Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insights into the Crustal Structure and Geodynamic Evolution of the Southern Granulite Terrain, India, from Isostatic Considerations

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Southern Granulite Terrain of India, formed through an ancient continental collision and uplift of the earth’s surface, was accompanied by thickening of the crust. Once the active tectonism ceased, the buoyancy of these deep crustal roots must have supported the Nilgiri and Palani-Cardamom hills. Here, the gravity field has been utilized to provide new constraints on how the force of buoyancy maintains the state of isostasy in the Southern Granulite Terrain. Isostatic calculations show that the seismically derived crustal thickness of 43–44 km in the Southern Granulite Terrain is on average 7–8 km more than that required to isostatically balance the present-day topography. This difference cannot be solely explained applying a constant shift in the mean sea level crustal thickness of 32 km. The isostatic analysis thus indicates that the current topography of the Southern Granulite Terrain is overcompensated, and about 1.0 km of the topographic load must have been eroded from this region without any isostatic readjustment. The observed gravity anomaly, an order of magnitude lower than that expected (−125 mGal), however, shows that there is no such overcompensation. Thermal perturbations up to Pan-African, present-day high mantle heat flow and low Te together negate the possible resistance of the lithosphere to rebound in response to erosional unloading. To isostatically compensate the crustal root, compatible to seismic Moho, a band of high density (2,930 kg m−3) in the lower crust and low density (3,210 kg m−3) in the lithospheric mantle below the Southern Granulite Terrain is needed. A relatively denser crust due to two distinct episodes of metamorphic phase transitions at 2.5 Ga and 550 Ma and highly mobilized upper mantle during Pan-African thermal perturbation reduced significantly the root buoyancy that kept the crust pulled downward in response to the eroded topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhishek Rai, Gaur, V.K., Rai, S.S., and Priestley, K. (2009), Seismic signatures of the Pan-African orogeny: implications for southern Indian high-grade terranes, Geophys. J. Internat. 176, 518–528, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03965.x.

  • Anil Kumar, Charan, S.N., Gopalan, K., and MacDougall, J.D. (1998), A long lived enriched mantle source for two Proterozoic carbonatite complexes from Tamil Nadu Southern India, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 62, 515–523.

  • Bartlett, J.M., Harris, N.B.W., Hawkesworth, C.J., and Santosh, M. (1995), New isotope constraints on the crustal evolution of South India and Pan-African granulite metamorphism, Geolog. Soc. India Memoir 34, 391–397.

  • Bhaskar Rao, Y.J., Chetty, T.R.K., Janardhan, A.S., and Gopalan, K. (1996), Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr ages and P-T history of the Archean Sittampundi and Bhavani layered meta-anorthosite complex in Cauvery shear zone, south India: evidence for Neoproterozoic reworking of Archean crust, Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology 125, 237–250.

  • Burov, E., and Diament, M. (1996), Isostasy, equivalent elastic thickness, and inelastic rheology of continents and oceans, Geology 24(5), 419–422.

  • Carrion, D., Niraj Kumar, Barzaghi, R., Singh, A.P., and Singh, B. (2009), Gravity and geoid estimate in South India and their comparison with EGM2008, Newton’s Bulletin 4, 275–283.

  • Chapin, D.A. (1996), A deterministic approach toward isostatic gravity residuals—a case study from South America, Geophysics 61, 1022–1033.

  • Chapman, M.E., and Bordine, J.H. (1979), Considerations of the indirect effect in marine gravity modelling, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 3889–3892.

  • Chetty, T.R.K., and Bhaskar Rao, Y.J. (2006), The Cauvery shear zone, Southern Granulite Terrain, India: a crustal-scale flower structure, Gondwana Res. 10, 77–85.

  • Chetty, T.R.K., Fitzsimons, I.C.W., Brown, L.D., Dimri, V.P., and Santosh, M. (Eds.), Crustal structure and tectonic evolution of the Southern Granulite Terrain, India (Gondwana Research 10, Elsevier’s Publication, The Netherlands 2006).

  • Christensen, N.I., and Mooney, W.D. (1995), Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 9761–9788.

  • Dewey, J.F., and Burke, K.C.A. (1973), Tibetan, Variscan and Precambrian basement reactivation: products of continental collision, J. Geology 81, 683–692.

  • Drury, S.A., Harris, N.B.W., Holt, R.W., Reeves-Smith, G.J., and Wightman, R.T. (1984), Precambrian tectonics and crustal evolution in south India, J. Geology 92, 3–20.

  • Ebbing, J., Braitenberg, C., and Wienecke, S. (2007), Insights into the lithospheric structure and tectonic setting of the Barents Sea region from isostatic considerations, Geophys. J. Internat. 171, 1390–1403, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03602.x.

  • Fischer, K.M. (2002), Waning buoyancy in the crustal roots of old mountains, Nature 417, 933–835.

  • Fountain, D.M., and Salisbury, M.H. (1981), Exposed cross-sections through the continental crust: implications for crustal structure, petrology, and evolution, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 56, 263–277.

  • Ghosh, J.G., de Wit, M.J., and Zartman, R.E. (2004), Age and tectonic evolution of Neoproterozoic ductile shear zone in the Southern Granulite Terrain of India, with implications for Gondwana studies, Tectonics 23, TC3600, 1–38.

  • GMSI (2006), Gravity Map Series of India 2006 on 1: 2,000,000 scale with 5 mGal contour interval. A joint publication of Geological Survey of India and National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.

  • Götze, H-J., Meurers, B., Schmidt, S., and Steinhauser, P. (1991), On the isostatic state of Eastern Alps and the Central Andes; a statistical comparison. In: Andean Magmatism and its Tectonic Settings (Eds. Harmon, R.S. and Rapela, C.W.) (Geological Society of America Special Paper 265, Boulder, CO 1991), pp 279–290.

  • Gratton, J. (1989), Crustal shortening, root spreading, isostasy, and growth of orogenic belts: a dimensional analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 15627–15634.

  • GSI (1998), Geological Map of India on 1:2,000,000 scale, Geological Survey of India Publication, Kolkata, India.

  • Gupta, S., and Rai, S.S. (2005), Structure and evolution of South Indian crust using teleseismic waveform inversion, Himalayan Geology 26, 109–123.

  • Gupta, S., Rai, S.S., Prakasam, K.S., Srinagesh, D., Chadha, R.K., Priestley, K., and Gaur, V.K. (2003), The nature of the crust in southern India: implications for Precambrian crustal evolution, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1-1–1-4.

  • Hackney, R. (2004), Gravity anomalies, crustal structure and isostasy associated with the Proterozoic Capricorn Orogen, Western Australia, Precamb. Res. 128, 219–236.

  • Harley, S.L. (1998), On the occurrence and characterization of ultrahigh-temperature crustal metamorphism. In What derives metamorphism and metamorphic reactions? (Eds. Treloar, P.J., and O’Brien, P.J.) Geological Society of London Special Publication 138, pp. 81–107.

  • Hinze, W.J., Aiken, C., Brozena, J., Coakley, B., Dater, D., Flanagan, G., Forsberg, R., Hildenbrand, Th., Keller, G.R., Kellogg, J., Kucks, R., Li, X., Mainville, A., Morin, R., Pilkington, M., Plouff, D., Ravat, D., Roman, D., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Véronneau, M., Webring, M., and Winester, D. (2005), New standards for reducing gravity data: the North American gravity database, Geophysics 70, J25–J32, doi: 10.1190/1.1988183.

  • Jagadeesh, S., and Rai, S.S. (2008), Thickness, composition, and evolution of the Indian Precambrian crust inferred from broadband seismological measurements, Precamb. Res. 162(1-2), 4–15.

  • Kaila, K.L., Roy Chowdhury, K., Reddy, P.R., Krishna, V.G., Hari Narain, Subbotin, S.I., Sollogub, V.B., Chekunov, A.V., Kharetchko, G.E., Lazarenko, M.A., and Ilchenko, T.V. (1979), Crustal structure along Kavali-Udipi profile in the Indian peninsular shield from deep seismic sounding, J. Geolog. Soc. India 20, 307–333.

  • Kaila, K.L., Murty, P.R.K., Rao, V.K., and Kharetchko, G.E. (1981), Crustal structure from deep seismic soundings along the Koyna II (Kelsi-Loni) profile in the Deccan Trap area, India, Tectonophysics 73, 365–384.

  • Krishna Brahmam, N. (1993), Gravity in relation to crustal structure, Palaeo-sutures and seismicity of Southern India (South of the 16th parallel), Geolog. Soc. India Memoir 25, 165–201.

  • Kröner, A., and Brown, L., (2005), Structure, composition and evolution of the South Indian and Sri Lankan granulite terrains from deep seismic profiling and other geophysical and geological investigations: a LEGENDS Initiative, Gondwana Research 8, 317–335.

  • Leaman, D.E. (1998), The gravity terrain correction—practical considerations, Exploration Geophysics 29, 467–471.

  • Leech, M.L. (2001), Arrested orogenic development: eclogitization, delamination, and tectonic collapse, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 185, 149–159.

  • Martinec, Z. (1994), The density contrast at the Mohorovičić discontinuity, Geophys. J. Internat. 117, 539–544.

  • Menke, W. (1999), Crustal Isostasy indicates anomalous densities beneath Iceland, Geophysical Research Letters 26(9), 1215–1218.

  • Mishra, D.C., Laxman, G., and Arora, K. (2004), Large-wavelength gravity anomalies over the Indian continent: indicators of lithospheric flexure and uplift and subsidence of Indian peninsular shield related to isostasy, Current Science 86, 861–867.

  • Morelli, C.G., Gantar, G., Honkasalo, T., McConnell, R.K., Tanner, J.G., Szabo, B., Uotila, U., and Whalen, C.T. (1974), The International Standardization Net 1971, International Association of Geodesy Special Publication 4, pp. 194.

  • Moritz, H. (1980), Geodetic Reference System 1980, J. Geodesy 54, 395–405.

  • Munt, I.J., Fernàndez, M., Vergés, J., and Platt, J.P. (2008), Lithosphere structure underneath the Tibetan Plateau inferred from elevation, gravity and geoid anomalies, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 267, 276–289.

  • Naqvi, S.M. (1973), Geological structure and aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies in the central part of the Chitradurga schist belt, Mysore, India, Geolog. Soc. Am. Bull. 84, 1721–1732.

  • Niraj Kumar, Singh, A.P., and Singh, B. (2009), Structural fabric of the southern Indian shield as defined by gravity trends, J. Asian Earth Sci. 34, 577–585.

  • Pandey, O.P., and Agrawal, P.K. (1999), Lithospheric mantle deformation beneath the Indian craton, J. Geology 107, 683–692.

  • Pathak, A., Ravi Kumar, M., and Sarkar, D. (2006), Seismic structure of Sri Lanka using receiver function analysis: a comparison with other high-grade Gondwana terrains, Gondwana Res. 10, 198–202.

  • Prakash Kumar, Yuan, X., Ravi Kumar, M., Kind, R., Li, X., and Chadha, R.K. (2007), The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate, Nature 449, doi:10.1038/nature06214, 894–897.

  • Parker, R.L. (1972), The rapid calculation of potential anomalies, Geophys. J R. Astron. Soc. 31, 447–455.

  • Prasad, B.R., Rao, G.K., Mall, D.M., Rao, P.K., Raju, S., Reddy, M.S., Rao, G.S.P., Sridhar, R., and Prasad, A.S.S.S.R.S. (2007), Tectonic implications of seismic reflectivity pattern observed over the Precambrian Southern Granulite Terrain, India, Precamb. Res. 153 (1–2), 1–10.

  • Qureshy, M.N. (1971), Relation of gravity to elevation and rejuvenation of blocks in India, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 545–557.

  • Qureshy, M.N. (1981), Gravity anomalies, isostasy and crust mantle relations in the Deccan Trap and contiguous regions, India, Geolog. Soc. India Memoir 3, 184–197.

  • Radhakrishna, B.P. (1969), Geomorphological approach to the charnockite problem, J. Geolog. Soc. India 9, 67–74.

  • Radhakrishna, B.P. (1993), Neogene uplift and geomorphic rejuvenation of Indian peninsula, Current Science 64, 787–793.

  • Radhakrishna, T., Maluski, H., Mitchell, J.G., and Joseph, M. (1999), 40 Ar- 39 Ar and K/Ar geochronology of the dykes from the south Indian granulite terrain, Tectonophysics, 304, 109–129.

  • Rajesh, R.S., and Mishra, D.C. (2004), Lithospheric thickness and mechanical strength of the Indian shield, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 225, 319–328.

  • Ramachandran, C. (1992), P-wave velocity in granulites from south India: implications for the continental crust, Tectonophysics 201, 187–198.

  • Ramakrishnan, M. (Ed.), Tectonics of Southern Granulite Terrain: Kuppam-Palani Geotransect. (Geological Society of India Memoir 50, Geological Society of India Publication, Bangalore 2003).

  • Rambabu, H.V. (1997), Average crustal density of the Indian lithosphere - an inference from gravity anomalies and deep seismic soundings, J. Geodyn. 23(1), 1–4.

  • Rao, V.V., and Prasad, B.R. (2006), Structure and evolution of the Cauvery Shear Zone system, Southern Granulite Terrain, India: evidence from deep seismic and other geophysical studies, Gondwana Res. 10, 29–40.

  • Rao, V.V., Sain, K., Reddy, P.R., and Mooney, W.D. (2006), Crustal structure and tectonics of the northern part of the Southern Granulite terrane, India, Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 251, 90–103.

  • Ravi Kumar, M., Saul, J., Sarkar, D., and Kind, R. (2001), Crustal structure of the Indian shield: new constraints from teleseismic receiver functions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1339–1342.

  • Ray, L., Kumar, P.S., Reddy, G.K., Roy, S., Rao, G.V., Srinivasan, R., and Rao, R.U.M. (2003), High mantle heat flow in a Precambrian granulite province: evidence from southern India, J. Geophys. Res. 108 (B2), 2084, doi:10.1029/2001JB000688.

  • Reddy, P.R., Chandrakala, K., and Sridhar, A.R. (2000), Crustal velocity structure of the Dharwar craton, India, J. Geolog. Soc. India 55, 381–386.

  • Reddy, P.R., Prasad, B.R., Rao, V.V., Sain, K., Rao, P.P., Khare, P., and Reddy, M.S. (2003), Deep seismic reflection and refraction/wide-angle reflection studies along Kuppam-Palani transect in the Southern Granulite Terrane of India, Geolog. Soc. India Memoir 50, 79–106.

  • Rudnick, R.L., and Fountain, D.M. (1995), Nature and composition of the continental crust: a lower crustal perspective, Rev. Geophys. 33, 267–309.

  • Sajeev, K., Windley, B.F., Connolly, J.A.D., and Kon, Y. (2009), Retrogressed eclogite (20 kbar, 1020°C) from the Neoproterozoic Palghat–Cauvery suture zone, southern India, Precamb. Res. 171, 23–36.

  • Santosh, M., Maruyama, S., and Sato, K. (2009), Anatomy of a Cambrian suture in Gondwana: Pacific-type orogeny in Southern India? Gondwana Res., doi:10.1016/j.gr.2008.12.012.

  • Sarkar, D., Chandrakala, K., Devi, P.P., Sridhar, A.R., Sain, K., and Reddy, P.R. (2001), Crustal velocity structure of western Dharwar craton, South India, J. Geodyn. 31, 227–241.

  • Shimpo, M., Tsunogae, T., and Santosh, M. (2006), First report of garnet-corundum rocks from southern India: implications for prograde high-pressure (eclogite-facies?) metamorphism, Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter. 242, 111–129.

  • Simpson, R.W., Jachens, R.C., Blakely, R.J., and Saltus, R.W. (1986), A new isostatic residual gravity map of the conterminous United States with a discussion on the significance of isostatic residual anomalies, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 8348–8372.

  • Singh, A.P., Mishra, D.C., Vijaya Kumar, V., and Rao, M.B.S.V. (2003), Gravity-magnetic signature and crustal architecture along Kuppam-Palani geotransect, South India, Geolog. Soc. India Memoir 50, 139–163.

  • Singh, A.P., Niraj Kumar, and Singh, B. (2006), Nature of the crust along Kuppam-Palani geotransect (South India) from gravity studies: implications for Precambrian continental collision and delamination, Gondwana Res. 10, 41–47.

  • Srinagesh, D., and Rai, S.S. (1996), Teleseismic tomographic evidence for contrasting crust and upper mantle in south Indian Archean terrains, Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter. 97, 27–41.

  • Stephen, J., Singh, S.B., and Yedekar, D.B. (2003), Elastic thickness and isostatic coherence anisotropy in the South Indian Peninsular Shield and its applications, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(16), 1853, doi: 10.1029/2003GL01686, SDE 8 -1–4.

  • Subba Rao, D.V. (1996), Resolving Bouguer anomalies in continents—a new approach, Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3543–3546.

  • Subrahmanyam, C., and Verma, R.K. (1980), The nature of free-air, Bouguer and isostatic anomalies in southern peninsular India, Tectonophysics 69, 147–162.

  • Subrahmanyam, C., and Verma, R.K. (1986), Gravity field, structure and tectonics of the Eastern Ghats, Tectonophysics 126, 195–212.

  • Thakur, N.K., and Nagarajan, N. (1992), Geotectonic remobilisation of the lower-crustal segment of southern peninsular India, Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter. 73, 153–162.

  • Thomas, M.D., Ancient collisional continental margins in the Canadian shield: geophysical signatures and derived crustal transects. In Basement Tectonics 8: Characterization and comparison of Ancient and Mesozoic continental Margins (Eds. Bartholomew, M.J., Hyndman, D.W., Mogk, D.W. and Mason, M.) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1992) pp. 5–25.

  • Turcotte, D., and Schubert, G., Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems (John Wiley & Sons, Ney York 1982).

  • Valdia, K.S. (1998), Late Quaternary movements and landscape rejuvenation in southern Karnataka and adjoining Tamil Nadu in Southern Indian Shield, J. Geolog. Soc. India 51, 139–166.

  • Watts, A.B., Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001).

  • Woollard, G.P. (1959), Crustal Structure form gravity and seismic measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 64, 1521–1544.

  • Woollard, G.P. (1970), Evolution of the isostatic mechanism and role of mineralogic transformations from seismic and gravity data, Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter. 3, 484–498.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director, NGRI, Hyderabad, for his encouragement and permission to publish this work. Thanks are also due to Prof. W. Jacoby, Dr M.R.K. Prabhakar Rao and two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions, which improved the manuscript considerably. A part of the data collected under Grant-in-aid Projects, supported by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Geophysical Research Institute (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research), Uppal Road, Hyderabad, 500007, India

    Niraj Kumar, A. P. Singh & B. Singh

Authors
  1. Niraj Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. P. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. P. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Singh, A.P. & Singh, B. Insights into the Crustal Structure and Geodynamic Evolution of the Southern Granulite Terrain, India, from Isostatic Considerations. Pure Appl. Geophys. 168, 1781–1798 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0210-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0210-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation