Skip to main content

Prognostic models for prolonged disorders of consciousness: an integrative review

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences volume 77, pages 3945–3961 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are acquired conditions of severe altered consciousness. During the past decades, some prognostic models for DoC have been explored on the basis of a variety of predictors, including demographics, neurological examinations, clinical diagnosis, neurophysiology and brain images. In this article, a systematic review of pertinent literature was conducted. We identified and evaluated 21 prognostic models involving a total of 1201 DoC patients. In terms of the reported accuracies of predicting the prognosis of DoC, these 21 models vary widely, ranging from 60 to 90%. Using improvement of consciousness level as favorable outcome criteria, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis, and found that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the hybrid model that combined more than one technique were both superior to those of any single technique, including EEG and fMRI at the tasks and resting state. These results support the view that any single technique has its own advantages and limitations; and the integrations of multiple techniques, including diverse brain images and different paradigms, have the potential to improve predictive accuracy for DoC. Then, we provide methodological points of view and some prospects about future research. Totally, in comparison to a great many diagnostic methods for the DoC, the research of prognostic models is sparse and preliminary, still largely in its infancy with many challenges and opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, Nakase-Richardson R, Seel RT, Yablon S, Getchius TSD, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ (2018) Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99(9):1710–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Erp WS, Lavrijsen JCM, van de Laar FA, Vos PE, Laureys S, Koopmans R (2014) The vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Eur J Neurol 21(11):1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, Schiff ND (2014) Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science. Nat Rev Neurol 10(2):99–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wijdicks EFM, Cranford RE (2005) Clinical diagnosis of prolonged states of impaired consciousness in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 80(8):1037–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aidinoff E, Groswasser Z, Bierman U, Gelernter I, Catz A, Gur-Pollack R (2018) Vegetative state outcomes improved over the last two decades. Brain Inj 32(3):297–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1418535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bender A, Jox RJ, Grill E, Straube A, Lule D (2015) Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int 112(14):235–242. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baricich A, de Sire A, Antoniono E, Gozzerino F, Lamberti G, Cisari C, Invernizzi M (2017) Recovery from vegetative state of patients with a severe brain injury: a 4-year real-practice prospective cohort study. Funct Neurol 32(3):131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luaute J, Maucort-Boulch D, Tell L, Quelard F, Sarraf T, Iwaz J, Boisson D, Fischer C (2010) Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states. Neurology 75(3):246–252

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yelden K, Duport S, James LM, Kempny A, Farmer SF, Leff AP, Playford ED (2018) Late recovery of awareness in prolonged disorders of consciousness—a cross-sectional cohort study. Disabil Rehabil 40(20):2433–2438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1339209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Santoro L, Trojano L (2010) Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state. Neurology 75(3):239–245

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Howell K, Grill E, Klein AM, Straube A, Bender A (2013) Rehabilitation outcome of anoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy survivors with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Resuscitation 84(10):1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Steppacher I, Kaps M, Kissler J (2014) Will time heal? A long-term follow-up of severe disorders of consciousness. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 1(6):401–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, Nakase-Richardson R, Seel RT, Yablon S, Getchius TSD, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ (2018) Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology 91(10):450–460. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000005926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O (2019) Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30031-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiff ND, Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Victor JD, Baker K, Gerber M, Fritz B, Eisenberg B, O’Connor J, Kobylarz EJ, Farris S, Machado A, McCagg C, Plum F, Fins JJ, Rezai AR (2007) Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury. Nature 448(7153):600–U610. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06041

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Corazzol M, Lio G, Lefevre A, Deiana G, Tell L, André-Obadia N, Bourdillon P, Guenot M, Desmurget M, Luauté J, Sirigu A (2017) Restoring consciousness with vagus nerve stimulation. Curr Biol 27(18):R994–R996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.060

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu Y-t, Yang Y, Wang L-b, Fang J-l, Chen Y-y, He J-h, Rong P-j (2017) Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in disorders of consciousness monitored by fMRI: the first case report. Brain Stimul 10(2):328–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giacino JT, Schnakers C, Rodriguez-Moreno D, Kalmar K, Schiff N, Hirsch J (2009) Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? In: Laureys S, Schiff ND, Owen AM (eds) Coma science: clinical and ethical implications. Progress in brain research, vol 177. Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, pp 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17704-x

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Demertzi A, Sitt J, Sarasso S, Pinxten W (2017) Measuring states of pathological (un)consciousness: research dimensions, clinical applications, and ethics. Neurosci Conscious. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Noirhomme Q, Brecheisen R, Lesenfants D, Antonopoulos G, Laureys S (2017) “Look at my classifier’s result”: disentangling unresponsive from (minimally) conscious patients. Neuroimage 145:288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steyerberg EW, Moons KGM, van der Windt DA, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S, Riley RD, Hemingway H, Altman DG, Grp P (2013) Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. Plos Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND (2002) The minimally conscious state—definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58(3):349–353. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hauger SL, Schanke AK, Andersson S, Chatelle C, Schnakers C, Lovstad M (2017) The clinical diagnostic utility of electrophysiological techniques in assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness following acquired brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 32(3):185–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000000267

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotchoubey B, Pavlov YG (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between brain data and the outcome in disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L, Kang XG, Qi S, Xu XX, Xiong LZ, Zhao G, Yin H, Jiang W (2015) Brain response to thermal stimulation predicts outcome of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol 126(8):1539–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno M-A, Charland-Verville V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, Chatelle C, Thonnard M, Thibaut A, Heine L, Soddu A, Boly M, Schnakers C, Gjedde A, Laureys S (2014) Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet 384(9942):514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60042-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Estraneo A, Moretta P, Loreto V, Lanzillo B, Cozzolino A, Saltalamacchia A, Lullo F, Santoro L, Trojano L (2013) Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology 80(5):464–470. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0f31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steppacher I, Eickhoff S, Jordanov T, Kaps M, Witzke W, Kissler J (2013) N400 predicts recovery from disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 73(5):594–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MMG, Sterne JAC, Bossuyt PMM, Grp Q- (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529-U104. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PMM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56(11):1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Verde PE (2018) bamdit: an R package for bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic test data. J Stat Softw 86(10):1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v086.i10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van Enst WA, Ochodo E, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Leeflang MM (2014) Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med Res Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Leeflang MMG (2014) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(2):105–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12474

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y (2010) Analysing and presenting results. In: Deeks J, Bossuyt P, Gatsonis C (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy

  35. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58(9):882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Billeri L, Naro A, Leo A, Galletti B, Tomasello P, Manuli A, Andronaco V, Lauria P, Bramanti A, Calabro RS (2019) Looking toward predicting functional recovery in disorders of consciousness: can sensorimotor integration help us? Brain Inj 33(3):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1553309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Logi F, Pasqualetti P, Tomaiuolo F (2011) Predict recovery of consciousness in post-acute severe brain injury: the role of EEG reactivity. Brain Inj 25(10):972–979. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.589795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stefan S, Schorr B, Lopez-Rolon A, Kolassa IT, Shock JP, Rosenfelder M, Heck S, Bender A (2018) Consciousness indexing and outcome prediction with resting-state EEG in severe disorders of consciousness. Brain Topogr 31(5):848–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0643-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu X, Zou Q, Hu J, Tang W, Mao Y, Gao L, Zhu J, Jin Y, Wu X, Lu L, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Dai Z, Gao J-H, Weng X, Zhou L, Northoff G, Giacino JT, He Y, Yang Y (2015) Intrinsic functional connectivity patterns predict consciousness level and recovery outcome in acquired brain injury. J Neurosci 35(37):12932–12946. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0415-15.2015

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z, Duncan NW, Tang W, Wolff A, Hu J, Gao L, Jin Y, Wu X, Zhang J, Lu L, Wu C, Qu X, Mao Y, Weng X, Zhang J, Northoff G (2015) How are different neural networks nelated to consciousness? Ann Neurol 78(4):594–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Song M, Yang Y, He J, Yang Z, Yu S, Xie Q, Xia X, Dang Y, Zhang Q, Wu X, Cui Y, Hou B, Yu R, Xu R, Jiang T (2018) Prognostication of chronic disorders of consciousness using brain functional networks and clinical characteristics. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Dolce G, Quintieri M, Serra S, Lagani V, Pignolo L (2008) Clinical signs and early prognosis in vegetative state: a decisional tree, data-mining study. Brain Inj 22(7–8):617–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050802132503

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Sant’Angelo A, Prestandrea C, Mazzilli R, Galardi G (2015) EEG predictors of outcome in patients with disorders of consciousness admitted for intensive rehabilitation. Clin Neurophysiol 126(5):959–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scarpino M, Lolli F, Hakiki B, Atzori T, Lanzo G, Sterpu R, Portaccio E, Romoli AM, Morrocchesi A, Amantini A, Macchi C, Grippo A, Intensive Rehabilitation Unit Study Group of the Irccs Don Gnocchi Foundation I (2019) Prognostic value of post-acute EEG in severe disorders of consciousness, using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society terminology. Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2019.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sara M, Pistoia F, Pasqualetti P, Sebastiano F, Onorati P, Rossini PM (2011) Functional isolation within the cerebral cortex in the vegetative state: a nonlinear method to predict clinical outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310378508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sitt JD, King JR, El Karoui I, Rohaut B, Faugeras F, Gramfort A, Cohen L, Sigman M, Dehaene S, Naccache L (2014) Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain 137:2258–2270. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schorr B, Schlee W, Arndt M, Bender A (2016) Coherence in resting-state EEG as a predictor for the recovery from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. J Neurol 263(5):937–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8084-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chennu S, Annen J, Wannez S, Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Cassoi H, Martens G, Schnakers C, Gosseries O, Menon D, Laureys S (2017) Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain 140:2120–2132. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM, Robson T, Ali A, Owen AM, Pickard JD (2009) Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 132:2541–2552. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp183

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vogel D, Markl A, Yu T, Kotchoubey B, Lang S, Muller F (2013) Can mental imagery functional magnetic resonance imaging predict recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(10):1891–1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang FY, Di HB, Hu XH, Jing S, Thibaut A, Di Perri C, Huang WS, Nie YZ, Schnakers C, Laureys S (2015) Cerebral response to subject’s own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state. BMC Med 13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0330-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Xu WW, Jiang GS, Chen YW, Wang XY, Jiang XD (2012) Prediction of minimally conscious state with somatosensory evoked potentials in long-term unconscious patients after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(4):1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31824475cc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kang X-g, Li L, Wei D, Xu X-x, Zhao R, Jing Y-y, Su Y-y, Xiong L-z, Zhao G, Jiang W (2014) Development of a simple score to predict outcome for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Lucca LF, Lofaro D, Pignolo L, Leto E, Ursino M, Cortese MD, Conforti D, Tonin P, Cerasa A (2019) Outcome prediction in disorders of consciousness: the role of coma recovery scale revised. Bmc Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1293-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Steppacher I, Fuchs P, Kaps M, Nussbeck FW, Kissler J (2019) A tree of life? Multivariate logistic outcome-prediction in disorders of consciousness. Brain Injury. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2019.1695289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Pablo Verde for his help with the R package “bamdit” and to three anonymous reviewers, who give some important suggestions that improve the manuscript. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 31870984, 31771076, 81600919 and 81671855) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ming Song and Yi Yang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Ming Song, Zhengyi Yang, Yue Cui, Shan Yu & Tianzi Jiang

  2. Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Ming Song, Zhengyi Yang, Yue Cui, Shan Yu & Tianzi Jiang

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China

    Yi Yang

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, The 7th Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100070, China

    Jianghong He

  5. CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Tianzi Jiang

  6. Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 625014, China

    Tianzi Jiang

  7. The Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Tianzi Jiang

Authors
  1. Ming Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhengyi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jianghong He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tianzi Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianghong He or Tianzi Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 18 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 1001 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, M., Yang, Y., Yang, Z. et al. Prognostic models for prolonged disorders of consciousness: an integrative review. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 3945–3961 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03512-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03512-z

Keywords

  • Disorders of consciousness
  • Prognostic model
  • Outcome
  • Conscious recovery
  • Prediction