Abstract
Since its formulation in 1967–1970, the classical ω −2 model of earthquake source spectrum awaits a consistent theoretical foundation. To obtain one, stochastic elements are incorporated both into the final structure of the fault and into the mode of rupture propagation. The main components of the proposed “doubly stochastic” model are: (1) the Andrews’s concept, that local stress drop over a fault is a random self-similar field; (2) the concept of rupture with running slip pulse, after Heaton; (3) the hypothesis that a rupture front is a tortuous, multiply connected (“lacy”) fractal polyline that occupies a strip of finite width close to the slip-pulse width; and (4) the assumption that the propagation distance of fault-guided, mostly Rayleigh waves from a failing spot on a fault is determined by the slip-pulse width. Waveforms produced by this model are determined based on the fault asperity failure model after Das and Kostrov. Properties of the model are studied by numerical experiments. At high frequency, simulated source spectra behave as ω −2, and acceleration spectra are flat. Their level, at a given seismic moment and rms stress drop, is inversely related to the relative width of the slip pulse. When this width is relatively low, a well-defined second corner frequency (lower cutoff of acceleration spectrum) is seen. The model shows clear dependence of propagation-related directivity on frequency. Between the first and the second corner frequency, amplitude spectra are strongly enhanced for the forward direction; whereas, above the second corner frequency, directivity is significantly reduced. Still, it is not inhibited totally, suggesting incomplete incoherence of the simulated radiator at high frequencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki, K. (1967). Scaling law of seismic spectrum. J. Geophys. Res., 72, 1217–1231.
Andrews, D. J. (1980). A stochastic fault model. 1. Static Case. J. Geophys. Res., 78, p. 3867–3877.
Archuleta, R. J. (1984) A faulting model for the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 559–4585.
Ben-Zion, Y., and Sammis, C.G. (2003) Characterization of Fault Zones Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 677–715.
Beresnev, I., and G. Atkinson (2002). Source parameters of earthquakes in eastern and western North America based on finite-fault modeling, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 92, 695–710.
Bernard, P. and A. Herrero (1994): Slip heterogeneity, body-wave spectra, and directivity of earthquake ruptures, Ann. Geofis., XXXVII (6), 1679–1690.
Boatwright, J. (1982) A dynamic model for far-field acceleration. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 72 1049–1068.
Boatwright, J. (1988) The seismic radiation from composite models of faulting, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 78, 489–508.
Boatwright, J. (2007) The persistence of directivity in small earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 97, 1850–1861, doi:10.1785/0120050228.
Boatwright, J. and Choy, G.L. (1989) Acceleration spectra for subduction-zone earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res, 94, 15541–15553.
Boore, D. M. and W. B. Joyner (1978). The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 68, 283–300.
Brune, J. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997–5009.
Das, S., and B.V. Kostrov. (1983). Breaking of a single asperity: rupture process and seismic radiation, J. Geophys. Res, 88, 4277–4288.
Das, S., and B.V. Kostrov. (1986). Fracture of a single asperity on a finite fault: a model for weak earthquakes? In: Earthquake Source Mechanics. Washington, Am. Geophys. Union. 91–96.
Das, S., and Kostrov, B. V. (1988), An investigation of the complexity of the earthquake source time function using dynamic faulting models, J. Geophys Res, 93(B7), 8035–8050.
Day, S. (1982). Three dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of non-uniform pre-stress. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 72, 1881–1902.
Day, S. M., Gonzalez, S. H., Anooshehpoor, R., and Brune, J. N. (2008), Scale-model and numerical simulations of near-fault seismic directivity, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 98, 1186–1206. doi:10.1785/0120070190.
Di Toro, G., R. Han, T. Hirose, N. De Paola, S. Nielsen, K. Mizoguchi, F. Ferri, M. Cocco, & T. Shimamoto (2011) Fault lubrication during earthquakes, Nature, 471, 494–98, doi:10.1038/nature09838.
Gusev, A. A. (1983). Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion, Geophys J R Astr Soc, 74, 787–808.
Gusev, A. A. (1988). A model of earthquake source with multitude of asperities. Vulkanol. Seismol, #1, 41–55 (in Russian).
Gusev, A.A. (1989). Multiasperity fault model and the nature of short-period subsources, Pure Appl. Geophys, 130, 635–660.
Gusev, A.A. (1992) On relations between asperity population and earthquake population on a fault. Tectonophysics, 211, 85–98.
Gusev, A.A. (1996) Peak factors of Mexican accelerograms: evidence of non-Gaussian amplitude distribution. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 20083–20090.
Gusev, A.A. (2011a) Broadband kinematic stochastic simulation of an earthquake source: a refined procedure for application in seismic hazard studies. Pure Appl. Geophys. 168, 155–200. doi:10.1007/s00024-010-0156-3.
Gusev, A.A. (2011b) Statistics of the Values of a Normalized Slip in the Points of an Earthquake Fault. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 47, 176–185. [Original Russian Text: Fizika Zemli, 2011, No. 3, 24–33].
Gusev, A.A. (2013a) High-frequency radiation from an earthquake fault: a review and a hypothesis of fractal rupture front geometry. Pure Appl. Geophys. 170, 65–93. doi:10.1007/s00024-012-0455-y.
Gusev, A.A. (2013b) Fractal earthquake source with slip zone generates acceleration time histories with flat spectra. Doklady Earth Sciences, Vol. 448, Part 2, pp. 211–213. [original in Russian: DAN, 2013, 448, 465–467].
Gusev, A.A., and I.R. Abybakirov. (1996). Simulated envelopes of non-isotropically scattered body waves as compared to observed ones: another manifestation of fractal heterogeneity, Geophys. J. Int. 127: 49–60, 1996.
Halldorsson, B., and Papageorgiou, A. S. (2005) Calibration of the specific barrier model to earthquakes of different tectonic regions, Bull Seism Soc Am, 95, 1276–1300. doi:10.1785/0120040157.
Hanks, T. C., and R. K. McGuire. (1981). The character of high frequency strong ground motion, Bull Seism. Soc Am, 71, 2071–2095.
Haskell, N. A. (1964). Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults, Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 54, 1811–1841.
Haskell, N. A., (1966), Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. II. A stochastic fault model. Bull Seism Soc Am, 56, 125–140.
Heaton, T. H., (1990). Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 64, 1–20.
Herrero, A., and P. Bernard, (1994). A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes, Bull Seism. Soc Am, 84, 1216–1228.
Kostrov, B. V. (1975). Mechanics of the source of a tectonic earthquake. (Nauka Moscow) (in Russian).
Koyama, J., Izutani, Y. (1990) Seismic excitation and directivity of short-period body waves from a stochastic fault model. Tectonophysics, 175, 67–79.
Lay, T. and H. Kanamori (1981). An asperity model of large earthquake sequences, in: Earthquake Prediction–An International Review, Maurice Ewing Series, vol. 4, D. Simpson and P.G. Richards, Editors; AGU, Washington D.C, pp 579–592.
Mai, P.M., and G.C. Beroza (2002). A spatial random-field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 107 (B11), 2308, doi:10.1029/2001JB000588.
Oglesby, D.D. and S. M. Day (2002) Stochastic fault stress: implications for fault dynamics and ground motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer 92, 3006–3021.
Papageorgiou, A. S., and K. Aki, (1983). A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of the strong ground motion, I: Description of the model, Bull Seism. Soc Am, 73, 693–722.
Shearer, P.M. (1999) Introduction to Seismology, Cambridge University Press, 260 pp.
Silver, P. (1983) Retrieval of source-extent parameters and the interpretation of corner frequency. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 73,#6A, 1499–1511.
Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R.W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson (1997). Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 199–222.
Somerville, P., K. Irikura, R. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong motion, Seism. Res. Lett. 70, 59–80.
Spudich, P. and E. Cranswick, (1984) Direct observation of rupture propagation during the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake using a short baseline accelerometer array. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 74, 2083–2114.
Tsai, C. -C. P. (1997). Ground motion modeling for seismic hazard analysis in the near-source regime: an asperity model, Pure Appl. Geophys, 149, 265–297.
Acknowledgments
Discussions with V.I. Osaulenko and G.M. Molchan were highly valuable. Comments of anonymous reviewers and of the Invited Editor helped to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gusev, A.A. Doubly Stochastic Earthquake Source Model: “Omega-Square” Spectrum and Low High-Frequency Directivity Revealed by Numerical Experiments. Pure Appl. Geophys. 171, 2581–2599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0764-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0764-9