Abstract
In the present study, local insitu observations are utilized in the Land Data Assimilation System (LDAS) to generate high-resolution (4 km and hourly) soil moisture (SM) and soil temperature (ST) data over India. Further, the impact of the LDAS-derived SM and ST initialization on simulation of pre-monsoon (March–May) thunderstorms over the Gangetic West Bengal region are assessed. The high-resolution (4 km and hourly) land surface conditions such as SM and ST data are prepared for the period from 2010 to 2013 using the LDAS forced with various insitu observations from Automatic Weather Stations (AWS), Meteorological Aviation Reports (METAR), and micro-meteorological tower observations over India. Four thunderstorm (TS) events during the pre-monsoon season of 2010 are considered for the numerical experiments using climatological SM and ST at coarser resolution (CNTR) and LDAS-generated high-resolution SM and ST (WLDAS) for initializing the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The efficacy of the LDAS-generated SM and ST data are verified against micro-meteorological tower observations at Kharagpur, West Bengal, and the results indicate the magnitude and variation in the data product are close to observations. The initialization of high-resolution LDAS-generated SM and ST in the WRF improves the simulation of near-surface air temperature, humidity, and pressure at Kharagapur. Most importantly, the location and timing of the storm are relatively better simulated in the WLDAS than CNTR over the Kolkata region. The study encourages the use of more local observations in the generation of high-resolution SM and ST data for application in the simulation of pre-monsoon TSs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asharfa, S., Dobler, A., & Ahrens, B. (2012). Soil moisture-precipitation feedback processes in the Indian summer monsoon season. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 1461–1474.
Barnes, S.L. (1973). Mesoscale objective map analysis using weighted time series observations. NOAA. Tech. Memo. 60.
Barnes, S. L. (1994). Application of Barnes objective analysis scheme part I: effect of under-sampling, wave position and station randomness. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 11, 1433–1448.
Chakraborty, P., Sarkar, A., Bhatla, R., & Singh, R. (2020a). Assessing the skill of NCMRWF global ensemble prediction system in predicting Indian summer monsoon during 2018. Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105255.
Chakraborty, P., Sarkar, A., Kumar, S., George, J. P., Rajagopal, E. N., & Bhatla, R. (2020b). Assessment of NCMRWF Global Ensemble System with differing ensemble populations for Tropical cyclones prediction. Atmospheric Research, 244, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105077.
Chen, F., & Dudhia, J. (2001). Coupling an advanced land-surface hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review, 129, 569–585.
Chen, F., Manning, K. W., LeMone, M. A., Trier, S. B., Alfieri, J. G., Roberts, R., et al. (2007). Description and evaluation of the characteristics of the NCAR high-resolution land data assimilation system. Journal of applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46(6), 694–713.
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H. L., Koren, V., et al. (1996). Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 101(D3), 7251–7268.
Chen, F., Pielke, R., Sr., & Mitchell, K. (2001). Development and application of land surface models for mesoscale atmospheric models. In V. Lakshmi, J. Alberston, & J. Schaaake (Eds.), Problems and promises. Observation and modeling of the land surface hydrological processes (pp. 107–135). Washington: American Geophysical Union.
Dickinson, R. E. (1992). Land surface. In K. E. Trenberth (Ed.), Climate system modeling (pp. 149–171). Cambridge: University Press.
Eischeid, J. K., Baker, C. B., Karl, T., & Diaz, H. F. (1995). The quality control of long-term climatological data using objective data analysis. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34, 2787–2795.
Feng, S., Hu, Q., & Qian, W. (2004). Quality control of daily meteorological data in China, 1951–2000: a new dataset. International Journal of Climatology, 24, 853–870.
Foley, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., Levis, S., Pollard, D., Sitch, S., & Haxeltine, A. (1996). An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10(4), 603–628.
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., et al. (2007). The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(1), 38–55.
Koch, S. E., DesJardins, M., & Kocin, P. J. (1983). An interactive Barnes objective map analysis scheme for use with satellite and conventional data. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology., 22(9), 1487–1503.
Koster, R. D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., et al. (2004). Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305(5687), 1138–1140.
Koster, R. D., Suarez, M. J., & Heiser, M. (2000). Variance and predictability of precipitation at seasonal-to-interannual timescales. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 1(1), 26–46.
Lim, Y. J., Byun, K. Y., Lee, T. Y., Kwon, H., Hong, J., & Kim, J. (2012). A land data assimilation system using the MODIS-derived land data and its application to numerical weather prediction in East Asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 48(1), 83–95.
Litta, A. J., Mary Ididcula, S., Mohanty, U. C., & Kiran Prasad, S. (2012). Comparison of thunderstorm simulations from WRF-NMM and WRF-ARW models over east Indian region. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/951870.
Los, S. O., Weedon, G. P., North, P. R., Kaduk, J. D., Taylor, C. M., & Cox, P. M. (2006). An observation-based estimate of the strength of rainfall-vegetation interactions in the Sahel. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(16), L16402.
Maurya, R. K. S., Sinha, P., Mohanty, M. R., & Mohanty, U. C. (2017). Coupling of community land model with RegCM4 for Indian summer monsoon simulation. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 4251–4270.
Meek, D. W., & Hatfield, J. L. (1994). Data quality checking for single station meteorological databases. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 69, 85–109.
Mohanty, U. C., Nayak, H. P., Sinha, P., Osuri, K. K., & Niyogi, D. (2019). Land surface processes over Indian summer monsoon region: a review. Mausam, 70, 551–560.
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce (2000) NCEP FNL operational model global tropospheric analyses, continuing from July 1999. UCAR/NCAR - Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6
Nayak, H. P., & Mandal, M. (2014). Analysis of stability parameters in relation to precipitation associated with pre-monsoon thunderstorms over Kolkata, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 123(4), 689–703.
Nayak, H. P., Osuri, K. K., Sinha, P., Nadimpalli, R., Mohanty, U. C., Chen, F., et al. (2018). High-resolution gridded soil moisture and soil temperature datasets for the Indian monsoon region. Scientific Data, 5, 180264. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.264.
Nayak, H. P., Sinha, P., Satyanarayana, A. N. V., Bhattacharya, A., & Mohanty, U. C. (2019). Performance evaluation of high-resolution land data assimilation system (HRLDAS) over Indian region. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176(1), 389–407.
Osuri, K. K., Nadimpalli, R., Mohanty, U. C., Chen, F., Rajeevan, M., & Niyogi, D. (2017). Improved prediction of severe thunderstorms over the Indian Monsoon region using high-resolution soil moisture and temperature initialization. Scientific Reports, 7, 41377. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41377.
Pai, D. S., Sridhar, L., Rajeevan, M., Sreejith, O. P., Satbhai, N. S., & Mukhopadhyay, B. (2014). Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25∘×0.25∘) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall dataset over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam, 65, 1–18.
Pielke, R. A., Avissar, R., Raupach, M., Dolman, A. J., Zeng, X., & Denning, A. S. (1998). Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climate. Global Change Biology, 4(5), 461–475.
Pitman, A. J. (2003). The evolution of, and revolution in land surface schemes designed for climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 23(5), 479–510.
Prasad, S. K., Mohanty, U. C., Routray, A., Osuri, K. K., Ramakrishna, S. S., & Niyogi, D. (2014). Impact of Doppler weather radar data on thunderstorm simulation during STORM pilot phase—2009. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1403–1427.
Reynolds, C. A., Jackson, T. J., & Rawls, W. J. (2000). Estimating soil water-holding capacities by linking the Food and Agriculture Organization soil map of the world with global pedon databases and continuous pedo-transfer functions. Water Resources Research, 36, 3653–3662.
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., et al. (2011). MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. Journal of Climate, 24(14), 3624–3648.
Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U. E., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng, C. J., et al. (2004). The Global Land Data Assimilation System. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85(3), 381–394.
Sarkar, A., Dutta, D., Chakraborty, P., Dutta, S. K., Majumdar, S., Payra, S., & Bhatla, R. (2020). Influence of cumulus convection and cloud microphysics parameterizations on the prediction of Western Disturbances. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 132, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-019-00697-2.
Sellers, P. J. (1992). Biophysical models of land surface processes. In K. E. Trenberth (Ed.), Climate system modeling (pp. 451–490). Cambridge: University Press.
Sharma, K., Ashrit, R., Bhatla, R., Mitra, A. K., Iyengar, G. R., & Rajagopal, E. N. (2017). Skill of predicting heavy rainfall over India: improvement in recent years using UKMO global model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174(11), 4241–4250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1640-9.
Sharma, K., Ashrit, R., Ebert, E., Mitra, A., Bhatla, R., Iyengar, G., & Rajagopal, E. N. (2019). Assessment of Met Office Unified Model (UM) quantitative precipitation forecasts during the Indian summer monsoon: contiguous rain area (CRA) approach. Journal of Earth System Science, 128(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-018-1023-3.
Singh, A. P., Mohanty, U. C., Sinha, P., & Mandal, M. (2007). Influence of different land surface processes on Indian summer monsoon circulation. Natural Hazards, 42, 423–438.
Singh, O., & Singh, J. (2015). Lightning fatalities over India: 1979–2011. Meteorological Applications, 22, 770–778.
Sinha, P., Nageswararao, M. M., Dash, G. P., Nair, A., & Mohanty, U. C. (2018). Pre-monsoon rainfall and surface air temperature trends over India and its global linkages. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-018-0621-6.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D., Wang, W., & Powers, J. G. (2008). A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Technical Note. https://doi.org/10.5065/D68S4MVH.
Tyagi, B., Krishna, V. N., & Satyanarayana, A. N. V. (2011). Study of thermodynamic indices in forecasting pre-monsoon thunderstorms over Kolkata during STORM pilot phase 2006–2008. Natural Hazards, 56(3), 681–698.
Wade, C. G. (1987). A quality control program for surface meso meteorological data. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 4, 435–453.
Xinmin, Z., Ming, Z., & Bingkai, S. (2000). A numerical study on effects of land—surface heterogeneity from ‘combined approach’ on atmospheric process part II: coupling—model simulations. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 17, 241–255.
Unnikrishnan, C. K., Rajeevan, M., Rao, S. V. B., & Kumar, M. (2013). Development of a high resolution land surface dataset for the South Asian monsoon region. Current Science, 1059, 1235–1246.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support given by the Earth System Science Organization, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India (Grant no./Project no. MM/SERP/CNRS/2013/INT-10/002) to conduct this research under the Monsoon Mission. The Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO), Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Service Center (GES DISC), and the National Aeronautics Space Administration are sincerely acknowledged for providing Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA), Global Land Data Assimilation (GLDAS) data, and 3-hourly satellite rainfall estimates, respectively. The Meteorological and Oceanographic Satellite Data Archival Centre (MOSDAC) is acknowledged for providing insitu observations. The Continental Tropical Convergence Zone (CTCZ) program is acknowledged for providing AWS observations. The India Meteorological Department (IMD), Pune is acknowledged for providing AWS observations. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Barnes Objective Analysis
The precipitation is interpolated using the Barnes successive correction method (Barnes 1973; Koch et al. 1983). The Barnes scheme assumes the desired scalar field at the grid point is the sum of the known prior information or the background and weighted sum of the observational increment inside a certain radius of influence. The weight (Wn) at each station within radius R is a function of distance (Xn, Yn) to grid point (i, j) and expressed as:
where d is the distance between station observation and grid point. For the grid point inside the radius of influence of station observation, the first guess is calculated as:
where S\(\left({x}_{n, }{y}_{n}\right)\) is the observation value within the radius of influence. The first guess is added with a correction term given by
where \({s}^{{\prime}}\left({x}_{n, }{y}_{n}\right)\) is the first guess obtained at observation point using an inverse distance interpolation technique. The W′ is the corrected weight given by
where γ (gamma) is the convergence parameter and can vary between 0 and 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nayak, H.P., Sinha, P. & Mohanty, U.C. Incorporation of Surface Observations in the Land Data Assimilation System and Application to Mesoscale Simulation of Pre-monsoon Thunderstorms. Pure Appl. Geophys. 178, 565–582 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02654-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02654-w