Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The equilibrium of ubiquitination and deubiquitination at PLK1 regulates sister chromatid separation

  • Review
  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PLK1 regulates almost every aspect of mitotic events, including mitotic entry, spindle assembly, chromosome alignment, sister chromatid segregation, metaphase-anaphase transition, cytokinesis, etc. In regulating the chromosome alignment and sister chromatid segregation, PLK1 has to be localized to and removed from kinetochores at the right times, and the underlying mechanism that regulates PLK1 both spatially and temporally only became clearer recently. It has been found that deubiquitination and ubiquitination of PLK1 are responsible for its localization to and dissociation from the kinetochores, respectively. The equilibrium of this ubiquitination and deubiquitination plays an important role in regulating proper chromosome alignment and timely sister chromatid segregation. Here, we summarize and discuss the recent findings in investigating the spatial and temporal regulation of PLK1 during chromosome alignment and sister chromatid segregation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

PLK1:

Polo-like kinase 1

Usp16:

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 16

CUL3:

Cullin 3

SAC:

Spindle assembly checkpoint

KT–MT:

Kinetochore–microtubule

PB:

Polo box

PBD:

Polo box domain

PBIP1:

Polo box domain-interacting protein 1

INCENP:

Inner centromere protein

APC/C:

Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome

CCAN:

Constitutive centromere-associated network

References

  1. Glover DM, Hagan IM, Tavares AA (1998) Polo-like kinases: a team that plays throughout mitosis. Genes Dev 12:3777–3787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr FA, Sillje HH, Nigg EA (2004) Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:429–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sumara I, Gimenez-Abian JF, Gerlich D, Hirota T, Kraft C, de la Torre C, Ellenberg J, Peters JM (2004) Roles of polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr Biol 14:1712–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lenart P, Petronczki M, Steegmaier M, Di Fiore B, Lipp JJ, Hoffmann M, Rettig WJ, Kraut N, Peters JM (2007) The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr Biol 17:304–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLuca KF, Lens SM, DeLuca JG (2011) Temporal changes in Hec1 phosphorylation control kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability during mitosis. J Cell Sci 124:622–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Foley EA, Maldonado M, Kapoor TM (2011) Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase. Nat Cell Biol 13:1265–1271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu D, Davydenko O, Lampson MA (2012) Polo-like kinase-1 regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and spindle checkpoint silencing. J Cell Biol 198:491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC (2004) The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 117:5461–5477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan GK, Liu ST, Yen TJ (2005) Kinetochore structure and function. Trends Cell Biol 15:589–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED (2009) Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J Cell Biol 184:373–381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchida KS, Takagaki K, Kumada K, Hirayama Y, Noda T, Hirota T (2009) Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 184:383–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khodjakov A, Pines J (2010) Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat Cell Biol 12:919–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakhoum SF, Genovese G, Compton DA (2009) Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol CB 19:1937–1942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA (2009) Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 11:27–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhuo X, Guo X, Zhang X, Jing G, Wang Y, Chen Q, Jiang Q, Liu J, Zhang C (2015) Usp16 regulates kinetochore localization of Plk1 to promote proper chromosome alignment in mitosis. J Cell Biol 210:727–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2006) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127:969–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elowe S, Hummer S, Uldschmid A, Li X, Nigg EA (2007) Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev 21:2205–2219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu D, Vleugel M, Backer CB, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM, Lampson MA (2010) Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J Cell Biol 188:809–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maia AR, Garcia Z, Kabeche L, Barisic M, Maffini S, Macedo-Ribeiro S, Cheeseman IM, Compton DA, Kaverina I, Maiato H (2012) Cdk1 and Plk1 mediate a CLASP2 phospho-switch that stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments. J Cell Biol 199:285–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM (2014) Polo-like kinase 1 licenses CENP-A deposition at centromeres. Cell 158:397–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang YH, Park JE, Yu LR, Soung NK, Yun SM, Bang JK, Seong YS, Yu H, Garfield S, Veenstra TD et al (2006) Self-regulated Plk1 recruitment to kinetochores by the Plk1-PBIP1 interaction is critical for proper chromosome segregation. Mol Cell 24:409–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park CH, Park JE, Kim TS, Kang YH, Soung NK, Zhou M, Kim NH, Bang JK, Lee KS (2015) Mammalian Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) promotes proper chromosome segregation by phosphorylating and delocalizing the PBIP1.CENP-Q complex from kinetochores. J Biol Chem 290:8569–8581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Goto H, Kiyono T, Tomono Y, Kawajiri A, Urano T, Furukawa K, Nigg EA, Inagaki M (2006) Complex formation of Plk1 and INCENP required for metaphase-anaphase transition. Nat Cell Biol 8:180–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suijkerbuijk SJ, Vleugel M, Teixeira A, Kops GJ (2012) Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Dev Cell 23:745–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mondal G, Ohashi A, Yang L, Rowley M, Couch FJ (2012) Tex14, a Plk1-regulated protein, is required for kinetochore-microtubule attachment and regulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol Cell 45:680–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu MH, Rajkovic A, Burns KH, Yan W, Lin YN, Matzuk MM (2003)Sequence and expression of testis-expressed gene 14 (Tex14): a gene encoding a protein kinase preferentially expressed during spermatogenesis. GEP 3:231–236

  27. Greenbaum MP, Iwamori N, Agno JE, Matzuk MM (2009) Mouse TEX14 is required for embryonic germ cell intercellular bridges but not female fertility. Biol Reprod 80:449–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee HS, Park YY, Cho MY, Chae S, Yoo YS, Kwon MH, Lee CW, Cho H (2015) The chromatin remodeller RSF1 is essential for PLK1 deposition and function at mitotic kinetochores. Nat Commun 6:7904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nigg EA (1998) Polo-like kinases: positive regulators of cell division from start to finish. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10:776–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Elia AE, Rellos P, Haire LF, Chao JW, Ivins FJ, Hoepker K, Mohammad D, Cantley LC, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB (2003) The molecular basis for phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the Polo-box domain. Cell 115:83–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leung GC, Hudson JW, Kozarova A, Davidson A, Dennis JW, Sicheri F (2002) The Sak polo-box comprises a structural domain sufficient for mitotic subcellular localization. Nat Struct Biol 9:719–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Slevin LK, Nye J, Pinkerton DC, Buster DW, Rogers GC, Slep KC (2012) The structure of the plk4 cryptic polo box reveals two tandem polo boxes required for centriole duplication. Structure 20:1905–1917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee KS, Park JE, Kang YH, Kim TS, Bang JK (2014) Mechanisms underlying Plk1 polo-box domain-mediated biological processes and their physiological significance. Mol Cells 37:286–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. de Carcer G, Manning G, Malumbres M (2011) From Plk1 to Plk5: functional evolution of polo-like kinases. Cell Cycle 10:2255–2262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Park JE, Soung NK, Johmura Y, Kang YH, Liao C, Lee KH, Park CH, Nicklaus MC, Lee KS (2010) Polo-box domain: a versatile mediator of polo-like kinase function. CMLS 67:1957–1970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Elia AE, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB (2003) Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science 299:1228–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu J, Maller JL (2005) Calcium elevation at fertilization coordinates phosphorylation of XErp1/Emi2 by Plx1 and CaMK II to release metaphase arrest by cytostatic factor. Curr Biol 15:1458–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang X, Chen Q, Feng J, Hou J, Yang F, Liu J, Jiang Q, Zhang C (2009) Sequential phosphorylation of Nedd1 by Cdk1 and Plk1 is required for targeting of the gammaTuRC to the centrosome. J Cell Sci 122:2240–2251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mimnaugh EG, Kayastha G, McGovern NB, Hwang SG, Marcu MG, Trepel J, Cai SY, Marchesi VT, Neckers L (2001) Caspase-dependent deubiquitination of monoubiquitinated nucleosomal histone H2A induced by diverse apoptogenic stimuli. Cell Death Differ 8:1182–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cai SY, Babbitt RW, Marchesi VT (1999) A mutant deubiquitinating enzyme (Ubp-M) associates with mitotic chromosomes and blocks cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2828–2833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Nijman SM, Luna-Vargas MP, Velds A, Brummelkamp TR, Dirac AM, Sixma TK, Bernards R (2005) A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell 123:773–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Song L, Rape M (2008) Reverse the curse–the role of deubiquitination in cell cycle control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:156–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hanna J, Leggett DS, Finley D (2003) Ubiquitin depletion as a key mediator of toxicity by translational inhibitors. Mol Cell Biol 23:9251–9261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson SM, Bhattacharyya B, Rachel RA, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Householder DB, Fletcher CF, Miller RJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA (2002) Synaptic defects in ataxia mice result from a mutation in Usp14, encoding a ubiquitin-specific protease. Nat Genet 32:420–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yao T, Cohen RE (2002) A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419:403–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Everett RD, Meredith M, Orr A, Cross A, Kathoria M, Parkinson J (1997) A novel ubiquitin-specific protease is dynamically associated with the PML nuclear domain and binds to a herpesvirus regulatory protein. EMBO J 16:1519–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li M, Chen D, Shiloh A, Luo J, Nikolaev AY, Qin J, Gu W (2002) Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization. Nature 416:648–653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu X, Zhou T, Kuriyama R, Erikson RL (2004) Molecular interactions of Polo-like-kinase 1 with the mitotic kinesin-like protein CHO1/MKLP-1. J Cell Sci 117:3233–3246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jensen DE, Rauscher FJ 3rd (1999) BAP1, a candidate tumor suppressor protein that interacts with BRCA1. Ann N Y Acad Sci 886:191–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dong Y, Hakimi MA, Chen X, Kumaraswamy E, Cooch NS, Godwin AK, Shiekhattar R (2003) Regulation of BRCC, a holoenzyme complex containing BRCA1 and BRCA2, by a signalosome-like subunit and its role in DNA repair. Mol Cell 12:1087–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Popov N, Wanzel M, Madiredjo M, Zhang D, Beijersbergen R, Bernards R, Moll R, Elledge SJ, Eilers M (2007) The ubiquitin-specific protease USP28 is required for MYC stability. Nat Cell Biol 9:765–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Joo HY, Zhai L, Yang C, Nie S, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Chang C, Wang H (2007) Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination. Nature 449:1068–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Reddy SK, Rape M, Margansky WA, Kirschner MW (2007) Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446:921–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stegmeier F, Rape M, Draviam VM, Nalepa G, Sowa ME, Ang XL, McDonald ER, 3rd, Li MZ, Hannon GJ, Sorger PK et al (2007) Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 446:876–881

  55. Kang D, Chen J, Wong J, Fang G (2002) The checkpoint protein Chfr is a ligase that ubiquitinates Plk1 and inhibits Cdc2 at the G2 to M transition. J Cell Biol 156:249–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Beck J, Maerki S, Posch M, Metzger T, Persaud A, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Rotin D, Pedrioli P, Swedlow JR et al (2013) Ubiquitylation-dependent localization of PLK1 in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 15:430–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bulatov E, Ciulli A (2015) Targeting Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases for drug discovery: structure, assembly and small-molecule modulation. Biochem J 467:365–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Sarikas A, Hartmann T, Pan ZQ (2011) The cullin protein family. Genome Biol 12:220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ (2005) Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:9–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bosu DR, Kipreos ET (2008) Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases: global regulation and activation cycles. Cell Div 3:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Marin I (2009) Diversification of the cullin family. BMC Evol Biol 9:267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Stogios PJ, Downs GS, Jauhal JJ, Nandra SK, Prive GG (2005) Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins. Genome Biol 6:R82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Maerki S, Olma MH, Staubli T, Steigemann P, Gerlich DW, Quadroni M, Sumara I, Peter M (2009) The Cul3-KLHL21 E3 ubiquitin ligase targets aurora B to midzone microtubules in anaphase and is required for cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 187:791–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Lasek AL, McPherson BM, Trueman NG, Burkard ME (2016) The functional significance of posttranslational modifications on polo-like kinase 1 revealed by chemical genetic complementation. PLoS One 11:e0150225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lera RF, Potts GK, Suzuki A, Johnson JM, Salmon ED, Coon JJ, Burkard ME (2016) Decoding Polo-like kinase 1 signaling along the kinetochore-centromere axis. Nat Chem Biol 12:411–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang L, Shao H, Huang Y, Yan F, Chu Y, Hou H, Zhu M, Fu C, Aikhionbare F, Fang G et al (2011) PLK1 phosphorylates mitotic centromere-associated kinesin and promotes its depolymerase activity. J Biol Chem 286:3033–3046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank other members of our laboratories for helpful comments and critical discussion on this work. Work in Liu laboratory is supported by a NIH Grant (5SC2GM089622-03), and in Zhang laboratory by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31520103906, 31371365, and 31430051) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFA0100501 and 2016YFA0500201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junjun Liu or Chuanmao Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Zhang, C. The equilibrium of ubiquitination and deubiquitination at PLK1 regulates sister chromatid separation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74, 2127–2134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2457-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2457-5

Keywords