Skip to main content
Log in

OSL Dating and GPR Mapping of Palaeotsunami Inundation: A 4000-Year History of Indian Ocean Tsunamis as recorded in Sri Lanka

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate and mitigate tsunami hazard, as long as possible records of inundations and dates of past events are needed. Coastal sediments deposited by tsunamis (tsunamites) can potentially provide this information. However, of the three key elements needed for reconstruction of palaeotsunamis (identification of sediments, dating and finding the inundation distance) the latter remains the most difficult. The existing methods for estimating the extent of a palaeotsunami inundation rely on extensive excavation, which is not always possible. Here, by analysing tsunamites from Sri Lanka identified using sedimentological and paleontological characteristics, we show that their internal dielectric properties differ significantly from surrounding sediments. The significant difference in the value of dielectric constant of the otherwise almost indistinguishable sediments is due to higher water content of tsunamites. The contrasts were found to be sharp and not to erode over thousands of years; they cause sizeable electromagnetic wave reflections from tsunamite sediments, which permit the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to trace their extent and morphology. In this study of the 2004 Boxing Day Indian Ocean tsunami, we use GPR in two locations in Sri Lanka to trace four identified major palaeotsunami deposits for at least 400 m inland (investigation inland was constrained by inaccessible security zones). The subsurface extent of tsunamites (not available without extensive excavation) provides a good proxy for inundation. The deposits were dated using the established method of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL). This dating, partly corroborated by available historical records and independent studies, contributes to the global picture of tsunami hazard in the Indian Ocean. The proposed method of combined GPR/OSL-based reconstruction of palaeotsunami deposits enables estimates of inundation, recurrence and, therefore, tsunami hazard for any sandy coast with identifiable tsunamite deposits. The method could be also used for anchoring and synchronizing chronologies of ancient civilisations adjacent to the ocean shores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, T., Goto, K., Sugawara, D. (2012), Relationship between the maximum extent of tsunamis and the inundation limit of the 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunami on the Sendai Plain, Japan, Sedimentary Geology, 282, 142–150.

  • Abeyratne, M., Jayasingha, P., Hewamanne, R., Mahawatta, P., and Pushparani, M.D.S. (2007), Thermo-luminescence dating of palaeo-tsunamis and/or large storm-laid sand deposits of small estuary in Kirinda, southern Sri Lanka. A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Session, Geological Society of Sri Lanka, p. 6.

  • Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri: Book VIII (Indica), (Kessinger Publishing Co, ISBN-10: 1419106783; ISBN-13: 978-1419106781, Whitefish, Montana, USA, 2004).

  • Blott, S.J. and Pye, K. (2001), Gradisat: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26, 1237–1248.

  • Bluszcz A., OSL Dating in Archaeology, in Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia (Eds. Scott E. M., Alekseev A. Y. and Zaitseva G), (Springer Netherlands 2006) pp. 137–149.

  • Bondevik, S., Svendsen, J.I., Johnsen, G., Mangerud, J., and Kaland, P.E. (1997), The Storegga tsunami along the Norwegian coast, its age and runup, Boreas, 26, 29–53.

  • Bondevik, S. (2008), Earth science: The sands of tsunami time, Nature, 455, 1183–1184.

  • Bos, A.J.J. and Wallinga, J. (2009), Analysis of the quartz OSL decay curves by differentiation, Radiation Measurements 44, 588–593.

  • Botha, G.A., Bristow, C.S., Porat, N., Duller, G.A.T., Armitage, S.J.,Roberts, H.M., Clarke, B.M., Kota, M.W., Schoeman, P. Evidence for dune reactivation from GPR profiles on the Maputaland coastal plain, South Africa, In: Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments, (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H.M.), (Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 2003), vol. 211, pp. 29–46.

  • Brill D., Brückner H., Jankaew K., Kelletat D., Scheffers, A and Scheffers S. (2011), Potential predecessors of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami Sedimentary evidence of extreme wave events at Ban Bang Sak, SW Thailand, Sedimentary Geology, 239, 146–161.

  • Brill D., Klasen N., Brückner H., Jankaew K., Scheffers, A., Kelletat D. and Scheffers S., (2012), OSL dating of tsunami deposits from Phra Thong Island, Thailand, Quaternary Geochronology, 10, 224–229.

  • Bristow, C.S., Ground penetrating radar in Aeolian dune sands. In., Ed. Ground Penetrating Radar: theory and applications. (ed. Jol, H.M) (Elsevier Science, 2009) pp. 273–297.

  • Bryant, E.A. and Nott, J. (2001), Geological indicators of large tsunami in Australia, Natural Hazards, 24, 231–249.

  • Byrne, D. E., L. R. Sykes, and D. M. Davis (1992), Great thrust earthquakes and aseismic slip along the plate boundary of the Makran Subduction Zone, J. Geophys. Res., 97(B1), 449–478.

  • Choi, B.H, Pelinovsky, E., Kim, K. O. and Lee, J.C. (2003), Simulation of the trans-oceanic tsunami propagation due to the 1883 Krakatau volcanic eruption. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 3, 321–332.

  • Choi, B.H, Min, B. I., Pelinovsky, E., Tsuji, Y. and Kim, K. O. (2012), Comparable analysis of the distribution functions of runup heights of the 1896, 1933 and 2011 Japanese Tsunamis in the Sanriku area Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 1463–1467.

  • Codrington, H.W., A Short History of Ceylon (Asian Educational Services, New Delhi Madras, 1994).

  • Dahanayake, K. and Kulasena N. (2008a), Geological evidence for Palaeo-Tsunami in Sri Lanka, Sci. Tsunami Hazards., 27, 54.

  • Dahanayake, K and Kulasena, N. (2008b), Recognition of diagnostic criteria for recent- and palaeo-tsunami sediments from Sri Lanka, Marine Geology, 254, 180–186.

  • Dawson, A.G., Shi, S., Dawson, S., Takahashi, T. and Shuto, N. (1996a), Coastal sedimentation associated with the June 2nd and 3rd, 1994 Tsunami in Rajegwesi, Java. Quaternary Science Reviews, 15, 901–912.

  • Dawson, S., Smith, D. E., Ruffman, A., and Shi, S. (1996b), The diatom biostratigraphy of tsunami sediments: Examples from recent and middle Holocene events, Phys. Chem. Earth, 21, 87–92.

  • Duller, G. A. T., Luminescence Dating: Guidelines on using luminescence dating in archaeology (English Heritage, Swindon 2008).

  • Engel M. and Brückner H., (2011), The identification of palaeo-tsunami deposits: a major challenge in coastal sedimentary research, Coastline Reports 17, 65–80.

  • Ezzy T. R., Huftile G. J. and Cox M. E. Applying ground penetrating radar (GPR) to improve hydrogeological understanding and groundwater modelling within a coastal plain setting, Tecnología de la intrusión de agua de mar en acuíferos costeros: países mediterráneos (IGME, Madrid 2003. ISBN 84-7840-470-8).

  • Fine I. V., Rabinovich, A. B. and Thomson, R. E. (2005), The dual source region for the 2004 Sumatra Tsunami, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L16602, doi:10.1029/2005GL023521.

  • Folk R L and Ward W C. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol. 27:3–26, 1957.

  • Fujino, S., Masuda, F., Tagomori, S., and Matsumoto, D., (2006), Structure and depositional processes of a gravelly tsunami deposit in a shallow marine setting: Lower Cretaceous Miyako Group, Japan, 1: Sedimentary Geology, 187, 127–138.

  • Goto, K., Chagué-Goff, C., Fujino, S., Goff, J.R., Jaffe, B.E., Nishimura, Y., Richmond, B.M., Sugawara, D., Szczuciński, W., Tappin, D.R., Witter, R.C., Yulianto, E., (2011), New insights of tsunami hazard from the 2011 Tohoku-oki event, Marine Geology 290 (1–4), 46–50.

  • Hardy S., R., The legends and theories of the Buddhists compared with history and science: with introductory notices of the life and system of Gothama Buddha, (Williams and Norgate, 14, Henrietta street, Covent garden. London, 1866).

  • Hashimoto, T, Koyanagi, A, Yokosaka, K., Hayashi, Y and Sotobayashi, T (1986), Thermoluminescence colour images from quartz of beach sands, Geochemical J. 20, 111–18.

  • Havholm, K.G., Bergstrom, N.D., Jol, H.M. and Running, G.L., GPR survey of a Holocene aeolian/fluvial/lacustrine succession, Lauder Sandhills, Manitoba, Canada. In Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H.M.). (The Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 211, 2003), pp. 47–54.

  • Heinz, J. and Aigner, T., Three-dimensional GPR analysis of various Quaternary gravel-bed braided river deposits (southwestern Germany). In Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow, C.S. and Jol, H. M.). (Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003, 211), pp 99–110.

  • Herath, J.W., The Economic Geology of Sri Lanka (Natural Resource Series No 1, NARESA Publication 1985).

  • Herath, M. M. J. W., Sri Lankan beach mineral sands (Geological Survey Publication. Sri Lanka, 1988).

  • Hettiarachchi, S.S.L. and Samarawickrama, S.P. (2005), Experience of the Indian Ocean Tsunami on the Sri Lankan coast. International Symposium on Disaster Reduction on Coasts, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Hindson, R.A. and Andrade, C. (1999), Sedimentation and hydrodynamic processes associated with the tsunami generated by the 1755 Lisbon earthquake, Quaternary International, 56, 27–38.

  • Huntley, D.J. and Clague, J.J. (1996), Optical dating of tsunami-laid sands, Quaternary Research, 46, 127–140.

  • Jackson K.L., Eberli, G.P., Amelung, F., McFadden, M.A., Moore A.L., Rankey, E.C. and Jayasena H. A. H., (2014), Holocene Indian Ocean tsunami history in Sri Lanka, Geology 42 (10), 859–862.

  • Jaffe, B., Gelfenbaum, G., Rubin, D., Peters, R., Anima, R., Swensson, M., Olcese, D. Bernales L., Gomez, J., and Riega, P. (2003), Tsunami Deposits: Identification and Interpretation of Tsunami Deposits from the June 23, 2001 Peru Tsunami, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Coastal Sediments 2003, CD-ROM Published by World Scientific Publishing Corp and East Meets West Productions, Corpus Christi, TX, USA. ISBN 981-238-422-7.

  • Jaffe, B. E. and Gelfenbaum, G. (2007), A simple model for calculating tsunami flow speed from tsunami deposits. Sedimentary Geology, 200, 347–361.

  • Jankaew K., Atwater B.F., Sawai Y., Choowong M., Charoentitirat, T., Martin, M.E. and Prendergast, A. (2008), Medieval forewarning of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Thailand, Nature, 455, 1228–1231.

  • Jol H. M., Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (Elsevier, 2008).

  • Jol H. M., and Bristow C. S., GPR in sediments: Advice on data collection, basic processing and interpretation, a good practice guide, in Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments (eds. Bristow C. S., and Jol H. M.,), (Geol. Soc. London, 2003), pp. 9–27.

  • Kato, Y., and M. Kimura (1983), Age and origin of so-called “Tsunami-ishi”, Ishigaki island, Okinawa prefecture, J. Geol. Soc. Japan, 89, 471–474.

  • Katupotha J. and Fujiwara, K. (1988), Holocene sea level change on the southwest and south coasts of Sri Lanka, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 68, 189–203.

  • Korycansky, D.G. and Lynett, P.J. (2007), Runup from impact tsunami, Geophysical Journal International, 170, 1076–1088.

  • Koster, B., Hadler, H., Vött, A. and Reicherter, K. (2013), Application of GPR for visualising spatial distribution and internal structures of tsunami depositsCase studies from Spain and Greece, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplementary Issues, 57(4), 29–45.

  • Koster B., Hoffmann G., Grützner C. and Reicherter, K. (2014), Ground penetrating radar facies of inferred tsunami deposits on the shores of the Arabian Sea (Northern Indian Ocean), Marine Geology 351(2014) 13–24.

  • Le Roux, J.P. and Vargas, G. (2005), Hydraulic behaviour of tsunami backflows: insights from their modern and ancient deposits, Environmental Geology, 49, 65–75.

  • Le Roux, J.P. and Vargas, G. (2007), Structure and depositional processes of a gravelly tsunami deposit in a shallow marine setting: Lower Cretaceous Miyako Group, Japandiscussion, Sedimentary Geology, 201, 485–487.

  • Mätzler C. and Murk A., Complex dielectric constant of dry sand in the 0.1 to 2 GHz range (Research Report No. 2010-06-MW, Institute of Applied Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland, 2010).

  • Meyers, R. A., Smith, D. G., Jol, H. M. and Peterson, C. D. (1996), Evidence for eight great earthquake-subsidence events detected with ground-penetrating radar, Willapa barrier, Washington. Geology, 24, 99–102.

  • Monecke, K., Finger, W., Klarer, D., Kongko, W., Mcadoo, B.G., Moore, A.L. and Sudrajat, S.U. (2008), A 1,000-year sediment record of tsunami recurrence in northern Sumatra. Nature, 455, 1232–1234.

  • Moore, A.L. (2000), Landward fining in onshore gravel as evidence for a late Pleistocene tsunami on Molokai, Hawaii, Geology, 28, 247–250.

  • Moore, A.L., McAdoo, B.G., and Ruffman, A. (2007), Landward fining from multiple sources in a sand sheet deposited by the 1929 Grand Banks tsunami, Newfoundland: Sedimentary Geology, 200, 336–346.

  • Morton, R.A., Gelfenbaum, G., and Jaffe, B.E. (2007), Physical criteria for distinguishing sandy tsunami and storm deposits using modem examples: Sedimentary Geology, 200, 184–207.

  • Morton, R.A., Goff, J.R., and Nichol, S.L. (2008), Hydrodynamic implications of textural trends in sand deposits of the 2004 tsunami in Sri Lanka, Sedimentary Geology, 207, 56–64.

  • Murray, A, S. and Wintle, A G. (2000), Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol, Radiation Measurements 32, 57–73.

  • Pelinovsky E., Choi B.H., Stromkov A., Didenkulova I., and Kim H.-S. (2005), Analysis of Tide-Gauge Records of the 1883 Krakatau Tsunami, In Tsunamis (ed. K.Satake), (Springer, Netherlands), pp. 57–78.

  • Peters, R., Jaffe, B., and Gelfenbaum, G. (2007), Distribution and sedimentary characteristics of tsunami deposits along the Cascadia margin of western North America, Sedimentary Geology, 200, 372–386.

  • Pratt, B.R. and Bordonaro, O.L. (2007), Tsunamis in a stormy sea: Middle Cambrian inner-shelf limestones of Western Argentina, Journal of Sedimentary Research, 77, 256–262.

  • Premasiri H. M. R., Identification of palaeotsunami deposits using ground penetrating radar, sedimentological and micropaleontological techniques; implications for Sri Lankan tsunami hazard (Ph.D. Thesis, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK, 2012) 284 pp.

  • Prendergast A. L., Cupper, M. L., Jankaew K. and Sawai, Y. (2012), Indian Ocean tsunami recurrence from optical dating of tsunami sand sheets in Thailand, Marine Geology, 295–298.

  • Ranasinghage, P.N., Holocene coastal development in southeastern-eastern Sri Lanka: Paleodepositional environments and paleo-coastal hazards (Ph.D. thesis, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 2010, 437 pp.).

  • Ruiz, F., Abad, M., Vidal, J.R., Caceres, L.M., Gonzalez-Regalado, M.L., Carretero, M.I., Pozo, M., and Toscano, F.G. (2008), The geological record of the oldest historical tsunamis in southwestern Spain, Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 114, 145–154.

  • Smith, D.E., Shi, S., Cullingford, R.A., Dawson, A.G., Dawson, S., Firth, C.R., Foster, I.D.L., Fretwell, P.T., Haggart, B.A., Holloway, L.K., and Long, D. (2004), The Holocene Storegga slide Tsunami in the United Kingdom, Quaternary Science Reviews, 23, 2291–2321.

  • Soulsby, R., Smith, D., and Ruffman, A., Reconstructing Tsunami Runup from Sedimentary Characteristics—A Simple Mathematical Model, In Coastal Sediments (eds. Kraus, N.C. and Rosati, J.D.) (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007), pp.1075-1088.

  • Spiske, M., Piepenbreier, J., Benavente, C. and Bahlburg, H. (2013), Preservation potential of tsunami deposits on arid siliciclastic coasts, Earth-Science Reviews 11, 126, 58–73.

  • Styles, P., Shrira, V. and Premasiri H. M. R. (2007), Sumatra tsunami signature in sediment characteristics on the Sri Lankan coast, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 9, 05310, SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU2007-A-05310.

  • Styles, P., Environmental Geophysics, (ISBN: 978-90-73834-33-0, EAGE Publications bv., 2011).

  • Sumangala, H, The Mahawamsa, first thirty-six chapters (Godage Brothers Colombo 1996),

  • Suraweera, A. V., A comprehensive account of the Kings of Sri Lanka (Rathmalana, Colombo 2000).

  • Switzer, A.D., Bristow, C.S., and Jones, B.G. (2006), Investigation of large-scale washover of a small barrier system on the southeast Australian coast using ground penetrating radar. Sedimentary Geology, 183, 145–156.

  • Syvitski, J. P. M., (ed)., Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis (Cambridge University Press 1991).

  • Tamura, T., Murakami, F., Nanayama, F., Watanabe, K., Saito, Y. (2008), Ground-penetrating radar profiles of Holocene raised-beach deposits in the Kujukuri strand plain, Pacific coast of eastern Japan, Marine Geology, 248, 11–27.

  • Wagner, J. F. and Chanchai, S. (2011), Grain-Size and Thin Section Characteristics of Tsunami Sediments from Thai-Andaman Coast, Thailand. In The Tsunami Threat—Research and Technology (ed. Nils-Axel Marner, ISBN: 978-953-307-552-5). http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/13086.pdf.

  • Wagner J.-F. and Srisutam C. (2011), Grain-Size and Thin Section Characteristics of Tsunami Sediments from Thai-Andaman Coast, Thailand. The Tsunami Threat—Research and Technology, Nils-Axel Marner (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-552-5, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/thetsunami-threat-research-and-technology/grain-size-and-thin-section-characteristics-of-tsunami-sedimentsfrom-thai-andaman-coast-thailand.

  • Wallinga, J. (2002), Optically stimulated luminescence dating of fluvial deposits: a review. Boreas 31, 303–322.

  • Wattegama, C., (2005), The Seven Tsunamis That Hit The Isle of Lanka, WWW Virtual Library—Sri Lanka, http://www.lankalibrary.com/news/tsunamis2.htm.

  • Weiss, R., (2008), Sediment grains moved by passing tsunami waves: Tsunami deposits in deep water, Marine Geology, 250, 251–257.

  • Wijetunga W. M., (2008), The Present Status of the Home gardens in Galle District of Sri Lanka Affected by the December 26, 2004 Tsunami: A Comparison with Non-affected Home gardens in Connection with Restoration, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna.

  • Witter, R.C., Kelsey, H.M. and Hemphill-Haley, E. (2001), Pacific storms, El Nino and tsunamis: Competing mechanisms for sand deposition in a coastal marsh, Euchre Creek, Oregon, Journal of Coastal Research, 17, 563–583.

  • Woodroffe, S.A. and Horton, B.P. (2005), Holocene sea-level changes in the Indo-Pacific, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 25, 29–43.

  • Woodward, J., Ashworth, P.J., Best, J.L., Sambrook Smith, G.H. and Simpson, C.J., The use and application of GPR in sandy fluvial environments: methodological considerations, In Ground penetrating radar in sediments.(eds. C.S. Bristow and H.M. Jol) (Geological Society, London, Special Publications 211, 2003), pp. 127–142.

  • Yan, Z. and Tang, D. (2008), Changes in Suspended Sediments Associated with 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, Advances in Space Research 43, 89–95.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for the thorough reading of the manuscript and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Styles.

Appendix: GPR Processing Sequence

Appendix: GPR Processing Sequence

The following processing sequence was applied to the Sri Lankan GPR data:

  1. 1.

    Zero adjust (static shift)—during a GPR survey, the first waveform to arrive at the receiver is the air wave., which is delayed due to propagation in the connecting cables. We, therefore, need associate zero-time with zero-depth, so that any time offset due to instrument recording is removed before interpretation of the radar image. This is done individually for each radar section but in this survey was typically about 7 ns.

  2. 2.

    Background removal—background noise is present due to ringing in the antennae, producing a coherent banding effect across the radar section. We sum all the amplitudes of simultaneous reflections along a profile and divide by the number of traces to give a composite signal, which is an average of all background noise which is then subtracted from the data.

  3. 3.

    Gain—gain compensates for amplitude variations in the GPR image as early signal arrival times have greater amplitude than later arrival times because of geometric spreading and intrinsic attenuation. Time-variable gain functions are to equalize the amplitudes of the recorded signals constant along the trace. We have used an inverse amplitude decay gain, which compensates for both geometric spreading and attenuation simultaneously in conjunction with automatic gain control, which balances the signal amplitudes and emphasizes more subtle features.

  4. 4.

    Frequency filtering—GPR data are collected with source and receiver antennae of specified dominant frequency, however, the recorded signals include a band of frequencies wider than this specific frequency. Frequency filtering removes undesirable higher and/or lower frequencies to produce a more interpretable GPR image. This is called band-pass filtering and in this survey a pass band was selected interactively for each section but typically this covered a range of 0.1–3.0 GHz.

  5. 5.

    Deconvolution—the recorded radar signal is the interaction between the layered earth and its reflecting horizons which depend on electromagnetic contrast (which is what we require) and the radar source function, which is generated by reflection at each interface and adds to the final recorded signal. Deconvolution is the inverse filtering operation that attempts to remove the effects of the source wavelet to better interpret GPR profiles as images of the earth structure. There many different deconvolution methodologies but the one, which we have used, is known as sparse deconvolution (i.e. the Earth has mostly zero reflectivity with a few ‘sparse’ strong reflectors) with a Blackman–Harris (a sum of weighted shifted sinc functions) window.

  6. 6.

    Median filter—this enhances the continuity of reflector signals by replacing each value by the 5 × 5 median of the values around it.

  7. 7.

    Depth conversion—the radar sections are converted from time to depth using the velocities determined experimentally in the laboratory and the depth correlation established in the field.

  8. 8.

    Colour scale—finally, an appropriate colour scale and set of brightness values is chosen to produce a good interpretable radar section. This is a subjective process but can make significant improvements in clarity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Premasiri, R., Styles, P., Shrira, V. et al. OSL Dating and GPR Mapping of Palaeotsunami Inundation: A 4000-Year History of Indian Ocean Tsunamis as recorded in Sri Lanka. Pure Appl. Geophys. 172, 3357–3384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1128-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1128-4

Keywords

Navigation