Skip to main content
Log in

A Self-adjointness Criterion for the Schrödinger Operator with Infinitely Many Point Interactions and Its Application to Random Operators

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annales Henri Poincaré Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove the Schrödinger operator with infinitely many point interactions in \(\mathbb {R}^d\)\((d=1,2,3)\) is self-adjoint if the support \(\Gamma \) of the interactions is decomposed into infinitely many bounded subsets \(\{\Gamma _j\}_j\) such that \(\inf _{j\not =k}\mathop {\mathrm{dist}}\nolimits (\Gamma _j,\Gamma _k)>0\). Using this fact, we prove the self-adjointness of the Schrödinger operator with point interactions on a random perturbation of a lattice or on the Poisson configuration. We also determine the spectrum of the Schrödinger operators with random point interactions of Poisson–Anderson type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1964)

  2. Albeverio, S., Gesztesy, F., Høegh-Krohn, R., Holden, H.: Solvable models in quantum mechanics, 2nd edn. With an appendix by Pavel Exner, AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI (2005)

  3. Albeverio, S., Høegh-Krohn, R., Kirsch, W., Martinelli, F.: The spectrum of the three-dimensional Kronig–Penney model with random point defects. Adv. Appl. Math. 3, 435–440 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Agmon, S.: Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems. Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc., New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ando, K., Iwatsuka, A., Kaminaga, M., Nakano, F.: The spectrum of Schrödinger Operators with Poisson type random potential. Ann. Henri Poincaré 7, 145–160 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Berezin, F.A., Faddeev, L.D.: A remark on Schrödinger’s equation with a singular potential. Soviet Math. Dokl. 2, 372–375 (1961)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bethe, H., Peierls, R.: Quantum theory of the diplon. Proc. R. Soc. 148A, 146–156 (1935)

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Boutet de Monvel, A., Grinshpun, V.: Exponential localization for multi-dimensional Schrödinger operator with random point potential. Rev. Math. Phys. 9(4), 425–451 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Brüning, J., Geyler, V., Pankrashkin, K.: Spectra of self-adjoint extensions and applications to solvable Schrödinger operators. Rev. Math. Phys. 20(01), 1–70 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Christ, C.S., Stolz, G.: Spectral theory of one-dimensional Schrödinger operators with point interactions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 184, 491–516 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Delyon, F., Simon, B., Souillard, B.: From power pure point to continuous spectrum in disordered systems. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 42(3), 283–309 (1985)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorlas, T.C., Macris, N., Pulé, J.V.: Characterization of the spectrum of the Landau Hamiltonian with delta impurities. Commun. Math. Phys. 204, 367–396 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Drabkin, M., Kirsch, W., Schulz-Baldes, H.: Transport in the random Kronig–Penney model. J. Math. Phys. 53, 122109 (2012)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Geĭler, V.A.: The two-dimensional Schrödinger operator with a uniform magnetic field, and its perturbation by periodic zero-range potentials. St. Petersburg Math. J. 3(3), 489–532 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Geĭler, V.A., Margulis, V.A., Chuchaev, I.I.: Potentials of zero radius and Carleman operators. Sib. Math. J. 36(4), 714–726 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossmann, A., Høegh-Krohn, R., Mebkhout, M.: The one particle theory of periodic point interactions. Commun. Math. Phys. 77, 87–110 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hislop, P.D., Kirsch, W., Krishna, M.: Spectral and dynamical properties of random models with nonlocal and singular interactions. Math. Nachrichten 278, 627–664 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaminaga, M., Mine, T.: Upper bound for the Bethe–Sommerfeld threshold and the spectrum of the Poisson random hamiltonian in two dimensions. Ann. Henri Poincaré 14, 37–62 (2013)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirsch, W., Martinelli, F.: On the spectrum of Schrödinger operators with a random potential. Commun. Math. Phys. 85, 329–350 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kostenko, A.S., Malamud, M.M.: 1-D Schrödinger operators with local point interactions on a discrete set. J. Differ. Equ. 249(2), 253–304 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kronig, R.de L., Penney, W.G.: Quantum mechanics of electrons in crystal lattices. Proc. R. Soc. 130A, 499–513 (1931)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malamud, M.M., Schmüdgen, K.: Spectral theory of Schrödinger operators with infinitely many point interactions and radial positive definite functions. J. Funct. Anal. 263(10), 3144–3194 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Meester, R., Roy, R.: Continuum Percolation, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Minami, N.: Schrödinger operator with potential which is the derivative of a temporally homogeneous Lévy process. In: Watanabe, S., Prokhorov, J.V. (eds.) Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pastur, L., Figotin, A.: Spectra of Random and Almost Periodic Operators. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. II. Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Reiss, R.-D.: A Course on Point Processes. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas, L.H.: The interaction between a neutron and a proton and the structure of \(H^3\). Phys. Rev. 47, 903–909 (1935)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of T. M. is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP18K03329. The work of F. N. is partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP26400145.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Mine.

Additional information

Communicated by Alain Joye.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Renormalization Procedure for Point Interactions

For readers’ convenience, we quote a result about the renormalization procedure (1)

figure a

in the case \(d=3\) and \(\Gamma =O:=\{0\}\) ([2, Theorem I-1.2.5]).

Theorem 23

([2]). Let \(d=3\). Let V be a real-valued function on \(\mathbb {R}^3\) belonging to Rollnik class (i.e., \(\iint _{\mathbb {R}^3\times \mathbb {R}^3}|V(x)||V(x')||x-x'|^{-2}\mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}x'<\infty \)), and \((1+|\cdot |)V\in L^1(\mathbb {R}^3)\). Let \(\lambda (\epsilon )=\epsilon \mu (\epsilon )\), where \(\mu (\epsilon )\) is real analytic near \(\epsilon =0\), \(\mu (0)=1\) and \(\mu '(0)\not =0\). Let \(G_0=(-\Delta )^{-1}\), defined as an integral operator with integral kernel \(1/(4\pi |x-x'|)\). If two functions \(\phi \in L^2(\mathbb {R}^3)\) and \(\psi \in L^2_\mathrm{loc}(\mathbb {R}^3){\setminus } L^2(\mathbb {R}^3)\) satisfy

$$\begin{aligned} \mathop {\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits V |V|^{1/2}G_0|V|^{1/2} \phi =-\phi ,\quad \psi = G_0 |V|^{1/2}\phi , \end{aligned}$$

where \(\mathop {\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits z= z/|z|\) (\(z\not =0\)) and \(\mathop {\mathrm{sgn}}\nolimits 0 =1\), then \(\psi \) is called a zero-energy resonance for \(-\Delta +V\).

  1. (i)

    If a zero-energy resonance for \(-\Delta +V\) exists, then the norm resolvent limit of \(H_{\epsilon }\) in (1) coincides with \(H_{O,\alpha }\), \(\alpha =(\alpha _0)\), for some \(\alpha _0\in \mathbb {R}\).

  2. (ii)

    If no zero-energy resonance for \(-\Delta +V\) exists, then the norm resolvent limit of \(H_{\epsilon }\) in (1) coincides with the free Laplacian \(H_0\).

It is easy to see that \(\psi \) satisfies the equation \((-\Delta +V)\psi =0\). In the case (i), an explicit formula for \(\alpha _0\) is given in [2, Theorem I-1.2.5]. If \(-\Delta +V\) has simple zero-energy resonance \(\psi \) and no zero-energy eigenfunction, it is given as

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _0 = - \mu '(0)C^{-1},\quad C=\left| \int _{\mathbb {R}^3}|V|^{1/2}\phi \mathrm{d}x\right| ^2. \end{aligned}$$

Thus, \(\alpha _0\) appears in the coefficient of \(\lambda (\epsilon )\) as \(\lambda (\epsilon )=\epsilon - C\alpha _0 \epsilon ^2 + O(\epsilon ^3)\). It is known that if V is nonnegative, then there is no zero-energy resonance for \(-\Delta +V\). So, the occurrence of the case (i) requires V to have negative part.

A similar result is obtained also in the case \(d=2\), but \(\alpha _0\) appears in the coefficient of \(\lambda (\epsilon )\) in more complicated way (see [2, Theorem I-5.5]).

1.2 Elliptic Inner Regularity Estimate

The following is a special case of the elliptic inner regularity theorem ([4, Theorem 6.3]).

Theorem 24

Let U be an open set in \(\mathbb {R}^d\) and \(u\in L^2(U)\). Assume that there exists a positive constant M such that

$$\begin{aligned} |(u,\Delta \phi )_{L^2(U)}|\le M \Vert \phi \Vert _{L^2(U)} \end{aligned}$$
(31)

holds for every \(\phi \in C_0^\infty (U)\). Then, \(u\in H^2_\mathrm{loc}(U)\). Moreover, for any open set V such that \(\overline{V}\) is a compact subset of U, there exists a positive constant C dependent only on U and V such that

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{H^2(V)}\le C(M + \Vert u\Vert _{L^2(U)}), \end{aligned}$$

where M is the constant in (31).

From Theorem 24, we have the following corollary useful for our purpose.

Corollary 25

Let U, V be open sets in \(\mathbb {R}^d\) such that \(\overline{V}\subset U\) and

$$\begin{aligned} \mathop {\mathrm{dist}}\nolimits (\partial U, V)\ge \delta \end{aligned}$$

for some positive constant \(\delta \). Let \(u\in L^2(U)\) such that \(\Delta u\in L^2(U)\) in the distributional sense. Then, \(u\in H^2_\mathrm{loc}(U)\), and there exists a constant C dependent only on \(\delta \) and the dimension d such that

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{H^2(V)}^2 \le C \left( \Vert \Delta u \Vert _{L^2(U)}^2+ \Vert u \Vert _{L^2(U)}^2 \right) . \end{aligned}$$
(32)

Proof

Put \(\epsilon =\delta /(2d)\). For \(x_0\in \mathbb {R}^d\), consider open cubes \(Q=x_0 + (-\epsilon ,\epsilon )^d\) and \(Q'=x_0 + (-\epsilon /2,\epsilon /2)^d\). When \(Q\subset U\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} |(u, \Delta \phi )_{L^2(Q)}| = |(\Delta u, \phi )_{L^2(Q)}| \le \Vert \Delta u\Vert _{L^2(Q)} \Vert \phi \Vert _{L^2(Q)} \end{aligned}$$

for every \(\phi \in C_0^\infty (Q)\). Then, the assumption of Theorem 24 is satisfied with \(U=Q\), \(V=Q'\), and \(M=\Vert \Delta u\Vert _{L^2(Q)}\), and we have

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{H^2(Q')}^2\le C(\Vert \Delta u\Vert _{L^2(Q)}^2 + \Vert u\Vert _{L^2(Q)}^2) \end{aligned}$$
(33)

for some positive constant C dependent only on \(\delta \) and dimension d. We collect all the cubes \(Q'\) such that the center \(x_0\in \epsilon \mathbb {Z}^d\) and \(Q'\cap V \not =\emptyset \). Notice that \(Q\subset U\) for such \(Q'\). Thus, we have by (33)

$$\begin{aligned} \Vert u\Vert _{H^2(V)}^2&\le \sum _{Q'} \Vert u\Vert _{H^2(Q')}^2\\&\le C \sum _{Q'} \left( \Vert \Delta u\Vert _{L^2(Q)}^2 + \Vert u\Vert _{L^2(Q)}^2 \right) \\&\le 2^{d}C \left( \Vert \Delta u\Vert _{L^2(U)}^2 + \Vert u\Vert _{L^2(U)}^2 \right) , \end{aligned}$$

where we use the fact Q can overlap at most \(2^d\) times. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaminaga, M., Mine, T. & Nakano, F. A Self-adjointness Criterion for the Schrödinger Operator with Infinitely Many Point Interactions and Its Application to Random Operators. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21, 405–435 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00869-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-019-00869-1

Navigation