Abstract
The quality of seismic migration images strongly depends on accurate velocity models. However, migration velocity models often contain errors causing artifacts which degrade seismic resolution and fidelity. Here, we propose a method to enhance seismic migration images using processes in angle-domain common-image-gathers (ADCIGs), without requiring modification to the velocity model. The ADCIGs impacted from velocity errors show non-flat gathers and scattered noise. To enhance the imaging quality in ADCIGs, these problems need to be treated prior to stacking. Ideally, layers in ADCIGs should be flat without smearing amplitudes through all angles. Using this principle, we iteratively process one reflection at a time by isolating it into a local window and then flattening it. Also, we apply internal processing steps to enhance the signal. The algorithm for segregating a reflection, referred to as the connected-component labeling (CCL) method, is the primary method for extracting any feature that has a continuous form within the ADCIGs. Moreover, this method is insensitive to scattered noise so it is a suitable approach for classifying reflections or noise. To test the efficiency of this algorithm, we create ADCIGs containing relatively poor-quality images using an inaccurate migration velocity model. The primary objective of this test is to show how well the CCL method can select various forms of reflections in the presence of various levels of noise. The results show that the CCL method is capable of individually decomposing a reflection, which can facilitate processing in the internal workflow. Finally, we evaluate the quality of processed migration images by comparing our processed Poynting-vector reverse time migration (PVRTM) images with reverse time migration applied Laplacian filter and partial stacked PVRTM. These comparable migration images are benchmarked against a baseline synthetic reflector model. The essential improvements of our method are addressed by the migration sections, namely the removal of diffraction artifacts at both small and large scales and the improvement of phase coherency. The final stacked migration image produced with our methods shows clearer geological features that are capable of delivering a more reliable seismic interpretation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bao, P., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. L. (2005). Canny edge detection enhancement by scale multiplication. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(9), 1485–1490.
Baysal, E., Kosloff, D. D., & Sherwood, J. W. C. (1983). Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48(11), 1514–1524.
Biggs, N. L. (1976). Graph theory 1736–1936. In: N. L. Biggs, E. Keith Lloyd, R. J. Wilson (Eds). Oxford [Eng.], Clarendon Press.
Biondi, B., & Tisserant, T. (2004). 3D angle-domain common-image gathers for migration velocity analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 52(6), 575–591.
Brandsberg-Dahl, S., de Hoop, M. V., & Ursin, B. (2003). Focusing in dip and AVA compensation on scattering-angle/azimuth common image gathers. Geophysics, 68(1), 232–254.
Burger, W., Burge, M. J., & Ian, M. (2009). Digital images. In I. Mackie (Ed.), Principles of digital image processing: Fundamental techniques. London: Springer-Verlag.
Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 6, 679–698.
Claerbout, J. F. (1971). Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping. Geophysics, 36(3), 467–481.
Dafni, R., & Symes, W. W. (2017). Diffraction imaging by prestack reverse-time migration in the dip-angle domain. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 295–316.
Davis, L. S. (1975). A survey of edge detection techniques. Computer Graphics Image Processing, 4(3), 248–270.
Dillencourt, M. B., Samet, H., & Tamminen, M. (1992). A general-approach to connected-component labeling for arbitrary image representations. Journal of the ACM, 39(2), 253–280.
Fiorio, C., & Gustedt, J. (1996). Two linear time union-find strategies for image processing. Theoretical Computer Science, 154(2), 165–181.
Gonzalez, R., Woods, R., & Eddins, C. (2006). Digital image processing in the Matlab environment. Moscow: Technosphere Publ.
Haralick, R. M., & Shapiro, L. G. (1985). Image segmentation techniques. Computer Vision, Graphics, Image Processing, 29(1), 100–132.
He, L. F., Ren, X. W., Gao, Q. H., Zhao, X., Yao, B., & Chao, Y. Y. (2017). The connected-component labeling problem: A review of state-of-the-art algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 70, 25–43.
Henry, M., Orcutt, J. A., & Parker, R. L. (1980). A new method for slant stacking refraction data. Geophysical Research Letters, 7(12), 1073–1076.
Huang, Y., Wang, X., & Schuster, G. T. (2014). Non-local means filter for trim statics. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2014 (pp. 3925–3929). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Jähne, B. (2005). Digital image processing. Berlin: Springer.
Jin, H., McMechan, G. A., & Nguyen, B. (2015). Improving input/output performance in 2D and 3D angle-domain common-image gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics, 80(2), S65–S77.
Kosloff, D. D., & Baysal, E. (1983). Migration with the full acoustic-wave equation. Geophysics, 48(6), 677–687.
Lee, J., Haralick, R., & Shapiro, L. (1987). Morphologic edge detection. IEEE Journal on Robotics Automation, 3(2), 142–156.
Lee, L. K., Liew, S. C., & Thong, W. J. (2015). A review of image segmentation methodologies in medical image. In Advanced computer and communication engineering technology (pp. 1069–1080). Springer.
Liu, Q. C. (2019). Dip-angle image gather computation using the Poynting vector in elastic reverse time migration and their application for noise suppression. Geophysics, 84(3), S159–S169.
Ma, Y., Luo, Y., & Kelamis, P. (2019). Superresolution stacking based on sparse Radon transform. Geophysics, 84(1), V45–V54.
Martin, G. S., Wiley, R., & Marfurt, K. J. (2006). Marmousi2: An elastic upgrade for Marmousi. The Leading Edge, 25(2), 156–166.
Oliveira, R. B., Mercedes Filho, E., Ma, Z., Papa, J. P., Pereira, A. S., & Tavares, J. M. R. (2016). Computational methods for the image segmentation of pigmented skin lesions: A review. Computer Methods Programs in Biomedicine, 131, 127–141.
Ottolini, R., & Claerbout, J. F. (1984). The migration of common midpoint slant stacks. Geophysics, 49(3), 237–249.
Poynting, J. H. (1884). XV. On the transfer of energy in the electromagnetic field. In Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London (Vol. 175, pp. 343–361).
Prucha, M. L., Biondi, B. L., & Symes, W. W. (1999). Angle-domain common image gathers by wave-equation migration. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1999 (pp. 824–827). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Radon, J. (1917). Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten. Berichte Sachsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Leipzig, Math-Phys Kl., 69(69), 262–277.
Reiss, T. H. (1993). Recognizing planar objects using invariant image features (Vol. 17). New York: Springer.
Rosenfel, A., & Pfaltz, J. L. (1966). Sequential operations in digital picture processing. Journal of the ACM, 13(4), 471–494.
Sava, P. C., & Fomel, S. (2003). Angle-domain common-image gathers by wavefield continuation methods. Geophysics, 68(3), 1065–1074.
Suzuki, K., Horiba, I., & Sugie, N. (2003). Linear-time connected-component labeling based on sequential local operations. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89(1), 1–23.
Tang, C., & McMechan, G. A. (2018). The dynamically correct Poynting vector formulation for acoustic media with application in calculating multidirectional propagation vectors to produce angle gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics, 83(4), S365–S374.
Thongsang, P., Hu, H., Lau, A., & Zhou, H.-w. (2018). Imaging improvement in angle-domain common-image-gathers by a local stack utilizing segmentation method. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2018 (pp. 4221–4225). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Virieux, J. (1986). P-Sv-wave propagation in heterogeneous media—velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51(4), 889–901.
Wu, R. S., & Chen, L. (2006). Directional illumination analysis using beamlet decomposition and propagation. Geophysics, 71(4), S147–S159.
Wu, K., Otoo, E., & Shoshani, A. (2005). Optimizing connected component labeling algorithms. In Medical imaging 2005: image processing, 2005 (Vol. 5747, pp. 1965–1976). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Xie, X.-B., & Wu, R.-S. (2002). Extracting angle domain information from migrated wavefield. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2002 (pp. 1360–1363). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Xu, S., Chauris, H., Lambare, G., & Noble, M. (2001). Common-angle migration: A strategy for imaging complex media. Geophysics, 66(6), 1877–1894.
Xu, S., Zhang, Y., & Tang, B. (2011). 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration. Geophysics, 76(2), S77–S92.
Yan, J., & Dickens, T. A. (2016). Reverse time migration angle gathers using Poynting vectors. Geophysics, 81(6), S511–S522.
Yoon, K., & Marfurt, K. J. (2006). Reverse-time migration using the Poynting vector. Exploration Geophysics, 37(1), 102–107.
Youn, O. K., & Zhou, H. W. (2001). Depth imaging with multiples. Geophysics, 66(1), 246–255.
Zhang, Q. S., & McMechan, G. A. (2011). Direct vector-field method to obtain angle-domain common-image gathers from isotropic acoustic and elastic reverse time migration. Geophysics, 76(5), Wb135–Wb149.
Zhang, D., Wang, X., Huang, Y., & Schuster, G. (2014). Warping for trim statics. In SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2014 (pp. 3946–3950). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
Zheng, Y. K., Wang, Y. B., & Chang, X. (2016). Eliminating artifacts in migration of surface-related multiples: An application to marine data. Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization, 4(4), 51–57.
Zhou, H.-W., Hu, H., Zou, Z., Wo, Y., & Youn, O. (2018). Reverse time migration: A prospect of seismic imaging methodology. Earth-Science Reviews, 179, 207–227.
Zhu, H. (2017). Improving the stacking quality of angle-domain common-image gathers based on local warping and simulated annealing. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 (pp. 4645–4650). https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17675340.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thongsang, P., Hu, H., Zhou, Hw. et al. Imaging Enhancement in Angle-Domain Common-Image-Gathers Using the Connected-Component Labeling Method. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 4897–4912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02518-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02518-9