Advertisement

Annales Henri Poincaré

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 857–868 | Cite as

Optimal Stability and Instability for Near-Linear Hamiltonians

  • Abed BounemouraEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we will prove a very general result of stability for perturbations of linear integrable Hamiltonian systems, and we will construct an example of instability showing that both our result and our example are optimal. Moreover, in the same spirit as the notion of KAM stable integrable Hamiltonians, we will introduce a notion of effectively stable integrable Hamiltonians, conjecture a characterization of these Hamiltonians and show that our result proves this conjecture in the linear case.

Keywords

Normal Form Hamiltonian System Integrable Hamiltonian System Optimal Stability Diophantine Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bounemoura A.: Generic super-exponential stability of invariant tori in Hamiltonian systems. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 31(5), 1287–1303 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bounemoura A.: Nekhoroshev theory for finitely differentiable quasi-convex Hamiltonians. J. Differ. Equ. 249(11), 2905–2920 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bounemoura, A.: Stabilité et instabilité des systèmes hamiltoniens presque-intégrables. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Sud, Orsay, 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delshams A., Gutiérrez P.: Effective stability and KAM theory. J. Differ. Equ. 128(2), 415–490 (1996)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fassò F.: Lie series method for vector fields and Hamiltonian perturbation theory. Z. Angew. Math. Phys 41(6), 843–864 (1990) (English)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fayad B., Krikorian R.: Herman’s last geometric theorem. Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. 4(2), 193–219 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herman, M.: Some Open Problems In Dynamical Systems, vol. II, pp. 797–808. ICM, Berlin (1998) (Doc. Math. J. DMV, Extra Vol)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolmogorov A.N.: On the preservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in Hamilton’s function. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 98, 527–530 (1954)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lochak P., Neishtadt A.I.: Estimates of stability time for nearly integrable systems with a quasiconvex Hamiltonian. Chaos 2(4), 495–499 (1992)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lochak P.: Canonical perturbation theory via simultaneous approximation. Russ. Math. Surv. 47(6), 57–133 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morbidelli A., Giorgilli A.: Superexponential stability of KAM tori. J. Stat. Phys. 78, 1607–1617 (1995)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moser J.: On the elimination of the irrationality condition and Birkhoff’s concept of complete stability. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 5(2), 167–175 (1960)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marco J.-P., Sauzin D.: Stability and instability for Gevrey quasi-convex near-integrable Hamiltonian systems. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 96, 199–275 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nekhoroshev N.N.: An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems. Russ. Math. Surv. 32(6), 1–65 (1977)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nekhoroshev N.N.: An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems II. Trudy Sem. Petrovs 5, 5–50 (1979)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niederman L.: Nonlinear stability around an elliptic equilibrium point in a Hamiltonian system. Nonlinearity 11(6), 1465–1479 (1998)MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niederman L.: Hamiltonian stability and subanalytic geometry. Ann. Inst. Fourier 56(3), 795–813 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pöschel J.: Nekhoroshev estimates for quasi-convex Hamiltonian systems. Math. Z 213, 187–216 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pöschel J.: On Nekhoroshev’s estimate at an elliptic equilibrium. Int. Math. Res. Not. 4, 203–215 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rüssmann H.: Stability of elliptic fixed points of analytic area-preserving mappings under the bruno condition. Erg. Th. Dyn. Syst. 22(5), 1551–1573 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sevryuk M.B.: The classical KAM theory at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Mosc. Math. J. 3(3), 1113–1144 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMPARio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations