Skip to main content
Log in

On the Equivalence in ZF+BPI of the Hahn–Banach Theorem and Three Classical Theorems

  • Published:
Results in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presented paper is a compendium or a kind of précis of relationships between the four classical theorems of mathematical analysis. More precisely, the first aim of this paper is to present the equivalence of the four classical theorems: the Hahn–Banach theorem, the Mazur–Orlicz theorem, the Markov–Kakutani fixed-point theorem and the von Neumann theorem on amenability of Abelian groups. The second purpose is to prove these equivalences in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice replaced by the Boolean prime ideal theorem, from which we can also prove the Hahn–Banach theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Badora, R.: Invariant means and the Hahn–Banach theorem. Report of meeting. Ann. Math. Silesianae 21, 62 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bingham, N.H., Ostaszewski, A.J.: Set theory and the analyst. Eur. J. Math. 5, 2–48 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Buskes, G.: The Hahn–Banach theorem surveyed. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.) 327, 49 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccherini-Silberstein, T., Coornaert, M.: Cellular Automata and Groups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chojnacki, W.: Sur un théoreme de Day, un théoreme de Mazur–Orlicz et une généralisation de quelques théoremes de Silverman. Colloq. Math. 50, 257–262 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixmier, J.: Les moyennes invariante dans les semi-groupes et leurs applications. Acta Sci. Math. Szeged 12, 213–227 (1950)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Foreman, M.: The Hahn–Banach theorem implies the existence of a non-Lebesgue measurable set. Stud. Math. 138, 13–19 (1991)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern, J.D.: The independence of the axiom of choice from the Boolean prime ideal theorem. Fund. Math. 55, 57–66 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Halpern, J.D., Levy, A.: The Boolean prime ideal theorem does not imply the axiom of choice. Axiomatic Set Theory Part 1 Proc. Symp. Pure Math 13, 83–134 (1971)

  10. Hewitt, E., Ross, K.A.: Abstract Harmonic Analysis I. Springer, Berlin (1963)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard, P., Rubin, J.E.: Consequences of the Axiom of Choice. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 59. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1998)

  12. Jech, T.J.: The Axiom of Choice. Studies in Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics, Vol. 75, North-Holland, Amsterdam, London 1973, and American Elsevier, New York (1973)

  13. Kakutani, S.: Two fixed-point theorems concerning bicompact convexsets. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 14, 242–245 (1938)

  14. Łoś, J., Ryll-Nardzewski, C.: Effectiveness of the representation theory for Boolean algebras. Fund. Math. 41, 49–56 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Luxemburg, W.A.J.: Two applications of the method of construction by ultrapowers to analysis. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 68, 416–419 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paterson, A.L.T.: Amenability. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Pincus, D.: Independence of the prime ideal theorem from the Hahn–Banach theorem. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 78, 766–770 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Przebieracz, B.: A proof of the Mazur–Orlicz theorem via the Markov–Kakutani common fixed point theorem, and vice versa. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 10, 9 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pták, V.: On a theorem of Mazur and Orlicz. Studia Math. 15, 365–366 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Schechter, E.: Handbook of Analysis and Its Foundations. Academic Press, San Diego (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Werner, D.: A proof of the Markov–Kakutani fixed point theorem via the Hahn–Banach theorem. Extracta Math. 8, 37–38 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no fundings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Badora.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

I have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badora, R., Przebieracz, B. On the Equivalence in ZF+BPI of the Hahn–Banach Theorem and Three Classical Theorems. Results Math 79, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-023-02116-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-023-02116-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation