Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 169, Issue 10, pp 1909–1920 | Cite as

Simulations of Severe Tropical Cyclone Nargis over the Bay of Bengal Using RIMES Operational System

Article

Abstract

The Regional Integrated Multi-Hazard Early Warning System (RIMES), an international, intergovernmental organization based in Thailand is engaged in disaster risk reduction over the Asia–Pacific region through early warning information. In this paper, RIMES’ customized Weather Research Forecast (WRF) model has been used to evaluate the simulations of cyclone Nargis which hit Myanmar on 2 May 2008, the most deadly severe weather event in the history of Myanmar. The model covers a domain of 35ºE to 145ºE in the east—west direction and 12ºS to 40ºN in the north—south direction in order to cover Asia and east Africa with a resolution of 9 km in the horizontal and 28 vertical levels. The initial and boundary conditions for the simulations were provided by the National Center for Environmental Prediction-Global Forecast System (NCEP-GFS) available at 1º lon/lat resolution. An attempt is being made to critically evaluate the simulation of cyclone Nargis by seven set of simulations in terms of track, intensity and landfall time of the cyclone. The seven sets of model simulations were initialized every 12 h starting from 0000 UTC 28 April to 01 May 2008. Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) precipitation (mm) is used to evaluate the performance of the simulations of heavy rainfall associated with the tropical cyclone. The track and intensity of the simulated cyclone are compared by making use of Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) data sets. The results indicate that the landfall time, the distribution and intensity of the rainfall, pressure and wind field are well simulated as compared with the JTWC estimates. The average landfall track error for all seven simulations was 64 km with an average time error of about 5 h. The average intensity error of central pressure in all the simulations were found out to be approximately 6 hPa more than the JTWC estimates and in the case of wind, the simulations under predicted it by an average of 12 m s−1.

Keywords

Cyclone Nargis model simulation track intensity landfall 

References

  1. Bengtson, L. (2001). Hurricane threats. Science. 293, 440–441.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaskar rao, D.V., and Prasad, D.H. (2007). Sensitivity of tropical cyclone intensification to boundary layer and convective process. Natural Hazard 41, 429–445.Google Scholar
  3. Bhaskar rao, D.V., Prasad, D.H., and Srinivas, D. (2009). Impact of horizontal resolution and the advantages of the nested domains approach in the prediction of tropical cyclone intensification and movement. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D11106. doi:10.1029/2008JD011623
  4. Braun S.A., Tao, W.K. (2000). Sensitivity of high resolution simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations. Mon. Weather Rev. 128, 3941–3961.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, W.Y.Y., and Steenbyrgh, W.J. (2005). Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by WRF and ETA models over the Western United States. Weather Forecast. 20, 812–821.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, F., and Dudhia J. (2001). Coupling an advanced land-surface/hydrology model with the Penn State NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part-I: model description and implementation. Mon Wea. Rev. 129, 569–585.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, C.A., Bosart, L.F. (2001). Numerical simulations of the genesis of Hurricane Diana (1984). Part I: Control simulation. Mon. Weather Rev. 129, 1859–1881.Google Scholar
  8. Dudhia, J. (1989). Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 3077–3177.Google Scholar
  9. Dudhia, J. (2004). The weather research and forecasting model (version 2.0) 2nd International workshop on next generation NWP model. Yonsei University Seoul, Koria, 19–23.Google Scholar
  10. Emanuel, K. (2007). Environmental factors affecting tropical cyclone power dissipation. J. Clim. 20, 5497–5509.Google Scholar
  11. Emanuel, K.A. (2005). Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436, 686–688.Google Scholar
  12. Janjic, Z.I. (1994). The step-mountain eta coordinate model: further developments of the convection, viscous sub-layer and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 122, 927–945.Google Scholar
  13. Janjic, Z.I. (2000). Comments on development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 3686.Google Scholar
  14. India Meteorological Department (2008). Report on cyclonic disturbances over North Indian Ocean during 2008, 108 pp (http://www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmc.pdf).
  15. Kain, J.S., and Fritsch, J.M. (1993). Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain-Fritsch scheme, the representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, K.A. Emanual and D.J. Raymond, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 246 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Mandal, M., Mohanty, U.C., and Raman, S. (2004). A study on the impact of parameterization of physical processes on prediction of tropical cyclone over the Bay of Bengal with NCAR/PSU mesoscale model. Nat. Hazard. 31, 391–414.Google Scholar
  17. Michalakes, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D.O., Henderson, T., Klemp, J., Skamarock, W.C., and Wand, W. (2005). The Weather Research and Forecast Model: Software Architecture and Performance, 11th Workshop on high performance computing in meteorology, World Scientific, 156–168.Google Scholar
  18. Mohanty, U.C., Mandal, M., and Raman, S. (2004). Simulation of Orissa super cyclone (1999) using PSU/NCAR mesoscale model. Nat. Hazard. 31, 373–390.Google Scholar
  19. Patra, P.K., Santhanam, M.S., Potty, K.V.J., Tewari, M and Rao, P.L.S. (2000). Simulation of tropical cyclones using regional weather prediction models. Curr. Sci. 79(1), 70–78.Google Scholar
  20. Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., Dudhia, J. Gill, D.O., Barker, D.M., Wang, W., and Powers, J.G. (2005). A description of the advanced research WRF Version 2, NCAR Technical Note TN-468 + ST, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Sousonis, P.J., Hutchinson, T.A., and Marshall, S.F. (2004). A comparison of MM5, WRF, RUC, ETA performance for Great Plains heavy precipitation event during the spring of 2003. 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, vol. J24.6, American Meteorological Society, Seattle.Google Scholar
  22. Sujatha, P., and Mohanty, U.C. (2008). A comparative study on prediction of MM5 and WRF models in simulation of tropical cyclones over Indian seas. Curr. Sci. 95(7), 923–936.Google Scholar
  23. Tenerelli, J.E. and Chen, S.S. (2001). High resolution simulation of Hurricane Floyd (1999) using MM5 with vertex following mesh refinements, Preprint, 18th Conference on Weather analysis and Forecasting/14th Conference on numerical weather prediction 30 July-2 August Ft-Lauderdale, Florida, AMS, J54–J56.Google Scholar
  24. Webster, P.J. (2008). Myanmar’s deadly daffodil. Nat. Geosci. doi: 10.1038/ngeo257.
  25. Wmo (2010) WMO/ESCAPE panel on tropical cyclones. Report on 37th session World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  26. Yang, M.-J., Ching, L. (2005). A modeling study of Typhoon Toraji 2001: Physical parameterization sensitivity and topographic effect. Terr. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. 16, 177–213.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. V. S. Raju
    • 1
  • Jayaraman Potty
    • 1
  • U. C. Mohanty
    • 2
  1. 1.Regional Integrated Multi-Hazard Early Warning System (RIMES)Asian Institute of Technology CampusPathumthaniThailand
  2. 2.Centre for Atmospheric SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations