Longevity, aging and rapamycin

Abstract

The federal drug administration (FDA)-approved compound rapamycin was the first pharmacological agent shown to extend maximal lifespan in both genders in a mammalian species. A major question then is whether the drug slows mammalian aging or if it has isolated effects on longevity by suppressing cancers, the main cause of death in many mouse strains. Here, we review what is currently known about the effects that pharmacological or genetic mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition have on mammalian aging and longevity. Currently available evidence seems to best fit a model, wherein rapamycin extends lifespan by suppressing cancers. In addition the drug has symptomatic effects on some aging traits, such as age-related cognitive impairments.

Introduction

Aging is a major risk factor for a range of diseases in numerous organ systems, including cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, diabetes mellitus type II, osteoporosis etc. Interventions that target the molecular processes underlying aging could therefore provide novel entry points for the development of innovative preventatives and/or therapeutics for a range of age-related diseases [1, 2].

Much research over the past ~2 decades has focused on the identification of genetic mutations that extend lifespan in invertebrate model organisms. Pathways involved in the control of cell growth and metabolism have emerged as important players of lifespan regulation [3, 4]. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a kinase at a key signalling node that integrates information regarding extracellular growth factor stimulation, nutrient availability and energy supplies [5]. A number of studies in yeast [6], worms [7, 8] and flies [9] have initially implicated mTOR in lifespan control.

The recent discovery that the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin extends mammalian lifespan [10] has created much excitement because it represented the first demonstration of pharmacological extension of maximal lifespan in a mammalian species. Rapamycin’s mammalian longevity effects have since then been confirmed by a number of additional studies [1115]. Rapamycin is FDA-approved and considerable experience exists with the clinical application of this drug: Rapamycin and derivates of this compound are used clinically to prevent organ rejection after kidney transplantation and also to prevent occlusion of cardiac stents. mTOR inhibitors are also clinically tested for the treatment of cancers and neurogenetic disorders, such as tuberous sclerosis. Translational studies that assess rapamycin’s effects on human aging and age-related disease are therefore thought to be within reach and have actually been initiated at some sites (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01649960; [16]).

Although mTOR inhibition has been clearly shown to extend murine lifespan [1015, 17] and also to have beneficial effects on a set of murine aging traits [1114, 1722], there is currently little evidence available to support the notion that mTOR inhibitors slow the rate of mammalian aging. In this article, we review what is currently known about the effects that pharmacological or genetic mTOR inhibition have on mammalian aging and longevity.

Rapamycin and mTOR signaling

mTOR occurs in two distinct protein complexes, namely mTORC1 and mTORC2 [23] (see Fig. 1; for abbreviations, see Fig. 1 legend). The mTORC1 protein complex includes raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mTOR) and mLST8 in addition to mTOR. Upstream regulatory signaling inputs that converge onto mTORC1-related cell signaling include the PI3K/AKT [24, 25] and Ras/MAPK pathways [26, 27], as well as AMPK signaling [28]. mTORC1 is therefore well-positioned to coordinate cellular growth-related processes and integrate them with the availability of nutrients, energy and the appropriate stimulation of growth factor receptors.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic illustration of mTOR-related cell signaling. AKT serine/threonine protein kinase, AMPK AMP-activated protein kinase, FKBP12 12 kDa FK506-binding protein, eIF4E eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E, 4E-BP eIF4E binding protein, MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase, MEK mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, mTORC1 mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1, mTORC2 mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2, NF1 neurofibromin, PDK phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase, PI3 K phosphoinositide-3-kinase, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, Ras G protein Ras, Rheb Ras homologue enriched in brain, S6 K S6 kinase, S6 ribosomal protein S6, TSC1 tuberous sclerosis protein 1, TSC2 tuberous sclerosis protein 2. Modified with permission from [79]

mTORC1 plays an important role in the regulation of a range of cellular processes, including de novo protein synthesis [5, 29, 30]: mTORC1 stimulates the translation of mRNAs with a highly structured 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) by phosphorylating 4E-BPs, thereby derepressing eIF4E and, consecutively, promoting translational initiation. Additionally, mTORC1 controls protein synthesis via the p70S6 kinase/ribosomal protein S6 pathway, which stimulates the translation of mRNAs with a 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine tract (5′TOP), many of which encode for components of the translational machinery (e.g., ribosomal subunits, translation factors etc.). Experiments in C. elegans showed that a number of different genetic manipulations affecting the protein synthesis machinery (such as genetic deletion or siRNA-mediated knock-down of ribosomal subunits and translation factors, respectively) are associated with extended lifespan [3133], indicating that altered translational rates could contribute to longevity effects of mTOR inhibition in this organism. In mice, lifespan extension was observed in female mice with a homozygous mutation in ribosomal S6 protein kinase 1 (S6K1) [34]. Whether mammalian aging rates are slowed by translational modulation remains unknown.

Another important cellular process regulated by mTORC1 signaling is autophagy. Autophagy, a process by which the cell recycles macromolecules and organelles, allows for the removal of damaged cellular constituents and enables the cell to mobilize substrate under nutrient-poor conditions. mTORC1 regulates autophagy by phosphorylating and inhibiting the autophagy-initiating kinase Ulk1 [35]. In C. elegans, autophagy has been reported to be required for the lifespan extension caused by genetic mTOR inhibition [36]. Available evidence in mice indicates that aspects of liver aging (age-related histopathological and functional liver changes) are improved when an inducible genetic system is employed to increase autophagy levels in aged mice [37]. Whether murine lifespan extension, caused by rapamycin, is dependent on autophagy effects has not been addressed to date.

In the context of the mTORC2 protein complex, mTOR is associated with rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), GβL and mSIN1 (mammalian stress-activated protein kinase interacting protein). mTORC2 is involved in regulating the activity of AKT [38]. In contrast to mTORC1, which is inhibited by rapamycin, mTORC2 is rapamycin-insensitive. Prolonged rapamycin treatment, however, inhibits mTORC2 indirectly [39].

The mechanisms by which rapamycin inhibits mTOR are not fully understood; it is, however, established that rapamycin associates with FKBP12 to bind to mTOR’s FRB (FKBP12-rapamycin-binding) domain. Binding of the rapamycin-FKBP12 complex to mTOR may destabilize the mTORC1 complex [40] and, in addition, interfere with the activation of mTOR by phosphatidic acid [41]. Novel mTOR inhibitors are available that either inhibit mTOR by interfering with mTORC1 complex formation (FKBP12-dependent or FKBP12-independent) or by directly inhibiting mTOR’s catalytic domain [42].

Rapamycin extends lifespan in mice

In their important 2009 paper, the NIA’s intervention testing program (ITP) identified rapamycin as the first pharmacological agent to extend maximal lifespan in a mammalian species, with effects in both males and females [10] (Table 1). Rapamycin was encapsulated (to increase bioavailablity of the drug) and delivered via the mouse chow at a concentration of 14 parts per million (ppm). In this study, treatment was started at two different ages: 270 days and 600 days, respectively. Both treatments were found to effectively extend maximal lifespan in a genetically heterogeneous stock of mice (UM-HET3 mice) [10] and the effect size did not differ in any obvious way between the earlier-onset and the later-onset treatment [11]. More recently, the longevity effect of two additional doses of rapamycin has been examined [15]: in this follow-up study, the ITP assessed rapamycin orally administered to initially 9 months old UM-HET3 mice at the concentrations of 4.7, 14 or 42 ppm. All three doses extended maximal and median lifespan in females and the two higher doses (14, 42 ppm) caused significant lifespan extension in males (also both maximal and median lifespan extension) [15]. Lifespan-extending effects were larger in females than in males, most likely because of higher rapamycin blood concentrations found in females at a given rapamycin chow concentration ([15]; although these gender differences in rapamycin blood concentrations were not observed in all studies [10]). It remains to be determined whether these possible gender differences in rapamycin blood levels are related to sex differences in food intake, resorption of the drug, tissue distribution, metabolism of the drug or a combination of these factors. Rapamycin has also been shown to extend lifespan in mice of other genetic backgrounds, such as C57BL/6 [12, 13] and 129/Sv [14] (Table 1). Additionally, there is also genetic evidence implicating loss of mTOR function in murine lifespan extension: animals homozygous for a hypomorphic mTOR mutation (decreasing mTOR expression to 25 % of wildtype levels) show a lifespan extension that is also seen across both males and females [17] (Table 1).

Table 1 Mammalian longevity studies using rapamycin or genetic mTOR inhibition

Rapamycin longevity studies: why do treated animals live longer?

As mentioned above, the rapamycin longevity studies in mice published to date examined several genetic backgrounds, namely inbred C57BL/6 backgrounds [12, 13], 129/Sv [14] and the genetically heterogeneous UM-HET3 stock of animals (the stock used by the NIA’s Intervention Testing Program) [10, 11, 15] (see Table 1).

In all these backgrounds and across sexes, neoplastic lesions represent a major cause of death. For example, approx. 70 % of C57BL/6 animals naturally die due to neoplastic disease with lymphomas and hematopoietic neoplasms representing the leading causes of death [4345]. Similarly, in UM-HET3 mice, neoplastic lesions are the natural cause of death in >80 % of cases [11, 46]. Lymphomas and hematopoietic tumors also represent the most common neoplastic lesions that naturally limit life in UM-HET3 mice [11, 46]. Any intervention extending lifespan in these strains is, therefore, expected to do so primarily by counteracting these common life-limiting neoplastic pathologies.

Lifespan extension via inhibition of carcinogenesis is indeed a plausible scenario for rapamycin-mediated longevity effects because rapamycin has well-known anti-neoplastic properties, including inhibitory effects on de novo cancer formation, as well as suppression of established tumors via inhibition of cancer growth, promotion of apoptosis of neoplastic cells and/or a modification of the host response to the tumor (for example, inhibiting angiogenesis) [4754]. In line with this, rapamycin was found to suppress cancers and extend life in a range of genetic early-onset cancer models, such as p53 mutant mice, Apc mutant animals, Rb mutant mice and HER-2/neu transgenic mice [5558], strongly implicating direct anti-cancer action in the longevity effects seen in these studies.

Detailed cause-of-death analyses in rapamycin-treated UM-HET3 mice and controls indicated that both groups die primarily (i.e., in >80 % of cases) due to cancers, but rapamycin-treated animals do so later in life than controls [11], indicating that rapamycin postpones lethal neoplastic disease in treated animals. In the context of this study, it was not possible to determine if rapamycin also extends lifespan in those animals that die due to non-neoplastic disease because non-neoplastic disease accounted only for a small fraction (approx. 10 %) of deaths in UM-HET3 mice [11].

An analysis of rapamycin’s lifespan effects in aging 129/Sv female mice showed a clear lifespan extension and a reduced tumor burden in treated animals [14]. Further analyses in 129/Sv mice indicated that rapamycin-mediated lifespan extension is only seen in animals that eventually die due to neoplastic disease; in contrast, rapamycin did not significantly extend lifespan in those animals that die due to non-neoplastic disease [14], supporting the notion that rapamycin extended lifespan by specifically inhibiting neoplasia-related lethality (without effects on lethality related to non-neoplastic disease).

Similarly, a study analyzing lifespan and end-of-life pathology in hypomorphic mTOR mutant mice reported a clear reduction of malignant tumors in the mutants, while infections were more common in these animals [17]. Reduced numbers of precancerous lesions and cancers were also found in rapamycin-treated aging C57BL/6J mice [13].

Together, the data available (discussed above) indicate that rapamycin primarily extends mammalian lifespan by inhibiting lethal neoplastic disease. It will be important to assess rapamycin’s effects on additional mouse strains and/or other mammalian species that show a broader spectrum of additional non-neoplastic pathology as contributory factors to death.

Aging research: from lifespan to healthspan measures

Studies over the past ~20 years have identified a large number of genetic manipulations that extend life in invertebrate model organisms, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Some of the pathways identified were also shown to be involved in the regulation of mammalian lifespan (using mice) [59], although mechanisms of lifespan extension in these different species are likely very different (at least the proximal mechanisms; see discussion above).

Lifespan extension does not necessarily indicate effects on aging. With regards to lifespan-extending interventions in mice two general scenarios are possible: (a) interventions may have isolated effects on lifespan by inhibiting specific life-limiting pathology, such as cancers, without broadly modulating aging traits; (b) lifespan extension occurs by inhibition of life-limiting pathologies, such as cancers, and this effect represents one aspect of a more general effect that the respective intervention has on aging.

During the course of aging most mammalian tissues and organ systems undergo characteristic molecular, structural and functional alterations. To assess whether a pharmacological or genetic intervention slows the rate of mammalian aging it is necessary to examine its effects on a broad range of mammalian aging phenotypes in different cell types, tissues and organ systems. Comprehensive analyses of aging traits may then identify aging traits that are ameliorated by specific genetic or pharmacological interventions.

Modulation of aging traits: slowing aging vs. symptomatic effects on aging traits

A given intervention that ameliorates aging traits could in principle do so via one of two ways: (a) causally, by slowing the rate of aging, that is by slowing the process(es) that underlie the age-dependent development of the respective aging trait(s); (b) symptomatically, i.e., by modifying the respective traits in ways that are mechanistically distinct from the processes that underlie the aging traits’ development.

Experimentally, one can reveal the symptomatic nature of the modulation of an aging trait by administering the intervention well before the respective aging trait has developed. C57BL/6J mice, for example, develop aging-associated deficits in spatial reference memory tasks, such as the Morris water maze, at some point during their second year of life or thereafter [60, 61]. If a one-month treatment with a drug (e.g., a stimulant psychoactive compound) enhances spatial memory in 4 months old C57BL/6J mice, then it is clear that this drug improves memory by tapping into mechanisms that are distinct from those that underlie aging-associated cognitive decline. If it is then found that a long-term treatment with this same drug enhances memory in 2 year old mice, the most parsimonious explanation of this set of findings is that the drug affects age-dependent memory impairments symptomatically (i.e., without affecting the rate of cognitive aging).

This principle is illustrated in Fig. 2: interventions that slow the rate of aging are expected to specifically interfere with the age-related change of specific traits (e.g., age-related decline in performance on certain cognitive tasks), but do not have the same effects on young organisms that did not yet express the respective aging trait (i.e., no enhancement of cognitive performance in young organisms that did not yet develop aging-associated cognitive impairments). Other interventions, in contrast, may have symptomatic effects on an aging trait without slowing the rate of aging itself: These interventions would be expected to influence the respective trait in young, as well as in old individuals.

Fig. 2
figure2

Causal versus symptomatic effects on aging traits. A putative anti-aging intervention could in principle exert its effects on a given aging trait causally, by slowing the rate of aging (a), or symptomatically via aging-independent effects (b). a and b show examples of age-related decline of performance on a cognitive task that progressively starts in the second year of life of the animal. A treatment (given throughout life) that slows the rate of cognitive aging would be expected to specifically affect performance on the task once age-related decline has started (a). A treatment (given throughout life) that symptomatically improves age-related cognitive decline would be expected to improve performance at all ages (b)

Rapamycin effects on aging traits in mice

Several studies have assessed rapamycin’s effects on aging traits and they cover numerous aging phenotypes in different cell types, tissues and organ systems [1114, 1822]. Most of these studies have employed the ITP’s original rapamycin treatment regimen (i.e., encapsulated rapamycin administered via the mouse chow at a concentration of 14 ppm) that has been repeatedly shown to extend maximal and median lifespan in both males and females. Rapamycin shows extensive tissue distribution [13, 22, 62] and is therefore available for mTOR inhibition in numerous organs. The ITP’s rapamycin treatment regimen was shown to inhibit phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 at the mTOR-sensitive sites Ser240/244 in a number of tissues of both male and female mice, including heart, liver, kidney and fat [10, 22]. Similarly, this treatment protocol was also found to increase the LC3II/LC3I ratio in the tissues mentioned above [22], which is indicative of enhanced autophagy in treated animals. The by far most comprehensive assessment of rapamycin’s effects on murine aging was performed by Neff et al. [13] in a study that covered >150 aging traits across >25 tissues. The Neff et al. study is the only published report that took aging-independent drug effects into consideration when assessing rapamycin’s effects on aging traits. In the sections below, we review the current state of knowledge regarding rapamycin effects and effects of genetic mTOR inhibition on murine aging traits.

Neurological findings

Aging is associated with a number of neurobehavioral and neurological changes, such as cognitive decline, alterations in motor coordination, balance and reduced muscle strength [13, 60, 61, 63]. Rapamycin effects on neurological aging traits were assessed in several studies [11, 13, 1822] and the observations are summarized below (see also Table 2).

Table 2 Neurological findings

Aging in mice is typically associated with reduced levels of exploration and locomotor activity [11, 13, 18]. One robust finding, seen across a number of studies, is rapamycin’s stimulatory effect on locomotor activity in treated animals [11, 13, 18, 19]. Miller et al. [11] and Wilkinson et al. [18] measured spontaneous motor activity of animals in their cages for an extended time period (50 h). They examined animals at two time points, first at 7 months of age and, in those that survived, again at 18 months of age. Rapamycin or vehicle control treatment was initiated at 9 months of age. Their findings indicated that the age-dependent reduction of motor activity is ameliorated in animals aged on rapamycin [11, 18]. Stimulatory rapamycin effects on motor activity were also noted in another study [19], in the context of which voluntary wheel running was measured in aged animals subjected to oral rapamycin or vehicle control chow for 3 months starting at the age of 24 months.

Neff et al. [13] examined exploratory activity in an open field assay in three cohorts of animals that were aged on rapamycin or vehicle control for approx. 1 year, starting at either 4, 13 or 25 months. Exploratory activity levels were substantially reduced in aged mice relative to young controls and rapamycin treatment significantly elevated exploratory activity in aged animals [13]. The same rapamycin treatment regimen, however, also increased exploratory activity in young mice (3 months old animals that were treated for 12 weeks before testing commenced) [13], indicating that these drug effects were probably not related to a modulation of aging, but that they rather represented aging-independent drug effects on locomotor activity.

Collectively, the studies mentioned above demonstrate stimulatory effects of rapamycin on locomotor activity that are observable across genetic backgrounds (UM-HET3, C57BL/6 J) and affect males, as well as females. Relatively shorter-term (i.e., 3 months) rapamycin treatment is sufficient to increase motor activity and this is the case also for young animals (treated from 3 to 6 months of age), indicating that these rapamycin effects are age-independent.

Another robust neurobehavioral finding in animals subjected to the ITP rapamycin protocol is an enhanced performance on a number of different learning and memory tasks [13, 20, 21] (Table 2). Reduced escape latencies and improved probe trial performance in the Morris water maze in rapamycin-treated animals was observed by a number of laboratories and across different genetic backgrounds (C57BL6/J, mixed C57BL6/129svj) [13, 20, 21]. Rapamycin treatment, however, improved learning and memory in the Morris water maze not only in animals that were aged on the drug, but also in young adult mice (treatment starting at 6 months and lasting for 6 weeks) [13]––i.e., well before the onset of age-related cognitive decline. The ITP rapamycin protocol has therefore clear enhancing effects on learning and memory that can be employed to symptomatically improve cognition in aged mice.

Additional neurological studies in rapamycin-treated aged animals included assessments of motor coordination and balance [13, 22], gait [22], muscle strength [13, 22], nociception [13] and histopathological assessments of aging traits in muscle and brain [13]. The ITP rapamycin regimen applied for 1 year did not measurably improve performance on an accelerating rotarod in cohorts of 16 months and 25 months old animals, respectively (treatment commenced at 4 months and 13 months, respectively) [13], indicating limited effects of treatment on this aging trait. Another study employed a longitudinal assessment of rotarod performance at 25 months and 31 months in mice subjected to treatment that was started at 19 months [22]. Although there was no decline in rotarod performance between 25 and 31 months in the controls, rapamycin treatment was reported to improve performance at the age of 31 months [22].

Rotarod performance was also examined in hypomorphic mTOR mutant mice (mTOR ∆/∆ mice; [17]). The study showed the expected age effect on rotarod performance (old animals performing worse then young animals; for details, see Table 2). Aged mTOR ∆/∆ mice performed better than aged wildtype controls, while there was no genotype effect (mTOR ∆/∆ mice vs. WT) in the young cohort of animals. This may indicate that the mTOR ∆/∆ mutation has age-dependent effects on motor coordination and balance. Limitations associated with this experiment, however, were small sample size (only 4–6 animals per group) and the fact that body weight differences between mutants and controls (mTOR ∆/∆ mice are smaller and weigh less than their wildtype counterparts [17]) were not accounted for in the analysis (body weight and latencies to fall are inversely correlated; [64]).

The ITP rapamycin protocol did not measurably affect age-related impairments in muscle strength, as assessed in the grip strength test [13, 22]. Additionally, this treatment regimen did not modify the aging-associated decline in cross-sectional muscle fiber area in the quadriceps femoris muscle [13]. Wu et al. [17] reported increased muscle strength in aged mTOR ∆/∆ mice relative to aged wildtype controls, while the mTOR ∆/∆ genotype did not affect grip strength in young animals. While these data may suggest that the hypomorphic mTOR mutation slows the development of aging-associated grip strength impairments, it will be important to corroborate this observation using larger groups of animals (the groups contained only 4–6 animals in most groups).

In sum, oral rapamycin has stimulatory effects on locomotor behavior [11, 13, 18, 19] and improves learning and memory [13, 20, 21]. These are robust findings seen across mouse strains and genders. Because rapamycin has similar effects in young animals and aging cohorts [13], it is the most parsimonious explanation of the data that these rapamycin effects are not related to a modulation of aging. The oral rapamycin ITP protocol had limited effects on motor coordination and balance [13, 22], muscle strength [13, 22], sarcopenia [13] and age-related nociceptive dysfunction [13]. Preliminary evidence suggests that genetic mTOR inhibition in hypomorphic mTOR mutant mice may result in preserved motor coordination and muscle strength in aged animals [17].

Ophthalmological findings

A common aging-associated pathology affecting the anterior part of the eye is cataract formation [65]. Two studies published to date assessed rapamycin effects on age-related lens density alterations [13, 18] (Table 3). Wilkinson et al. [18] employed investigator-based ratings of lens density during slit lamp examination in UM-HET3 mice. They reported an exacerbation of age-related lens density alterations under rapamycin treatment [18]. Assessing C57BL/6J Rj mice and using computer-assisted automated Scheimpflug imaging, Neff et al. found no clear effects of rapamycin on age-related changes in mean lens density [13]. Neff et al. [13] also used the virtual drum vision test to examine if rapamycin can prevent the aging-associate decline in visual acuity. While aged animals showed significantly reduced visual acuity, rapamycin treatment had no measurable effects on this aging trait. Together, the data available indicate that the lifespan-extending rapamycin treatment regimen pioneered by the ITP does not beneficially influence age-related ophthalmological changes and may even have adverse effects on specific aging traits of the eyes (i.e., changes in lens density).

Table 3 Ophthalmological findings

Cardiological findings

Aging is associated with structural and functional changes affecting the heart [66]. Echocardiography was employed in two studies to analyze the effects of the ITP rapamycin protocol on age-related structural and functional cardiac alterations [13, 19] (Table 4). In both studies, rapamycin was found to decrease a subset of heart dimensional measures, such as diastolic left ventricular internal diameter (LVIDd), and also decreased overall heart mass [13, 19]. Analyses in young animals demonstrated similar effects after a 3 months rapamycin treatment starting at 12 weeks of age [13], indicating age-independent drug effects on heart weight and heart dimensional measures.

Table 4 Cardiological findings

Echocardiography also demonstrated the expected aging-associated decrease in functional cardiac measures, such as cardiac output, ejection fraction, fractional shortening, as well as blood flow measurements and pressure gradients across the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves [13]. Neff et al. [13] assessed 26 months old male C57BL/6J Rj mice that had been treated for 13 months and found no significant rapamycin effects on any of these measures, suggesting limited effects of the drug on cardiac function. Flynn et al. [19] used a within-subjects design in female C57BL/6J mice, measuring cardiac function at 24 months of age and then again after 3 months of rapamycin or vehicle treatment. These authors report a small beneficial rapamycin effect on the ejection fraction and on fractional shortening [19]. Possible explanations for these different findings include differences in study design (between-subjects versus within-subjects), gender (male versus female) and treatment duration (with transient effects of treatment on these cardiac measures).

Effects on the skeletal system and tendons

During the course of aging, there are typical changes affecting bones and the skeletal system, including decreases in trabecular bone volume and progressive kyphotic changes affecting the spine [19, 67]. The effect of a short-term rapamycin treatment (the ITP rapamycin protocol for 3 months, starting at 24 months of age) on spine kyphosis was examined using whole body micro CT [19] (Table 5). Measures were taken before commencement and after completion of the treatment. While a progressive change of spine kyphotic index was detected over this 3 months period, rapamycin had no measurable effects on the degenerative changes [19].

Table 5 Bones and skeletal system

Micro CT analyzes were also employed to measure tibial bone density in young and aging mTOR ∆/∆ mice, as well as corresponding wildtype controls [17] (Table 5). These analyzes showed the expected loss of trabecular bone volume in the tibiae of aged mice. The mTOR ∆/∆ genotype had no beneficial effects on age-related loss of bone volume, but instead appeared to lead to a further exacerbation of this aging phenotype [17]. No difference in trabecular bone volume was detected between young mTOR ∆/∆ mice and age-matched wildtype controls [17]. Together, the data available [17, 19] suggest that pharmacological and genetic mTOR inhibition may have limited effects on specific age-related skeletal and bone changes.

Wilkinson et al. [18] examined age-related changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior tendons (Table 5). Aged mice showed a significant increase in maximum tangent modulus (a measure indicating resistance to stretching) and a decrease in hysteresis (a measure indicating the extent to which tendons recover to their original length in the unstretched condition) [18]. Rapamycin treatment (the ITP protocol) significantly improved these age-related biomechanical tendon properties [18]. Rapamycin effects on tendons in young animals were not included in the analyses. Future studies have to address if rapamycin has symptomatic effects on tendon properties in aged mice or if it slows the age-related development of these alterations.

Clinical chemistry, hematology and immunology

Murine aging is associated with an altered cellular composition of the peripheral blood [68, 69]. Blood cell counts were measured in three aging mouse cohorts that were treated with rapamycin or vehicle control for approx. 1 year (starting at either 4, 13 or 25 months) before analyses commenced [13] (Table 6). Aged animals showed elevated white blood cell counts and elevated platelet counts, both of which were not modified by rapamycin treatment [13]. Additionally, old animals showed reduced red blood cells counts associated with decreased mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and increased red blood cell distribution width (RDW) [13]. Together, these findings are reminiscent to hematology findings associated with iron deficiency anemia, anemia of chronic diseases and anemia caused by chronic bleeding. Rapamycin treatment significantly elevated red blood cell counts in aged animals and tended to have similar effects on red blood cell counts in young animals ([13]; see also [70]), indicating that rapamycin effects were likely linked to aging-independent effects on erythrocyte production and/or turnover.

Table 6 Clinical chemistry, hematology and immunology

Detailed clinical chemistry assessments showed clear aging-associated changes in plasma concentrations of sodium, calcium, and chloride (increased), glucose (decreased), and triglycerides (decreased) [13], which is in agreement with previously reported murine aging traits [68]. Additionally, old mice showed increased alkaline phosphatase and α-amylase levels in their plasma [13]. Rapamycin treatment had by and large no detectable effects on these clinical chemistry aging traits (except for an elevation of blood glucose) [13].

Ten-color polychromatic flow cytometry was used to examine quantitative aging and/or rapamycin effects on various immune cell populations in the three aging mouse cohorts mentioned above [13]. Aged animals showed the expected strong reduction in the frequency of CD4+ T cells, an increase in the frequency of CD44hi T cells (indicative of an activated/memory T cell phenotype) and a strong reduction in the frequency of NK cells, among additional alterations [13]. Rapamycin treatment had no measurable effects on the frequency of CD4+ T cells and NK cells, but counteracted the age-related change in CD44hi T cells [13]. Rapamycin did not influence the frequency of CD44hi T cells in the young group of animals examined in the Neff et al. [13] study. Nevertheless, it still remains unclear if rapamycin specifically has this effect on CD44hi T cells in aged animals because genetic mTOR inhibition has been shown previously to lead to reduced CD44hi T cell counts in young animals [71].

Immunoglobulin plasma concentrations are often robustly elevated in aged mice [13]. Rapamycin tended to decrease plasma immunoglobulin concentrations in several cases [13]. These analyses were only carried out in the aging cohorts and it remains to be determined if a more acute rapamycin treatment may have similar consequences in young mice.

Metabolism

Indirect calorimetry was used to assess metabolic changes in aged animals and their possible modulation by rapamycin [13] (Table 7). These studies showed that certain parameters seen in aged mice, such as reduced oxygen consumption and lower body temperature, were not restored by rapamycin treatment [13]. Rapamycin had an effect on the respiratory exchange ratio, at least in one of the examined cohorts [13], that deserves further attention in future studies.

Table 7 Metabolism

Pathology findings

A number of experiments have been carried out to study rapamycin’s effects on histopathological aging phenotypes in mice. The data available to date are described below and are summarized in Table 8.

Table 8 Pathology

One of the well-documented age-related alterations is the strong decline in adult hippocampal neurogenesis [72]. Neff et al. [13] determined if a 1 year rapamycin treatment (the ITP protocol), initiated at 4 months, prevents the age-related decline in hippocampal neurogenesis. They observed the expected clear reduction in doublecortin immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus, which was, however, not significantly modulated by rapamycin [13], indicating that the treatment had no measurable effects on age-related alterations in adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

There is an accumulation of polyubiquitinated and nitrotyrosinylated proteins in the aging mouse brain. Wu et al. [17] employed immunohistochemical analyses of brain sections to measure possible effects of a hypomorphic mTOR mutation on these aging traits. Their data showed a reduced immunoreactivity for polyubiquitinated and nitrotyrosinylated proteins in brain sections of aged mTOR mutants compared to age-matched wildtype controls [17], suggesting that the appearance of these aging traits was suppressed in the mutants.

The aging-associated loss in muscle strength (discussed above) is paralleled by an atrophy of skeletal muscle fibers (sarcopenia) [73]. Neff et al. [13] quantitatively analyzed cross-sectional muscle fiber surface area of the quadriceps femoris muscle of aged animals treated either with rapamycin or vehicle control. Aged animals showed the expected reduction in cross-sectional muscle fiber surface area and rapamycin did not ameliorate this aging phenotype [13].

Aging of the cardiovascular system is associated with a broad set of histopathological alterations. Neff et al. [13] performed detailed histopathological analyses of aging-associated myocardial changes (such as ventricular dilation, myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis and thickening of the heart valves) and degenerative arterial alterations, which showed no obvious preventative effects of rapamycin treatment (the ITP protocol) on these aging traits. Wilkinson et al. [18] assessed rapamycin’s effects on morphological changes affecting cardiomyocytes in the aged heart (abnormalities in nuclear size and chromatin conformation): Their findings suggest that rapamycin may have reduced the frequency of this alteration in aged animals, which should encourage future studies to re-examine this rapamycin effect. It was not assessed if rapamycin has effects on nuclear size and chromatin conformation of cardiomyocytes in young animals. It is therefore currently unknown if this finding is better explained by a general age-independent drug effect or by specific prevention of a cardiac aging phenotype.

Age-related liver phenotypes were examined histopathologically in the context of the Neff et al. and the Wilkinson et al. study. Neff et al. [13] observed no preventative rapamycin effect on periportal fibrosis and polyploidy of hepatic cells, which are both substantially more common in aged animals than in young controls. Rapamycin did, however, decrease the frequency of microgranulomas in the liver of animals aged on the drug [13]. Wilkinson et al. [18] examined rapamycin’s effects on multifocal macrovesicular lipidosis of the liver, which is common in aged male, but not female UM-HET3 mice. Rapamycin treatment seemed to decrease the prevalence of this trait in aged male UM-HET3 mice in a dose-dependent fashion [18]. It is currently unclear if this rapamycin effect is reflective of a prevention of aspects of liver aging or if it is related to more immediate drug effects on hepatic lipid metabolism [74].

Renal age-related changes include glomerulosclerosis and alterations affecting the renal tubular system. Neff et al. [13] assessed rapamycin effects on the prevalence of glomerulosclerosis in aged mice and on histopathological changes affecting tubulus epithelia cells (vacuolization of tubulus epithelia; hyperplasia of tubulus epithelia). There was no detectable beneficial effect on glomerulosclerosis [13]. Rapamycin treatment, however, resulted in a significantly increased prevalence of vacuolization of tubulus epithelial cells [13], indicative of nephrotoxic side effects of rapamycin treatment.

In the thyroid gland, aging is associated with increased follicle sizes and decreased colloid resorption [13, 75]. Neff et al. [13] examined thyroid follicle size distributions in mice aged on rapamycin (oral, 14 ppm) or vehicle control diet. The data showed the expected substantial age-related increase in thyroid follicle sizes [13]. Rapamycin treatment significantly decreased thyroid follicle size in aged mice [13]. However, the drug also led to a reduction in thyroid follicle size in young animals (in which a 3 months treatment was initiated at 12 weeks of age) [13], indicating that rapamycin effects on thyroid follicle size in aged animals cannot be attributed to a slowing of aging. In the adrenal glands, aging is associated with a prominent deposition of lipofuscin within the adrenal gland parenchyma. Rapamycin treatment did not ameliorate lipofuscin deposition in the adrenal glands [13].

Rapamycin effects on the male reproductive tract were examined histopathologically in two studies published to date [13, 18]. Wilkinson et al. treated UM-HET3 mice with three different doses of oral rapamycin (4.7, 14, 42 ppm), starting at 9 months of age and assessing the animals at 22 months [18]. Neff et al. [13] assessed C57BL/6J mice that were treated with 14 ppm of oral rapamycin for approx. 1 year (starting at 4, 13 and 20–22 months, respectively) before assessment commenced. In both studies significant testicular degeneration was observed in rapamycin-treated animals, indicating that this is a robust side effect of rapamycin that is seen at various doses and across different genetic backgrounds.

Aging-associated changes in the uterus include an increased prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia. Wilkinson et al. assessed rapamycin effects on the frequency of endometrial hyperplasia in aged female UM-HET3 mice [18]. The authors report a significant decrease in the prevalence of endometrial hyperplasia when comparing the rapamycin group with the highest dose (42 ppm orally) against the untreated aged controls [18]. It is currently unclear if this rapamycin effect reflects a slower rate of aging under treatment. More immediate, aging-independent rapamycin effects could well-explain the inhibition of endometrial hyperplasia given that inactivating Tsc2 mutations (an important mTOR repressor) were shown to result in endometrial hyperplasia, which could then be suppressed by pharmacological mTOR inhibition [76].

Gene expression

Using the ITP rapamycin adminstration protocol [10], two complementary studies investigating rapamycin-induced gene expression changes in the liver of aged mice were published recently [77, 78].

The first one performed transcriptome analysis of liver tissues derived from 25 months old C57BL/6 mice which were fed with 14 ppm encapsulated rapamycin starting at 4 months (for 21 months) or 19 months (for 6 months), respectively [77]. Despite of considerably extended lifespan in both genders, changes of gene expression induced by long term rapamycin treatment were apparently greater in females (2,504 genes up-regulated and 2,257 down-regulated) than males (159 genes up-regulated and 129 down-regulated) [77] (Table 9). Results obtained from chronically rapamycin fed males, however, remained ambiguous because of profound inner gender heterogenity: approximately, half of the animals (7 of 13) showed a profile similar to control fed males, while the other half (6 of 13) exhibited general similarity to rapamycin fed females. One possibility is that effects in females were more consistent because of higher rapamycin blood levels at a given dose [15]. Shorter-term rapamycin treatment (for 6 months) yielded expression alterations of 100 genes (32 up-regulated and 68 down-regulated) in males and 1,427 genes (675 up-regulated and 752 down-regulated) in females (Table 9). Using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), genes significantly affected by chronic rapamycin treatment were categorized into 13 different pathways. Two of those pathways (mitochondrial function and protein degradation) were also modulated by the 6 months treatment (Table 9).

Table 9 Rapamycin and gene expression studies using microarrays in mice

The second study aimed to compare liver transcriptome profiles of rapamycin fed male mice and those under a 40 % dietary restriction (DR) regimen starting at 2 months until 8 months of age [78]. The vast majority of gene expression modifications were restricted either to DR or rapamycin treatment as there was only an overlap of a small subset of genes (490 up-regulated genes (=26 %) and 74 down-regulated genes (=9 %) detected. Moreover, according to IPA analysis, ubiquitination represented the only top ranked pathway in both DR and rapamycin treated groups. Interestingly, DR combined with rapamycin led to additional gene expression changes (1,049 genes up-regulated and 767 down-regulated) not found by DR or rapamycin treatment alone (Table 9).

In summary, both studies provide initial insights of rapamycin associated gene regulation in a single organ (the liver). Unfortunately, the question whether those changes are directly linked with aging phenomena remained unanswered since the first report did not include young mice and the second one was limited to young male animals. In the future, more comprehensive transcriptome analyses including multiple tissue types and organs are required to fully elucidate the connection between rapamycin regulated gene expression and aging.

Conclusions and future directions

Rapamycin effects on numerous aging traits have been analyzed to date (as outlined above), mostly employing the original rapamycin administration regimen developed by the ITP that was shown to extend lifespan in mice [10]. Although there were a considerable number of aging traits not modified by treatment, rapamycin afforded improvement of a subset of traits examined [1114, 1822]. The aging traits found to be ameliorated by rapamycin were either related to immune system changes (e.g., plasma immunoglobulin concentrations, frequency of specific T cell subsets, cytokine concentrations in blood and heart, response to vaccination), age-related alterations in body mass, organ size and dimensions (body weight, fat mass, lean mass, thyroid follicle size, cardiac dimension, heart weight), tumors and pre-cancerous lesions, as well as neurobehavioral changes (motor activity, learning and memory). Where available [13], the data indicate that similar effects are seen using shorter-term treatments in young adult animals, indicative of aging-independent drug effects. More work is, therefore, needed to determine to what extend these rapamycin effects on the aged organism reflect symptomatic improvements (such as seen on a number of traits in the Neff et al. [13] study) versus a true slowing of aging processes. Although many drug effects are seen with the ITP rapamycin protocol, it will also be important to assess higher doses that may allow for a more complete mTOR inhibition in target tissues.

References

  1. 1.

    Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller RA, Butler RN (2006) In pursuit of the longevity dividend. Scientist 20:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Blagosklonny MV (2007) An anti-aging drug today: from senescence-promoting genes to anti-aging pill. Drug Discov Today 12(5–6):218–224. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2007.01.004

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kapahi P, Chen D, Rogers AN, Katewa SD, Li PW, Thomas EL, Kockel L (2010) With TOR, less is more: a key role for the conserved nutrient-sensing TOR pathway in aging. Cell Metab 11(6):453–465. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2010.05.001

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blagosklonny MV (2006) Aging and immortality: quasi-programmed senescence and its pharmacologic inhibition. Cell Cycle 5(18):2087–2102 (pii: 3288)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ehninger D (2013) From genes to cognition in tuberous sclerosis: implications for mTOR inhibitor-based treatment approaches. Neuropharmacology 68:97–105 (Pii:S0028-3908(12)00200-6)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kaeberlein M, Powers RW 3rd, Steffen KK, Westman EA, Hu D, Dang N, Kerr EO, Kirkland KT, Fields S, Kennedy BK (2005) Regulation of yeast replicative life span by TOR and Sch9 in response to nutrients. Science 310(5751):1193–1196

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vellai T, Takacs-Vellai K, Zhang Y, Kovacs AL, Orosz L, Muller F (2003) Genetics: influence of TOR kinase on lifespan in C. elegans. Nature 426(6967):620

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jia K, Chen D, Riddle DL (2004) The TOR pathway interacts with the insulin signaling pathway to regulate C. elegans larval development, metabolism and life span. Development 131(16):3897–3906. doi:10.1242/dev.01255

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kapahi P, Zid BM, Harper T, Koslover D, Sapin V, Benzer S (2004) Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Curr Biol 14(10):885–890

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Harrison DE, Strong R, Sharp ZD, Nelson JF, Astle CM, Flurkey K, Nadon NL, Wilkinson JE, Frenkel K, Carter CS, Pahor M, Javors MA, Fernandez E, Miller RA (2009) Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature 460(7253):392–395

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Miller RA, Harrison DE, Astle CM, Baur JA, Boyd AR, de Cabo R, Fernandez E, Flurkey K, Javors MA, Nelson JF, Orihuela CJ, Pletcher S, Sharp ZD, Sinclair D, Starnes JW, Wilkinson JE, Nadon NL, Strong R (2011) Rapamycin, but not resveratrol or simvastatin, extends life span of genetically heterogeneous mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66(2):191–201. doi:10.1093/gerona/glq178

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen C, Liu Y, Zheng P (2009) mTOR regulation and therapeutic rejuvenation of aging hematopoietic stem cells. Sci Signal 2(98):ra75. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000559

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Neff F, Flores-Dominguez D, Ryan DP, Horsch M, Schroder S, Adler T, Afonso LC, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, Becker L, Garrett L, Hans W, Hettich MM, Holtmeier R, Holter SM, Moreth K, Prehn C, Puk O, Racz I, Rathkolb B, Rozman J, Naton B, Ordemann R, Adamski J, Beckers J, Bekeredjian R, Busch DH, Ehninger G, Graw J, Hofler H, Klingenspor M, Klopstock T, Ollert M, Stypmann J, Wolf E, Wurst W, Zimmer A, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Hrabe de Angelis M, Ehninger D (2013) Rapamycin extends murine lifespan but has limited effects on aging. J Clin Invest 123(8):3272–3291. doi:10.1172/JCI67674

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Anisimov VN, Zabezhinski MA, Popovich IG, Piskunova TS, Semenchenko AV, Tyndyk ML, Yurova MN, Rosenfeld SV, Blagosklonny MV (2011) Rapamycin increases lifespan and inhibits spontaneous tumorigenesis in inbred female mice. Cell Cycle 10(24):4230–4236. doi:10.4161/cc.10.24.18486

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Miller RA, Harrison DE, Astle CM, Fernandez E, Flurkey K, Han M, Javors MA, Li X, Nadon NL, Nelson JF, Pletcher S, Salmon AB, Sharp ZD, Van Roekel S, Winkleman L, Strong R (2013) Rapamycin-mediated lifespan increase in mice is dose and sex-dependent and appears metabolically distinct from dietary restriction. Aging Cell. doi:10.1111/acel.12194

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Leslie M (2013) Biomedicine a putative antiaging drug takes a step from mice to men. Science 342(6160):789. doi:10.1126/science.342.6160.789

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wu JJ, Liu J, Chen EB, Wang JJ, Cao L, Narayan N, Fergusson MM, Rovira II, Allen M, Springer DA, Lago CU, Zhang S, DuBois W, Ward T, deCabo R, Gavrilova O, Mock B, Finkel T (2013) Increased mammalian lifespan and a segmental and tissue-specific slowing of aging after genetic reduction of mTOR expression. Cell Rep 4(5):913–920. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.030

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wilkinson JE, Burmeister L, Brooks SV, Chan CC, Friedline S, Harrison DE, Hejtmancik JF, Nadon N, Strong R, Wood LK, Woodward MA, Miller RA (2012) Rapamycin slows aging in mice. Aging Cell. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00832.x

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Flynn JM, O’Leary MN, Zambataro CA, Academia EC, Presley MP, Garrett BJ, Zykovich A, Mooney SD, Strong R, Rosen CJ, Kapahi P, Nelson MD, Kennedy BK, Melov S (2013) Late-life rapamycin treatment reverses age-related heart dysfunction. Aging Cell 12(5):851–862. doi:10.1111/acel.12109

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Majumder S, Caccamo A, Medina DX, Benavides AD, Javors MA, Kraig E, Strong R, Richardson A, Oddo S (2012) Lifelong rapamycin administration ameliorates age-dependent cognitive deficits by reducing IL-1beta and enhancing NMDA signaling. Aging Cell 11(2):326–335. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00791.x

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Halloran J, Hussong S, Burbank R, Podlutskaya N, Fischer K, Sloane L, Austad SN, Strong R, Richardson A, Hart M, Galvan V (2012) Chronic inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin modulates cognitive and non-cognitive components of behavior throughout lifespan in mice. Neuroscience. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.054

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang Y, Bokov A, Gelfond J, Soto V, Ikeno Y, Hubbard G, Diaz V, Sloane L, Maslin K, Treaster S, Rendon S, van Remmen H, Ward W, Javors M, Richardson A, Austad SN, Fischer K (2013) Rapamycin extends life and health in C57BL/6 mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. doi:10.1093/gerona/glt056

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Huang J, Manning BD (2009) A complex interplay between Akt, TSC2 and the two mTOR complexes. Biochem Soc Trans 37(Pt 1):217–222. doi:10.1042/BST0370217

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Inoki K, Li Y, Zhu T, Wu J, Guan KL (2002) TSC2 is phosphorylated and inhibited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signalling. Nat Cell Biol 4(9):648–657

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Manning BD, Tee AR, Logsdon MN, Blenis J, Cantley LC (2002) Identification of the tuberous sclerosis complex-2 tumor suppressor gene product tuberin as a target of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/akt pathway. Mol Cell 10(1):151–162

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Johannessen CM, Reczek EE, James MF, Brems H, Legius E, Cichowski K (2005) The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(24):8573–8578

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ma L, Chen Z, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Pandolfi PP (2005) Phosphorylation and functional inactivation of TSC2 by Erk implications for tuberous sclerosis and cancer pathogenesis. Cell 121(2):179–193

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Inoki K, Zhu T, Guan KL (2003) TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115(5):577–590

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Klann E, Dever TE (2004) Biochemical mechanisms for translational regulation in synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(12):931–942

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Costa-Mattioli M, Sonenberg N, Richter JD (2009) Translational regulatory mechanisms in synaptic plasticity and memory storage. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 90:293–311. doi:10.1016/S1877-1173(09)90008-4

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hansen M, Taubert S, Crawford D, Libina N, Lee SJ, Kenyon C (2007) Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6(1):95–110. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00267.x

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Syntichaki P, Troulinaki K, Tavernarakis N (2007) eIF4E function in somatic cells modulates ageing in caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 445(7130):922–926. doi:10.1038/nature05603

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pan KZ, Palter JE, Rogers AN, Olsen A, Chen D, Lithgow GJ, Kapahi P (2007) Inhibition of mRNA translation extends lifespan in caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6(1):111–119. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00266.x

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Selman C, Tullet JM, Wieser D, Irvine E, Lingard SJ, Choudhury AI, Claret M, Al-Qassab H, Carmignac D, Ramadani F, Woods A, Robinson IC, Schuster E, Batterham RL, Kozma SC, Thomas G, Carling D, Okkenhaug K, Thornton JM, Partridge L, Gems D, Withers DJ (2009) Ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 signaling regulates mammalian life span. Science 326(5949):140–144. doi:10.1126/science.1177221

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL (2011) AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol 13(2):132–141. doi:10.1038/ncb2152

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hansen M, Chandra A, Mitic LL, Onken B, Driscoll M, Kenyon C (2008) A role for autophagy in the extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in C. elegans. PLoS Genet 4(2):e24. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040024

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhang C, Cuervo AM (2008) Restoration of chaperone-mediated autophagy in aging liver improves cellular maintenance and hepatic function. Nat Med 14(9):959–965. doi:10.1038/nm.1851

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM (2005) Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 307(5712):1098–1101

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sengupta S, Sheen JH, Hsu PP, Bagley AF, Markhard AL, Sabatini DM (2006) Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol Cell 22(2):159–168

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Oshiro N, Yoshino K, Hidayat S, Tokunaga C, Hara K, Eguchi S, Avruch J, Yonezawa K (2004) Dissociation of raptor from mTOR is a mechanism of rapamycin-induced inhibition of mTOR function. Genes Cells 9(4):359–366. doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00727.x

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Veverka V, Crabbe T, Bird I, Lennie G, Muskett FW, Taylor RJ, Carr MD (2008) Structural characterization of the interaction of mTOR with phosphatidic acid and a novel class of inhibitor: compelling evidence for a central role of the FRB domain in small molecule-mediated regulation of mTOR. Oncogene 27(5):585–595. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210693

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Guertin DA, Sabatini DM (2009) The pharmacology of mTOR inhibition. Sci Signal 2(67):pe24. doi:10.1126/scisignal.267pe24

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Blackwell BN, Bucci TJ, Hart RW, Turturro A (1995) Longevity, body weight, and neoplasia in ad libitum-fed and diet-restricted C57BL6 mice fed NIH-31 open formula diet. Toxicol Pathol 23(5):570–582

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Brayton CF, Treuting PM, Ward JM (2012) Pathobiology of aging mice and GEM: background strains and experimental design. Vet Pathol 49(1):85–105. doi:10.1177/0300985811430696

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pettan-Brewer C, Treuting PM (2011) Practical pathology of aging mice. Pathobiol Aging Age relat Dis 1:7202

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lipman R, Galecki A, Burke DT, Miller RA (2004) Genetic loci that influence cause of death in a heterogeneous mouse stock. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59(10):977–983 (pii: 59/10/B977)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hidalgo M, Rowinsky EK (2000) The rapamycin-sensitive signal transduction pathway as a target for cancer therapy. Oncogene 19(56):6680–6686. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204091

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Garber K (2001) Rapamycin’s resurrection: a new way to target the cancer cell cycle. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(20):1517–1519

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Panwalkar A, Verstovsek S, Giles FJ (2004) Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition as therapy for hematologic malignancies. Cancer 100(4):657–666. doi:10.1002/cncr.20026

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kopelovich L, Fay JR, Sigman CC, Crowell JA (2007) The mammalian target of rapamycin pathway as a potential target for cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16(7):1330–1340. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0045

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kauffman HM, Cherikh WS, Cheng Y, Hanto DW, Kahan BD (2005) Maintenance immunosuppression with target-of-rapamycin inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of de novo malignancies. Transplantation 80(7):883–889 (pii: 00007890-200510150-00003)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Elghazi L, Weiss AJ, Barker DJ, Callaghan J, Staloch L, Sandgren EP, Gannon M, Adsay VN, Bernal-Mizrachi E (2009) Regulation of pancreas plasticity and malignant transformation by Akt signaling. Gastroenterology 136(3):1091–1103. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.043

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hezel AF, Gurumurthy S, Granot Z, Swisa A, Chu GC, Bailey G, Dor Y, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA (2008) Pancreatic LKB1 deletion leads to acinar polarity defects and cystic neoplasms. Mol Cell Biol 28(7):2414–2425. doi:10.1128/MCB.01621-07

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Blagosklonny MV (2012) Rapalogs in cancer prevention: anti-aging or anticancer? Cancer Biol Ther 13(14):1349–1354. doi:10.4161/cbt.22859

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Anisimov VN, Zabezhinski MA, Popovich IG, Piskunova TS, Semenchenko AV, Tyndyk ML, Yurova MN, Antoch MP, Blagosklonny MV (2010) Rapamycin extends maximal lifespan in cancer-prone mice. Am J Pathol 176(5):2092–2097. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.091050

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Comas M, Toshkov I, Kuropatwinski KK, Chernova OB, Polinsky A, Blagosklonny MV, Gudkov AV, Antoch MP (2012) New nanoformulation of rapamycin Rapatar extends lifespan in homozygous p53-/- mice by delaying carcinogenesis. Aging (Albany NY) 4(10):715–722 (pii: 100496)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hasty P, Livi CB, Dodds SG, Jones D, Strong R, Javors M, Fischer KE, Sloane L, Murthy K, Hubbard G, Sun L, Hurez V, Curiel TJ, Sharp ZD (2014) eRapa restores a normal life span in a FAP mouse model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 7(1):169–178. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0299

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Livi CB, Hardman RL, Christy BA, Dodds SG, Jones D, Williams C, Strong R, Bokov A, Javors MA, Ikeno Y, Hubbard G, Hasty P, Sharp ZD (2013) Rapamycin extends life span of Rb1±mice by inhibiting neuroendocrine tumors. Aging (Albany NY) 5(2):100–110 (pii: 100533)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Miller RA (2009) Biology of aging and longevity. In: Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti ME, Studenski S, High KP, Asthana S (eds) Hazzard’s geriatric medicine and gerontology. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kennard JA, Woodruff-Pak DS (2011) Age sensitivity of behavioral tests and brain substrates of normal aging in mice. Front Aging Neurosci 3:9. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2011.00009

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Magnusson KR (2001) Influence of diet restriction on NMDA receptor subunits and learning during aging. Neurobiol Aging 22(4):613–627 (pii: S019745800000258X)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Napoli KL, Wang ME, Stepkowski SM, Kahan BD (1997) Distribution of sirolimus in rat tissue. Clin Biochem 30(2):135–142 (pii: S0009-9120(96)00157-9)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Murphy GG, Rahnama NP, Silva AJ (2006) Investigation of age-related cognitive decline using mice as a model system: behavioral correlates. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14(12):1004–1011

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ingram DK (1983) Toward the behavioral assessment of biological aging in the laboratory mouse: concepts, terminology, and objectives. Exp Aging Res 9(4):225–238. doi:10.1080/03610738308258457

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Harding JJ (2003) Aging of the eye. In: Aspinall R (ed) Aging of organs and systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 179–200

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Dai DF, Rabinovitch PS (2009) Cardiac aging in mice and humans: the role of mitochondrial oxidative stress. Trends Cardiovasc Med 19(7):213–220. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2009.12.004

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Halloran BP, Ferguson VL, Simske SJ, Burghardt A, Venton LL, Majumdar S (2002) Changes in bone structure and mass with advancing age in the male C57BL/6 J mouse. J Bone Miner Res 17(6):1044–1050. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1044

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Frith CH, Suber RL, Umholtz R (1980) Hematologic and clinical chemistry findings in control BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Lab Anim Sci 30(5):835–840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Leuenberger HG, Kunstyr I (1976) Gerontological data of C57BL/6 J mice. II. Changes in blood cell counts in the course of natural aging. J Gerontol 31(6):648–653

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Diekmann F, Rovira J, Diaz-Ricart M, Arellano EM, Vodenik B, Jou JM, Vives-Corrons JL, Escolar G, Campistol JM (2012) mTOR inhibition and erythropoiesis: microcytosis or anaemia? Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(2):537–541. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr318

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Zhang S, Readinger JA, DuBois W, Janka-Junttila M, Robinson R, Pruitt M, Bliskovsky V, Wu JZ, Sakakibara K, Patel J, Parent CA, Tessarollo L, Schwartzberg PL, Mock BA (2011) Constitutive reductions in mTOR alter cell size, immune cell development, and antibody production. Blood 117(4):1228–1238. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-287821

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH (1998) Experience-induced neurogenesis in the senescent dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 18(9):3206–3212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Romero-Suarez S, Shen J, Brotto L, Hall T, Mo C, Valdivia HH, Andresen J, Wacker M, Nosek TM, Qu CK, Brotto M (2010) Muscle-specific inositide phosphatase (MIP/MTMR14) is reduced with age and its loss accelerates skeletal muscle aging process by altering calcium homeostasis. Aging (Albany NY) 2(8):504–513 (pii: 100190)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Laplante M, Sabatini DM (2009) An emerging role of mTOR in lipid biosynthesis. Curr Biol 19(22):R1046–R1052. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.058

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kmiec Z, Kotlarz G, Smiechowska B, Mysliwski A (1998) The effect of fasting and refeeding on thyroid follicule structure and thyroid hormone levels in young and old rats. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 26(2):161–175 (pii: S0167-4943(97)00040-X)

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    McCampbell AS, Harris HA, Crabtree JS, Winneker RC, Walker CL, Broaddus RR (2010) Loss of inhibitory insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation is an early event in mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3(3):290–300. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0199

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Fok WC, Chen Y, Bokov A, Zhang Y, Salmon AB, Diaz V, Javors M, Wood WH 3rd, Becker KG, Perez VI, Richardson A (2014) Mice fed rapamycin have an increase in lifespan associated with major changes in the liver transcriptome. PLoS ONE 9(1):e83988. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083988

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Fok WC, Bokov A, Gelfond J, Yu Z, Zhang Y, Doderer M, Chen Y, Javors M, Wood WH 3rd, Becker KG, Richardson A, Perez VI (2013) Combined treatment of rapamycin and dietary restriction has a larger effect on the transcriptome and metabolome of liver. Aging Cell 13(2):311–319. doi:10.1111/acel.12175

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Ehninger D, Silva AJ (2011) Rapamycin for treating Tuberous sclerosis and autism spectrum disorders. Trends Mol Med 17(2):78–87. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2010.10.002

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Ehninger.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehninger, D., Neff, F. & Xie, K. Longevity, aging and rapamycin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 4325–4346 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1677-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • mTOR
  • Mammalian target of rapamycin
  • Longevity
  • Lifespan
  • Aging
  • Rapamycin
  • Mice
  • Mammals
  • Disease
  • Treatment
  • Drug
  • Prevention
  • Mechanism
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Cancer
  • Anti-aging