Abstract
Seismic illumination can be defined as the maximum angle between rays that pass through a point. Only interfaces completely contained in the angular apertures can be correctly imaged with first arrival traveltime tomography (FATTT). We investigate if 2D acoustic full-waveform inversion (FWI) can compensate for the lack of illumination of a crosshole tomography experiment. We use synthetic data generated with Ricker wavelets with peak frequencies at 100 or 500 Hz, resulting in small overlapping in the frequency bandwidths, allowing the use of a multiscale FWI approach. We investigate two FWI cases: in the first case (FWI T), just the waves recorded at the opposite borehole are used whilst, in the second case (FWI T+R), the waves recorded at the two boreholes are used. For a single interface, the shape of the transmitted waveform only varies significantly when it is contained in the angular apertures. Accordingly, shot gathers for layered models with interfaces outside the angular apertures can be roughly reproduced with equivalent homogeneous media. Thus, in comparison with FATTT, both FWI cases give mild improvements for models with interfaces inside the angular coverage, and cannot compensate for the lack of illumination of the experiment. However, in the mixed condition where layers with interfaces inside the angular coverage are cut by a fault, FWI offers substantial improvements over FATTT, even if the fault plane is outside the angular coverage. In this mixed situation, resolution increases when FWI T+R is used. However, for the studied cases, no significant improvements were obtained in the FWI stage where the 500 Hz peak frequency was used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajo-Franklin, J. B. (2009). Optimal experiment design for time-lapse traveltime tomography. Geophysics, 74(4), Q27–Q40. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3141738
Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Minsley, B. J., & Daley, T. M. (2007). Applying compactness constraints to differential traveltime tomography. Geophysics, 72(4), R67–R75. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2742496
Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Peterson, J., Doetsch, J., & Daley, T. M. (2013). High-resolution characterization of a CO\(_{2}\) plume using crosswell seismic tomography: Cranfield, MS, USA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 18, 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.018
Almalki, M., Harris, B., & Dupuis, J. C. (2013). Field and synthetic experiments for virtual source crosswell tomography in vertical wells: Perth Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.08.021
Asnaashari, A., Brossier, R., Garambois, S., Audebert, F., Thore, P., & Virieux, J. (2012). Time-lapse imaging using regularized FWI: A robustness study. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2012, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0699.1
Bartle, R. G. (1964). The elements of real analysis. Wiley.
Belina, F. A., Ernst, J. R., & Holliger, K. (2009). Inversion of crosshole seismic data in heterogeneous environments: Comparison of waveform and ray-based approaches. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.10.012
Boonyasiriwat, C., Valasek, P., Routh, P., Cao, W., Schuster, G. T., & Macy, B. (2009). An efficient multiscale method for time-domain waveform tomography. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC59–WCC68. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3151869
Bube, K. P., & Langan, R. T. (1995). Resolution of crosswell tomography with transmission and reflection traveltimes. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1995 (pp. 77–80). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1887571
Bube, K. P., & Langan, R. T. (2008). Resolution of slowness and reflectors in crosswell tomography with transmission and reflection traveltimes. Geophysics, 73(5), VE321–VE335. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2969777
Bunks, C., Saleck, F. M., Zaleski, S., & Chavent, G. (1995). Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443880
Butchibabu, B., Sandeep, N., Sivaram, Y., Jha, P., & Khan, P. (2017). Bridge pier foundation evaluation using cross-hole seismic tomographic imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 144, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.07.008
Byun, J., Yu, J., & Seol, S. J. (2010). Crosswell monitoring using virtual sources and horizontal wells. Geophysics, 75(3), SA37–SA43. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3427175
Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., & Reshef, M. (1985). A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics, 50(4), 705–708. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441945
Chavent, G. (1974). Identification of functional parameters in partial differential equations. In IEEE joint automatic control conference (pp. 155–156).
Chavent, G. (2010). Nonlinear least squares for inverse problems: Theoretical foundations and step-by-step guide for applications. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2785-6
Cheng, F., Liu, J., Wang, J., Zong, Y., & Yu, M. (2016). Multi-hole seismic modeling in 3-D space and cross-hole seismic tomography analysis for boulder detection. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 134, 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.09.014
Dablain, M. (1986). The application of high-order differencing to the scalar wave equation. Geophysics, 51(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442040
Daily, W., & Ramirez, A. (1995). Environmental process tomography in the United States. The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal, 56(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(94)02911-3
Daley, T. M., Majer, E. L., & Peterson, J. E. (2004). Crosswell seismic imaging in a contaminated basalt aquifer. Geophysics, 69(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649371
Daley, T. M., Solbau, R. D., Ajo-Franklin, J. B., & Benson, S. M. (2007). Continuous active-source seismic monitoring of CO\(_{2}\) injection in a brine aquifer. Geophysics, 72(5), A57–A61. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2754716
Dantas, R. R., & Medeiros, W. E. (2016). Resolution in crosswell traveltime tomography: The dependence on illumination. Geophysics, 81(1), W1–W12. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0119.1
Dantas, R. R., Medeiros, W. E., & Costa, J. C. (2019). A multiscale approach to full-waveform inversion using a sequence of time-domain misfit functions. Geophysics, 84(4), R539–R551. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0291.1
Emery, X., & Parra, J. (2013). Integration of crosswell seismic data for simulating porosity in a heterogeneous carbonate aquifer. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.09.004
Fichtner, A. (2011). Full seismic waveform modelling and inversion. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15807-0
Gao, Y., Song, H., Zhang, J., & Yao, Z. (2017). Comparison of artificial absorbing boundaries for acoustic wave equation modelling. Exploration Geophysics, 48(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG15068
Gasperikova, E., & Hoversten, G. M. (2006). A feasibility study of nonseismic geophysical methods for monitoring geologic CO\(_{2}\) sequestration. The Leading Edge, 25(10), 1282–1288. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2360621
Gheymasi, H. M., Gholami, A., Siahkoohi, H., & Amini, N. (2016). Robust total-variation based geophysical inversion using split Bregman and proximity operators. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 132, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.06.011
Greenhalgh, S., Zhou, B., & Cao, S. (2003). A crosswell seismic experiment for nickel sulphide exploration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 53(2–3), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(03)00029-6
Haldorsen, J. B., Johnson, D. L., Plona, T., Sinha, B., Valero, H.-P., & Winkler, K. (2006). Borehole acoustic waves. Oilfield Review, 18(1), 34–43.
Hicks, E., Hoeber, H., Houbiers, M., Lescoffit, S. P., Ratcliffe, A., & Vinje, V. (2016). Time-lapse full-waveform inversion as a reservoir-monitoring tool - A North Sea case study. The Leading Edge, 35(10), 850–858. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle35100850.1
Huang, Y., & Schuster, G. T. (2014). Resolution limits for wave equation imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 107, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.018
Hyndman, D. W., Harris, J. M., & Gorelick, S. M. (1994). Coupled seismic and tracer test inversion for aquifer property characterization. Water Resources Research, 30(7), 1965–1977. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00950
Johnson, W. J., & Clark, J. C. (1992). Improving subsurface resolution with the seismic reflection method: Use S-waves. Ground Water Management, 11, 655–663.
Li, G. (2003). 4D seismic monitoring of CO\(_{2}\) flood in a thin fractured carbonate reservoir. The Leading Edge, 22(7), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1599698
Lo, T., & Inderwiesen, P. L. (1994). Fundamentals of seismic tomography. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802334
Mathisen, M. E., Vasiliou, A. A., Cunningham, P., Shaw, J., Justice, J., & Guinzy, N. (1995). Time-lapse crosswell seismic tomogram interpretation: Implications for heavy oil reservoir characterization, thermal recovery process monitoring, and tomographic imaging technology. Geophysics, 60(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443803
Menke, W. (1984). The resolving power of cross-borehole tomography. Geophysical Research Letters, 11(2), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL011i002p00105
Moret, G. J., Knoll, M. D., Barrash, W., & Clement, W. P. (2006). Investigating the stratigraphy of an alluvial aquifer using crosswell seismic traveltime tomography. Geophysics, 71(3), B63–B73. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2195487
Onishi, K., Ueyama, T., Matsuoka, T., Nobuoka, D., Saito, H., Azuma, H., & Xue, Z. (2009). Application of crosswell seismic tomography using difference analysis with data normalization to monitor CO\(_{2}\) flooding in an aquifer. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.003
Perozzi, L., Gloaguen, E., Rondenay, S., & McDowell, G. (2012). Using stochastic crosshole seismic velocity tomography and Bayesian simulation to estimate Ni grades: Case study from Voisey’s Bay, Canada. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.036
Plessix, R.-E. (2006). A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x
Plessix, R.-E. (2006). Estimation of velocity and attenuation coefficient maps from crosswell seismic data. Geophysics, 71(6), S235–S240. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2345051
Podvin, P., & Lecomte, I. (1991). Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International, 105(1), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb03461.x
Pratt, R. G. (1999). Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics, 64(3), 888–901. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444597
Pratt, R. G., & Goulty, N. R. (1991). Combining wave-equation imaging with traveltime tomography to form high-resolution images from crosshole data. Geophysics, 56(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443033
Pratt, R. G., & Sams, M. S. (1996). Reconciliation of crosshole seismic velocities with well information in a layered sedimentary environment. Geophysics, 61(2), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443981
Pratt, R., Song, Z.-M., Williamson, P., & Warner, M. (1996). Two-dimensional velocity models from wide-angle seismic data by wavefield inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 124(2), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb07023.x
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W., & Flannery, B. P. (2007). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press.
Rao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2005). Crosshole seismic tomography: Working solutions to issues in real data travel time inversion. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/2/2/008
Rao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2009). Fracture effects in seismic attenuation images reconstructed by waveform tomography. Geophysics, 74(4), R25–R34. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3129264
Rao, Y., Wang, Y., & Morgan, J. V. (2006). Crosshole seismic waveform tomography-II. Resolution analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 166(3), 1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03031.x
Rector, J. W., III., & Washbourne, J. K. (1994). Characterization of resolution and uniqueness in crosswell direct-arrival traveltime tomography using the Fourier projection slice theorem. Geophysics, 59(11), 1642–1649. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443553
Rumpf, M., & Tronicke, J. (2014). Predicting 2D geotechnical parameter fields in near-surface sedimentary environments. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 101, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.12.002
Saito, H., Nobuoka, D., Azuma, H., Xue, Z., & Tanase, D. (2006). Time-lapse crosswell seismic tomography for monitoring injected CO\(_{2}\) in an onshore aquifer, Nagaoka, Japan. Exploration Geophysics, 37(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06030
Schön, J. H. (2015). Physical properties of rocks: Fundamentals and principles of petrophysics (Vol. 65). Elsevier.
Shin, C., Jang, S., & Min, D.-J. (2001). Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth migration by inverse scattering theory. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00279.x
Silva Neto, F., Costa, J., Novais, A., & Barbosa, B. (2005). Finite difference elastic modeling in 2.5D. In 9th international congress of the Brazilian geophysical society, salvador, expanded abstracts (pp. 1771–1775). https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.160.SBGF356
Sirgue, L., & Pratt, R. G. (2004). Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics, 69(1), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649391
Sochacki, J., Kubichek, R., George, J., Fletcher, W., & Smithson, S. (1987). Absorbing boundary conditions and surface waves. Geophysics, 52(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442241
Song, Z.-M., Williamson, P. R., & Pratt, R. G. (1995). Frequency-domain acoustic-wave modeling and inversion of crosshole data: Part II-Inversion method, synthetic experiments and real-data results. Geophysics, 60(3), 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443818
Soupios, P., Akca, I., Mpogiatzis, P., Basokur, A. T., & Papazachos, C. (2011). Applications of hybrid genetic algorithms in seismic tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 75(3), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.08.005
Tarantola, A. (1984). Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441754
Tikhonov, A. N., & Arsenin, V. Y. (1977). Solutions of ill-posed problems. Winston.
Van Leeuwen, T., & Herrmann, F. J. (2013). Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space. Geophysical Journal International, 195(1), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt258
Van Schaack, M. A. (1997). Velocity estimation for crosswell reflection imaging using combined direct and reflected arrival traveltime tomography. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Virieux, J., & Operto, S. (2009). An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3238367
Wang, Y. (2011). Seismic, waveform modeling and tomography. In H. Gupta (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics (pp. 1290–1301). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8702-7
Wang, Y., & Rao, Y. (2006). Crosshole seismic waveform tomography-I. Strategy for real data application. Geophysical Journal International, 166(3), 1224–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03030.x
Wang, Y., & Rao, Y. (2009). Reflection seismic waveform tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005916
Warner, M., & Guasch, L. (2016). Adaptive waveform inversion: Theory. Geophysics, 81(6), R429–R445. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0387.1
Warner, M., Ratcliffe, A., Nangoo, T., Morgan, J., Umpleby, A., Shah, N., Vinje, V., Štekl, I., Guasch, L., Win, C., Conroy, G., & Bertrand, A. (2013). Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion. Geophysics, 78(2), R59–R80. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0338.1
Watanabe, T., Shimizu, S., Asakawa, E., & Matsuoka, T. (2004). Differential waveform tomography for time-lapse crosswell seismic data with application to gas hydrate production monitoring. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2004 pp. 2323–2326. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845221
Williamson, P. (1991). A guide to the limits of resolution imposed by scattering in ray tomography. Geophysics, 56(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443032
Wu, W.-J., Lines, L. R., & Lu, H.-X. (1996). Analysis of higher-order, finite-difference schemes in 3-D reverse-time migration. Geophysics, 61(3), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444009
Xu, K., & Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Ore-body imaging by crosswell seismic waveform inversion: A case study from Kambalda, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 70(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.11.001
Yamamoto, T., Nye, T., & Kuru, M. (1994). Porosity, permeability, shear strength: Crosswell tomography below an iron foundry. Geophysics, 59(10), 1530–1541. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443542
Zhang, W., Youn, S., & Doan, Q. T. (2007). Understanding reservoir architectures and steam-chamber growth at Christina Lake, Alberta, by using 4D seismic and crosswell seismic imaging. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 10(05), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.2118/97808-PA
Zhou, C., Cai, W., Luo, Y., Schuster, G. T., & Hassanzadeh, S. (1995). Acoustic wave-equation traveltime and waveform inversion of crosshole seismic data. Geophysics, 60(3), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443815
Zhou, B., & Greenhalgh, S. A. (2003). Crosshole seismic inversion with normalized full-waveform amplitude data. Geophysics, 68(4), 1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1598125
Funding
The Human Resources Training Program PRH-229 (PETROBRAS, UFRN, and ANP) is thanked for the MSc scholarship to Alex T. Oliveira. The Brazilian agency CNPq is thanked for the research fellowships and associated grants to Walter E. Medeiros and Jessé C. Costa. The financial support to purchase the computational infrastructure used in this study was given by the INCT-GP/CNPq/CAPES.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ATO: methodology, software, writing—original draft, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation. RRSD: software, methodology, writing—review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation, supervision. WEM: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation, supervision. JCC: software, writing—review and editing, validation. VFA: writing—review and editing, validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oliveira, A.T., Dantas, R.R.S., Medeiros, W.E. et al. Can Full-Waveform Inversion Compensate for the Lack of Illumination in Crosswell Tomography?. Pure Appl. Geophys. 180, 2651–2672 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03287-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03287-x