Volume, Surface, Connectivity and Size Distribution of Soil Pore Space in CT Images: Comparison of Samples at Different Depths from Nearby Natural and Tillage Areas


The study of soil structure, i.e., the pores, is of vital importance in different fields of science and technology. Total pore volume (porosity), pore surface, pore connectivity and pore size distribution are some (probably the most important) of the geometric measurements of pore space. The technology of X-ray computed tomography allows us to obtain 3D images of the inside of a soil sample enabling study of the pores without disturbing the samples. In this work we performed a set of geometrical measures, some of them from mathematical morphology, to assess and quantify any possible difference that tillage may have caused on the soil. We compared samples from tilled soil with samples from a soil with natural vegetation taken in a very close area. Our results show that the main differences between these two groups of samples are total surface area and pore connectivity per unit pore volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6


  1. Brewer, R. 1964 Fabric and mineral analysis of soils. John Wiley and Sons.

  2. Brye, K.R., and A.L. Pirani. 2005 Native soil quality and the effects of tillage in the grand prairie region of eastern Arkansas. Am. Midl. Nat. 154, 28–41. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2005)154[0028:NSQATE]2.0.CO;2.

  3. Chun, H.C., D. Giménez, and S.W. Yoon. 2008 Morphology, lacunarity and entropy of intra-aggregate pores: Aggregate size and soil management effects. Geoderma 146, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.05.018.

  4. Dathe, A., Tarquis, A.M., and Perrier, E. 2006 Multifractal analysis of the pore-and solid-phases in binary two-dimensional images of natural porous structures. Geoderma 134(3), 318–326.

  5. Dexter, A.R. 1988 Advances in characterization of soil structure. Soil Till. Res. 11, 199–238.

  6. Gale, W.J., Cambardella, C.A. 2000 Carbon dynamics of surface residue and root-derived organic matter under simulated no-till. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 190–195.

  7. Gantzer, C.J., Anderson, S.H. 2002 Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds. Soil Till. Res. 64, 101–111.

  8. Gibson, J.R., Lin, H., Bruns, M.A. 2006 A comparison of fractal analytical methods on 2- and 3-dimensional computed tomographic scans of soil aggregates. Geoderma 134, 335–348.

  9. Glasbey, C. A. and Horgan, G. W. 1995 Image Analysis for Biological Sciences. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester, England.

  10. Iassonov, P., Gebrenegus, T., and Tuller, M. 2009 Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures. Water Resources Research 45(9).

  11. INIA. 1977 El Encín, suelo y clima. INIA-MAPA, Madrid, 213 pp.

  12. Kravchenko, A.N., Wang, W., Smucker, A.J.M., Rivers, M.L. 2011 Long-term differences in tillage and land use affect intra-aggregate pore heterogeneity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75, 1658–1666.

  13. Lal, R. 2002 Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ. Pollut. 116, 353–362.

  14. Michielsen, K., De Raedt, H. 2001 Integral-geometry morphological image analysis. Physics Reports 347(6), 461–538.

  15. Nunan, N., Ritz, K., Rivers, M., Feeney, D.S., Young, I.M. 2006 Investigating microbial micro-habitat structure using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma 133, 398–407.

  16. Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckman, F., Donath, T., Fisher, J., Smucker, A.J.M. 2008 Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore space features using synchrotron radiation-based microtomography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72, 897–907.

  17. Posadas, A.N.D., Giménez, D., Quiroz, R., Protz, R. 2003 Multi-fractal characterization of soil pore systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 1361–1369.

  18. Revil, A., Cathles, L.M. 1999 Permeability of shaly sands. Water Resour. Res. 35, 651–662.

  19. Rasband, W. S. 1997 ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

  20. Saucier, A., Muller, J. 1999 Textural analysis of disordered materials with multifractals. Physica A 267, 221–238.

  21. San José Martínez. F., M.A. Martín, F.J. Caniego, M. Tuller, A. Guber, Y. Pachepsky, C. García-Gutiérrez. 2010 Multifractal analysis of discretized X-ray CT images for the characterization of soil macropore structures. Geoderma 156, 32–42.

  22. San José Martínez, F., F.J. Muñoz, F.J. Caniego, F. Peregrina. 2013 Morphological Functions to Quantify Three-Dimensional Tomograms of Macropore Structure in a Vineyard Soil with Two Different Management Regimes. Vadose Zone J. 12(3).

  23. Serra, J. 1982 Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press Inc. Orlando, Florida, USA.

  24. Six, J., Paustian, K., Elliott, E.T., Combrink, C. 2000 Soil structure and organic matter. I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate associated carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64(2), 681–689.

  25. Soil Survey Staff. 2010 Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

  26. Vogel, H. J. 2002 Topological characterization of porous media. In Morphology of condensed matter (pp. 75–92). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  27. Wang, W., Kravchenko, A.N., Smucker, A.J.M, Rivers, M.L. 2012 Intra-aggregate pore characteristics: X-ray computed microtomography analysis. Soil Sci. Soc Am J 76, 1159–1171.

  28. Young, I.M. and Crawford, J.W. 2004 Interactions and self-organization in the soil–microbe complex. Science 304(5677).

Download references


This research work was partially funded by Spain’s Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (I + D + I) under ref. AGL2011-25175.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Muñoz-Ortega.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz-Ortega, F.J., San José Martínez, F. & Caniego Monreal, F.J. Volume, Surface, Connectivity and Size Distribution of Soil Pore Space in CT Images: Comparison of Samples at Different Depths from Nearby Natural and Tillage Areas. Pure Appl. Geophys. 172, 167–179 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0897-5

Download citation


  • Pore Size Distribution
  • Pore Surface
  • Mathematical Morphology
  • Morphological Transformation
  • Specific Pore