Abstract
Recent studies reported that pancreatic β-cells are heterogeneous in terms of their transcriptional profiles and their abilities for insulin secretion. Sub-populations of pancreatic β-cells have been identified based on the functionality and expression of specific surface markers. Under diabetes condition, β-cell identity is altered leading to different β-cell sub-populations. Furthermore, cell–cell contact between β-cells and other endocrine cells within the islet play an important role in regulating insulin secretion. This highlights the significance of generating a cell product derived from stem cells containing β-cells along with other major islet cells for treating patients with diabetes, instead of transplanting a purified population of β-cells. Another key question is how close in terms of heterogeneity are the islet cells derived from stem cells? In this review, we summarize the heterogeneity in islet cells of the adult pancreas and those generated from stem cells. In addition, we highlight the significance of this heterogeneity in health and disease conditions and how this can be used to design a stem cell-derived product for diabetes cell therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pancreatic β-cells are glucose-regulated insulin-producing cells located in islets of Langerhans in the pancreas. These cells play an essential role in glucose metabolism and regulation. Reduction in β-cell function and/or mass can lead to alterations in glucose metabolism leading to abnormal elevation in blood glucose levels and eventually causing diabetes. Different therapeutic approaches for diabetes aim to maintain/restore the β-cell mass, hence function, including whole pancreas or pancreatic islet cell transplantation [1]. However, with islet transplantation being the ideal treatment for type 1 (T1D) and end-stages of type 2 diabetes (T2D), it remains difficult due to the limited number of donors and the need for the usage of strong immunosuppressant drugs [2]. Moreover, pancreatic islet cell transplantation requires at least 10,000 islet equivalents per kilogram of body weight which can be obtained from 2–3 donors approximately [3]. This also adds up to the limited resources for treating more patients with diabetes in need for such interventions. New research approaches aim to efficiently generate an unlimited source of functional pancreatic β-cells in vitro using human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) [4]. hPSCs are a valuable tool for generating different types of cells, including pancreatic islets and β-cells. As the structure of pancreatic islets is essential for proper cell-to-cell interaction and proper regulation of insulin secretion, multiple efforts focus on understanding the complex connective network between the different endocrine cells [5].
Recent studies have described that not all pancreatic β-cell populations are similar but heterogenous. To gain more insight, one should consider the factors that could contribute to β-cell heterogeneity. Hence, understanding the process of β-cell development, β-cell interaction with neighbouring cells, and β-cell response to stimulus can open the door to an explanation behind β-cell heterogeneity.
Islet structure and composition
The adult endocrine pancreas, islets of Langerhans, constitutes about 1–4% of the total pancreas [6]. Each islet contains hormone-producing cells that synthesize and release glucagon (GCG; α-cells), insulin (INS; β-cells), somatostatin (SST; δ-cells), pancreatic polypeptide (PPY; γ-cells) and ghrelin (GHRL; ε-cells) in a nutrient-dependent fashion [7, 8]. Pancreatic islets receive up to 20% of the total pancreatic blood supply, hence, they are defined as highly vascularized micro-organs [9]. In addition, studies have shown that the microvascular density of pancreatic islets is 5–10 times higher than that of surrounding exocrine tissues [10]. The increased islet vascularization helps in sensing the systemic blood glucose levels, which is essential for the proper accomplishment of the islets’ endocrine function and efficient hormone delivery to target tissues [9, 11]. It has been reported that islets are not simply disordered clusters of endocrine cells but are highly organized micro-organs with a species-specific three-dimensional architecture. This unique cellular organization allows pancreatic islets to effectively carry out their primary physiological function of responding to changes in metabolic demands and regulating optimal glucose levels in the bloodstream. Furthermore, physical, and electrical cell–cell coupling enable synchronous hormone secretion, and intra-islet paracrine signaling is directed and connected with the nervous system for feedback regulation [12,13,14].
The architecture of mouse islets is characterized by a central, rounded core primarily composed of insulin-secreting β-cells. Meanwhile, the islet periphery is mainly occupied by α-cells that secrete glucagon, δ-cells that secrete somatostatin, and γ-cells that secrete polypeptide [15]. The β-cells located in the central core of the islet form rosette structures that are polarized around the blood capillaries [16]. Within these rosettes, β-cells have an apical domain located on the outer edge of the rosette, where primary cilia extend into the shared extracellular spaces. The basal domain of the β-cell is located adjacent to the blood vessel, where the insulin granules are located. The lateral domains between the edges of β-cells are enriched in glucose transporters and Ca2 + sensing machinery [16,17,18]. The architecture of human islets is characterized by a higher degree of complexity. There are several proposed models for the “stereotypical” human islet, each with its unique features [19,20,21]. The proportion of the primary endocrine cell types within the islet varies between mice and humans. In mice, approximately 75–80% of the islet cells are β-cells, with 20% α-cells, and less than 10% δ-cells. In contrast, the islets in humans have a lower proportion of β-cells, ranging from 55 to 70% and a higher percentage of α-cells, ranging from 30 to 45%, with less than 10% for both δ- and γ-cells [19, 20, 22,23,24]. The size of human islets can vary significantly, with a diameter range of approximately 50–500 μm and an average of 1500 cells per islet. Variations in the ratio of endocrine cells among individuals are reflected in differences in β-cell mass, [25, 26], while the distribution of islet cells across pancreatic regions exhibits only minor differences [27]. Differences in the methods used to study human islet architecture have resulted in various proposed models, and it is uncertain whether a stereotypical architecture exists in humans at all [11, 26]. However, research supports the existence of a common design principle between mice and humans, wherein homotypic interactions among the same type of endocrine cells are more crucial than heterotypic interactions between different types of endocrine cells [26, 28, 29]. Recent findings suggest that there are also conserved β-cells polarity domains in both species, but their functional roles in islets remain unclear and require further investigation [18, 30, 31].
Heterogeneity of pancreatic β-cells
Cumulative evidence showed the existence of heterogenous β-cell sub-populations. By implementing new biomarkers and using advanced single-cell analyses, the identification of the different β-cell sub-populations became more promising. Initially, β-cell heterogeneity has been suggested through the identification of various response levels to glucose observed by different INS biosynthesis and secretion patterns [32]. Additional β-cell heterogeneity aspects include differences in maturity and proliferative states, redox states, membrane potentials, and glucose transport [33]. Different studies have revealed β-cell heterogeneity in animal and human models. However, here, we only focus on the identified β-cell populations in humans.
Maturation and proliferative heterogeneity
Proper glucose response and INS secretion require mature β-cells that can synthesize sufficient amounts of INS upon glucose uptake. Immature β-cells are marked with higher proliferation and metabolic demands for the energy-consuming processes during cell proliferation [34]. Unlike immature β-cells, mature cells become more function-specific and less proliferative. Interestingly, the existence of both mature and immature β-cell populations has been discovered using single-cell analysis techniques. Wang et al. revealed three β-cell clusters (C1, C2, and C3) with different proliferative capabilities [34] (Table 1). C1 showed a quiescent cell state with no proliferation, while C2 and C3 revealed higher proliferative rates indicated by the expression of proliferation marker Ki67+ [34]. Interestingly, C1 showed high PDX1 and INS expression and is found to be increased with age but decreased with obesity. Proliferative C2 and C3 express a set of genes important for cell adhesion and migration including CD44, CD9, CD49F, and CYP26A1. Furthermore, C2 showed higher phosphorylation levels of PDGFRA, pERK1/2, pSTAT3, and pSTAT5. Regression models revealed that C2 negatively correlates with T2D, while C3 negatively correlates with age [34]. Several other studies support the presence of different β-cell populations depending on their maturity level. Szabat et al. identified two β-cell populations with distinct gene profiles: PDX1+/INSlow and PDX1high/INShigh [35]. PDX1+/INSlow cell population exhibits immature β-cell characteristics, associated with upregulated developmental, proliferative, and apoptotic markers (Table 1). Since PDX1+/INSlow are immature cells, β-cell function associated genes are remarkably reduced and cells reflected progenitor-like phenotype with polyhormonal gene profile by expressing PPY, GCG, SST, and GHRL. Remarkably, the expression of calcium-modulated INS secretion regulators (CAMK2G and MAPK4) is increased. However, MAPK1, a regulator of INS secretion in response to glucose, is decreased in PDX1+/INSlow cell population [35]. Furthermore, a few diabetes-related genes are enriched in PDX1+/INSlow cells as well including DPP4, LEPR, and SIRT5. Syntaphilin (SNPH), an inhibitor of SNARE complex formation and exocytosis regulator, is also increased [35]. PDX1high/INShigh population composed the majority of the β-cell population (78.3%) and showed mature β-cell characteristics with increased INS secretion. This cell population has high levels of mature β-cell function-related genes including GLUT2, MAPK1, CALML4, TIPRL, G6PC2, IAPP, and GCGR. Yet, SIRT1, a diabetes-related gene that has been shown to enhance INS resistance and diabetes, is found to be higher in PDX1high/INShigh [35, 36]. Even though PDX1high/INShigh are mature cells, development-related genes in TGFβ superfamily are also enriched such as BMP5, GREM1, and TGFBR3. Conversely, PDX1+/INSlow cells have increased expression of FSTL5 and BAMBI which are from the same TGFβ superfamily [35]. Nevertheless, mature cells display enriched maturity-related genes like GCGR, IAPP, and MAPK1 [35].
Other research groups have identified β-cell heterogeneity according to surface markers expressed on β-cells. Dorrell and colleagues have categorized β-cells into four distinct populations based on two surface markers (CD9 and ST8SIA1) [37]. Interestingly, ST8SIA1− cells, composing ~ 85% in healthy individuals, express high GLUT2 levels and show more mature phenotypes regarding β-cell functionality. By contrast, ST8SIA1+ cells show immature cell phenotypes and compose ~ 15% in healthy individuals. Additionally, immature cells had lower INS secretion profile and decreased GLUT2 expression [37]. Yet, ST8SIA1+ cells have increased K+ channel expression and a three-fold increase in f-channel HCN1 expression, a possible gene with INS secretion relevance [37]. Several transcriptional factors (TFs) are expressed in ST8SIA1+ as well, such as SIX3, RFX6, MAFB, and NEUROD1. SIX3 has been identified as an important TF in age-related β-cell maturation and expression levels positively correlate with INS secretion [37, 38]. Moreover, the ST8SIA1− cell population is reduced in T2D, while the ST8SIA1+ cell population increases in the case of diabetes [37]. Recently, CD9 has been identified as a negative surface marker for functional glucose-responsive β-cells. hPSC-derived pancreatic β-cells, which are negative for CD9, have higher NKX6.1, MAFA, and C-peptide levels in comparison to CD9+ cells [39].
The hallmark of a mature β-cell involves a complex cellular identity with finely tuned coupling to the prevailing glucose level. Ultra-structurally, a β-cell is estimated to contain ~ 10,000 dense-core secretory granules with a clear peripheral mantle and the presence of fully processed proinsulin molecules in these dense-core granules depends on the maturity of the β-cell [40]. The concerted activity of key TFs determines the fate of endocrine cells; hence, mature β-cells are also distinct in terms of the expression of certain genes and TFs. Single-cell analyses that have revealed the transcriptional program of human pancreatic endocrine cells depicted genes such as PAX4, PDX1, MAFA, MAFB, DLK1, SIX2/3, ID1, IAPP, UCN3, and OLIG1 that are highly or exclusively expressed in human β-cells [41, 42]. Interestingly, those studies did not report any sub populations of islet cells. In addition, single-cell transcription profiling in human islets also revealed two TFs, SIX2 and SIX3 [43,44,45], which have been shown to enhance INS content and secretion in immature β-cells, suggesting their crucial role in human β-cell maturation [38].
β-cell heterogeneity under stress and diabetes conditions
Previous studies have identified relationships between β-cell populations and diabetes. The heterogeneity of β-cells has been found to be changed under diabetic conditions where studies have reported changes in β-cell sub-populations in pancreatic islets derived from T2D patients. This alteration suggested a transformation of β-cells into progenitor cells or other endocrine islet cells (reviewed in [46]). Wang et al. have identified three β-cell clusters (C1, C2 and C3) where C2 and C3 reflect immature phenotypes and C1 reflects mature phenotypes. However, the C2 cell population decreases in the presence of T2D [34]. Unlike C2 immature cells, the immature ST8SIA1+ cell population increases with T2D [37]. Another study conducted by Segerstolpe et al. identified five β-cell clusters (C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5) [43]. Notably, C1 and C5 characterized by the expression of RBP4 and FFAR4, which are diabetes-associated genes and correlate with INS resistance, are found to be increased in T2D and obese individuals [43, 47, 48]. Few studies have identified β-cell heterogeneity in diabetes conditions, yet more single cell studies performed on human islets in both healthy and diseased conditions are required.
Synthesized proteins undergo protein maturation and folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The amount of protein synthesis is regulated by the folding capacity within the cell’s ER. In normal β-cell conditions, > 10% of protein production accounts for INS synthesis and this percent increases to 50% in stimulated conditions. Nevertheless, proinsulin is widely known as a misfolding-prone protein where 20% of synthesized proinsulin fails to fold properly [49]. In cases of increased INS demands as in diabetes, accumulation of misfolded proinsulin protein can result in ER stress in β-cells [50]. Unfolded protein response (UPR) is a homeostatic cell signaling-based system that recovers ER function and folding capacity; however, the inability to adapt to ER stress causes cell apoptosis [51]. Another factor to β-cell stress is the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) known as oxidative stress. β-cells depend mainly on oxidative phosphorylation for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, and this add on the stress levels exerted on β-cells. Furthermore, β-cells possess low defence mechanisms against ROS that further increase their vulnerability to stress condition formation [49]. However, a recent study has revealed a unique and dynamic mechanism of β-cell heterogeneity where it allows the cells to defend themselves and adapt to various insults. With the aid of single-cell and pseudo-time analyses, three β-cell populations have been identified in stress conditions: INSlo UPRlo, INShi UPRlo, and INSlo UPRhi [49]. A sequential order of these cell populations is suggested where a proportion of β-cells characterized by high INS synthesis and low UPR (INShi UPRlo), supports the body’s need for INS. Meanwhile, another cell proportion characterized by low INS synthesis and high UPR (INSlo UPRhi) would be allowed to complete its stress recovery. INSlo UPRhi has high expression of proliferation-related genes and they have high metabolic demands observed by the increased expression of G6PD, RPIA, TALDO, and TKT. An intermediate cell population marked as INSlo UPRlo can be observed after stress recovery and before initiating the increased INS synthesis demands [49]. Whether these β-cell states under stress conditions are permanently present throughout life or have a limited capacity for activating UPR are still unknown. Furthermore, Muraro et al. have identified a distinct β-cell population marked by the increased expression of SRXN1, SQSTM1, FTH1P3, FTH1, and FTL in which they labelled them as FTH1+ cells [44]. These highly expressed genes are associated with ER and oxidative stress responses [52, 53]. This further supports the concept of β-cell heterogeneity under stress conditions.
Epigenetic heterogeneity of β-cells
Interestingly, β-cell heterogeneity has been identified at epigenetic levels that affect β-cells’ transcriptomic profiles. A recent study conducted by Dror et al., has identified two β-cell subtypes with high (βHI) and low (βLO) expressions of H3K27me3, a polycomb-associated heterochromatin, where βHI have an average of ~ 4.5 folds increase in H3K27me3 expression level [54]. Furthermore, the βHI cell population shows enriched active nuclear interior and smaller nuclei compared to βLO cells, which is consistent with H3K27me3 role in chromatin silencing and compaction [54, 55]. Transcriptomic analysis revealed increased expression of CD24 surface marker in βHI population. INS + β-cells co-sorting using H3K27me3 and CD24 revealed two distinct populations as well where ~ 20% of all INS + cells were CD24 + and ~ 80% were CD24- [54]. A rare subtype (~ 1%) of extremely high CD24-expressing cells (CD24high) was also identified with high SST expression, supporting previous studies reporting high CD24 expression in δ-cells [54, 56]. In addition, βHI cells have higher mitochondrial content, increased INS secretory function, and a small but significant increase in proliferative capacity. Differential DNA methylation analysis between βHI and βLO revealed enrichment in specific enhancer regions and H3K27me3 annotated genomic regions; at regions binding JUNB, AEBP2, CEBPD, MAFB, ATF3, H3K3me1, and PROX1 [54]. Rs340874 is a significant T2D-associated variant located in the PROX1 locus in human, suggesting possible cell-subtype-specific effects due to the variant [54]. In contrast, βLO cells exhibit hypermethylation in NKX6.1 and NEUROD1 regions, potentially indicating a more thorough decommissioning of the plasticity linked to NKX6.1 and NEUROD1 in βLO cells [54]. Interestingly, single-cell RNA-seq analysis in the context of T2D revealed 2 major cell clusters distributed along βHI and βLO axis based on their differentially expressed genes [54]. Identified β-cell populations from T2D patients showed increased βHI/βLO ratio, proposing a diabetes-specific alteration in βHI/βLO ratio.
Cell–cell communication and its importance for β-cell functionality: knowledge from both rodent and human β-cell studies
The optimum function of β-cells in pancreatic islet requires a tight and temporal control of INS secretion, which is largely achieved by sensing and integrating a variety of signals including circulating glucose, hormones, neurotransmitters, and other nutrients [57, 58]. However, local regulation may also take place within islets, in which β-cells cohabit with several other cell types and communicate with neighbouring cells (plausibly over long distances) to organize their activities. As discussed in the previous section, in human islets, β-cells are interspersed with other endocrine cells (largely α-cells) and promote a heterologous contact of endocrine cells [19]. Such divergence in islet architecture influences cell–cell communication among the islet cells (summarized in Fig. 1).
Cell adhesion molecules
Gap junctions
The best-characterized cell–cell coupling mechanism in the pancreas is provided by gap junctions (GJs). GJs are clusters of intercellular channels that allow the direct transfer of ions fluxes and second messengers between adjacent cells. In vertebrates, these channels are mainly formed by a family of proteins called connexins (Cxs), composed of 20 members in mice and 21 in humans [59]. Most β-cells in rodent and human islets have been found to be electrically coupled by connexin 36 (Cx36 or GJD2) facilitating the rhythmic and synchronized bursts of electrical activity and Ca2+, which are observed under both resting conditions and following stimulation of INS secretion by physiological nutrients and drugs [60, 61]. Cx36 is critical for coordinating islet activity as dispersed β-cells fail to synchronize their responses to glucose, thus restricting β-cells’ proper function, particularly the pulsatility of [Ca(2 +)](i) and INS secretion during glucose stimulation [62]. Even though other islet cells (for example, α- and δ-cells) show oscillations (of GCG and SST respectively) [63, 64], it has been suggested that they are also coupled. However, the coupling between other islet cells does not involve CX36 as it forms only homomeric and homotypic intercellular channels (specific only to β-cells) [65, 66]. Another junction protein, pannexins (Panx1 and Panx2), a family of integral membrane proteins, also express both rodent and human islets [67, 68]. Islet cell purification studies demonstrated that β-cell-rich fractions predominantly express the Pnax2 mRNA, whereas the non-β-cell-rich fractions predominantly express the transcript of Pnax1, suggesting Pnax2 is selectively expressed in β-cells [67]; however, later on both Panx1 and Panx2 mRNA expression have been identified in both rodent and human islets [69]. While connexins form intercellular junctions between adjacent cells, pannexins form single hydrophilic channels that establish communication between the cytosol and the extracellular fluid, when opened [70]. These channels can be permeated by small molecules like glutamate, a putative β-to-α paracrine signal [71], such channels could operate in coordinating the antagonistic INS and GCG secretions.
Adherent junctions
Islet endocrine cells also interconnected by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that are expressed on neighbouring cells and facilitate cell-to-cell adhesion. Most CAMs are glycoproteins having a molecular mass of about 120 KDa, functionally dependent on extracellular Ca2+ and thus are referred to as cadherins. These glycoproteins, which have a molecular mass of about 120 KDa, form a family including E, P, N, and R isoforms [72]. There are other CAMs, such as N-CAM also ensure cell–cell adhesion independently of Ca2 + [73]. Multiple CAMs are expressed in pancreatic islets to exert cell–cell communications. While N-CAM140 is preferentially found in non-β cell fraction, E-cadherin is the predominantly expressed CAM of β-cells [74]. Cadherin-mediated adhesion in single β-cells, but not α-cells, is positively regulated by glucose and it is associated with increased INS secretion [75].
Tight junctions
β-cells are also connected with tetraspan transmembrane Claudin, which ise often associated with another membrane protein occludin and form tight junctions (TJs). TJs between neighbouring epithelial cells have important biochemical and physiological roles in islets as they allow selective and critical permeability to important compounds [76]. The transcriptome data sets and other approaches have demonstrated the involvement of previously understudied claudin (Cldn) family genes of TJs in the islets [77]. β-cells maintain a consistent orientation with respect to islet capillary networks, which is defined as ‘polarity of β-cells’ and the positioning of the polarity is determined by the expression of Par family protein Par-3 [17]. Par-3 is found at TJs in epithelial cells [78]; however, the 3D spatial distribution of β-cells within islets has revealed that Par-3 is specifically enriched in the apical region of β-cells positioned in a domain away from capillaries [17]. Thus, a critical function for Par-3 in the TJ assembly demonstrates the novel mechanism through which the spatial regulation between endocrine cells within islets is maintained.
Focal adhesions
Interactions between endocrine cells and the extra cellular matrix are also critical for the normal development, survival, and function of β-cells. Integrins appear to be the primary receptors involved in cell–matrix interactions in islets, which influence islet vascular remodelling [79]. Integrins also facilitates the motility of endocrine cells within islets, which is necessary for the development of normal islet architecture and INS secretion [80]. Islets are richly endowed with capillaries and the majority of β-cells have at least one point of contact with the basement membrane (BM) of the capillary bed, occupying ~ 15% of the total β-cells surface area of β-cells [17, 81]. However, in contrast to the mouse islet, where endocrine cells are in direct contact with the vascular BM, the human islet has a unique double BM structure consisting of specifically structured and closely associated parenchymal and endothelial BMs [82]. Several non-integrin receptors such as the dystroglycan protein complex and Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lut), which are exclusively expressed on human islet cell membranes interact with BM of capillary networks and trigger the local responses of endocrine cells [82, 83].
Functional heterogeneity of β-cells: Role of homotypic and the heterotypic interactions of cell adhesion molecules
Human β-cells exhibit functional heterogeneity in terms of their insulin secretory activity. This variability is influenced by intercellular communication among subpopulations of β-cells within the islet, both homologous and heterologous [84, 85]. Functional heterogeneity of β-cells also depends on the coordination of gap junctional communications demonstrated by a study where in isolated single cells, increasing glucose concentrations leads to increasing recruitment in the numbers of cells that responded to glucose [86, 87]. Thus, the activation of a single β-cell by glucose results in the recruitment of neighbouring β-cells to an active state where they can optimally utilize glucose [88]. This movement of heterogenous β-cells within the islets is mediated by cell adhesion molecules, CAMs, that significantly impact the functional heterogeneity of pancreatic β-cells.
Human pancreatic β-cells express CAMs, such as E-cadherin and N-cadherin, which mediate homotypic interactions between the cells. E-cadherin plays a critical role in regulating the adhesive properties of β-cells, which are essential for the aggregation of neighbouring endocrine cells into islets [89]. This creates a tight junction that seals the intercellular space and prevents the leakage of hormones. E-cadherin also participates in signaling pathways that regulate human β-cell survival, proliferation, and function [75, 90]. Another type of CAMs expressed by human β-cell is N-cadherin, which also mediates homotypic interactions between β-cells. N-cadherin predominantly expressed on the cell surface of human β-cells [90]. Under low glucose conditions, cadherins do not affect insulin secretion. However, at high glucose levels, both E- and N-cadherin increase insulin secretion from a single human β-cell, suggesting that they modulate the functional heterogeneity of human β-cells [75, 91]. The molecular mechanism of cadherins mediated enhancement of human β-cell function is still under investigation, but it is believed that changes in cortical actin distribution after cadherin engagement may play an important role. Furthermore, cadherin-mediated adhesion is increased by ROCK inhibitor, suggesting the involvement of Rho-GTPase pathway in cadherin-mediated modulation of human β-cell function [75].
Heterotypic interactions of CAMs in human pancreatic β-cells are complex and dynamic processes that can modulate the function and survival of β-cells by influencing their polarity, cytoskeleton, signaling pathways and gene expression. Integrins, a family of heterodimeric receptors that bind to various ligands on the extra cellular matrix (ECM) or on other cell surfaces [92] and mediates the heterodimeric interactions in β-cells. Integrins are expressed by all islet cell types, but their expression pattern and function vary among different β-cell subpopulations. For example, integrin, alpha 1 (ITGA1) has been reported to be significantly expressed in human β-cells, but with differential expression in a distinct subtype (ST8SIA1± subtypes) of β-cell [37], suggesting the critical role of CAMs in the heterogeneity of human β-cells.
Autocrine actions of pancreatic islet β-cells
The homeostasis of the islet endocrine system is maintained by a wide range of extracellular factors secreted from the same cells (autocrine action) or neighbouring cells (paracrine action). The signaling molecules that harmonize the physiological activities between the islet endocrine cells include hormones, peptides, neurotransmitters, proteins, and ions that act via specific receptors to elicit cellular responses. The autocrine signaling molecules in islet cells are often determined by the components of the synthetic machinery producing the molecule. For example, ATP, an important extracellular messenger molecule in the brain as well as in the vasculature and in endocrine organs, is also released during high glucose stimulation [93, 94]. Human β-cells express both ionotropic purinergic receptors P2X and metabotropic P2Y receptors; however, in response to glucose ATP is released from human β- cells and predominantly activates the P2X receptor to establish a positive feedback loop [95]. Thus, ATP signaling increases human β-cell electrical activity and promotes INS secretion [96, 97]. The nonessential amino acid glycine acts as an autocrine regulator of INS secretion in pancreatic β cells. Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are ligand-gated chloride ion channels that mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the spinal cord and the brainstem [98]. Previous study demonstrated that GlyR is highly expressed in human β-cells and that activation of GlyR stimulates electrical activity. Upon stimulation and rise in cytosolic [Ca2+]i, intracellular glycine is released and serves as a positive autocrine signal for INS secretion [99].
Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that plays a fundamental role in many specific regions of the brain. β-cells synthesize dopamine from circulating l-dopa, store it in secretory vesicles, and release it with INS in response to glucose stimulation [100]. Dopamine type 2 receptors (D2R) are present in islets and dopaminergic feedback loop modulates their activation by dopamine to inhibit glucose-induced INS secretion from β-cells [101]. The monoamine neurotransmitter Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) is produced in β-cells and released in response to glucose stimulation [102, 103]. In the absence of exogenous Serotonin, glucose-induced INS secretion is increased by an agonist of 5HT2 receptors and completely suppressed by blockage of the receptors, suggesting β-cells derived serotonin acts as an autocrine negative regulator of INS secretion [103]. Gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and its levels in human islets are as high as in the brain [104]. While β-cell-derived GABA exerts an autocrine-positive effect on INS secretion via GABA-A receptors, GABA-B receptors augmented a negative autocrine action in pancreatic β-cells [105, 106] (Table 2).
Paracrine actions of pancreatic islet cells
In contrast to islet autocrine signaling, where a cell secretes a signaling molecule that binds to receptors on the same cell or other cells of the same cell type, paracrine signals influence other cells within the same islet by diffusing through the interstitial space or circulating in a local blood vessel [107]. The common feature of islet endocrine cells is the release of molecules that serve as paracrine signals (Fig. 1). GCG is a major hyperglycemic hormone in the organism that counters the decrease in plasma glucose levels. GCG secretion is thought to provide the first line of defence in glucose counter regulation [108]. In human islets, most of β-cells directly appose α-cells, δ-cells, or both and the proximity of β-cells with α-cells further enables paracrine interactions [20] (Fig. 1). GCG and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) derive from a common precursor, proglucagon, but the primary source of GLP-1 is the L cells of gastrointestinal tract from which it is released in a meal dependent manner [109]. It is well established that human β-cells express GCG and GLP-1 receptors, GCGR and GLP1R, respectively [43, 110] (Fig. 1) (Table 2). Interestingly, two-fold higher expression of GLP1R than GCGR has been reported in human β-cells [9], suggesting a higher affinity of GLP1 for human β-cells. However, at the physiological concentration, GCG can activate GLP1R, whereas GLP-1 does not act on GCGR [111]. The notion that intra-islet GCG functions as a paracrine regulator of INS secretion have been demonstrated by increased INS secretion from β-cells overexpressing GCG receptors [112, 113]. Other studies used humanized mouse model and human islets also revealed the strong insulinotropic action of GCG [114, 115]. While 10 nM GCG effectively increases INS secretion in the presence of 6 mM glucose [116], GLP-1 is consistently, although variably, effective at 1–100 nM to enhance INS secretion from human islets [117, 118].
The parasympathetic neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) is also released from α-cells in human islets and functions as a paracrine signal that primes the β-cells to respond optimally to subsequent increases in glucose concentration [119]. Despite not all other studies agreed on the presence of ACh vesicles (vACh) in α-cells (Fig. 1) [120], the mechanism of Ach-mediated increase in INS secretion involves activation of muscarinic M3 receptors in human β-cells [121, 122]. PPY, the 36-amino acid peptide, secreted from pancreatic γ-cells is also one of the paracrine modulators in pancreatic islets. The frequency of γ-cells is higher in the head of the pancreas [123], where the cells are found to accompany the outer mantle of rodent islets or lining the capillaries in human islets [124]. The paracrine function of PPY on α- and δ-cells is exerted through two distinct types of receptor families expressed on respective cell surfaces. On GCG producing α-cells, PPY binds to G-protein coupled receptor PPYR1 [125], while NPY receptor family NPY4 receptor (NPY4R) has been reported as the specific receptor for the PPY in SST producing δ-cells [126] and inhibits both GCG and SST secretion. Glutamate is another amino acid that functions as paracrine and autocrine regulator of INS and GCG secretion from pancreatic β- and α-cells, respectively. Glutamate is negatively charged major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. In pancreatic islets, glutamate is released from α-cells when ambient glucose decreases [127] and once released, glutamate can act on different cell types through three different types of membrane receptors: AMPA/kainate receptors, metabotropic receptors, and NMDA receptors [128]. Pancreatic endocrine cells express those receptors and the paracrine function of glutamate on islet endocrine cells solely depends on cell-specific interaction of glutamate with those receptors. For example, Glutamate has been reported to activate α-cells via AMPA/kainate receptors [127, 129, 130]; inhibit α-cells via metabotropic receptors [131]. In β-cells, glutamate binds to the metabotropic receptors to increase INS secretion [132].
Islet δ-cell derived SST potently inhibits INS and GCG release from pancreatic islets and its effects are mediated via five SST receptor subtypes (SSTR1–SSTR5) [133]. There are two major physiological ligands for SSTRs: SST-14 and SST-28, consisting of 14 and 28 amino acids, respectively, and both forms of SST play an important role in the regulation of INS and GCG release from the endocrine pancreas. While SST28 is secreted by the gut, SST14 is secreted by δ-cells in the stomach and islets in response to glucose and amino acids [134, 135]. By using quantitative double-label confocal fluorescence immunocytochemistry, it has been demonstrated that all five human SST receptor subtypes (hSSTR1-5) subtypes are variably expressed in islets, however, SSTR5 being colocalized in 87% of β-cells, whereas, SSTR2 is strongly colocalized with GCG in 89% of α-cells [136]. Consistent with those findings, studies in SSTRKO mice also revealed that SST-mediated inhibition of GCG release in islets is primarily mediated via SSTR2, whereas INS secretion is regulated primarily via SSTR5 [137].
Growth hormone secretory hormone, GHRL, an acylated 28-amino acid peptide is expressed in pancreatic islet cells as well as the stomach. GHRL mRNAs are expressed in the pancreas and islets in rats and humans [138]. To become biologically active, GHRL needs to be acylated and acylated-GHRL is also detected in rat islets using radioimmunoassay (RIA) [139]. Ghrelin receptor (GHSR) is expressed in rat and human β-cells [140, 141] and GHRL inhibits glucose-stimulated INS secretion (GSIS) from β-cell lines [142, 143]. Taken together, it has been suggested that GHRL is a paracrine modulator of INS secretion and exert INS-static action on pancreatic β-cells via the inhibitory signaling of GHSR.
Autocrine and paracrine action of β-cells and functional heterogeneity
Endocrine cells within the pancreatic islets secrete a wide range of diffusible chemical messengers, the autocrine or paracrine factors, which via binding to cognate receptors, are able to evoke biological effects in the neighbouring cells. Experimental studies have shown that by synchronizing their secretory activity in response to electrical coupling, autocrine or paracrine signaling, islet β-cells exploit several pathways of cell-to-cell communication [144]. However, human β-cells show complex and heterogeneous electrophysiological responses to many factors including ion channel antagonists [145]. This is probably due to the variability in the number of specific channels between β-cells that has been modelled to generate variable oscillation patterns and responses thus affecting the regularity of membrane potential bursting and [Ca2+] oscillations [146,147,148]. One of the paracrine mediators of human β-cell is mediated by glucagon (released from α-cell) signaling, which activates human β-cell G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), including glucagon receptor (GCGR), and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) [114, 116]. Both glucagon and GLP-1 increase intracellular cAMP levels and elicit synchronous intracellular Ca2 + oscillation respectively in human β-cell [116, 149]. By utilizing optogenetics, based on the signature of Ca2+ dynamics, discrete functional subpopulations of β-cells have been identified [14]. Therefore, it is likely that these subpopulations of β-cells will show functional heterogeneity in controlling coordinated electrical regulation and electrical dynamics in response to paracrine actions of glucagon or GLP-1.
Hub cell dynamics
The idea of having pancreatic β-cells residing freely without clustering has been recently studied. Several studies have suggested that the role of these scattered β-cells (hub cells) is to regulate INS expression while coordinating islet oscillatory in a pacemaker-like manner (Fig. 2). A previous study employed large-scale functional cell mapping and optogenetics and demonstrated that ~ 1 to 10% of the β-cell population (i.e. hub cells) controls the synchronized and rhythmic action of pancreatic islets [150]. Hub cells have been found to be highly connected to other β-cells and robustly respond to high glucose levels compared to other “follower” β-cell subpopulations (Fig. 2). Hub cells have low expression of PDX1 and NKX6.1 pancreatic markers with increased expression of glucokinase (GCK), an important protein in the glycolysis pathway, but with less INS expression (~ 50%) [150, 151]. In addition, examination of the mitochondrial activity in these hub cells showed no difference in mitochondrial number, but increased activity is observed using tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE) imaging. The increased expression of GCK and mitochondrial activity in hub cells may suggest a mechanism of action for these cells for their high level of respondence to glucose levels. Furthermore, β-cells with low INS levels have been found to have high ATP levels with normal glucose sensing and cell survival [151]. This may suggest that hub cells conserve their energy by decreasing the ATP-consuming INS production process [151]. However, hub cells subjected to glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity or pro-inflammatory conditions, as in diabetes, fail to properly respond to the high glucose levels marking them as metabolically fragile cells, which eventually can lead to ER stress and cell dysfunction [150].
Interestingly, other subpopulations of β-cells exhibiting high functional connectivity, referred to as “wave-initiators” or “leaders” as stated in Sterk et al. [152] and “first responders” as explained in Kravet et al. [153], have been recently identified. It has been suggested that hub, wave-initiator, and first responder cells are characteristic components of islets; however, they exhibit distinct Ca2+ signaling characteristics and do not appear to have overlapping functions [152, 153]. The first responders lead the first phase Ca2+ response, are more excitable and crucial for mobilizing β-cells to increase Ca2+ immediately after glucose stimulation [153]. It has been found that during the transition from low to high glucose levels, the first responder cells play a crucial role in recruiting and coordinating Ca2+ activity within a specific time frame, as different cells lead distinct phases of the Ca2+ response to glucose (first responders for the first phase, and leader cells for the second phase) [153]. Previous studies have linked leader (wave origin) cells to the regulation of second-phase Ca2+ dynamics [152], in which hub cells are associated with maintaining elevated and coordinated Ca2+ [14, 154]. This suggests that the heterogeneity controlling second-phase Ca2+ is distinct from that of first-phase Ca2+.
There has been significant debate about the function of hub cells and other subpopulations and their effect on islet function. The identification and categorization of distinct β-cell subgroups, evaluation of their operational features, and understanding of how the group of cells work together to regulate intercellular calcium activity and insulin release within an islet are highly engaging areas of research that have captured significant interest within the islet biology field. Therefore, in the years to come, we anticipate an increase in research aimed at revealing the distinct contributions of these populations towards the coordinated β-cell activity under different conditions.
Heterogeneity of stem cell-derived islet cells
Generation of stem cell-derived islet organoids: recent progress
Through utilizing hPSCs, different pancreatic differentiation protocols have been designed to mimic human embryonic development in vitro (Fig. 3). Understanding the sequential process of pancreatic development serves as the foundational template for protocols’ design. An initial step in pancreatic differentiation is to generate highly efficient definitive endoderm (DE) cells to be then directed towards hepatic or pancreatic tissues [155, 156]. Afterwards, activation of signaling pathways promoting pancreatic differentiation takes place while inhibiting hepatic-promoting signaling pathways [157]. To generate efficient DE, most protocols include Activin A in the first 3–5 days of differentiation to activate the Activin-Nodal signaling pathway [157, 158]. Generated DE cells are then introduced to FGF10, FGF7 or keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and retinoic acid (RA) for FGF and RA signaling activation while inhibiting Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the addition of KAAD-Cyclopamine or SANT-1 for PDX1 induction [159,160,161]. An essential step then follows where hepatic lineage differentiation is prevented by inhibiting the BMP signaling pathway through BMP inhibitors such as Dorsomorphin or Noggin [162, 163]. Upon PDX1 induction, nicotinamide and EGF are added to induce NKX6.1 expression to generate PDX1+/NKX6.1+ pancreatic progenitors (PPs) [159, 160]. Following that, PPs are then differentiated into endocrine progenitors (EPs) expressing NEUROG3 through the addition of γ-secretase inhibitors or DAPT to inhibit the Notch signaling pathway, and β-cellulin and ALK5i to block the TGF-β signaling pathway [164]. To induce INS and MAFA production, high glucose media supplemented with Triiodothyronine (T3), a thyroid hormone, as well as ALK5i is added to the generated EPs to prevent their transition from epithelial to mesenchymal cells [165, 166]. In addition, NKX6.1 expression is found to be exclusively restricted to β-cells where it participates in their development, INS-containing vesicle formation, INS secretory function, and maintains their β-cell identity [167, 168]. As a result, the efficient generation of PDX1 and NKX6.1 co-expressing PPs and later generation of NKX6.1+/INS+ β-cells are crucial for the generation of mature, functional, mono-hormonal β-cells. Hence, the process of in vitro pancreatic β-cell differentiation utilizes small molecules and growth factors targeting specific pathways to either suppress or enhance them [4].
Multiple studies have shown that the generation of functional mono-hormonal pancreatic β-cells is mainly derived from PDX1 and NKX6.1 co-expressing PPs, which currently, can be generated with high efficiency (~ 80–90% of PDX1+/NKX6.1+ cells) [159, 169]. Constant modifications and protocol enhancements in pancreatic differentiation have led us to the generation of efficient functional pancreatic β-cells ~ 30–50% co-expressing C-PEP and NKX6.1 [165, 166, 170,171,172,173,174]. Yet, non-functional INS+ cells were also reported several times in which they were found to co-express GCG and/or SST; hence named, polyhormonal cells [175, 176]. In addition, these polyhormonal cells do not express several key pancreatic β-cell markers including, NKX6.1, MAFA, and important glucose channels/transporters that help in GSIS [165, 166, 172]. Despite protocol modifications, still, there are variations in hPSC-derived pancreatic β-cell differentiation from various cell lines due to the inherent hPSC line differences and efficiency of differentiation protocols [4]. Early pancreatic differentiation protocols depended on continuing β-cell maturation in vivo upon transplantation to animal models [165, 166]. However, recent protocols have provided improved differentiation protocols that are able to generate mature, functional β-cells in vitro [170, 171]. Recently, it has been found that the hippo-YAP signaling pathway affects β-cell differentiation [177]. Moreover, the inhibition of this specific pathway through the addition of Verteporfin, a YAP inhibitor, increases the number of NEUROG3 expressing EP cells and NKX6.1+/C-PEP+ β-cells; hence, enhancing β-cell differentiation and functionality [177]. In addition, the generation of functional β-cells has been found to be improved by emitting the use of growth factors and serum in stage 6 media and it would result in an increase in glucose responsiveness [174]. It is noteworthy that loss of ZnT8 has been observed to promote the maturation of hESC-dervied β-cells and protects them against cell death resulting from lipotoxicity or glucotoxicity. This is achieved by regulating zin levels, which reduces ER stress [178]. Although glucose responsive β-cells can now be generated, they still differ from adult human pancreatic β-cells in the transcriptomic profiles in which they show lower GLIS3, PCSK2, PAX6, and KCNK3 levels, in addition to lower calcium response [166]. Other studies tried to implement different culturing conditions, from 2D culturing system to 3D and found differences in the generated β-cell efficiency. A study identified that the re-clustering of hPSC-derived immature INS+ cells generate β-cells that resemble adult human β-cells, yet not entirely, as they express lower levels of maturity-associated markers UCN3, MAFA, and G6PC2 [165, 172]. Although current pancreatic differentiation protocols focus on eliminating the generated polyhormonal subset during in vitro differentiation, a subset of polyhormonal cells were found in human islets and most commonly in fetal islets [179]. In addition, multiple studies have reported the generation of large number of polyhormonal β-cells that resemble the transient endocrine cells observed during the mid-gestation of human fetal pancreas [162, 176, 180]. Yet, these polyhormonal cells lack the hallmark function of bona fide pancreatic β-cells, and do not secrete INS properly in response to glucose stimulation in vitro [5, 176]. In response to GSIS, in vitro generated polyhormonal β-cells resulted in varying degrees of glucose stimulation ranging from zero stimulation to 2-folds increase in INS secretion [176, 180, 181]. The generation of various numbers of polyhormonal cells in culture may be the cause of these variations and the reduced levels of insulin release. The in vitro generated polyhormonal cells may reflect the immature β-cells which are found during the mid-gestation period of human fetal pancreas [175]. Although the function of polyhormonal cells during human fetal development is not fully understood, immunohistochemical characterization suggested that these cells resemble the transcriptomic profile of α-cells [182]. Interestingly, slender T2D patients were found to have higher numbers of poly hormonal cells [183] that could play a role in stress-adaptation and maintaining normal glucose levels. Characterization of these poly hormonal cells revealed that these cells secrete INS and GCG upon non-glucose associated membrane depolarization and may be fated towards α-cells in vivo [182, 184,185,186]. The natural occurrence of these poly hormonal cells suggests that they might have a role in postnatal pancreatic β-cell maturation and function or other important roles that are yet to be discovered.
Pancreatic progenitor and endocrine progenitor subpopulations derived from hPSCs
During embryo development, multipotent PP cells expressing the TFs, PDX1, NKX6.1, FOXA2, SOX9, HNF6, and PTF1A, differentiate into exocrine (acinar and duct) and endocrine (islets of Langerhans) pancreas [168]. PDX1 and NKX6.1 specifically, are known to be crucial factors for generating functional, mono-hormonal INS-secreting β-cells [2]. Therefore, hPSC differentiation protocols aim to generate efficient PP cells co-expressing PDX1 and NKX6.1. However, variations in PDX1 and NKX6.1 expression patterns have been observed when applying the same differentiation protocol on eight different human embryonic stem cell (hESC)/ human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines [2, 159]. This can be considered one of the factors resulting in mature β-cells heterogeneity that must be considered when designing transplantation protocols.
PDX1 is the earliest TF to be produced during pancreas development [187]. Interestingly, as PPs further differentiate, PDX1 expression becomes restricted to β-cells. Although PDX1 is essential for β-cell differentiation, generated PDX1+/NKX6.1− PPs differentiate into GCG-secreting cells or non-functional poly hormonal β-cells that co-express INS and other islet hormones. These polyhormonal β-cells cannot be used as an option for transplantation therapy as they lack the hallmark function of β-cells [2, 5]. Multiple studies have reported the generation of GCG-secreting α-cells upon in vivo transplantation of hESC-derived poly hormonal cells [176, 184, 185, 188, 189]. Interestingly, a novel PDX1−/NKX6.1+ PP population has been recently identified and is able to generate functional glucose-responsive β-cells [168, 190].
Several in vitro pancreatic differentiation protocols suggest the generation of functional β-cells from PDX1+/NKX6.1+ PP populations that later express NEUROG3 [185, 186]. Studies have shownheterogeneity at EP stage marked by the difference in NEUROG3 expression where NEUROG3– EPs lacked PDX1 expression but co-expressed CDX2 [191]. Another study further identified subclusters within NEUROG3+ cells: EPs (39.1%), poly hormonal endocrine cells (Endo; 42%), duct cells (6%), liver cells (8.2%), and an unknown cell type cluster (4.7%) [192]. The identified EP cluster had three different sub-clusters where they expressed different profiles with EP1 expressing the highest NEUROG3 levels, EP2 expressing TPH1 and FEV, and EP3 expressing GAST. In addition, the authors identified three endocrine clusters targeted towards different cell fates. Endo1 expressed ERO1B and SLC30A8 indicating β-cell fate, Endo2 expressed GCG, PEMT, and IRX2 indicating α-cell fate, while Endo3 expressed SST and HHEX suggesting δ-cell fate [192]. These results show the further complexity in endocrine cell populations and further heterogeneity can be observed as cells differentiate towards end-stages of pancreatic differentiation.
As hPSC-derived pancreatic differentiation protocols can generate heterogenous cell populations in which some could even be committed towards non-pancreatic lineages, several studies aimed to purify PPs directed towards β-cells. Previous studies reported that PPs can be purified using cell surface markers. Glycoprotein 2 (GP2), CD142, and CD24 have been found to be specifically expressed in PPs that can generate functional INS-secreting cells [186, 193,194,195,196]; therefore, those markers have been used to purify PDX1+ cells at the PP stage. On the other hand, NEUROG3-expressing cells can be isolated from the heterogenous population at the EP stage using specific surface markers, including SUSD2, CD318, CD133, CD200, and CD49f [186, 197]. This indicates that pure NEUROG3+ cells can be obtained for further differentiation into pancreatic islet cells. In 2018, a study compared in vivo and in vitro EP cells (stage 5) post-sorting based on E-cadherin, CD142 and SUSD2 surface markers which were previously described to discriminate between progenitors fated towards β-cells from those fated towards α- or γ-cells [196, 197]. In vitro EPs have increased levels of RFX6 and CDX2 that might reflect a mixed pancreas-duodenum fated populations or early PPs. On the other hand, human fetal EPs express high NKX6.1 and DLK1 levels. In addition, GPM6A, CDKN1A, and BMP5 have been found to be sporadically expressed in the in vitro-generated EPs [198].
Subpopulations of hPSC-derived islet cells
Recently, multiple single-cell transcriptome studies performed on human islet cells and hPSC-derived islets highlighted the unique genetic signatures and intra-islet heterogeneity levels. By tackling these studies, it is suggested that the early stages of pancreatic development are widely consistent with homogenous profiles. On the other hand, during late pancreatic developmental stages where endocrine commitment takes place, this uniformity starts to be lost resulting in different end-stage cells with different genetic profiles. Although limited studies focused on generated pancreatic β-cell populations derived from hPSCs have been found, multiple single-cell analysis studies have identified and supported that islet cells heterogeneity starts from pancreatic and EP stages. These studies also indicated that hPSC-derived islets generated in vitro, differ from adult human islets where cell heterogeneity depends on the differentiation protocol used.
One of the important studies that tackled hPSC-derived β-cell heterogeneity has been done by Veres et al. [174]. The study reported that cells’ heterogeneity starts to appear from stage 4 and continued onwards. At end-stages, β-cells expressing β-cell markers such as INS, NKX6.1, and ISL1, α-like cells expressing GCG, ARX, IRX2, including INS, and a small subset of SST+/HHEX+/ISL1+ resembling δ-cell population have been identified [174]. They also detected a new population of enterochromaffin cells, located within the intestinal epithelium, marked by the expression of TPH1 and SLC18A1, which are normally not present in fetal or adult islets [174]. Several study groups have identified such off-target populations during hPSC-derived islet cell differentiation [174, 192, 199, 200]. Therefore, β-cell purification methods using surface markers can be used to isolate the functional mono-hormonal β-cell fraction from the total heterogenous hPSC-derived islet populations. Recent studies have identified CD49a as a specific cell surface marker for the functional INS+ cell fraction, which then can be re-aggregated to form 3D islet organoid structures [174, 201]. Nevertheless, the isolation of β-cells from the generated islet organoids would cause disturbance of the islet architecture that is required to mimic the in vivo environment. Reports have shown that disturbed islets perform less when compared with intact islet cells during GSIS [202,203,204]. Yet, islet cell fractionation and then re-aggregation of isolated β-cells enhances their functional maturation and response to glucose [172]. These results support the importance of the complex and heterogenous islet architecture and close proximity of cells in conferring β-cell functionality and response to glucose stimulation through β-cells contact with the environment and other types of endocrine cells. Other combinations of surface markers have been reported to enrich β-cell fraction from the whole pancreas including Hpi2+/HPα1−/HPx2− and CD9+/CD56+, yet, a small fraction of δ-cells was also purified using these markers indicating the essential need for full characterization of the identified surface markers [205, 206].
Heterogenous versus homogenous endocrine cell population for cell therapy
The organization of endocrine cells within the islet is crucial for the functional performance of pancreatic β-cells and response to glucose alterations. Studies have shown that intact islet cells respond more efficiently than isolated β-cells [202,203,204]. Within the human islet, the pancreatic β-cells are directly communicating with other endocrine cells for paracrine signaling and electrical coupling [19, 65]. This raises an important question regarding the use of purified β-cells versus a heterogenous islet cell population for transplantation therapy.
The secretion of GCG and GCG-derived peptides has been shown to enhance INS exocytosis machinery [207] and that ACh secreted from α-cells affects β-cell functionality [119]. In addition, SST secretion is known to inhibit INS secretion [208]. While other endocrine cells can affect β-cells functionality, β-cells can also have a direct effect on other endocrine cells. INS receptors are highly expressed in α-cells where excessive INS secretion can inhibit GCG secretion [209]. This interwind hormonal effect on other endocrine cells indicates a complex yet homogenous intra-islet activity where the different types of endocrine cells have effects on other endocrine cells’ functionalities. In cases of T2D, studies have shown increased α- to β-cell ratio as α-cells are more resistant to metabolic stresses through their high expression of anti-apoptotic proteins [210]. However, in T1D, a decrease in α-cell population is observed [211], which can correlate to an inter-cell dependency between α- and β-cells for cells’ development and function. Therefore, it is important to study co-transplanting β-, α-, and δ-cells together, which may give better outcomes in correcting hyperglycaemia. For cell transplantation therapy, researchers may need to design a cell product, which includes the main endocrine islet cells in addition to β-cells that can be achieve selecting for each endocrine cell type through specific surface markers and re-aggregating the purified islet cells.
Conclusion and future perspectives
Pancreatic β-cell heterogeneity has recently been the focus of new pancreatic β-cell research. Recent advances in single-cell studies have paved the way for further understanding of human islet structure and cell composition. Heterogeneity of pancreatic β-cells can be observed in normal human islets, disease status, and more variability is seen in in vitro generated β-cells. The observed variability in pancreatic β-cells generated in vitro could be the cause for the slowly improved pancreatic differentiation protocols that are able to generate functional, mono-hormonal β-cells. Here, we tackled β-cell heterogeneity from different aspects while looking at their maturity status, under stress and diabetes conditions, as well as their abilities to respond to increased glucose levels. We further analysed inter- and intra-islet cell communication and its importance in developing a harmonious network of cell–cell communication. Furthermore, applying single analysis tools on the heterogenous populations will allow researchers to better understand the transcriptome profiles of different islet cell populations. By implementing newly developed research techniques such as single-cell sequencing, a better understanding of the different β-cell populations is within reach and more approachable.
Availability of data and materials
No data availability.
Abbreviations
- CAMs:
-
Cell adhesion molecules
- Cxs:
-
Connexins
- DE:
-
Definitive endoderm
- EPs:
-
Endocrine progenitors
- ER:
-
Endoplasmic reticulum
- GCG:
-
Glucagon
- GCK:
-
Glucokinase
- GJs:
-
Gap junctions
- GlyRs:
-
Glycine receptors
- hiPSCs:
-
Human induced pluripotent stem cells
- hPSCs:
-
Human pluripotent stem cells
- INS:
-
Insulin
- PPs:
-
Pancreatic progenitors
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- SST:
-
Somatostatin
- T1D:
-
Type 1 diabetes
- T2D:
-
Type 2 diabetes
- TFs:
-
Transcription factors
- UPR:
-
Unfolded protein response
References
Narushima M, Kobayashi N, Okitsu T, Tanaka Y, Li S-A, Chen Y, Miki A, Tanaka K, Nakaji S, Takei K, Gutierrez AS, Rivas-Carrillo JD, Navarro-Álvarez N, Jun H-S, Westerman KA, Noguchi H, Lakey JRT, Leboulch P, Tanaka N, Yoon J-W (2005) A human β-cell line for transplantation therapy to control type 1 diabetes. Nat Biotechnol 23(10):1274–1282. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1145
Memon B, Abdelalim EM (2020) Stem cell therapy for diabetes: beta cells versus pancreatic progenitors. Cells 9(2):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020283
Balamurugan AN, Loganathan G, Tweed B, Tucker WW, Subhashree V, Mokshagundam SPL, Hughes MG, Williams SK (2016) Islet cell transplant. In: Lim JW (ed) Contemporary pancreas transplantation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20789-6_9-2
Abdelalim EM (2021) Modeling different types of diabetes using human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 78(6):2459–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03710-9
Shahjalal HM, Abdal Dayem A, Lim KM, Jeon T-I, Cho S-G (2018) Generation of pancreatic β cells for treatment of diabetes: advances and challenges. Stem Cell Res Ther 9(1):355–355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1099-3
Dolenšek J, Rupnik MS, Stožer A (2015) Structural similarities and differences between the human and the mouse pancreas. Islets 7(1):e1024405–e1024405. https://doi.org/10.1080/19382014.2015.1024405
Cabrera O, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Berggren PO, Caicedo A (2006) The unique cytoarchitecture of human pancreatic islets has implications for islet cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2334–2339
Wierup N, Sundler F (2005) Ultrastructure of islet ghrelin cells in the human fetus. Cell Tissue Res 319(3):423–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-004-1044-x
Rorsman P, Ashcroft FM (2018) Pancreatic β-cell electrical activity and insulin secretion: of mice and men. Physiol Rev 98(1):117–214. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00008.2017
Konstantinova I, Lammert E (2004) Microvascular development: learning from pancreatic islets. BioEssays 26(10):1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20105
Dybala MP, Kuznetsov A, Motobu M, Hendren-Santiago BK, Philipson LH, Chervonsky AV, Hara M (2020) Integrated pancreatic blood flow: bidirectional microcirculation between endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Diabetes 69(7):1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.2337/db19-1034
Arrojo E Drigo R, Ali Y, Diez J, Srinivasan DK, Berggren PO, Boehm BO (2015) New insights into the architecture of the islet of Langerhans: a focused cross-species assessment. Diabetologia 58(10):2218–2228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3699-0
Roscioni SS, Migliorini A, Gegg M, Lickert H (2016) Impact of islet architecture on beta-cell heterogeneity, plasticity and function. Nat Rev Endocrinol 12(12):695–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.147
Westacott MJ, Ludin NWF, Benninger RKP (2017) Spatially organized beta-cell subpopulations control electrical dynamics across islets of langerhans. Biophys J 113(5):1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.021
Kim A, Miller K, Jo J, Kilimnik G, Wojcik P, Hara M (2009) Islet architecture: a comparative study. Islets 1(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.1.2.9480
Geron E, Boura-Halfon S, Schejter ED, Shilo BZ (2015) The edges of pancreatic islet beta cells constitute adhesive and signaling microdomains. Cell Rep 10(3):317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.031
Gan WJ, Zavortink M, Ludick C, Templin R, Webb R, Webb R, Ma W, Poronnik P, Parton RG, Gaisano HY, Shewan AM, Thorn P (2017) Cell polarity defines three distinct domains in pancreatic β-cells. J Cell Sci 130(1):143–151. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.185116
Farack L, Golan M, Egozi A, Dezorella N, Bahar Halpern K, Ben-Moshe S, Garzilli I, Toth B, Roitman L, Krizhanovsky V, Itzkovitz S (2019) Transcriptional heterogeneity of beta cells in the intact pancreas. Dev Cell 48(1):115-125E114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.11.001
Cabrera O, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Berggren P-O, Caicedo A (2006) The unique cytoarchitecture of human pancreatic islets has implications for islet cell function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(7):2334. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510790103
Bosco D, Armanet M, Morel P, Niclauss N, Sgroi A, Muller YD, Giovannoni L, Parnaud G, Berney T (2010) Unique arrangement of alpha- and beta-cells in human islets of Langerhans. Diabetes 59(5):1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.2337/db09-1177
Bonner-Weir S, Sullivan BA, Weir GC (2015) Human islet morphology revisited: human and rodent islets are not so different after all. J Histochem Cytochem 63(8):604–612. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155415570969
Ichii H, Inverardi L, Pileggi A, Molano RD, Cabrera O, Caicedo A, Messinger S, Kuroda Y, Berggren PO, Ricordi C (2005) A novel method for the assessment of cellular composition and beta-cell viability in human islet preparations. Am J Transplant 5(7):1635–1645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00913.x
Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Gagniuc PA, Gubceac E, Mardare L, Popescu I, Dima S, Militaru M (2015) A 3D map of the islet routes throughout the healthy human pancreas. Sci Rep 5:14634. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14634
Pisania A, Weir GC, O’Neil JJ, Omer A, Tchipashvili V, Lei J, Colton CK, Bonner-Weir S (2010) Quantitative analysis of cell composition and purity of human pancreatic islet preparations. Lab Invest 90(11):1661–1675. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2010.124
Olehnik SK, Fowler JL, Avramovich G, Hara M (2017) Quantitative analysis of intra- and inter-individual variability of human beta-cell mass. Sci Rep 7(1):16398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16300-w
Dybala MP, Hara M (2019) Heterogeneity of the Human Pancreatic Islet. Diabetes 68(6):1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.2337/db19-0072
Poudel A, Fowler JL, Zielinski MC, Kilimnik G, Hara M (2016) Stereological analyses of the whole human pancreas. Sci Rep 6:34049. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34049
Striegel DA, Hara M, Periwal V (2016) Adaptation of pancreatic islet cyto-architecture during development. Phys Biol 13(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/13/2/025004
Hoang DT, Matsunari H, Nagaya M, Nagashima H, Millis JM, Witkowski P, Periwal V, Hara M, Jo J (2014) A conserved rule for pancreatic islet organization. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110384
Volta F, Scerbo MJ, Seelig A, Wagner R, O’Brien N, Gerst F, Fritsche A, Haring HU, Zeigerer A, Ullrich S, Gerdes JM (2019) Glucose homeostasis is regulated by pancreatic beta-cell cilia via endosomal EphA-processing. Nat Commun 10(1):5686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12953-5
Cottle L, Gan WJ, Gilroy I, Samra JS, Gill AJ, Loudovaris T, Thomas HE, Hawthorne WJ, Kebede MA, Thorn P (2021) Structural and functional polarisation of human pancreatic beta cells in islets from organ donors with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 64(3):618–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05345-8
Pipeleers D, De Mesmaeker I, Robert T, Van Hulle F (2017) Heterogeneity in the beta-cell population: a guided search into its significance in pancreas and in implants. Curr Diab Rep 17(10):86–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0925-9
Benninger RKP, Hodson DJ (2018) New understanding of β-cell heterogeneity and in situ islet function. Diabetes 67(4):537–547. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi17-0040
Wang Yue J, Golson Maria L, Schug J, Traum D, Liu C, Vivek K, Dorrell C, Naji A, Powers Alvin C, Chang K-M, Grompe M, Kaestner Klaus H (2016) Single-cell mass cytometry analysis of the human endocrine pancreas. Cell Metab 24(4):616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.007
Szabat M, Pourghaderi P, Soukhatcheva G, Verchere CB, Warnock GL, Piret JM, Johnson JD (2011) Kinetics and genomic profiling of adult human and mouse β-cell maturation. Islets 3(4):175–187. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.3.4.15881
Kitada M, Koya D (2013) SIRT1 in type 2 diabetes: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Diabetes Metab J 37(5):315–325. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2013.37.5.315
Dorrell C, Schug J, Canaday PS, Russ HA, Tarlow BD, Grompe MT, Horton T, Hebrok M, Streeter PR, Kaestner KH, Grompe M (2016) Human islets contain four distinct subtypes of β cells. Nat Commun 7:11756–11756. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11756
Arda HE, Li L, Tsai J, Torre EA, Rosli Y, Peiris H, Spitale RC, Dai C, Gu X, Qu K, Wang P, Wang J, Grompe M, Scharfmann R, Snyder MS, Bottino R, Powers AC, Chang HY, Kim SK (2016) Age-dependent pancreatic gene regulation reveals mechanisms governing human β cell function. Cell Metab 23(5):909–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.04.002
Li X, Yang KY, Chan VW, Leung KT, Zhang X-B, Wong AS, Chong CCN, Wang CC, Ku M, Lui KO (2020) Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals that CD9 is a negative marker of glucose-responsive pancreatic β-like cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 15(5):1111–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.09.009
In’t Veld P, Marichal M (2010) Microscopic anatomy of the human islet of Langerhans. Adv Exp Med Biol 654:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3271-3_1
Xin Y, Kim J, Okamoto H, Ni M, Wei Y, Adler C, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Lin C, Gromada J (2016) RNA sequencing of single human islet cells reveals type 2 diabetes genes. Cell Metab 24(4):608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.018
Tritschler S, Theis FJ, Lickert H, Böttcher A (2017) Systematic single-cell analysis provides new insights into heterogeneity and plasticity of the pancreas. Mol Metab 6(9):974–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2017.06.021
Segerstolpe Å, Palasantza A, Eliasson P, Andersson E-M, Andréasson A-C, Sun X, Picelli S, Sabirsh A, Clausen M, Bjursell MK, Smith DM, Kasper M, Ämmälä C, Sandberg R (2016) Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 24(4):593–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020
Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, Groen N, Dielen T, Jansen E, van Gurp L, Engelse MA, Carlotti F, de Koning EJ, van Oudenaarden A (2016) A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas. Cell Syst 3(4):385-394.e383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002
Lawlor N, George J, Bolisetty M, Kursawe R, Sun L, Sivakamasundari V, Kycia I, Robson P, Stitzel ML (2017) Single-cell transcriptomes identify human islet cell signatures and reveal cell-type–specific expression changes in type 2 diabetes. Genome Res 27(2):208–222. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.212720.116
Efrat S (2019) Beta-cell dedifferentiation in type 2 diabetes: concise review. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 37(10):1267–1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3059
Tan MI, Hisana AN, Ridwan A, Fitri LL, Fajar PA (2020) Diabetes and retinol-binding protein (RBP4): the study of free and exosomal RBP4 in blood plasma and urine of patients. Biomed Pharmacol J 13(2):693–699
Houthuijzen JM (2016) For better or worse: FFAR1 and FFAR4 signaling in cancer and diabetes. Mol Pharmacol 90(6):738. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.116.105932
Dominguez-Gutierrez G, Xin Y, Gromada J (2019) Heterogeneity of human pancreatic β-cells. Mol Metab 27:S7–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2019.06.015
Adams CJ, Kopp MC, Larburu N, Nowak PR, Ali MMU (2019) Structure and molecular mechanism of ER stress signaling by the unfolded protein response signal activator IRE1. Front Mol Biosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2019.00011
Hetz C (2012) The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13(2):89–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3270
Orino K, Lehman L, Tsuji Y, Ayaki H, Torti SV, Torti FM (2001) Ferritin and the response to oxidative stress. Biochem J 357(1):241–247. https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3570241
Zhou Y, Duan S, Zhou Y, Yu S, Wu J, Wu X, Zhao J, Zhao Y (2015) Sulfiredoxin-1 attenuates oxidative stress via Nrf2/ARE pathway and 2-Cys prdxs after oxygen-glucose deprivation in astrocytes. J Mol Neurosci 55(4):941–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-014-0449-6
Dror E, Fagnocchi L, Wegert V, Apostle S, Grimaldi B, Gruber T, Panzeri I, Heyne S, Höffler KD, Kreiner V, Ching R, Tsai-Hsiu LuT, Semwal A, Johnson B, Senapati P, Lempradl A, Schones D, Imhof A, Shen H, Pospisilik JA (2023) Epigenetic dosage identifies two major and functionally distinct β cell subtypes. Cell Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2023.03.008
Eskeland R, Leeb M, Grimes GR, Kress C, Boyle S, Sproul D, Gilbert N, Fan Y, Skoultchi AI, Wutz A, Bickmore WA (2010) Ring1B compacts chromatin structure and represses gene expression independent of histone ubiquitination. Mol Cell 38(3):452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.032
Berthault C, Staels W, Scharfmann R (2020) Purification of pancreatic endocrine subsets reveals increased iron metabolism in beta cells. Mol Metab 42:101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101060
Ahrén B (2000) Autonomic regulation of islet hormone secretion–implications for health and disease. Diabetologia 43(4):393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051322
Nolan CJ, Prentki M (2008) The islet β-cell: fuel responsive and vulnerable. Trends Endocrinol Metab 19(8):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2008.07.006
Pérez-Armendariz EM (2013) Connexin 36, a key element in pancreatic beta cell function. Neuropharmacology 75:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.015
Meissner HP (1976) Electrophysiological evidence for coupling between beta cells of pancreatic islets. Nature 262(5568):502–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/262502a0
Charpantier E, Cancela J, Meda P (2007) Beta cells preferentially exchange cationic molecules via connexin 36 gap junction channels. Diabetologia 50(11):2332–2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0807-9
Ravier MA, Güldenagel M, Charollais A, Gjinovci A, Caille D, Söhl G, Wollheim CB, Willecke K, Henquin JC, Meda P (2005) Loss of connexin36 channels alters beta-cell coupling, islet synchronization of glucose-induced Ca2+ and insulin oscillations, and basal insulin release. Diabetes 54(6):1798–1807. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1798
Hellman B, Salehi A, Grapengiesser E, Gylfe E (2012) Isolated mouse islets respond to glucose with an initial peak of glucagon release followed by pulses of insulin and somatostatin in antisynchrony with glucagon. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 417(4):1219–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.113
Hellman B, Salehi A, Gylfe E, Dansk H, Grapengiesser E (2009) Glucose generates coincident insulin and somatostatin pulses and antisynchronous glucagon pulses from human pancreatic islets. Endocrinology 150(12):5334–5340. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0600
Jain R, Lammert E (2009) Cell-cell interactions in the endocrine pancreas. Diabetes Obes Metab 11(Suppl 4):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01102.x
Tengholm A, Gylfe E (2009) Oscillatory control of insulin secretion. Mol Cell Endocrinol 297(1–2):58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2008.07.009
Meda P (2013) Protein-mediated interactions of pancreatic islet cells. Scientifica. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/621249
Cigliola V, Allagnat F, Berchtold LA, Lamprianou S, Haefliger JA, Meda P (2015) Role of Connexins and Pannexins in the Pancreas. Pancreas 44(8):1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000378
Berchtold LA, Miani M, Diep TA, Madsen AN, Cigliola V, Colli M, Krivokapic JM, Pociot F, Eizirik DL, Meda P, Holst B, Billestrup N, Størling J (2017) Pannexin-2-deficiency sensitizes pancreatic β-cells to cytokine-induced apoptosis in vitro and impairs glucose tolerance in vivo. Mol Cell Endocrinol 448:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.04.001
Sosinsky GE, Boassa D, Dermietzel R, Duffy HS, Laird DW, MacVicar B, Naus CC, Penuela S, Scemes E, Spray DC, Thompson RJ, Zhao HB, Dahl G (2011) Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels. Channels (Austin) 5(3):193–197. https://doi.org/10.4161/chan.5.3.15765
Ishihara H, Maechler P, Gjinovci A, Herrera PL, Wollheim CB (2003) Islet beta-cell secretion determines glucagon release from neighbouring alpha-cells. Nat Cell Biol 5(4):330–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb951
Takeichi M (1990) Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. Annu Rev Biochem 59:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.001321
Langley K, Aletsee-Ufrecht MC, Grant N, Gratzl M (1989) Expression of the neural cell adhesion NCAM in endocrine cells. J Histochem Cytochem 37:781–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/37.6.2723399
Rouiller DG, Cirulli V, Halban PA (1991) Uvomorulin mediates calcium-dependent aggregation of islet cells, whereas calcium-independent cell adhesion molecules distinguish between islet cell types. Dev Biol 148(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(91)90332-w
Parnaud G, Lavallard V, Bedat B, Matthey-Doret D, Morel P, Berney T, Bosco D (2015) Cadherin engagement improves insulin secretion of single human β-cells. Diabetes 64(3):887–896. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0257
Suzuki H, Nishizawa T, Tani K, Yamazaki Y, Tamura A, Ishitani R, Dohmae N, Tsukita S, Nureki O, Fujiyoshi Y (2014) Crystal structure of a claudin provides insight into the architecture of tight junctions. Science (New York, NY) 344(6181):304–307. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248571
Jiang FX, Mishina Y, Baten A, Morahan G, Harrison LC (2015) Transcriptome of pancreas-specific Bmpr1a-deleted islets links to TPH1-5-HT axis. Biology open 4(8):1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.011858
Chen X, Macara IG (2005) Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat Cell Biol 7(3):262–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1226
Kaido T, Perez B, Yebra M, Hill J, Cirulli V, Hayek A, Montgomery AM (2004) Alphav-integrin utilization in human beta-cell adhesion, spreading, and motility. J Biol Chem 279(17):17731–17737. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308425200
Kaido T, Yebra M, Cirulli V, Montgomery AM (2004) Regulation of human beta-cell adhesion, motility, and insulin secretion by collagen IV and its receptor alpha1beta1. J Biol Chem 279(51):53762–53769. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411202200
Bonner-Weir S (1988) Morphological evidence for pancreatic polarity of beta-cell within islets of Langerhans. Diabetes 37(5):616–621. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.5.616
Virtanen I, Banerjee M, Palgi J, Korsgren O, Lukinius A, Thornell LE, Kikkawa Y, Sekiguchi K, Hukkanen M, Konttinen YT, Otonkoski T (2008) Blood vessels of human islets of Langerhans are surrounded by a double basement membrane. Diabetologia 51(7):1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-0997-9
Otonkoski T, Banerjee M, Korsgren O, Thornell LE, Virtanen I (2008) Unique basement membrane structure of human pancreatic islets: implications for beta-cell growth and differentiation. Diabetes Obes Metab 10(Suppl 4):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00955.x
Benninger RKP, Kravets V (2022) The physiological role of β-cell heterogeneity in pancreatic islet function. Nat Rev Endocrinol 18(1):9–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00568-0
Wojtusciszyn A, Armanet M, Morel P, Berney T, Bosco D (2008) Insulin secretion from human beta cells is heterogeneous and dependent on cell-to-cell contacts. Diabetologia 51(10):1843–1852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1103-z
Schuit FC, In’t Veld PA, Pipeleers DG (1988) Glucose stimulates proinsulin biosynthesis by a dose-dependent recruitment of pancreatic beta cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(11):3865–3869. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.11.3865
Hoang Do O, Thorn P (2015) Insulin secretion from beta cells within intact islets: location matters. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 42(4):406–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12368
Kelly C, McClenaghan NH, Flatt PR (2011) Role of islet structure and cellular interactions in the control of insulin secretion. Islets 3(2):41–47. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.3.2.14805
Dahl U, Sjødin A, Semb H (1996) Cadherins regulate aggregation of pancreatic beta-cells in vivo. Development 122(9):2895–2902. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.9.2895
Parnaud G, Gonelle-Gispert C, Morel P, Giovannoni L, Muller YD, Meier R, Borot S, Berney T, Bosco D (2011) Cadherin engagement protects human β-cells from apoptosis. Endocrinology 152(12):4601–4609. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-1286
Bosco D, Rouiller DG, Halban PA (2007) Differential expression of E-cadherin at the surface of rat beta-cells as a marker of functional heterogeneity. J Endocrinol 194(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe-06-0169
Arous C, Wehrle-Haller B (2017) Role and impact of the extracellular matrix on integrin-mediated pancreatic β-cell functions. Biol Cell 109(6):223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/boc.201600076
Hazama A, Hayashi S, Okada Y (1998) Cell surface measurements of ATP release from single pancreatic beta cells using a novel biosensor technique. Pflugers Arch 437(1):31–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004240050742
Leitner JW, Sussman KE, Vatter AE, Schneider FH (1975) Adenine nucleotides in the secretory granule fraction of rat islets. Endocrinology 96(3):662–677. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-96-3-662
Jacques-Silva MC, Correa-Medina M, Cabrera O, Rodriguez-Diaz R, Makeeva N, Fachado A, Diez J, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Pileggi A, Molano RD, Berggren P-O, Caicedo A (2010) ATP-gated P2X3 receptors constitute a positive autocrine signal for insulin release in the human pancreatic beta cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(14):6465–6470. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908935107
Fernandez-Alvarez J, Hillaire-Buys D, Loubatières-Mariani MM, Gomis R, Petit P (2001) P2 receptor agonists stimulate insulin release from human pancreatic islets. Pancreas 22(1):69–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-200101000-00012
Silva AM, Rodrigues RJ, Tomé AR, Cunha RA, Misler S, Rosário LM, Santos RM (2008) Electrophysiological and immunocytochemical evidence for P2X purinergic receptors in pancreatic beta cells. Pancreas 36(3):279–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31815a8473
Avila A, Nguyen L, Rigo J-M (2013) Glycine receptors and brain development. Front Cell Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00184
Yan-Do R, Duong E, Manning Fox JE, Dai X, Suzuki K, Khan S, Bautista A, Ferdaoussi M, Lyon J, Wu X, Cheley S, MacDonald PE, Braun M (2016) A glycine-insulin autocrine feedback loop enhances insulin secretion from human β-cells and is impaired in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 65(8):2311–2321. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-1272
Simpson N, Maffei A, Freeby M, Burroughs S, Freyberg Z, Javitch J, Leibel RL, Harris PE (2012) Dopamine-mediated autocrine inhibitory circuit regulating human insulin secretion in vitro. Mol Endocrinol (Baltimore, Md) 26(10):1757–1772. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2012-1101
Rubí B, Ljubicic S, Pournourmohammadi S, Carobbio S, Armanet M, Bartley C, Maechler P (2005) Dopamine D2-like receptors are expressed in pancreatic beta cells and mediate inhibition of insulin secretion. J Biol Chem 280(44):36824–36832. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505560200
Almaça J, Molina J, Menegaz D, Pronin AN, Tamayo A, Slepak V, Berggren PO, Caicedo A (2016) Human beta cells produce and release serotonin to inhibit glucagon secretion from alpha cells. Cell Rep 17(12):3281–3291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.072
Bennet H, Balhuizen A, Medina A, Dekker Nitert M, Ottosson Laakso E, Essén S, Spégel P, Storm P, Krus U, Wierup N, Fex M (2015) Altered serotonin (5-HT) 1D and 2A receptor expression may contribute to defective insulin and glucagon secretion in human type 2 diabetes. Peptides 71:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2015.07.008
Michalik M, Erecińska M (1992) GABA in pancreatic islets: metabolism and function. Biochem Pharmacol 44(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(92)90030-m
Braun M, Ramracheya R, Bengtsson M, Clark A, Walker JN, Johnson PR, Rorsman P (2010) Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an autocrine excitatory transmitter in human pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 59(7):1694–1701. https://doi.org/10.2337/db09-0797
Taneera J, Jin Z, Jin Y, Muhammed SJ, Zhang E, Lang S, Salehi A, Korsgren O, Renström E, Groop L, Birnir B (2012) γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in human pancreatic islets is altered in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 55(7):1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2548-7
Caicedo A (2013) Paracrine and autocrine interactions in the human islet: more than meets the eye. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.09.007
Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H (2003) Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 26(6):1902–1912. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.6.1902
Müller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, D’Alessio D, Drucker DJ, Flatt PR, Fritsche A, Gribble F, Grill HJ, Habener JF, Holst JJ, Langhans W, Meier JJ, Nauck MA, Perez-Tilve D, Pocai A, Reimann F, Sandoval DA, Schwartz TW, Seeley RJ, Stemmer K, Tang-Christensen M, Woods SC, DiMarchi RD, Tschöp MH (2019) Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Molecular metabolism 30:72–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010
Noguchi GM, Huising MO (2019) Integrating the inputs that shape pancreatic islet hormone release. Nat Metab 1(12):1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-019-0148-2
Svendsen B, Larsen O, Gabe MBN, Christiansen CB, Rosenkilde MM, Drucker DJ, Holst JJ (2018) Insulin secretion depends on intra-islet glucagon signaling. Cell Rep 25(5):1127-1134.e1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.018
Gelling RW, Vuguin PM, Du XQ, Cui L, Rømer J, Pederson RA, Leiser M, Sørensen H, Holst JJ, Fledelius C, Johansen PB, Fleischer N, McIntosh CH, Nishimura E, Charron MJ (2009) Pancreatic beta-cell overexpression of the glucagon receptor gene results in enhanced beta-cell function and mass. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297(3):E695-707. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00082.2009
Sørensen H, Winzell MS, Brand CL, Fosgerau K, Gelling RW, Nishimura E, Ahren B (2006) Glucagon receptor knockout mice display increased insulin sensitivity and impaired beta-cell function. Diabetes 55(12):3463–3469. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0307
Rodriguez-Diaz R, Molano RD, Weitz JR, Abdulreda MH, Berman DM, Leibiger B, Leibiger IB, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Pileggi A, Caicedo A, Berggren P-O (2018) Paracrine interactions within the pancreatic islet determine the glycemic set point. Cell Metab 27(3):549-558.e544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.015
Huypens P, Ling Z, Pipeleers D, Schuit F (2000) Glucagon receptors on human islet cells contribute to glucose competence of insulin release. Diabetologia 43(8):1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051484
Capozzi ME, Svendsen B, Encisco SE, Lewandowski SL, Martin MD, Lin H, Jaffe JL, Coch RW, Haldeman JM, MacDonald PE, Merrins MJ, D’Alessio DA, Campbell JE (2019) β Cell tone is defined by proglucagon peptides through cAMP signaling. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126742
Edwards CM, Todd JF, Mahmoudi M, Wang Z, Wang RM, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR (1999) Glucagon-like peptide 1 has a physiological role in the control of postprandial glucose in humans: studies with the antagonist exendin 9–39. Diabetes 48(1):86–93. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.1.86
Fehmann HC, Hering BJ, Wolf MJ, Brandhorst H, Brandhorst D, Bretzel RG, Federlin K, Göke B (1995) The effects of glucagon-like peptide-I (GLP-I) on hormone secretion from isolated human pancreatic islets. Pancreas 11(2):196–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-199508000-00014
Rodriguez-Diaz R, Dando R, Jacques-Silva MC, Fachado A, Molina J, Abdulreda MH, Ricordi C, Roper SD, Berggren P-O, Caicedo A (2011) Alpha cells secrete acetylcholine as a non-neuronal paracrine signal priming beta cell function in humans. Nat Med 17(7):888–892. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2371
Tang SC, Baeyens L, Shen CN, Peng SJ, Chien HJ, Scheel DW, Chamberlain CE, German MS (2018) Human pancreatic neuro-insular network in health and fatty infiltration. Diabetologia 61(1):168–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4409-x
Molina J, Rodriguez-Diaz R, Fachado A, Jacques-Silva MC, Berggren PO, Caicedo A (2014) Control of insulin secretion by cholinergic signaling in the human pancreatic islet. Diabetes 63(8):2714–2726. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1371
Zhu L, Rossi M, Cohen A, Pham J, Zheng H, Dattaroy D, Mukaibo T, Melvin JE, Langel JL, Hattar S, Matschinsky FM, Appella DH, Doliba NM, Wess J (2019) Allosteric modulation of β-cell M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors greatly improves glucose homeostasis in lean and obese mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116(37):18684–18690. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904943116
Rahier J, Wallon J, Loozen S, Lefevre A, Gepts W, Haot J (1983) The pancreatic polypeptide cells in the human pancreas: the effects of age and diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 56(3):441–444. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-56-3-441
Brereton MF, Vergari E, Zhang Q, Clark A (2015) Alpha-, Delta- and PP-cells: are they the architectural cornerstones of islet structure and co-ordination? J Histochem Cytochem 63(8):575–591. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155415583535
Aragón F, Karaca M, Novials A, Maldonado R, Maechler P, Rubí B (2015) Pancreatic polypeptide regulates glucagon release through PPYR1 receptors expressed in mouse and human alpha-cells. Biochem Biophys Acta 1850(2):343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.11.005
Kim W, Fiori JL, Shin YK, Okun E, Kim JS, Rapp PR, Egan JM (2014) Pancreatic polypeptide inhibits somatostatin secretion. FEBS Lett 588(17):3233–3239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.07.005
Cabrera O, Jacques-Silva MC, Speier S, Yang SN, Köhler M, Fachado A, Vieira E, Zierath JR, Kibbey R, Berman DM, Kenyon NS, Ricordi C, Caicedo A, Berggren PO (2008) Glutamate is a positive autocrine signal for glucagon release. Cell Metab 7(6):545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.004
Zhou Y, Danbolt NC (2014) Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the healthy brain. J Neural Transm (Vienna, Austria: 1996) 121(8):799–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-014-1180-8
Bertrand G, Gross R, Puech R, Loubatières-Mariani MM, Bockaert J (1993) Glutamate stimulates glucagon secretion via an excitatory amino acid receptor of the AMPA subtype in rat pancreas. Eur J Pharmacol 237(1):45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(93)90091-u
Cho JH, Chen L, Kim MH, Chow RH, Hille B, Koh DS (2010) Characteristics and functions of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptors expressed in mouse pancreatic α-cells. Endocrinology 151(4):1541–1550. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-0362
Uehara S, Muroyama A, Echigo N, Morimoto R, Otsuka M, Yatsushiro S, Moriyama Y (2004) Metabotropic glutamate receptor type 4 is involved in autoinhibitory cascade for glucagon secretion by alpha-cells of islet of Langerhans. Diabetes 53(4):998–1006. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.4.998
Bertrand G, Puech R, Loubatieres-Mariani MM, Bockaert J (1995) Glutamate stimulates insulin secretion and improves glucose tolerance in rats. Am J Physiol 269(3 Pt 1):E551-556. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1995.269.3.E551
Yamada Y, Post SR, Wang K, Tager HS, Bell GI, Seino S (1992) Cloning and functional characterization of a family of human and mouse somatostatin receptors expressed in brain, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89(1):251–255. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.1.251
Braun M, Ramracheya R, Amisten S, Bengtsson M, Moritoh Y, Zhang Q, Johnson PR, Rorsman P (2009) Somatostatin release, electrical activity, membrane currents and exocytosis in human pancreatic delta cells. Diabetologia 52(8):1566–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1382-z
Zhang Q, Bengtsson M, Partridge C, Salehi A, Braun M, Cox R, Eliasson L, Johnson PR, Renström E, Schneider T, Berggren PO, Göpel S, Ashcroft FM, Rorsman P (2007) R-type Ca(2+)-channel-evoked CICR regulates glucose-induced somatostatin secretion. Nat Cell Biol 9(4):453–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1563
Kumar U, Sasi R, Suresh S, Patel A, Thangaraju M, Metrakos P, Patel SC, Patel YC (1999) Subtype-selective expression of the five somatostatin receptors (hSSTR1-5) in human pancreatic islet cells: a quantitative double-label immunohistochemical analysis. Diabetes 48(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.48.1.77
Strowski MZ, Parmar RM, Blake AD, Schaeffer JM (2000) Somatostatin inhibits insulin and glucagon secretion via two receptors subtypes: an in vitro study of pancreatic islets from somatostatin receptor 2 knockout mice. Endocrinology 141(1):111–117. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.141.1.7263
Date Y, Nakazato M, Hashiguchi S, Dezaki K, Mondal MS, Hosoda H, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Arima T, Matsuo H, Yada T, Matsukura S (2002) Ghrelin is present in pancreatic alpha-cells of humans and rats and stimulates insulin secretion. Diabetes 51(1):124–129. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.1.124
Dezaki K, Hosoda H, Kakei M, Hashiguchi S, Watanabe M, Kangawa K, Yada T (2004) Endogenous ghrelin in pancreatic islets restricts insulin release by attenuating Ca2+ signaling in beta-cells: implication in the glycemic control in rodents. Diabetes 53(12):3142–3151. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.12.3142
Kageyama H, Funahashi H, Hirayama M, Takenoya F, Kita T, Kato S, Sakurai J, Lee EY, Inoue S, Date Y, Nakazato M, Kangawa K, Shioda S (2005) Morphological analysis of ghrelin and its receptor distribution in the rat pancreas. Regul Pept 126(1–2):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2004.08.031
Granata R, Settanni F, Biancone L, Trovato L, Nano R, Bertuzzi F, Destefanis S, Annunziata M, Martinetti M, Catapano F, Ghè C, Isgaard J, Papotti M, Ghigo E, Muccioli G (2007) Acylated and unacylated ghrelin promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells and human islets: involvement of 3’,5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and phosphatidyl inositol 3-Kinase/Akt signaling. Endocrinology 148(2):512–529. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-0266
Colombo M, Gregersen S, Xiao J, Hermansen K (2003) Effects of ghrelin and other neuropeptides (CART, MCH, orexin A and B, and GLP-1) on the release of insulin from isolated rat islets. Pancreas 27(2):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-200308000-00009
Wierup N, Yang S, McEvilly RJ, Mulder H, Sundler F (2004) Ghrelin is expressed in a novel endocrine cell type in developing rat islets and inhibits insulin secretion from INS-1 (832/13) cells. J Histochem Cytochem 52(3):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540405200301
Cherubini C, Filippi S, Gizzi A, Loppini A (2015) Role of topology in complex functional networks of beta cells. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 92(4):042702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042702
Andrean D, Pedersen MG (2022) Machine learning provides insight into models of heterogeneous electrical activity in human beta-cells. Math Biosci 354:108927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108927
Sherman A, Rinzel J, Keizer J (1988) Emergence of organized bursting in clusters of pancreatic beta-cells by channel sharing. Biophys J 54(3):411–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(88)82975-8
Jo J, Kang H, Choi MY, Koh DS (2005) How noise and coupling induce bursting action potentials in pancreatic {beta}-cells. Biophys J 89(3):1534–1542. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.053181
Zhang M, Goforth P, Bertram R, Sherman A, Satin L (2003) The Ca2+ dynamics of isolated mouse beta-cells and islets: implications for mathematical models. Biophys J 84(5):2852–2870. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(03)70014-9
Marchetti P, Lupi R, Bugliani M, Kirkpatrick CL, Sebastiani G, Grieco FA, Del Guerra S, D’Aleo V, Piro S, Marselli L, Boggi U, Filipponi F, Tinti L, Salvini L, Wollheim CB, Purrello F, Dotta F (2012) A local glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) system in human pancreatic islets. Diabetologia 55(12):3262–3272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2716-9
Johnston Natalie R, Mitchell Ryan K, Haythorne E, Pessoa Maria P, Semplici F, Ferrer J, Piemonti L, Marchetti P, Bugliani M, Bosco D, Berishvili E, Duncanson P, Watkinson M, Broichhagen J, Trauner D, Rutter Guy A, Hodson David J (2016) Beta cell hubs dictate pancreatic islet responses to glucose. Cell Metab 24(3):389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.020
Szabat M, Page MM, Panzhinskiy E, Skovsø S, Mojibian M, Fernandez-Tajes J, Bruin JE, Bround MJ, Lee JT, Xu EE, Taghizadeh F, O’Dwyer S, van de Bunt M, Moon KM, Sinha S, Han J, Fan Y, Lynn FC, Trucco M, Borchers CH, Foster LJ, Nislow C, Kieffer TJ, Johnson JD (2016) Reduced insulin production relieves endoplasmic reticulum stress and induces β cell proliferation. Cell Metab 23(1):179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.016
Sterk M, Dolensek J, Skelin Klemen M, Krizancic Bombek L, Paradiz Leitgeb E, Kercmar J, Perc M, Slak Rupnik M, Stozer A, Gosak M (2023) Functional characteristics of hub and wave-initiator cells in beta cell networks. Biophys J 122(5):784–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2023.01.039
Kravets V, Dwulet JM, Schleicher WE, Hodson DJ, Davis AM, Pyle L, Piscopio RA, Sticco-Ivins M, Benninger RKP (2022) Functional architecture of pancreatic islets identifies a population of first responder cells that drive the first-phase calcium response. PLoS Biol 20(9):e3001761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001761
Benninger RK, Hutchens T, Head WS, McCaughey MJ, Zhang M, Le Marchand SJ, Satin LS, Piston DW (2014) Intrinsic islet heterogeneity and gap junction coupling determine spatiotemporal Ca(2)(+) wave dynamics. Biophys J 107(11):2723–2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.048
Al-Khawaga S, Memon B, Butler AE, Taheri S, Abou-Samra AB, Abdelalim EM (2018) Pathways governing development of stem cell-derived pancreatic β cells: lessons from embryogenesis. Biol Rev 93(1):364–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12349
Lyttle BM, Li J, Krishnamurthy M, Fellows F, Wheeler MB, Goodyer CG, Wang R (2008) Transcription factor expression in the developing human fetal endocrine pancreas. Diabetologia 51(7):1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1006-z
D’Amour KA, Agulnick AD, Eliazer S, Kelly OG, Kroon E, Baetge EE (2005) Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm. Nat Biotechnol 23(12):1534–1541. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1163
Loh Kyle M, Ang Lay T, Zhang J, Kumar V, Ang J, Auyeong Jun Q, Lee Kian L, Choo Siew H, Lim Christina YY, Nichane M, Tan J, Noghabi Monireh S, Azzola L, Ng Elizabeth S, Durruthy-Durruthy J, Sebastiano V, Poellinger L, Elefanty Andrew G, Stanley Edouard G, Chen Q, Prabhakar S, Weissman Irving L, Lim B (2014) Efficient endoderm induction from human pluripotent stem cells by logically directing signals controlling lineage bifurcations. Cell Stem Cell 14(2):237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.007
Nostro MC, Sarangi F, Yang C, Holland A, Elefanty AG, Stanley EG, Greiner DL, Keller G (2015) Efficient generation of NKX6-1+ pancreatic progenitors from multiple human pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem cell reports 4(4):591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.017
Korytnikov R, Nostro MC (2016) Generation of polyhormonal and multipotent pancreatic progenitor lineages from human pluripotent stem cells. Methods 101:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.017
Tehrani Z, Lin S (2011) Antagonistic interactions of hedgehog, Bmp and retinoic acid signals control zebrafish endocrine pancreas development. Development 138(4):631–640. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.050450
Nostro MC, Sarangi F, Ogawa S, Holtzinger A, Corneo B, Li X, Micallef SJ, Park I-H, Basford C, Wheeler MB, Daley GQ, Elefanty AG, Stanley EG, Keller G (2011) Stage-specific signaling through TGFβ family members and WNT regulates patterning and pancreatic specification of human pluripotent stem cells. Development 138(5):861–871. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.055236
Mfopou JK, Chen B, Mateizel I, Sermon K, Bouwens L (2010) Noggin, retinoids, and fibroblast growth factor regulate hepatic or pancreatic fate of human embryonic stem cells. Gastroenterology 138(7):2233-2245.e2214. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.056
Memon B, Abdelalim EM (2022) Toward precision medicine with human pluripotent stem cells for diabetes. Stem Cells Transl Med 11(7):704–714. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szac030
Rezania A, Bruin JE, Arora P, Rubin A, Batushansky I, Asadi A, O’Dwyer S, Quiskamp N, Mojibian M, Albrecht T, Yang YHC, Johnson JD, Kieffer TJ (2014) Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 32(11):1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3033
Pagliuca Felicia W, Millman Jeffrey R, Gürtler M, Segel M, Van Dervort A, Ryu Jennifer H, Peterson Quinn P, Greiner D, Melton Douglas A (2014) Generation of functional human pancreatic β CELLS IN VITRO. Cell 159(2):428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040
Aigha II, Abdelalim EM (2020) NKX6.1 transcription factor: a crucial regulator of pancreatic β cell development, identity, and proliferation. Stem Cell Res Ther 11(1):459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01977-0
Aigha II, Memon B, Elsayed AK, Abdelalim EM (2018) Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into two distinct NKX6.1 populations of pancreatic progenitors. Stem Cell Res Ther 9(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0834-0
Memon B, Karam M, Al-Khawaga S, Abdelalim EM (2018) Enhanced differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into pancreatic progenitors co-expressing PDX1 and NKX6.1. Stem Cell Res Ther 9(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0759-z
Velazco-Cruz L, Song J, Maxwell KG, Goedegebuure MM, Augsornworawat P, Hogrebe NJ, Millman JR (2019) Acquisition of dynamic function in human stem cell-derived β cells. Stem Cell Rep 12(2):351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.12.012
Hogrebe NJ, Augsornworawat P, Maxwell KG, Velazco-Cruz L, Millman JR (2020) Targeting the cytoskeleton to direct pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 38(4):460–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0430-6
Nair GG, Liu JS, Russ HA, Tran S, Saxton MS, Chen R, Juang C, Li M-L, Nguyen VQ, Giacometti S, Puri S, Xing Y, Wang Y, Szot GL, Oberholzer J, Bhushan A, Hebrok M (2019) Recapitulating endocrine cell clustering in culture promotes maturation of human stem-cell-derived β cells. Nat Cell Biol 21(2):263–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0271-4
Russ HA, Parent AV, Ringler JJ, Hennings TG, Nair GG, Shveygert M, Guo T, Puri S, Haataja L, Cirulli V, Blelloch R, Szot GL, Arvan P, Hebrok M (2015) Controlled induction of human pancreatic progenitors produces functional beta-like cells in vitro. EMBO J 34(13):1759–1772. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201591058
Veres A, Faust AL, Bushnell HL, Engquist EN, Kenty JH-R, Harb G, Poh Y-C, Sintov E, Gürtler M, Pagliuca FW, Peterson QP, Melton DA (2019) Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation. Nature 569(7756):368–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1168-5
Hrvatin S, O’Donnell CW, Deng F, Millman JR, Pagliuca FW, DiIorio P, Rezania A, Gifford DK, Melton DA (2014) Differentiated human stem cells resemble fetal, not adult, β cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(8):3038. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400709111
D’Amour KA, Bang AG, Eliazer S, Kelly OG, Agulnick AD, Smart NG, Moorman MA, Kroon E, Carpenter MK, Baetge EE (2006) Production of pancreatic hormone–expressing endocrine cells from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 24(11):1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1259
Rosado-Olivieri EA, Anderson K, Kenty JH, Melton DA (2019) YAP inhibition enhances the differentiation of functional stem cell-derived insulin-producing β cells. Nat Commun 10(1):1464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09404-6
Ma Q, Xiao Y, Xu W, Wang M, Li S, Yang Z, Xu M, Zhang T, Zhang ZN, Hu R, Su Q, Yuan F, Xiao T, Wang X, He Q, Zhao J, Chen ZJ, Sheng Z, Chai M, Wang H, Shi W, Deng Q, Cheng X, Li W (2022) ZnT8 loss-of-function accelerates functional maturation of hESC-derived beta cells and resists metabolic stress in diabetes. Nat Commun 13(1):4142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31829-9
Bocian-Sobkowska J, Zabel M, Wozniak W, Surdyk-Zasada J (1999) Polyhormonal aspect of the endocrine cells of the human fetal pancreas. Histochem Cell Biol 112(2):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004180050401
Jiang W, Shi Y, Zhao D, Chen S, Yong J, Zhang J, Qing T, Sun X, Zhang P, Ding M, Li D, Deng H (2007) In vitro derivation of functional insulin-producing cells from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Res 17(4):333–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.28
Chen S, Borowiak M, Fox JL, Maehr R, Osafune K, Davidow L, Lam K, Peng LF, Schreiber SL, Rubin LL, Melton D (2009) A small molecule that directs differentiation of human ESCs into the pancreatic lineage. Nat Chem Biol 5(4):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.154
Riedel MJ, Asadi A, Wang R, Ao Z, Warnock GL, Kieffer TJ (2012) Immunohistochemical characterisation of cells co-producing insulin and glucagon in the developing human pancreas. Diabetologia 55(2):372–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2344-9
Md Moin AS, Dhawan S, Cory M, Butler PC, Rizza RA, Butler AE (2016) Increased frequency of hormone negative and polyhormonal endocrine cells in lean individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(10):3628–3636. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2496
Bruin JE, Erener S, Vela J, Hu X, Johnson JD, Kurata HT, Lynn FC, Piret JM, Asadi A, Rezania A, Kieffer TJ (2014) Characterization of polyhormonal insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 12(1):194–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2013.10.003
Rezania A, Bruin JE, Xu J, Narayan K, Fox JK, O’Neil JJ, Kieffer TJ (2013) Enrichment of human embryonic stem cell-derived NKX61-expressing pancreatic progenitor cells accelerates the maturation of insulin-secreting cells in vivo. Stem Cells 31(11):2432–2442. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1489
Kelly OG, Chan MY, Martinson LA, Kadoya K, Ostertag TM, Ross KG, Richardson M, Carpenter MK, D’Amour KA, Kroon E, Moorman M, Baetge EE, Bang AG (2011) Cell-surface markers for the isolation of pancreatic cell types derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29(8):750–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1931
Gao T, McKenna B, Li C, Reichert M, Nguyen J, Singh T, Yang C, Pannikar A, Doliba N, Zhang T, Stoffers DA, Edlund H, Matschinsky F, Stein R, Stanger BZ (2014) Pdx1 maintains β cell identity and function by repressing an α cell program. Cell Metab 19(2):259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.12.002
Rezania A, Riedel MJ, Wideman RD, Karanu F, Ao Z, Warnock GL, Kieffer TJ (2011) Production of functional glucagon-secreting α-cells from human embryonic stem cells. Diabetes 60(1):239–247. https://doi.org/10.2337/db10-0573
Basford CL, Prentice KJ, Hardy AB, Sarangi F, Micallef SJ, Li X, Guo Q, Elefanty AG, Stanley EG, Keller G, Allister EM, Nostro MC, Wheeler MB (2012) The functional and molecular characterisation of human embryonic stem cell-derived insulin-positive cells compared with adult pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 55(2):358–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2335-x
Memon B, Younis I, Abubaker F, Abdelalim EM (2020) PDX1−/NKX61+ progenitors derived from human pluripotent stem cells as a novel source of insulin-secreting cells. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev 37(5):e3400. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3400
Petersen MBK, Azad A, Ingvorsen C, Hess K, Hansson M, Grapin-Botton A, Honoré C (2017) Single-cell gene expression analysis of a human ESC model of pancreatic endocrine development reveals different paths to β-cell differentiation. Stem cell reports 9(4):1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.009
Krentz NAJ, Lee MYY, Xu EE, Sproul SLJ, Maslova A, Sasaki S, Lynn FC (2018) Single-cell transcriptome profiling of mouse and hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors. Stem Cell Rep 11(6):1551–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.11.008
Ameri J, Borup R, Prawiro C, Ramond C, Schachter KA, Scharfmann R, Semb H (2017) Efficient generation of glucose-responsive beta cells from isolated GP2+ human pancreatic progenitors. Cell Rep 19(1):36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.032
Cogger KF, Sinha A, Sarangi F, McGaugh EC, Saunders D, Dorrell C, Mejia-Guerrero S, Aghazadeh Y, Rourke JL, Screaton RA, Grompe M, Streeter PR, Powers AC, Brissova M, Kislinger T, Nostro MC (2017) Glycoprotein 2 is a specific cell surface marker of human pancreatic progenitors. Nat Commun 8(1):331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00561-0
Jiang W, Sui X, Zhang D, Liu M, Ding M, Shi Y, Deng H (2011) CD24: a novel surface marker for PDX1-positive pancreatic progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 29(4):609–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.608
Ramond C, Glaser N, Berthault C, Ameri J, Kirkegaard JS, Hansson M, Honoré C, Semb H, Scharfmann R (2017) Reconstructing human pancreatic differentiation by mapping specific cell populations during development. Elife 6:e27564. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27564
Sugiyama T, Rodriguez RT, McLean GW, Kim SK (2007) Conserved markers of fetal pancreatic epithelium permit prospective isolation of islet progenitor cells by FACS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(1):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609490104
Ramond C, Beydag-Tasöz BS, Azad A, van de Bunt M, Petersen MBK, Beer NL, Glaser N, Berthault C, Gloyn AL, Hansson M, McCarthy MI, Honoré C, Grapin-Botton A, Scharfmann R (2018) Understanding human fetal pancreas development using subpopulation sorting, RNA sequencing and single-cell profiling. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.165480
Balboa D, Saarimäki-Vire J, Borshagovski D, Survila M, Lindholm P, Galli E, Eurola S, Ustinov J, Grym H, Huopio H, Partanen J, Wartiovaara K, Otonkoski T (2018) Insulin mutations impair beta-cell development in a patient-derived iPSC model of neonatal diabetes. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38519
Sharon N, Vanderhooft J, Straubhaar J, Mueller J, Chawla R, Zhou Q, Engquist EN, Trapnell C, Gifford DK, Melton DA (2019) Wnt signaling separates the progenitor and endocrine compartments during pancreas development. Cell Rep 27(8):2281-2291.e2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.083
Molakandov K, Berti DA, Beck A, Elhanani O, Walker MD, Soen Y, Yavriyants K, Zimerman M, Volman E, Toledo I, Erukhimovich A, Levy AM, Hasson A, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Chebath J, Revel M (2021) Selection for CD26(-) and CD49A(+) cells from pluripotent stem cells-derived islet-like clusters improves therapeutic activity in diabetic mice. Front Endocrinol 12:635405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.635405
Scarl RT, Corbin KL, Vann NW, Smith HM, Satin LS, Sherman A, Nunemaker CS (2019) Intact pancreatic islets and dispersed beta-cells both generate intracellular calcium oscillations but differ in their responsiveness to glucose. Cell Calcium 83:102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2019.102081
Reissaus CA, Piston DW (2017) Reestablishment of glucose inhibition of glucagon secretion in small pseudoislets. Diabetes 66(4):960–969. https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-1291
Benninger RKP, Head WS, Zhang M, Satin LS, Piston DW (2011) Gap junctions and other mechanisms of cell–cell communication regulate basal insulin secretion in the pancreatic islet. J Physiol 589(22):5453–5466. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218909
Sharivkin R, Walker MD, Soen Y (2015) Functional proteomics screen enables enrichment of distinct cell types from human pancreatic islets. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0115100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115100
Dorrell C, Abraham SL, Lanxon-Cookson KM, Canaday PS, Streeter PR, Grompe M (2008) Isolation of major pancreatic cell types and long-term culture-initiating cells using novel human surface markers. Stem Cell Res 1(3):183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2008.04.001
Gromada J, Brock B, Schmitz O, Rorsman P (2004) Glucagon-like peptide-1: regulation of insulin secretion and therapeutic potential. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 95(6):252–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2004.t01-1-pto950502.x
van der Meulen T, Donaldson CJ, Cáceres E, Hunter AE, Cowing-Zitron C, Pound LD, Adams MW, Zembrzycki A, Grove KL, Huising MO (2015) Urocortin3 mediates somatostatin-dependent negative feedback control of insulin secretion. Nat Med 21(7):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3872
Koh D-S, Cho J-H, Chen L (2012) Paracrine interactions within islets of langerhans. J Mol Neurosci 48(2):429–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-012-9752-2
Marroqui L, Masini M, Merino B, Grieco FA, Millard I, Dubois C, Quesada I, Marchetti P, Cnop M, Eizirik DL (2015) Pancreatic α cells are resistant to metabolic stress-induced apoptosis in type 2 diabetes. EBioMedicine 2(5):378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.03.012
Bonnet-Serrano F, Diedisheim M, Mallone R, Larger E (2018) Decreased α-cell mass and early structural alterations of the exocrine pancreas in patients with type 1 diabetes: An analysis based on the nPOD repository. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191528
Hogrebe NJ, Maxwell KG, Augsornworawat P, Millman JR (2021) Generation of insulin-producing pancreatic β cells from multiple human stem cell lines. Nat Protoc 16(9):4109–4143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00560-y
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by grants from Qatar Biomedical Research Institute (QBRI) (Grant No. IGP3 and QBRI-HSCI Project 1).
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NA, ASM contributed to write the manuscript and prepared the figures. EMA contributed to the conception and design of the study and the final editing of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that this article content has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable. This study does not involve experiments.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aldous, N., Moin, A.S.M. & Abdelalim, E.M. Pancreatic β-cell heterogeneity in adult human islets and stem cell-derived islets. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 80, 176 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04815-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04815-7