Abstract
Cross-gradients joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data is the focus of this work. Cross-gradients are introduced as a constraint in the minimization of a least square functional including the misfits of the available data. We propose to initialize the cross gradients iterations with a surrogate density model. The latter is constructed by means of Bayesian estimation in a low dimensional parameter space. To sample from the posterior, an affine invariant MCMC is also introduced. The proposed methodology is successfully tested on synthetic models consisting of isolated sources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarts, E., & Korst, J. (1988). Simulated annealing and boltzmann machines. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bhaskara-Rao, D., Prakash, M. J., & Ramesh-Babu, N. (1990). 3D and 2D modeling of gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 411–422.
Bhattacharyya, B. K. (1966). A method for computing the total magnetization vector and the dimensions of a rectangular block-shaped body from magnetic anomalies. Geophysics, 31, 74–96.
Christen, A., & Fox, C. (2010). A general purpose sampling algorithm for continuous distributions (the t-walk). Bayesian Analysis, 5(2), 263–281.
Fedi, M., Hansen, P. C., & Paoletti, V. (2005). Tutorial: Analysis of depth resolution in potential-field inversion. Geophysics, 70(6), A1–A11. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2122408.
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). Emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125(925). IOP Publishing.
Fregoso, E., & Gallardo, L. A. (2009). Cross-gradients joint 3D inversion with applications to gravity and magnetic data. Geophysics, 74(4), L31–L42. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3119263.
Fregoso, E., Gallardo, L. A., & García-Abdeslem, J. (2015). Structural joint inversion coupled with Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity and magnetic anomalies. Geophysics, 80(2), G67–G79.
Gallardo L. A., & Meju., M. A. (2004). Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109.
Haber, E., & Oldenburg, D. (1997). Joint inversion: A structural approach. Inverse Problems, 13, 63–77.
Joulidehsar, F., Moradzadeh, A., & Ardejani, Doulati. (2018). An improved 3D joint inversion method of potential field data using cross-gradient constraint and LSQR method. Pure and Applied Geophysics,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1909-7.
Li, Y., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1996). 3-D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics, 61(2), 394–408.
Li, Y., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1998). 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics, 63(1), 109–119.
Li, W., & Qian, J. (2016). Joint inversion of gravity and traveltime data using a level-set-based structural parameterization. Geophysics, 81(6), G107–G119.
Moorkamp, M. B., Heincke, M. B., Jegen, M., Roberts, A. W., & Hobbs, R. W. (2011). A framework for 3-D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data. Geophysical Journal International, 184, 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04856.x.
Moorkamp, M., Roberts, A. W., Jegen, M., Heincke, B., & Hobbs, R. W. (2013). Verification of velocity-resistivity relationships derived from structural joint inversion with borehole data. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 3596–3601. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50696.
Nielsen, L., & Jacobsen, B. H. (2000). Integrated gravity and wide-angle seismic inversion for two-dimensional crustal modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 140, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00012.x.
Paoletti, V., Hansen, P. C., Hansen, M. F., & Fedi, M. (2014). A computationally efficient tool for assessing the depth resolution in large-scale potential-field inversion. Geophysics, 79(4), A33–A38. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2014-0017.1.
Pilkington, M. (2012). Analysis of gravity gradiometer inverse problems using optimal design measures. Geophysics, 77(2), G25–G31. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0317.1.
Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2013). Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Sambridge, M., & Mosegaard, K. (2002). Monte Carlo methods in geophyisical inverse problems. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(3), 3-1.
Stuart, A. M. (2010). Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective. Acta Numerica, 19, 451–559.
Tarantola, A., & Valette, B. (1982). Generalized non-linear inverse problems solved using the least-squares criterion. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 20, 219–232.
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out while M. A. Moreles was a on sabbatical leave at the mathematics Department of the Universidad de Guadalajara. Their hospitality is greatly appreciated. Also, M. A. Moreles would like to acknowledge the support of ECOS-NORD project number 000000000263116/M15M01. The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees. The manuscript was greatly improved by their very constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fregoso, E., Palafox, A. & Moreles, M.A. Initializing Cross-Gradients Joint Inversion of Gravity and Magnetic Data with a Bayesian Surrogate Gravity Model. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 1029–1041 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02334-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02334-w