Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 167, Issue 12, pp 1549–1559 | Cite as

Correlation of Geoelectric Data with Aquifer Parameters to Delineate the Groundwater Potential of Hard rock Terrain in Central Uganda

  • A. G. BatteEmail author
  • E. Barifaijo
  • J. M. Kiberu
  • W. Kawule
  • A. Muwanga
  • M. Owor
  • J. Kisekulo
Article

Abstract

Knowledge of aquifer parameters is essential for management of groundwater resources. Conventionally, these parameters are estimated through pumping tests carried out on water wells. This paper presents a study that was conducted in three villages (Tumba, Kabazi, and Ndaiga) of Nakasongola District, central Uganda to investigate the hydrogeological characteristics of the basement aquifers. Our objective was to correlate surface resistivity data with aquifer properties in order to reveal the groundwater potential in the district. Existing electrical resistivity and borehole data from 20 villages in Nakasongola District were used to correlate the aquifer apparent resistivity (ρ e) with its hydraulic conductivity (K e), and aquifer transverse resistance (TR) with its transmissivity (T e). K e was found to be related to ρ e by; \( {\text{Log }}(K_{\text{e}} ) = - 0.002\rho_{\text{e}} + 2.692 \). Similarly, TR was found to be related to T by; \( {\text{TR}} = - 0.07T_{\text{e}} + 2260 \). Using these expressions, aquifer parameters (T c and K c) were extrapolated from measurements obtained from surface resistivity surveys. Our results show very low resistivities for the presumed water-bearing aquifer zones, possibly because of deteriorating quality of the groundwater and their packing and grain size. Drilling at the preferred VES spots was conducted before the pumping tests to reveal the aquifer characteristics. Aquifer parameters (T o and K o) as obtained from pumping tests gave values (29,424.7 m2/day, 374.3 m/day), (9,801.1 m2/day, 437.0 m/day), (31,852.4 m2/day, 392.9 m/day). The estimated aquifer parameter (T c and K c) when extrapolated from surface geoelectrical data gave (7,142.9 m2/day, 381.9 m/day), (28,200.0 m2/day, 463.4 m/day), (19,428.6 m2/day, 459.2 m/day) for Tumba, Kabazi, and Ndaiga villages, respectively. Interestingly, the similarity between the K c and K o pairs was not significantly different. We observed no significant relationships between the T c and T o pairs. The root mean square errors were estimated to be 18,159 m2/day and 41.4 m/day.

Keywords

Basement complex transverse resistance hydraulic conductivity groundwater electrical resistivity methods Uganda 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to extend their sincere gratitude to Action Against Hunger (ACF) for funding this research.

References

  1. Ako, B. D., and Olorunfemi M. O. (1989), Geoelectric survey for groundwater in the Newer Basalts of Vom Plateau State, Nig. J. Min. Geol. 25, 247–450.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, H. O., and Whiteley, R. J. (1981), Gravity exploration for groundwater in the Bara Basin, Sudan, Geoexpl. 19, 127–141.Google Scholar
  3. Arafin, M. S. (1988), Geophysical Investigation of the hydrogeology of Perlis. Unpub. Ph.D. thesis. University of Science Malaysia.Google Scholar
  4. Arafin, M. S., and Lee, C. Y. (1987), Application of resistivity and induced polarization methods in locating karstic aquifers in Perlis. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Groundwater Environ, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  5. Ballukraya, P. N. (2001), Hydrogeophysical investiagtions in namagiripettai area, Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu. J. Geol. Soc. India. 58, 239–249.Google Scholar
  6. Batte, A. G., Muwanga, A., Sigrist P. W., and Owor, M. (2008), Vertical electrical sounding as an exploration technique to improve on the certainty of groundwater yield in the fractured crystalline basement aquifers of eastern Uganda, Hydrogeol J. 16, 1683–1693.Google Scholar
  7. Biella, G., Lojez, A., and Tabacco, I. (1983), Experimental study of some of hydrogeophysical properties of unconsolidated media, Groundwater. 21, 741–751.Google Scholar
  8. Boerner, F. D., Schopper, J. R., and Wller, A. (1996), Evaluation of transport and storage properties in the soil and groundwater zone from induced polarisation measurements, Geophys. 44, 583–601.Google Scholar
  9. Brace, W. F. (1977), Permeability from resistivity and pore shape, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 23, 334–339.Google Scholar
  10. Bussian, A. E. (1983), Electrical conductance in porous medium, J. Geophys. 48, 1258–1268.Google Scholar
  11. Charukalas. B., and Tamblyn, W. L. (1987), Exploration and development of the shallow quaternary aquifer for irrigation in northern Thailand, In: Proc Int Conf Groundwater Environ, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, J., Hubbard, S., and Rubin Y. (2001), Estimating hydraulic conductivity at the south oyster site from geophysical tomographic data using bayesian techniques based on the normal linear regression model, Water. Resour. Res. 37, 6, 1603–1613.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, N. B., and Sorensen, K. I. (1998), Surface and borehole electric and electromagnetic methods for hydrogeological investigations. European J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 3, 75–90.Google Scholar
  14. De Lima, O. A. L., Clennell, M. B., Nery, G. G., and Niwas, S. (2005), A volumetric approach for the resistivity response of freshwater shaly sandstones, Geophys. 70 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. Denahan, B. J., and Smith, D. L. (1984), Electrical resistivity investigation of potential cavities underlying a proposed ash disposal area, Environ. Geol. 6, p. 45–49.Google Scholar
  16. Ekine, A. S., Osobonye, G. T. (1996), Surface Geoelectric sounding for the determination of Aquifer characteristics in parts of Bonny local government area of River State, Nig. J. Phys. 85, 93–97.Google Scholar
  17. FELS Consultants Ltd (2003) Hydrogeological Surveys/Siting and drilling supervision report for deep wells in the Sub counties of Kakooge, Nakitoma, Kalungi, Kalongo and Nabiswera. Unpub data.Google Scholar
  18. Fitts, C. R. (2002), Groundwater Science (Elsevier, The Netherlands) 167–175.Google Scholar
  19. Flathe, H. (1954), Possibilities and limitations in applying geoelectrical methods to hydrogeological problems in the coastal areas of north-west Germany, Geophys. Prosp. 3, 95–110.Google Scholar
  20. Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A. (1979), Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  21. Frohlich, R. K., and Kelly, W. E. (1987), Estimates of specific yield with the geoelectric resistivity method in glacial aquifers, J. Hydrol. 97, 33–44.Google Scholar
  22. Geissler, P. E. (1989), Seismic reflection profiling for groundwater studies in Victoria, Australia, Geophys. 54, 31–37.Google Scholar
  23. Gupta, R. N., Narenda, P., Guha, S., and Ramakrishna, A. (2000), Geophysical resistivity investigation in parts of Ganjam District, Orissa. In: Proc. of Seminar, Groundwater Resources of Orissa for 2020, Central Ground Water Board, BBSR, Orissa. 51–60.Google Scholar
  24. Heigold, P. C., Gilkeson, R. H., Cartwright, K., and Reid, P. C. (1979), Aquifer transmissivity from surficial electrical methods, Groundwater. 17, 330–345.Google Scholar
  25. Hubbard, S., and Rubin, Y. (2002), Hydrogeophysics: state-of-the-discipline, EOS, 83, 51, 602, 606.Google Scholar
  26. Huntley, D. (1986), Relations between permeability and electrical resistivity in granular aquifers, Groundwater. 24, 466–474.Google Scholar
  27. Ioannis F. L, Filippos I. L., and Alexia G. (2002), Exploring for favorable groundwater conditions in hard rock environments by resistivity imaging methods: synthetic simulation approach and case study example, Int. Conf. Earth Sci. Electron. 1–14.Google Scholar
  28. Jakosky, J. N. (1950), Exploration Geophysics: Los Angeles, Trija, 1,195 p.Google Scholar
  29. Jupp, D. L. B. and Vozo, K. (1975), Stable iteration method for inversion of geophysical data, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 42, 957–976.Google Scholar
  30. Kelly, W. E. (1977), Electrical resistivity for estimating permeability, J. Geotech. Eng. Div, 103, 1165–1168.Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, W. E. (1979), Geoelectrical sounding for estimating aquifer hydraulic conductivity, Groundwater. 50, 6, 420–425.Google Scholar
  32. Kessels, W., Flentge, I., Kolditz, H. (1985), DC geoelectric sounding to determine water content in the salt mine asse (FRG), Geophys Prosp. 33, 456–446.Google Scholar
  33. Kossinski, W. K., and Kelly, W. E. (1981), Geoelectric sounding for predicting Aquifer Properties, Groundwater. 19, 163–171.Google Scholar
  34. Maillet, R. (1947), The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting, Geophys. 12, 529–556.Google Scholar
  35. Matias, M.J.S. (2002), Squary array anisotropy measurements and resistivity sounding interpretation, J. Appl Geophys. 49, 185–194.Google Scholar
  36. Mazac, O., Kelly. W. E., and Landa, I. (1985), A hydrogeophysical model for relations between electrical and hydraulic properties of aquifers, J. Hydrol.. 79, 1–19.Google Scholar
  37. Mazac, O., Cislerova, M., and Vogel, T. (1988), Application of geophysical methods in describing spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in the zone of aeration’ J. Hydrol. 103, 117–126.Google Scholar
  38. Mbonu, P. D. C., Ebeniro, J. O., Ofoegbu, C. O. and Ekine, A. S. (1991), Geoelectric sounding for the determination of aquifer characteristics in parts of the Unuahia area of Nigeria, Geophys. 56, 284–291.Google Scholar
  39. Meidav, T. (1960), An electrical resistivity survey for groundwater, Geophys. 25, 1077–1093.Google Scholar
  40. Mendosa, F. G., Steenhuis, S. T., Todd W. M., and Parlange, J. Y (2003) Estimating basin-wide hydraulic parameters of a semi-arid mountainous watershed by recession-flow analysis, Hydrol J. 279, 57–69.Google Scholar
  41. Niwas, S., and Singhal, D. C. (1981), Estimation of aquifer transmissivity from Dar Zarrouk parameters in porous media, Hydrol J. 50, 393–399.Google Scholar
  42. Niwas, S., Gupta, P. K., and de Lima, O. A. L., (2006), Nonlinear electrical response of saturated shaley sand reservoir and its asymptotic approximations, Geophys. 71 (3), 129–133.Google Scholar
  43. Onuoha. K. M. and Mbazi, F. C. C. (1988), Aquifer transmissivity from electrical sounding data: the case of Ajali Sandstone aquifers south-west of Enugu, Nigeria, in Ofoegbu, C.O., ED. Ground water and mineral resources of Nigeria. Vieweg-Verlag, 17–30.Google Scholar
  44. Palacky, G. V., Ritsema, I. L., and De Jong, S. J. (1981), Electromagnetic prospecting for groundwater in Precambrian terrains in the Republic of Upper Volta (Burkina Faso), Geophys Prosp. 29, 932–955.Google Scholar
  45. Patangay, N. S., Srisailnath, A., and Bhima, V. L. S. (1977), Prediction of groundwater yield of wells in granites by means of resistivity sounding method, Geophy. Case Hist., India. 1, 161–168.Google Scholar
  46. Poddar, M., and Rathor, B. S. (1983), VLF survey of the weathered layers in southern India, Geophys Prosp. 31, 524–537.Google Scholar
  47. Quarto, R., and Schiavone, D. (1994), Hydrogeological implications of the resistivity distribution inferred from electrical prospecting data from the Apulian Carbonate Platform, Hydrol. 154, 219–244.Google Scholar
  48. Ritz, M., Parisot, J., Diouf, S., Beauvais, A., and Dione, F. (1999), Electrical imaging of lateritic weathering mantles over granitic and metamorphic basement of eastern Senegal, West Africa, Appl Geophys. 41, 335–344.Google Scholar
  49. Roy, K. K., and Elliot, H. M. (1981), Some observations regarding depth of exploration in DC electrical methods, Geoexpl. 19, 1–13.Google Scholar
  50. Rubin, Y., and Hubbard, S. S. (2005), Hydrogeophysics, water science and technology library, 50. Springer, p. 521.Google Scholar
  51. Saraf, A. K. (1999), A Report on Landuse Modelling in GIS for Bankura District, Project sponsored by DST, NRDMS Division Govt. of India.Google Scholar
  52. Satpathy, B. N., and Kanungo, D. V. (1976), Groundwater exploration in hard rock terrain—a case history, Geophys Prosp. 24, 725–736.Google Scholar
  53. Schlüter, T. (2006), Geological Atlas of Africa, Chap 4, pp. 238–241.Google Scholar
  54. Senosy, M. M. (1997), Ground water possibilities using earth resistivity method in some desert areas of Assiut province, Egypt, Bull. Fac. Sci., Assiut Uni., 26 (2-F), p. 169–187.Google Scholar
  55. Serres, Y. F. (1969), Resistivity prospecting in a United Nations groundwater project of Western Argentina, Geophys Prosp 17, 449–467.Google Scholar
  56. Singh, K. P. (2005), Nonlinear estimation of aquifer parameters from surficial resistivity measurements, Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci. Discuss. 2, 917–938.Google Scholar
  57. Soupios P. M, Kouli, M., Vallianatos, F., Vafidis, A. and Stavroulakis, G. (2007), Estimation of aquifer hydraulic parameters from surficial geophysical methods: a case study of Keritis Basin in Chania (Crete-Greece) Hydrol. J, 338, 122–131.Google Scholar
  58. Stewart, M., Layton, M., and Lizanee, T. (1983), Application of resistivity surveys to regional hydrogeologic reconnaissance, Groundwater 21, 42–48.Google Scholar
  59. Troisi, S., Fallicos, C., Straface, S., and Migliari, E. (2000), Application of kriging with external drift to estimate hydraulic conductivity from electrical resistively data in unconsolidated deposits near Montato Uffugo, Italy, Hydrogeol J. 8, 356–367.Google Scholar
  60. Urish, D. W. (1981), Electrical resistivity: Hydraulic conductivity relationships in glacial out wash aquifers, Wat. Resour. Res. 17, 1401–1408.Google Scholar
  61. Van Dam, J. C., and Meulenkamp, J. J. (1967), Some results of the geoelectrical resistivity method in groundwater investigations in the Netherlands, Geophys Prosp. 15, 92–115.Google Scholar
  62. Van Kuijk, J. M. J., Haak, A. M., and Ritsema, I. L. (1985), Combined interpretation of electromagnetic conductivity and electrical resistivity measurements reduces equivalency in layer interpretation: some case histories in groundwater surveys, paper presented at the 47th European Associate of Exploration Geophysicists Meeting, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  63. Van Lissa, R. V., Van Maanan, H. R. J., and Odera, F. W. (1987), The use of remote sensing and geophysics for groundwater exploration in Nyanza Province, Kenya. DHV Consulting Engineers. African Water Technol Conf Nairobi. 24 pp.Google Scholar
  64. Van Overmeeren, R. A. (1981), A combination of electrical resistivity, seismic refraction and gravity measurements for groundwater exploration in Sudan, Geophys. 46, 1304–1313.Google Scholar
  65. Van Overmeeren, R. A. (1989), Aquifer boundaries explored by geoelectrical measurements in the coastal plains of Yemen: a case study of equivalence, Geophys. 54, 38–48.Google Scholar
  66. Vincenz, S. A. (1968), Resistivity investigations of limestone aquifers in Jamaica (Caribbean Groundwater Karst), Geophys. 33, 980–994.Google Scholar
  67. Weaver, W. 1929, Certain application of the surface potential method: AIME. Geophys Prosp. Trans. 81, 68–86.Google Scholar
  68. Yadav, G. S., and Abolfazli, H. (1998), Geoelectric soundings and their relationship to hydraulic parameters in semiarid regions of Jalore, Northwestern India, J Appl Geophys. 39, 35–51.Google Scholar
  69. Young, M. E., De Bruijin, R. G. M., and Salim Al-Ismaily, A. (1998), Exploration of an alluvial aquifer in Oman by time-domain electromagnetic sounding, Hydrogeol J. 6, 383–393.Google Scholar
  70. Zecharias, Y. B., Brutsaert, W. (1988), Recession characteristics of groundwater outflow and baseflow from mountainous watersheds, Water Resour. Res. 24 (10), 1651–1658.Google Scholar
  71. Zohdy, A. A. R. (1969), Application of deep electrical soundings for groundwater exploration in Hawaii, Geophys. 34, 584–600.Google Scholar
  72. Zohdy, A. A. R. Eaton, G. P. and Mabey, D. R. (1974), Application of surface geophysics to groundwater investigations. USGS Techniques of Water Resource Investigations. Book 2. Chap. D1., 116pp Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser / Springer Basel AG 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Batte
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Barifaijo
    • 1
  • J. M. Kiberu
    • 1
  • W. Kawule
    • 1
  • A. Muwanga
    • 1
  • M. Owor
    • 1
  • J. Kisekulo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeologyMakerere UniversityKampalaUganda
  2. 2.Geo_Red LtdKampalaUganda

Personalised recommendations