Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 175, Issue 11, pp 3759–3778 | Cite as

Waterspout Forecasting Method Over the Eastern Adriatic Using a High-Resolution Numerical Weather Model

  • Tanja RenkoEmail author
  • Sarah Ivušić
  • Maja Telišman Prtenjak
  • Vinko Šoljan
  • Igor Horvat
Article

Abstract

In this study, a synoptic and mesoscale analysis was performed and Szilagyi’s waterspout forecasting method was tested on ten waterspout events in the period of 2013–2016. Data regarding waterspout occurrences were collected from weather stations, an online survey at the official website of the National Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia and eyewitness reports from newspapers and the internet. Synoptic weather conditions were analyzed using surface pressure fields, 500 hPa level synoptic charts, SYNOP reports and atmospheric soundings. For all observed waterspout events, a synoptic type was determined using the 500 hPa geopotential height chart. The occurrence of lightning activity was determined from the LINET lightning database, and waterspouts were divided into thunderstorm-related and “fair weather” ones. Mesoscale characteristics (with a focus on thermodynamic instability indices) were determined using the high-resolution (500 m grid length) mesoscale numerical weather model and model results were compared with the available observations. Because thermodynamic instability indices are usually insufficient for forecasting waterspout activity, the performance of the Szilagyi Waterspout Index (SWI) was tested using vertical atmospheric profiles provided by the mesoscale numerical model. The SWI successfully forecasted all waterspout events, even the winter events. This indicates that the Szilagyi’s waterspout prognostic method could be used as a valid prognostic tool for the eastern Adriatic.

Keywords

Waterspout Adriatic Szilagyi Waterspout Index WRF convection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Szilagyi, who shared his knowledge of the SWN and SWI. We would also like to thank all of the individuals who helped us to collect the data. This research was supported by the ECMWF (http://www.ecmwf.int/) data, atmospheric soundings from http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html and the WRF-ARW model freely available at www.wrf-model.org/index.php. The contribution of Sarah Ivušić to this paper was partially funded by HrZZ contract I-3833-2016. Sarah Ivušić also thanks Kristian Horvath and Ivan Güttler for their available discussion and comments. Maja Telišman Prtenjak wishes to acknowledge the Croatian Science Foundation project VITCLIC (PKP-2016-06-2975), which is funded by the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund under the Government Programme (Ministry of Environment and Energy & Ministry of Science and Education) for the Promotion of Research and Development Activities in the Field of Climate Change for the period 2015–2016.

References

  1. American Meteorological Society, cited 2017: Waterspout. Glossary of Meteorology. Available online at http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/waterspout.
  2. Antonescu, B., Schultz, D. M., Lomas, F., & Kühne, T. (2016). Tornadoes in Europe: synthesis of the observational datasets. Monthly Weather Review, 144, 2445–2480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belušić, A., Telišman Prtenjak, M., Güttler, I., Ban, N., Leutwyler, D., & Schär, C. (2017). Near-surface wind variability over the broader Adriatic region: insights from an ensemble of regional climate models. Climate Dynamics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3885-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betz, H. D., Schmidt, K., Laroche, P., Blanchet, P., Oettinger, W. P., Defer, E., et al. (2009). LINET—an international lightning detection network in Europe. Atmospheric Research, 91, 564–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bošković, R. (1749). Sopra il turbine che la notte tra gli XI, e XII Giugno del MDCCXLIX daneggio` una gran parte di Roma dissertazione, Rome.Google Scholar
  6. Caruso, J. M., & Davies, J. M. (2005). Tornadoes in non-mesocyclone environments with pre-existing vertical vorticity along convergence boundaries. NWA Electronic Journal of Operational Meteorology, 6(4), 1–36.Google Scholar
  7. Davies-Jones, R., Trapp, R. J., & Bluestein, H. B. (2001). Tornadoes and tornadic storms. In C. A. Doswell III (Ed.), Severe convective storms (pp. 167–221). Boston MA: American Meteorological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doswell, C. A., III, & Evans, J. S. (2003). Proximity sounding analysis for derechos and supercells: an assessment of similarities and differences. Atmospheric Research, 67–68, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doswell, C. A., III, & Rasmussen, E. N. (1994). The effect of neglecting the virtual temperature correction on CAPE calculations. Weather and Forecasting, 9, 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dotzek, N., Emeis, S., Lefebvre, C., & Gerpott, J. (2010). Waterspouts over the North and Baltic Seas: Observations and climatology, prediction and reporting. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 19, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferro, C. A. T. (2007). A Probability model for verifying deterministic forecasts of extreme events. Weather and Forecasting, 22, 1089–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferro, C. A. T., & Stephenson, D. B. (2011). Extremal dependence indices: improved verification measures for deterministic forecasts of rare binary events. Weather and Forecasting, 26, 69–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feudale, L., & Manzato, A. (2014). Cloud-to-ground lightning distribution and its relationship with orography and anthropogenic emissions in the Po Valley. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 53, 2651–2670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giaiotti, D. B., Giovannoni, M., Pucillo, A., & Stel, F. (2007). The climatology of tornadoes and waterspouts in Italy. Atmospheric Research, 83(2), 534–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golden, J. H. (1974). The life cycle of Florida Keys’ waterspouts I. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 13, 676–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Groenemeijer, P. H., & van Delden, A. (2007). Sounding-derived parameters associated with large hail and tornadoes in the Netherlands. Atmospheric Research, 83, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holler, H., Betz, H. D., Schmidt, K., Calheiros, R. V., May, P., Houngninou, E., et al. (2009). Lightning characteristics observed by a VLF/LF lightning detection network (LINET) in Brazil, Australia, Africa and Germany. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 7795–7824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holley, D. M., Dorling, S. R., Steele, C. J., & Earla, N. (2014). A climatology of convective available potential energy in Great Britain. International Journal of Climatology, 34, 3811–3824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horvat, I., Renko, T., Stanešić, A., Szilagyi, W. (2017). Development of operational waterspout forecast product for Adriatic Sea using ALADIN NWP model. In: 9th European Conference on Severe Storms, pp. 18–22. Pula, Croatia.Google Scholar
  20. Horvath, K., Koracin, D., Vellore, R. K., Jiang, J., & Belu, R. (2012). Sub-kilometer dynamical downscaling of near-surface winds in complex terrain using WRF and MM5 mesoscale models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, D11111.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ivančan-Picek, B., Horvath, K., Strelec Mahović, N., & Gajić-Čapka, M. (2014). Forcing mechanisms of a heavy precipitation event in the southern Adriatic area. Natural Hazards, 72(2), 1231–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivančan-Picek, B., Tudor, M., Horvath, K., Stanešić, A., & Ivatek-Šahdan, S. (2016). Overview of the first HyMeX special observation period over Croatia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16, 2657–2682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ivatek-Šahdan, S., & Tudor, M. (2004). Use of high-resolution dynamical adaptation in operational suite and research impact studies. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 13(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  24. Kehler-Poljak, G., Telišman Prtenjak, M., Kvakić, M., Šariri, K., & Večenaj, Ž. (2017). Interaction of sea breeze and deep convection over the northeastern Adriatic coast: an analysis of sensitivity experiments using a high-resolution mesoscale model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 4197–4224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1607-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keul, A. G., Sioutas, M. V., & Szilagyi, W. (2009). Prognosis of central-eastern Mediterranean waterspouts. Atmospheric Research, 93, 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khodayar, S., Fosser, G., Berthou, S., Davolio, S., Drobinski, P., Ducrocq, V., et al. (2016). A seamless weather–climate multi-model intercomparison on the representation of a high impact weather event in the western Mediterranean: HyMeX IOP12. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 142(1), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuzmić, M., Grisogono, B., Li, X. M., & Lehner, S. (2015). Examining a deep and a shallow Adriatic bora event. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141, 3434–3438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markowski, P. M., & Richardson, Y. P. (2009). Tornadogenesis: Our current understanding, forecasting considerations and questions to guide future research. Atmospheric Research, 93, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marsh, P. T., Hart, J. A. (2012). SHARPPY: a Python implementation of the Skew-T/Hodograph Analysis and Research Program. AMS 2nd symposium on advances in modeling and analysis using Python. https://ams.confex.com/ams/92Annual/webprogram/Paper203274.html. Accessed Aug 8, 2017.
  30. Mikuš, P., Telišman Prtenjak, M., & Strelec Mahović, N. (2012). Analysis of the convective activity and its synoptic background over Croatia. Atmospheric Research, 104–105, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2016). Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/waterspout.html.
  32. Office, Meteorological. (1962). Weather in the Mediterranean (Vol. 1). London: General Meteorology, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  33. Poljak, G., Telišman Prtenjak, M., Kvakić, M., Strelec Mahović, N., & Babić, K. (2014). Wind patterns associated with the development of daytime thunderstorms over Istria. Annales Geophysicae, 32, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pucik, T., Groenemeijer Ryva, D., & Kolar, M. (2015). Proximity soundings of severe and nonsevere thunderstorms in central Europe. Monthly Weather Review, 143, 4805–4821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rasmussen, E. N., & Blanchard, D. O. (1998). A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Weather Forecasting, 13, 1148–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Renko, T., Kozarić, T., & Tudor, M. (2013). An assessment of waterspout occurrence in the Eastern Adriatic basin in 2010: synoptic and mesoscale environment and forecasting method. Atmospheric Research, 123, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Renko, T., Kuzmić, J., Šoljan, V., & Strelec Mahović, N. (2016). Waterspouts in the Eastern Adriatic from 2001 to 2013. Natural Hazards, 82, 441–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez, O., & Bech, J. (2017). Sounding-derived parameters associated with tornadic storms in Catalonia. International Journal of Climatology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sherburn, K. D., & Parker, M. D. (2014). Climatology and ingredients of significant severe convection in high shear, low CAPE environments. Weather Forecasting, 29, 854–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherburn, K. D., Parker, M. D., King, J. R., & Lackman, G. M. (2016). Composite environments of severe and non-severe high-shear, low-CAPE convective events. Weather Forecasting, 31, 1899–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sioutas, M. V., & Flocas, H. A. (2003). Hailstorms in northern Greece: synoptic patterns and thermodynamic environment. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 75, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sioutas, M. V., & Keul, A. G. (2007). Waterspouts of the Adriatic, Ionian and Aegean Sea and their meteorological environment. Atmospheric Research, 83, 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sioutas, M., Szilagyi, W., & Keul, A. (2013). Waterspout outbreaks over areas of Europe and North America: environment and predictability. Atmospheric Research, 123, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., et al. (2008). A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR/TN-475+STR. Boulder: NCAR.Google Scholar
  45. Supić, N., & Orlić, M. (1992). Annual cycle of sea surface temperature along the east Adriatic coast. Geofizika, 9, 79–97.Google Scholar
  46. Szilagyi, W. (2009). A waterspout forecasting technique. https://www.essl.org/ECSS/2009/preprints/O05-14-sziladgyi.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017.
  47. Taszarek, M., Brooks, H. E., & Czerneck, B. (2017). Sounding-derived parameters associated with convective hazards in Europe. Monthly Weather Review, 145, 1511–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Telišman Prtenjak, M., & Grisogono, B. (2007). Sea/land breeze climatological characteristics along the northern Croatian Adriatic Coast. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 90(3–4), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Telišman Prtenjak, M., Viher, M., & Jurković, J. (2010). Sea/land breeze development during a summer bora event along the north-eastern Adriatic coast. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 136, 1554–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Telišman Prtenjak, M. Horvat, I., Tomažić, I., Kvakić, M., Viher, M., & Grisogono, B. (2015) Impact of mesoscale meteorological processes on anomalous radar propagation conditions over the northern Adriatic area, Journal of Geophysical ResearchAtmospheres, 120, 17, 8759-8782.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson, R. L., Edwards, R., Hart, J. A., Elmore, K. L., & Markowski, P. (2003). Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the rapid update cycle. Weather Forecasting, 18, 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Delden, A. (2001). The synoptic setting of thunderstorms in western Europe. Atmospheric Research, 56, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meteorological and Hydrological ServiceZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Geophysics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Croatia Control LtdVelika GoricaCroatia

Personalised recommendations