Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated GPR and ERT as Enhanced Detection for Subsurface Historical Structures Inside Babylonian Houses Site, Uruk City, Southern Iraq

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uruk archaeological site, which located in Al-Muthanna Governorate southern Iraq, was investigated by integrated geophysical methods, ground penetration radar (GPR) and electric resistivity tomography (ERT) to image the historical buried structures. The GPR images show large radar attributes characterized by its continuous reflections having different widths. GPR attributes at shallower depth are mainly representing the upper part of Babylonian Houses that can often be found throughout the study area. In addition, radargrams characterized objects such as buried items, buried trenches and pits which were mainly concentrated near the surface. The ERT results show the presence of several anomalies at different depths generally having low resistivities. It is clear that the first upper zone can be found throughout the whole area and it may represent the top zone of the Babylonian houses. This zone is characterized by its dry clay and sandy soil containing surface broken bricks and slag mixed with core boulders. The second one underneath the top shows a prominent lower resistivity zone. It is probably caused by the moisture content that reduces the resistivity. The thickness of this zone is not equal at all parts of the site. The third deeper zone typically represents the archaeological walls. Most of the main anomalies perhaps referred to the buried clay brick walls. The map of the archaeological anomalies distribution and 3D view of the foundations at the study area using GPR and ERT techniques clearly show the characteristics of the Babylonian remains. A contour map and 3D view of Uruk show that the archaeological anomalies are concentrated mainly at the NE part of the district with higher values of wall height that range between 6 and 8 m and reach to more than 10 m. At the other directions, there are fewer walls with lower heights of 4–6 m and reach in some places the wall foot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizebeokhai, A. P., (2010), 2D and 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging, Theory and field design, Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 5, 14p.

  • Al-Hashimi, H., (1974), Stratigraphy and palaeontology of the subsurface rocks of Samawa Area, SOM, Iraq.

  • Baker, H. D., (2002), The Urban landscape in first millennium BC Babylonia, University of Vienna.

  • Barker, R.D., (1992), A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface, First Break, Vol. 10, No. 2, 10p.

  • Beaulieu, P., (2003), The Pantheon of Uruk during the Neo-Babylonian period, 424p.

  • Buday, T., (1980), Regional geology of Iraq, Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography, GEOSURV, Baghdad, Iraq, Vol. 1, 445p.

  • Dahlin, T. and Zhou, B., (2004), A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with ten electrode arrays, Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 52, 20 p.

  • Fassbinder, J. and Becker, H., (2001), “Uruk-City of Gilgamesh (Iraq) First tests in 2001 for magnetic prospecting”, dans Becker, H., Fassbinder, J. W.E, Magnetic prospecting in Archaeological Sites, Vol. VI, 5p.

  • Fassbinder, J., Becker, H. and Van Ess, M. (2003), Prospections magnetiques a Uruk (Warka): La cite du roi Gilgamesh (Irak).

  • Hritz, C., (2012), History and Archaeology in Southern Mesopotamia, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University Basrah.

  • Loke, M.H. and Dahlin, T., (2002), A comparison of Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of applied geophysics, vol. 49, 19 p.

  • Loke, M.H., (2004), Tutorial: 2D and 3D electrical imaging surveys, 127p.

  • Loke, M.H., (2010), Tutorial: 2D and 3D electrical imaging surveys, 154p.

  • Oswin, J., (2009), A Field guide to geophysics in archaeology, Praxis Publishing, No 2009925774, Chic Ester, UK, 243p.

  • Pollock, S., Pope, M. and Course, Y., (1996), Household production at the Uruk Mound, Abu Salabikh, Iraq, American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 100, No. 4, 16p.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly grateful to Dr. Firas H. Al-Menshed and Dr. Ahmed S. Al-Zubedi for their sincere assistance in the field works. Thanks also extend to Dr. Ali Z. Al-Khashan for reading the manuscript of the present research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emad H. Al-Khersan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Khersan, E.H., Al-Ani, J.M.T. & Abrahem, S.N. Integrated GPR and ERT as Enhanced Detection for Subsurface Historical Structures Inside Babylonian Houses Site, Uruk City, Southern Iraq. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173, 963–982 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1162-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1162-2

Keywords

Navigation