Abstract
In this study, a new approach to improve the 3D Cauchy-type integral is presented for faster and more accurate forward modeling of gravity data produced by a sediment-basement interface. The conventional method for calculating the gravity effect of a sedimentary basin is to discretize that into right-rectangular prisms. Its associated volumetric integral over the prisms has computational complexity which makes volumetric integral time-demanding for 3D modeling. A 3D Cauchy-type integral only discretizes the density contrast surface. In fact, it is a surface integral without transcendental functions, which enables fast computation of potential fields. The purpose of the technique is to increase the accuracy of the customary Cauchy-type integral in order to calculate the gravity field over a sedimentary structure which is more likely in real geological structures. To achieve this, the vertical planes located between basement edges and the horizontal reference plane are considered. The accuracy and computational cost is assessed by synthetic gravity data modeling. Three forward functions, namely improved Cauchy-type integral, customary Cauchy-type integral, and volumetric integral, are applied to calculate the gravity field over synthetic sedimentary basins with different geometries. The volumetric integral is set as a benchmark to validate the efficiency of the presented method. Results are analyzed by comparing the dissimilarities of gravity anomalies calculated using the volumetric integral and each of the customary and improved Cauchy-type integrals. The resulting anomaly differences indicate that, compared with the customary Cauchy-type integral, the improved Cauchy-type integral increases the accuracy in calculated gravity anomalies considerably. Furthermore, forward calculations using the improved Cauchy-type integral require approximately the same time as the customary Cauchy-type integral, and are about 50 times faster than the volumetric integral. In addition, the improved Cauchy-type integral gives better results if the edges of the basement are not at an equal level, which is very likely in real geological structures. The new approach is tested on the basement of the Yucca Flat basin to assess the viability of the proposed model in real cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cai, H., & Zhdanov, M. (2015a). Application of Cauchy-type integrals in developing effective methods for depth to basement inversion of gravity and gravity gradiometery. Geophysics, 80(2), G81–G94.
Cai, H., & Zhdanov, M. (2015b). Modeling and inversion of magnetic anomalies caused by sediment–basement interface using three-dimensional Cauchy-type integrals. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters., 12(3), 477–481.
Cai, H., & Zhdanov, M. (2017). Joint inversion of gravity data and magnetotelloric data for depth to basement estimation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(8), 1228–1232.
Cai, H., Xiong, B., and Zhu, Y. (2018). 3D modeling and inversion of gravity in exploration. Intech Open Limited. https://www.intechopen.com/books/gravity-geoscienceapplications-industrial-technology-and-quantum-aspect/3dmodeling-and-inversion-of-gravity-data-in-exploration-scale, 19–37.
Chakravarthi, V., Mallesh, K., & Ramamma, B. (2017). Basement depth estimation from gravity anomalies: two 2.5D approaches coupled with the exponential density contrast model. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 14, 303–315.
Ferguson, J. F., Felch, R. N., Aiken, C. L. V., Oldo, J. S., & Dockery, H. (1988). Models of the Bouguer gravity and geologic structure at Yucca Flat Nevada. Geophysics, 53(02), 231–244.
Florio, G. (2020). The estimation of depth to basement under sedimentary basins from gravity data: review of approaches and the ITRESC method, with an application to the Yucca Flat basin (Nevada). Surveys In Geophysics, 41, 935–961.
GallardoDelgado, L. A., Perez- Flores, M. A., & Gomez- Trevino, E. (2003). A versatile algorithm for joint 3D inversion of gravity and magnetic data. Geophysics, 68(3), 249–259.
Jamasb, A., Motavalli-Anbaran, S.-H., & Zeyen, H. (2017). Non-linear stochastic inversion of gravity data via quantum behaved particle swarm optimization: application to Eurasia–Arabic collision zone (Zagros, Iran). Geophysical Prospecting, 65(1), 274–294.
Jamasb, A., Motavalli-Anbaran, S.-H., & Ghasemi, K. (2018). A novel hybrid algorithm of particle swarm optimization and evolution strategies for geophysical non-linear inverse problems. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176(4), 1601–1613.
Mallesh, K., Chakravarthi, V., & Ramamma, B. (2019). 3D gravity analysis in the spatial domain: model simulation by multiple polygonal cross-sections coupled with exponential density contrast. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176(6), 2497–2511.
Martelet, G., Perrin, J., Truffert, C., & Deparis, J. (2013). Fast mapping of magnetic basement depth, structure and nature using aeromagnetic and gravity data: combined methods and their application in the Paris Basin. Geophysical Prospecting. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12024.
Oruç, B., Sertçelik, İ, Kafadar, Ö., & Selim, H. H. (2013). Structural interpretation of the Erzurum Basin, eastern Turkey, using curvature gravity gradient tensor and gravity inversion of basement relief. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 88, 105–113.
Pallero, J., Fernández-Martínez, J. L., Bonvalot, S., & Fudym, O. (2015). Gravity inversion and uncertainty assessment of basement relief via particle swarm optimization. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 116, 180–191.
Pallero, J., Fernández-Martínez, J. L., Bonvalot, S., & Fudym, O. (2017). 3D gravity inversion and uncertainty assessment of basement relief. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 139, 338–350.
Phelps, G. A., Langenheim, V. E., and Jachens, R. C. (1999). Thickness of Cenozoic deposits of Yucca Flat inferred from gravity data, Nevada Test Site, Nevada. USGS open-file report, 99–310.
Silva, J. B. C., & Santos, D. F. (2017). Efficient gravity inversion of basement relief using a versatile modeling algorithm. Geophysics, 82(2), G23–G34.
Silva, J. B. C., Vasconcelos, S. S., & Barbosa, V. C. F. (2010). Gravity inversion of 2D basement relief using entropic regularization. Geophysics, 75(3), I29–I35.
Wu, L. (2018). Efficient modeling of gravity fields caused by sources with arbitrary geometry and arbitrary density distribution. Surveys In Geophysics, 39, 401–434.
Zhao, G., Chen, B., Chen, L., Liu, J., & Ren, Z. (2018). High-accuracy 3D Fourier forward modeling of gravity field based on the Gauss-FFT method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 150, 294–303.
Zhdanov, M. (1988). Integral transforms in geophysics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-72628-6#authorsandaffiliationsbook.
Zhdanov, M., & Liu, X. (2013). 3D Cauchy-type integrals for terrain correction of gravity and gradiometery data. Geophysical Journal International, 194(1), 249–268.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that greatly helped to improve the paper. We are deeply grateful to Giovanni Florio for kindly providing us the digitized gravity data of the Yucca Flat basin used in his 2020 paper (Florio, G., 2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi, N., Motavalli-Anbaran, SH. & Ebrahimzadeh Ardestani, V. Improved 3D Cauchy-type Integral for Faster and More Accurate Forward Modeling of Gravity Data Caused by Basement Relief. Pure Appl. Geophys. 178, 79–90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02635-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02635-5