Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 170, Issue 12, pp 2173–2183 | Cite as

Power-Law Testing for Fault Attributes Distributions

  • Dmitry KolyukhinEmail author
  • Anita Torabi
Article

Abstract

This paper is devoted to statistical analysis of faults’ attributes. The distributions of lengths, widths of damage zones, displacements and thicknesses of fault cores are studied. Truncated power-law (TPL) is considered in comparison with commonly used simple power-law (PL) (or Pareto) distribution. The maximal likelihood and the confidence interval of the exponent for both PL and TPL are estimated by appropriate statistical methods. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test and the likelihood ratio test with alternative non-nested hypothesis for exponential distribution are used to verify the statistical approximation. Furthermore, the advantage of TPL is proved by Bayesian information criterion. Our results suggest that a TPL is more suitable for describing fault attributes, and that its condition is satisfied for a wide range of fault scales. We propose that using truncated power laws in general might eliminate or relax the bias related to sampling strategy and the resolution of measurements (such as censoring, truncation, and cut effect) and; therefore, the most reliable range of data can be considered for the statistical approximation of fault attributes.

Keywords

Faults power-law distribution likelihood ratio test non-nested hypotheses Bayesian information criterion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support from Statoil-VISTA, and research cooperation between the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and Statoil to the first author is acknowledged. His research was carried out as part of the Impact of Fault Envelope Architecture on Reservoir Fluid Flow Project at the Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research (CIPR), Uni Research. We are grateful to Jan Tveranger for his comments on the earlier version of the manuscript. The second author is grateful to CIPR, centre of excellence and the Research Council of Norway for supporting her research.

References

  1. Ackermann, R.V., Schlische, R.W., Withjack, M.O. (2001), The geometrical and statistical evolution of normal fault systems: an experimental study of the effects of mechanical layer thickness on scaling laws. J. Struct. Geol., 23, 1803–1819.Google Scholar
  2. Bastesen, E., Braathen, A. (2010), Extensional fault cores in fine grained carbonates, analysis of fault core lithology and thickness-displacement relationships, J. Struct. Geol., 32, 1609–1628.Google Scholar
  3. Beach, A., Welbon, A.I., Brockbank, P.J., McCallum, J.E. (1999), Reservoir damage around faults: outcrop examples from the Suez Rift, Petroleum Geoscience, 5, 109–116.Google Scholar
  4. Bonnet E., Bour O., Odling N. E., Davy P., Main I., Cowie P. and Berkowitz B. (2001), Scaling of fracture systems in geological media, Rev. Geophys., 39(3), 347–383.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, J.A., Trudgill, B. D., Mansfield, C. S. (1995), Fault growth by segment linkage: an explanation for scatter in maximum displacement and trace length data from the Canyonlands Grabens of SE Utah. J. Struct. Geol., 17(9), 1319–1326.Google Scholar
  6. Childs, C., Manzocchi, T., Walsh, J.J., Bonson, C.G., Nicol, A., Schöpfer, M.P.J. (2009), A geometric model of fault zone and fault rock thickness variations, J. Struct. Geol., 31, 117–127.Google Scholar
  7. Clark R.M., Cox S.J.D. and Laslett G.M. (1999), Generalizations of power-law distributions applicable to sampled fault-trace lengths: model choice, parameter estimation and caveats. Geophys. J. Int., 136, 357–372.Google Scholar
  8. Clauset A., Shalizi C. R. and Newman M. E. J. (2009), Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661–703, doi: 10.1137/070710111.Google Scholar
  9. Cowie, P. A., Sornette, D., Vanneste, C. (1995), Multifractal scaling properties of a growing fault population. Geophys. J. Int., 122, 457–469.Google Scholar
  10. Cowie, P.A., Malinverno, A., Ryan, W.B.F., Edwards, M.H. (1994), Quantitative fault studies on the East Pacific Rise: a comparison of sonar imaging techniques. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (B8), 15205–15218.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, K., Burbank, D. W., Fisher, D., Wallaces, S., Nobes, D. (2005), Thrust-fault growth and segment linkage in the active Ostler fault zone, New Zealand. J. Struct. Geol., 27, 1528–1546.Google Scholar
  12. Davy, P., Sornette, A., Sornette, D. (1990), Some consequences of a proposed fractal nature of continental faulting. Nature, 348, 56–58.Google Scholar
  13. Efron B., Tibshirani R., An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1993).Google Scholar
  14. Fossen H., Rørnes A. (1996), Properties of fault populations in the Gullfaks Field, northern North Sea. J. Struct. Geol., 18(2/3), 179–190.Google Scholar
  15. Fossen, H., Schultz, R.A., Shipton, Z.K., Mair, K. (2007), Deformation bands in sandstone, a review. J. Geolo. Soc., 164, 755–769.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, D. (1976), Energy balance and deformation mechanisms of thrust sheets. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A., 283, 289–312.Google Scholar
  17. Gillespie, P.A., Walsh, J.J., Watterson, J. (1992), Limitations of dimension and displacement data from single faults and the consequences for data analysis and interpretation. J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1157–1172.Google Scholar
  18. Girón, F. Javier; Moreno, Elías; Casella, George (2007), Objective Bayesian analysis of multiple changepoints for linear models. Bayesian statistics, 8, 227252, Oxford Sci. Publ., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Gross, M. R., Gutierrez-Alonso, G., Bai, T., Wacker, M. A., Collinsworth, K. B., Behl, R. J. (1997), Influence of mechanical stratigraphy and kinematics on fault scaling relations. J. Struct. Geol., 19(2), 171–183.Google Scholar
  20. Kolyukhin, D., and A. Torabi (2012), Statistical analysis of the relationships between faults attributes. J. Geophys. Res., 117, B05406, doi: 10.1029/2011JB008880.
  21. Lai T.L. (1995), Sequential changepoint detection in quality control and dynamical systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 57, 613–658.Google Scholar
  22. Manly B.F.J., Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (2nd ed.) (London: Chapman and Hall, 1997).Google Scholar
  23. Main I. G., Leonard T., Papasouliotis O., Hatton C. G., Meredith P. G. (1999), One slope or two? Detecting statistically significant breaks of slope in geophysical data, with application to fracture scaling relationships, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26(18), 2801–2804.Google Scholar
  24. McMillan, R.A. (1975), The Orientation and Sense of Displacement of Strike-slip Faults in Continental Crust [Bachelor’s thesis]: Ottawa, Ontario, Carleton University.Google Scholar
  25. Page R. (1968), Aftershocks and microaftershocks of the great Alaska earthquake of 1964, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58(3), 1131–1168.Google Scholar
  26. Ouillon, G., Castaing, C., Sornette, D. (1996), Hierarchical geometry of faulting. J. Geophys. Res., 101 (B3), 5477–5487.Google Scholar
  27. Peacock, D. C. P., Sanderson, D. J. (1991), Displacement and segment linkage and relay ramps in normal fault zones, J. Struct. Geol., 13, 721–733.Google Scholar
  28. Pickering, G., Bull, J.M., Sanderson. D.J. (1995), Sampling power-law distributions. Tectonophysics, 248, 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Ruzhich, V. V. (1977), Relations between fault parameters and practical application of them. In: Mekhanizmy Structur Vostochnochnoi sibiri Novisbirsk Nanka (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Schlische, R.W., Young, S.S., Ackermann, R.V., Gupta, A. (1996), Geometry and scalingrelations of a population of very small rift: related normal faults. Geology, 24, 683–686.Google Scholar
  31. Sperrevik, S., Gillespie, P.A., Fisher, Q.J., Halverson, T., Knipe, R.J. (2002), Empirical estimation of fault rock properties. In: Koestler, A.G., Hunsdale, R. (Eds.), Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification. NPF Special Publication, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 11, 109–125.Google Scholar
  32. Soliva, R., Schultz, R.A. (2008), Distributed and localized faulting in extensional settings: insights from the North Ethiopian Rift-Afar transition area. Tectonics 27, TC2003. Google Scholar
  33. Sornette, A., Davy, P., Sornette, D. (1993), Fault growth in brittle-ductile experiments and mechanics of continental collision. J. Geophys. Res., 98 (B7), 12111–12137.Google Scholar
  34. Schwarz G. (1978), Estimating the dimension of a model. The Ann. Stat., 6(2), 461–464.Google Scholar
  35. Torabi A., Berg S. S. (2011), Scaling of fault attributes: A review, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28, 1444–1460.Google Scholar
  36. Turcotte, D. L. (1997), Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 222 p.Google Scholar
  37. Tveranger, J., et al. (2008), Final report on fault facies I project, report, 191 pp., Cent. for Integrated Pet. Res., Unifob Pet., Univ. of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  38. Villemin, T., and C. Sunwoo (1987), Distribution logarithmique selfsimilairedes rejets et longueurs de failles: Example du Bassin Houiller Lorrain, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. II, 305, 1309–1312.Google Scholar
  39. Vuong Q.H. (1989), Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.Google Scholar
  40. Wibberley, C. A. J., G. Yielding, and G. D. Toro (2008), Recent advances in the understanding of fault zone internal structure, a review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 299, 5–33.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkins, S. J., Gross, M. R. (2002), Normal fault growth in layered rocks at Split Mountain, Utah: influence of mechanical stratigraphy on dip linkage, fault restriction and fault scaling, J. Struct. Geol., 24, 1413–1429.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uni CIPRBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations