Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 173, Issue 8, pp 2711–2725 | Cite as

The Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data to Analyze the Estimated Volume of Pyroclastic Deposits and Morphological Changes Caused by the 2010–2015 Eruption of Sinabung Volcano, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Article

Abstract

In this research, remotely sensed data has been used to estimate the volume of pyroclastic deposits and analyze morphological changes that have resulted from the eruption of Sinabung volcano. Topographic information was obtained from these data and used for rapid mapping to assist in the emergency response. Topographic information and change analyses (pre- and syn- eruption) were conducted using digital elevation models (DEMs) for the period 2010–2015. Advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) global digital elevation model (GDEM) data from 2009 were used to generate the initial DEMs for the condition prior to the eruption of 2010. Satellite pour l’observation de la terre 6 (SPOT 6) stereo images acquired on 21 June 2015 and were used to make a DEM for that time. The results show that the estimated total volume of lava and pyroclastic deposits, produced during the period 2010 to mid-2015 is approximately 2.8 × 108 m3. This estimated volume of pyroclastic deposits can be used to predict the magnitude of future secondary lahar hazards, which are also related to the capacity of rivers in the area. Morphological changes are illustrated using cross-sectional analysis of the deposits, which are currently deposited to the east, southeast and south of the volcano. Such analyses can also help in forecasting the direction of the future flow hazards. The remote sensing and analysis methods used at Sinabung can also be applied at other volcanoes and to assess the threats of other types of hazards such as landslides and land subsidence.

Keywords

Pyroclastic deposits morphological change remote sensing SPOT 6 Sinabung volcano North Sumatra Indonesia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of the research activities entitled “The utilization of remotely sensed data for disaster mitigation volcanoes in Indonesia”. This research was funded by the budget of DIPA LAPAN activities in 2015, Remote Sensing Application Center, Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN). Thanks go to Dr. M. Rokhis Khomarudin (Director of Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN) who has supported the implementation of this research. We also acknowledge to Drs. Taufik Maulana, MBA., Dr. Wikanti Asriningrum and our colleagues at the Remote Sensing Application Center, LAPAN for discussions and suggestions, and two anonymous reviewers were very helpful in improving our manuscript. SPOT 6 stereo images data and Landsat 8 LDCM data were provided by Remote Sensing Technology and Data Center, LAPAN. ASTER GDEM data were provided by the Japan-US ASTER Science Team. Topographic maps were provided by the Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency (BIG).

References

  1. Bater, C. W., & Coops, N. C. (2009). Evaluating error associated with LiDAR-derived DEM interpolation. Computers & Geosciences, 35(2), 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becek, K. (2014). Assessing global digital elevation models using the runway method: the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer versus the shuttle radar topography mission case. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 52(8), 4823–4831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bignami, C., Ruch, J., Chini, M., Neri, M., & Buongiorno, F. (2013). Pyroclastic density current volume estimation after the 2010 Merapi volcano eruption using X-band SAR. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.Google Scholar
  4. Brivio, P. A., Colombo, R., Maggi, M., & Tomasoni, R. (2002). Integration of remote sensing data and GIS for accurate mapping of flood areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(3), 429–441. doi: 10.1080/01431160010014729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buyuksalih, G., Kocak, G., Topan, H., Oruc, M., & Marangoz, A. (2005). SPOT revisited: accuracy assessment, DEM generation and validation from stereo SPOT 5 HRG images. The Photogrammetric Record, 20(110), 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charbonnier, S. J., Germa, A., Connor, C. B., Gertisser, R., Preece, K., Komorowski, J. C., et al. (2013). Evaluation of the impact of the 2010 pyroclastic density currents at Merapi volcano from high-resolution satellite imagery, field investigation and numerical simulations. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 261, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaussard, E., & Amelung, F. (2012). Precursory inflation of shallow magma reservoirs at west Sunda volcanoes detected by InSAR. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L21311. doi: 10.1029/2012gl053817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CVGHM (2015). Evaluation of Sinabung volcano observation until June 2nd, 2015. http://www.vsi.esdm.go.id/ Cited June 05, 2015 (In Indonesian).
  9. Czubski, K., Kozak, J., & Kolecka, N. (2013). Accuracy of SRTM-X and ASTER elevation data and its influence on topographical and hydrological modelling: case study of the Pieniny Mts. in Poland. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 9(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  10. Daag, A., & van Westen, C. J. (1996). Cartographic modelling of erosion in pyroclastic flow deposits of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. ITC Journal, 2, 110–124.Google Scholar
  11. Darmawan, H. (2012). Pyroclastic flow modeling using TITAN2D to predict the hazard of hot cloud after the 2010 eruption Merapi volcano. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Geography, Gadjah Mada University. (In Indonesian).Google Scholar
  12. Diefenbach, A. K., Crider, J. G., Schilling, S. P., & Dzurisin, D. (2012). Rapid, low-cost photogrammetry to monitor volcanic eruptions: an example from Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. Bulletin of Volcanology, 72(2), 579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. d’Ozouville, N., Deffontaines, B., Benveniste, J., Wegmuller, U., Violette, S., & de Marsily, G. (2008). DEM generation using ASAR (ENVISAT) for addressing the lack of freshwater ecosystems management, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos, Galapagos. Remote Sensing of Environment on Monitoring Freshwater Ecosystems, 112, 4131–4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Felpeto, A., Matri, J., & Ortiz, R. (2007). Automatic GIS-based system for volcanic hazard assessment. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 166, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giribabu, D., Kumar, P., Mathew, J., Sharma, K. P., & Murthy, Y. V. N. K. (2013). DEM generation using Cartosat-1 stereo data: issues and complexities in Himalayan terrain. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 46, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GonzáLez, P.J., Singh, K.D., & Tiampo, K.F. (2014). Shallow hydrothermal pressurization before the 2010 Eruption of Mount Sinabung Volcano, Indonesia, Observed by use of ALOS Satellite Radar Interferometry. Pure and Applied Geophysics doi: 10.1007/s00024-014-0915-7.
  17. Hashimoto, M. (2013). Ground deformation related to active faults detected by persistent scatterer InSAR. Synthetic Aperture Radar (APSAR), Asia-Pacific Conference, pp. 477–480.Google Scholar
  18. Hayakawa, Y. S., Uguchi, T., & Zhou, L. (2008). Comparison of new and existing global digital elevation models: ASTER G-DEM and SRTM-3. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(17), 1–5. doi: 10.1029/2008GL035036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirano, A., Welch, R., & Lang, H. (2003). Mapping from ASTER stereo image data: DEM validation and accuracy assessment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57(5–6), 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huggel, C., Schneider, D., Miranda, P. J., Granados, H. D., & Kääb, A. (2008). Evaluation of ASTER and SRTM DEM data for lahar modeling: a case study on lahars from Popocatépetl Volcano, Mexico. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 170, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Indonesian Central Agency of Statistic (BPS) (2013). Government of North Sumatra. http://sumut.bps.go.id/ Cited June 08, 2015 (In Indonesian).
  22. Surono, Jousset, P., Pallister, J., Boichu, M., Buongiorno, M.F., Budisantoso, A., et al. (2012). The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano—A ‘100-year’ event. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 241–242, 121–135.Google Scholar
  23. Kornus, W., Alamús, R., Ruiz, A., & Talaya, J. (2006). DEM generation from SPOT-5 3-fold along track stereoscopic imagery using autocalibration. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 60, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kriswati, E., Agustan, Pamitro, Y., Hendrasto, & Trisakti, B. (2012). Volcano deformation analysis using ALOS PALSAR. In: Working Group 3, Report and Proceedings of ALOS Application and Verification Project in Indonesia 2nd edn. Google Scholar
  25. Marfai, M. A., & King, L. (2007). Monitoring land subsidence in Semarang, Indonesia. Environmental Geology, 53, 651–659. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0680-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mukherjee, S., Joshi, P. K., Ghosh, A., Garg, R. D., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2013). Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray, J. B. (1990). High-level magma transport at Mount Etna volcano, as deduced from ground deformation measurements. In M. P. Ryan (Ed.), magma transport and storage (pp. 357–383). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Pallister, J. S., Hoblitt, R. P., Crandell, D. R., & Mullineaux, D. R. (1992). Mount St. Helens a decade after the 1980 eruptions magmatic models, chemical cycles, and a revised hazard assessment. Bulletin of Volcanology, 54, 126–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pallister, J. S., Schneider, D. J., Griswold, J. P., Keeler, R. H., Burton, W. C., Noyles, C., et al. (2013). Merapi 2010 eruption—chronology and extrusion rates monitored with satellite radar and used in eruption forecasting. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 261, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prush, V. B., & Lohman, R. B. (2015). Time-Varying elevation change at the Centralia coal mine in Centralia, Washington (USA). Constrained with InSAR, ASTER, and Optical Imagery, Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 8(2), 919–925.Google Scholar
  31. Sambodo, K.A., & Soleh, M. (2011). Interferometric SAR phase unwrapping ALOS PALSAR data using least-squares algorithm two-dimensional phase unwapping. In: Proceedings of the national geomatics SAR (GEOSARNAS), Bogor 12–13 September 2011. (In Indonesian).Google Scholar
  32. Solikhin, A., Thouret, J. C., Gupta, A., Sayudi, D. S., Oehler, J. F., & Liew, S. C. (2015). Effects and behavior of pyroclastic and lahar deposits of the 2010 Merapi eruption based on high-resolution optical imagery. 3rd International Symposium on Earthquake and Disaster Mitigation. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 12, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens, N. F., Wadge, G., & Murray, J. B. (1999). Lava flow volume and morphology from digitized contour maps: a case study at Mount Etna, Sicily. Geomorphology, 28, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Su, J., & Bork, E. (2006). Influence of vegetation, slope, and LiDAR sampling angle on DEM accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72(11), 1265–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sutikno, S. (2007). Earthquake disaster of Yogyakarta and Central Java, and disaster reduction, Indonesia. Forum Geografic, 21(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  36. Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M., & Iwasaki, A. (2011). Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), IEEE, pp. 3657–3660. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6050017.
  37. Tadono, T., Takaku, J., Tsutsui, K., Oda, F., & Nagai, H. (2015). Status of ALOS World 3D (AW3D) global DSM generation. Geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), IEEE pp. 3822–3825.Google Scholar
  38. Toutin, T. H. (2010). Impact of RADARSAT-2 SAR ultrafine-mode parameters on stereo—radargrammetric DEMs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(10), 3816–3823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trisakti, B., & Julzarika, A. (2011). DEM generation from stereo ALOS PRIMS and its quality improvement. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, 8, 41–48.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, L., Chen, J., Zhang, H, & Chen, L. (2011). Difference analysis of SRTM C-band DEM and ASTER GDEM for global land cover mapping, In: 2011 international symposium on image and data fusion (ISIDF), Tengchong, Yunnan, 9–11 Aug. 2011, pp. 1–4, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J.Google Scholar
  41. Yulianto, F. (2014). Risk analysis of pyroclastic flows of the 2010 post-eruption of Merapi volcano using remotely sensed data and Geographic Information Systems. M.Sc. Thesis, IPB Graduate School, Bogor Agriculture University. (In Indonesian).Google Scholar
  42. Yulianto, F., Sofan, P., Khomarudin, M. R., & Haidar, M. (2013). Extracting the damaging effects of the 2010 eruption of Merapi volcano in Central Java, Indonesia. Natural Hazards, 66, 229–247. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0438-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yulianto, F., Sofan, P., Zubaidah, A., Sukowati, K. A. D., Pasaribu, J. M., & Khomarudin, M. R. (2015a). Detecting areas affected by flood using multi-temporal ALOS PALSAR remotely sensed data in Karawang, West Java, Indonesia. Natural Hazards, 77, 959–985. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1633-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yulianto, F., Tjahjono, B., & Anwar, S. (2015b). The applications of Monte Carlo algorithm and energy cone model to produce the probability of block-and-ash flows of the 2010 eruption of Merapi volcano in Central Java, Indonesia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8, 4717–4739. doi: 10.1007/s12517-014-1525-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Remote Sensing Application Center, Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN)JakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations