove that, for any \(\varepsilon > 0\), either a single line or circle contains n/2 points of \({\mathcal {P}}\), or the number of distinct perpendicular bisectors determined by pairs of points in \({\mathcal {P}}\) is \(\Omega (n^{52/35 - \varepsilon })\), where the constant implied by the \(\Omega \) notation depends on \(\varepsilon \). This is progress toward a conjecture of Lund, Sheffer, and de Zeeuw, that either a single line or circle contains n/2 points of \({\mathcal {P}}\), or the number of distinct perpendicular bisectors is \(\Omega (n^2)\). The proof relies bounding the size of a carefully selected subset of the quadruples \((a,b,c,d) \in {\mathcal {P}}^4\) such that the perpendicular bisector of a and b is the same as the perpendicular bisector of c and d.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term additive energy, referring to the number of quadruples (abcd) in some underlying set of numbers such that \(a+b = c+d\), was coined by Tao and Vu [8]. Starting with the work of Elekes and Sharir [3], and Guth and Katz [6] on the distinct distance problem, the strategy of using geometric incidence bounds to obtain upper bounds on analogously defined energies has become indispensable in the study of questions about the number of distinct equivalent subsets.

References

  1. Eran Agarwal, Pankaj K .and Nevo, János Pach, Rom Pinchasi, Micha Sharir, and Shakhar Smorodinsky. Lenses in arrangements of pseudo-circles and their applications. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 51(2):139–186, 2004.

  2. Boris Aronov and Micha Sharir. Cutting circles into pseudo-segments and improved bounds for incidences. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 28(4):475–490, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. György Elekes and Micha Sharir. Incidences in three dimensions and distinct distances in the plane. Combina- torics, Probability and Computing, 20(04):571–608, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Paul Erdős. On sets of distances of n points. The American Mathematical Monthly, 53(5):248–250, 1946.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacob Fox, János Pach, Ádám Sheffer, Andrew Suk, and Joshua Zahl. A semi-algebraic version of Zarankiewicz’s problem. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 19(6):1785–1810, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Larry Guth and Nets Hawk Katz. On the Erdős distinct distances problem in the plane. Annals of Mathematics, 181(1):155–190, 2015.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandon Hanson, Ben Lund, and Oliver Roche-Newton. On distinct perpendicular bisectors and pinned distances in finite fields. Finite Fields and Their Applications, 37:240–264, 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Terry Tao (http://mathoverflow.net/users/766/terrytao). Where did the term “additive energy” originate? MathOverflow. URL:http://mathoverflow.net/q/223962 (version: 2015-11-18).

  9. Ben Lund, Adam Sheffer, and Frank De Zeeuw. Bisector energy and few distinct distances. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 56(2):337–356, 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam Marcus and Gábor Tardos. Intersection reverse sequences and geometric applications. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 113(4):675–691, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Szemerédi and W. T. Trotter. Extremal problems in discrete geometry. Combinatorica, 3(3):381–392, 1982.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Brandon Hanson, Peter Hajnal, Oliver Roche-Newton, Adam Sheffer, and Frank de Zeeuw for many stimulating conversations on perpendicular bisectors and related questions. I thank Luca Ghidelli for pointing out an error in Lemma 7 in an earlier version. I thank the anonymous referees for numerous helpful comments on the writing and presentation of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Lund.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported by ERC Grant 267165 DISCONV.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lund, B. A Refined Energy Bound for Distinct Perpendicular Bisectors. Ann. Comb. 24, 225–235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-019-00478-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-019-00478-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation