Skip to main content
Log in

Investigate and Analysis the Efficiency of Existing Recommendations of Near-Field Effect and Boundary Conditions on Bender Element Technique

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the bender element (BE), the variations in the recommended Ltt/λ (wave path length, Ltt and the wavelength, λ) raise questions about the effect of these ratios in the near-field effect. The objectives of this study were sought to verify the efficiency of the Ltt/λ on the near-field effects as well as filling the gap associated with the assessment boundary conditions in both free/flexible and rigid boundaries. To achieve these objectives, the BE technique was implemented in uniform material (polystyrene) to assess both effects using various excitation frequencies, thicknesses, ratios of specimen width (D) to wave path length (Ltt), Ltt/λ, and time-domain interpretation methods. The results showed that both free/flexible and rigid boundary had no significant effects on compression wave velocity while the shear wave velocity was subjected to variation at D/Ltt < 1.15 and D/Ltt < 0.77 in free/flexible and rigid boundary respectively. At the rigid boundary, the reflected compression wave obscured the first-peak of direct shear wave at D/Ltt < 0.77. The outcomes from this study and the variations in the suggested Ltt/λ from previous researchers using different materials indicated that the near-field effects do not entirely depend on Ltt/λ. Nevertheless, the detection of the arrival time is affected by the variation in the frequency. Conclusively, to avoid the effect of boundary conditions, no measurements should be conducted via BE if the D/Ltt is less than 0.77. The first-peak method (using the conditions of Ltt/λ ≥ 5) was recommended to reduce the variations in the results as well as near-field effects. The longer the wave path, the lower the variation in the analysis of the wave velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The author confirms that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Abbreviations

D:

Specimen width

f :

Excitation frequency

Ltt :

Wave path length from the tip of the transmitter to the tip of the receiver

t:

Travel time

V:

Wave velocity

VP :

Compression wave velocity

VP(D-D) :

Compression wave velocity from first-peak methods (D-D)

VP2 :

Compression wave velocity from the second wave cycle

VP2(D-D*) :

Compression wave velocity from second peak methods (D-D*)

VPR :

Reflected compression wave velocity

VS :

Shear wave velocity

VS(C-A) :

Shear wave velocity from first-deflection methods at near-field zone (C-A)

VS(C-C) :

Shear wave velocity from first-deflection methods (C-C)

VS(D-D) :

Shear wave velocity from first-peak methods (D-D)

VS(F-F) :

Shear wave velocity from the first-trough method (F-F)

λ:

Wavelength

References

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The stages of writing and preparing this paper done by Badee Alshameri.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badee Alshameri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

The work titled “Investigate and Analysis the Efficiency of Existing Recommendations of Near-Field Effect and Boundary conditions on Bender Element Technique” has not been published elsewhere, in part, or in another form.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshameri, B. Investigate and Analysis the Efficiency of Existing Recommendations of Near-Field Effect and Boundary Conditions on Bender Element Technique. Pure Appl. Geophys. 180, 3769–3785 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03347-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03347-2

Keywords

Navigation