Abstract
A recent explosion of methods to produce human trophoblast and stem cells (hTSCs) is fuelling a renewed interest in this tissue. The trophoblast is critical to reproduction by facilitating implantation, maternal physiological adaptations to pregnancy and the growth of the fetus through transport of nutrients between the mother and fetus. More broadly, the trophoblast has phenotypic properties that make it of interest to other fields. Its angiogenic and invasive properties are similar to tumours and could identify novel drug targets, and its ability to regulate immunological tolerance of the allogenic fetus could lead to improvements in transplantations. Within this review, we integrate and assess transcriptomic data of cell-based models of hTSC alongside in vivo samples to identify the utility and applicability of these models. We also integrate single-cell RNA sequencing data sets of human blastoids, stem cells and embryos to identify how these models may recapitulate early trophoblast development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Please see Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 for lists of accession IDs for data sets and specific samples used in this analysis.
References
Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, Yamanaka S (2017) Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.245
Aghazadeh Y, Poon F, Sarangi F et al (2021) Microvessels support engraftment and functionality of human islets and hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors in diabetes models. Cell Stem Cell 28:1936-1949.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.001
Mercuri ND, Cox BJ (2021) Meta-research: a poor research landscape hinders the progression of knowledge and treatment of reproductive diseases. bioRxiv 2021.11.16.468787. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.16.468787
Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakisa K et al (1998) Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 282:2072–2075
Kunath T, Yamanaka Y, Detmar J et al (2014) Developmental differences in the expression of FGF receptors between human and mouse embryos. Placenta 35:1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2014.09.008
Okae H, Toh H, Sato T et al (2018) Derivation of human trophoblast stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 22:50-63.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.004
Sheridan MA, Fernando RC, Gardner L et al (2020) Establishment and differentiation of long-term trophoblast organoid cultures from the human placenta. Nat Protoc 15:3441–3463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0381-x
Haider S, Meinhardt G, Saleh L et al (2018) Self-Renewing trophoblast organoids recapitulate the developmental program of the early human placenta. Stem Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.07.004
Xu R-H, Chen X, Li DS et al (2002) BMP4 initiates human embryonic stem cell differentiation to trophoblast. Nat Biotechnol 20:1261–1264. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt761
Amita M, Adachi K, Alexenkoa P et al (2013) Complete and unidirectional conversion of human embryonic stem cells to trophoblast by BMP4. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303094110
Krendl C, Shaposhnikov D, Rishko V et al (2017) GATA2/3-TFAP2A/C transcription factor network couples human pluripotent stem cell differentiation to trophectoderm with repression of pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E9579–E9588. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708341114
Li Y, Moretto-Zita M, Soncin F et al (2013) BMP4-directed trophoblast differentiation of human embryonic stem cells is mediated through a ΔNp63+ cytotrophoblast stem cell state. Development 140:3965–3976. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.092155
Bernardo ASASAS, Faial T, Gardner L et al (2011) BRACHYURY and CDX2 mediate BMP-induced differentiation of human and mouse pluripotent stem cells into embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Cell Stem Cell 9:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.015
Roberts RM, Loh KM, Amita M et al (2014) Differentiation of trophoblast cells from human embryonic stem cells: to be or not to be? Reproduction 147:D1-12. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0080
Zheng Y, Xue X, Shao Y et al (2019) Controlled modelling of human epiblast and amnion development using stem cells. Nature 573:421–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1535-2
Hayashi Y, Furue MK, Tanaka S et al (2010) BMP4 induction of trophoblast from mouse embryonic stem cells in defined culture conditions on laminin. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 46:416–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-009-9266-6
Harun R, Ruban L, Matin M et al (2006) Cytotrophoblast stem cell lines derived from human embryonic stem cells and their capacity to mimic invasive implantation events. Hum Reprod 21:1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del017
Theunissen TW, Friedli M, He Y et al (2016) Molecular criteria for defining the naive human pluripotent state resource molecular criteria for defining the naive human pluripotent state. Cell Stem Cell 19(4):502–515
Cinkornpumin JK, Kwon SY, Guo Y et al (2020) Naive human embryonic stem cells can give rise to cells with a trophoblast-like transcriptome and methylome. Stem Cell Rep 15:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.06.003
Dong C, Beltcheva M, Gontarz P et al (2020) Derivation of trophoblast stem cells from naïve human pluripotent stem cells. Elife 9:1–26. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52504
Liu X, Ouyang JF, Rossello FJ et al (2020) Reprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells. Nature 586:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2734-6
Li R, Zhong C, Yu Y et al (2019) Generation of blastocyst-like structures from mouse embryonic and adult cell cultures. Cell 179:687-702.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.029
Yanagida A, Spindlow D, Nichols J et al (2021) Naive stem cell blastocyst model captures human embryo lineage segregation. Cell Stem Cell 28:1016-1022.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.031
Yu L, Wei Y, Duan J, Schmitz DA, Sakurai M, Wang L, Wang K, Zhao S, Hon GC, Wu J (2021) Blastocyst-like structures generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 591(7851):620–626
Kagawa H, Javali A, Khoei HH et al (2022) Human blastoids model blastocyst development and implantation. Nature 601:600–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04267-8
McInnes L, Healy J, Melville J (2018) UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. J Open Source Softw 3:861
Zygmunt M, Herr F, Münstedt K et al (2003) Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00168-4
Christiansen OB (2013) Reproductive immunology. Mol Immunol 55:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2012.08.025
Carter AM (2012) Evolution of placental function in mammals: the molecular basis of gas and nutrient transfer, hormone secretion, and immune responses. Physiol Rev 92:1543–1576. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00040.2011
Soncin F, Natale D, Parast MM (2014) Signaling pathways in mouse and human trophoblast differentiation: a comparative review. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1794-x
Knöfler M, Pollheimer J (2013) Human placental trophoblast invasion and differentiation: a particular focus on Wnt signaling. Front Genet 4:190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00190
Doherty KR, Cave A, Davis DB et al (2005) Normal myoblast fusion requires myoferlin. Development 132:5565–5575. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02155
Robinson JM, Ackerman WE, Behrendt NJ, Vandre DD (2009) While dysferlin and myoferlin are coexpressed in the human placenta, only dysferlin expression is responsive to trophoblast fusion in model systems. Biol Reprod 81:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.074591
Petropoulos S, Deng Q, Panula SP et al (2016) Single-cell RNA-seq reveals lineage and X-chromosome dynamics in human preimplantation embryos. Cell 165:1012–1026
Tonge PD, Corso AJ, Monetti C et al (2014) Divergent reprogramming routes lead to alternative stem-cell states. Nature 516:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14047
Lee CQEE, Gardner L, Turco M et al (2016) What Is trophoblast? A combination of criteria define human first-trimester trophoblast. Stem Cell Rep 6:257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.01.006
Posfai E, Schell JP, Janiszewski A et al (2021) Evaluating totipotency using criteria of increasing stringency. Nat Cell Biol 23:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-020-00609-2
Maherali N, Hochedlinger K (2008) Guidelines and techniques for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.008
Hussein SMI, Elbaz J, Nagy AA (2013) Genome damage in induced pluripotent stem cells: assessing the mechanisms and their consequences. Bioessays 35:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200114
Knox K, Baker JC (2008) Genomic evolution of the placenta using co-option and duplication and divergence. Genome Res 18:695–705. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.071407.107
Yu L, Wei Y, Duan J et al (2021) Blastocyst-like structures generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Springer, USA
Sakoff JA, Murdoch RN (1993) Cell Reaction in pseudopregnant mice. J Reprod Fertil 101:91–102
Paria BC, Ma WG, Tan J et al (2001) Cellular and molecular responses of the uterus to embryo implantation can be elicited by locally applied growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.3.1047
Io S, Kabata M, Iemura Y et al (2021) Capturing human trophoblast development with naive pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 28:1023-1039.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.03.013
Guo G, Stirparo GG, Strawbridge SE et al (2021) Human naive epiblast cells possess unrestricted lineage potential. Cell Stem Cell 28:1040-1056.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.02.025
Mischler A, Karakis V, Mahinthakumar J et al (2021) Two distinct trophectoderm lineage stem cells from human pluripotent stem cells. J Biol Chem 296:100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100386
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Frances Wong for assistance with the integration of processing RNA sequencing data.
Funding
BC is supported in part by a Tier II Canada Research Chair in maternal–fetal medicine. KN was supported in part by the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Fund from the Department of Physiology at the University of Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BC conceived the project. KN and BC analyzed data, generated figures and tables and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funding agencies played no role in the direction of the research.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed to the manuscript and conclusions.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
18_2022_4589_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file3 Supplemental Table 3. Enrichment Map Ontologies for terminal clusters 0, 2, 3 and 5. Ontologies are based on the word frequency of nodes with significant overlap in gene members. All nodes were significant at an FDR corrected p-values of <0.1 (XLSX 12 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, B.J., Naismith, K. Here and there a trophoblast, a transcriptional evaluation of trophoblast cell models. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04589-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04589-4