Advertisement

Physics in Perspective

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 279–299 | Cite as

Quantum Humor: The Playful Side of Physics at Bohr’s Institute for Theoretical Physics

  • Paul HalpernEmail author
Article

Abstract

From the 1930s to the 1950s, a period of pivotal developments in quantum, nuclear, and particle physics, physicists at Niels Bohr’s Institute for Theoretical Physics in Copenhagen took time off from their research to write humorous articles, letters, and other works. Best known is the Blegdamsvej Faust, performed in April 1932 at the close of one of the Institute’s annual conferences. I also focus on the Journal of Jocular Physics, a humorous tribute to Bohr published on the occasions of his 50th, 60th, and 70th birthdays in 1935, 1945, and 1955. Contributors included Léon Rosenfeld, Victor Weisskopf, George Gamow, Oskar Klein, and Hendrik Casimir. I examine their contributions along with letters and other writings to show that they offer a window into some issues in physics at the time, such as the interpretation of complementarity and the nature of the neutrino, as well as the politics of the period.

Keywords

Niels Bohr Kanetaka Ariyama Hans Bethe Hendrik Casimir James Chadwick Paul Ehrenfest George Gamow Piet Hein Werner Heisenberg Oskar Klein Hendrik Kramers Wolfgang Pauli Rudolf Peierls Léon Rosenfeld Stefan Rozental Arnold Sommerfeld Victor Weisskopf Niels Bohr Institute Blegdamsvej Faust Journal of Jocular Physics humor history of atomic physics history of nuclear physics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Finn Aaserud and Felicity Pors of the Niels Bohr Archive for copies of the Blegdamsvej Faust and Journal of Jocular Physics, and for information about Oskar Klein’s unpublished submission to its first volume. I thank Robert P. Crease and Peter Pesic for encouraging comments, and Roger H. Stuewer for his excellent, careful, and knowledgeable editorial work on my paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Felicity Pors and Finn Aaserud, “Historical Sites of Physical Science in Copenhagen,” Physics in Perspective 3 (2001), 230–248; reprinted in John S. Rigden and Roger H. Stuewer, ed., The Physical Tourist: A Science Guide for the Traveler (Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhäuser, 2009), pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finn Aaserud, “The Copenhagen Conferences,” website <http://www.nbi.ku.dk/english/www/institute/History/The_Copenhagen_conferences/>.
  3. 3.
    George Gamow, Thirty Years that Shook Physics: The Story of Quantum Theory (New York: Doubleday & Co., 1966), p. 167.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., pp. 165–214.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Victor Weisskopf, The Joy of Insight: Passions of a Physicist (New York: Basic Books, 1991), pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hendrik Casimir, Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), pp. 97–99, 116–126.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gino Segrè, Faust in Copenhagen: A Struggle for the Soul of Physics (New York: Viking, 2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michael Faraday, A Course of Six Lectures on the Chemical History of a Candle: to which is added a Lecture on Platinum. Delivered before a Juvenile Auditory at the Royal Institution of Great Britain during the Christmas Holidays of 1860-1. Edited by William Crookes. With Numerous Illustrations (London: Griffin, Bohn, and Company, 1861).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charles Dickens, “The Chemistry of a Candle,” Household Words. A Weekly Journal. Conducted by Charles Dickens 1, No. 19 (1850), 439–444.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    James Clerk Maxwell, “Report on Tait’s Lecture on Force: B.A., 1876”; quoted in Lewis Campbell and William Garnett, The Life of James Clerk Maxwell, etc. (London: Macmillan and Co., 1882), p. 647.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. and T. Ehrenfest, “Begriffliche Grundlagen der statistischen Auffassung in der Mechanik,” Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 4, Teil 4, Heft 6, Art. 32 (Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1911), 3–90; reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers, ed. Martin J. Klein (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959), pp. 213–300; W. Pauli, “Relativitätstheorie,” ibid., Band 5, Teil 2 (Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1921), pp. 539–775; reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers. Vol. 1, ed. R. Kronig and V.F. Weisskopf (New York, London, Sydney: Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, 1964), pp. 1–237.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oskar Klein, “Wolfgang Pauli Några Minnesord,” Kosmos 37 (1959), 9–12, on 10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paul Halpern, “Klein, Einstein, and Five-Dimensional Unification,” Phys. in Perspec. 9 (2007), 390–405.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Interview of Hendrik Brugt Gerhard Casimir by Thomas S. Kuhn, Léon Rosenfeld, Aage Bohr, and Erik Rüdinger, July 5, 1963, Niels Bohr Library and Archives, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA, website <http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4550_1.html>, p. 10 of 24.
  15. 15.
    Klein to Ehrenfest, March 1930, Archives for History of Quantum Physics; hereafter AHQP.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ehrenfest to Klein, March 19, 1930, AHQP.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Faust: Eine Historie (1932), Niels Bohr Archive; hereafter NBA; translated into English in Gamow, Thirty Years (ref. 3), pp. 165–214.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panagiotis Pantidos, Kalliopi Spathi and Evagelos Vitoratos, “The Use of Drama in Science Education: The Case of ‘Blegdamsvej Faust,’” Science & Education 10 (2001), 107–117.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Segré, Faust in Copenhagen (ref. 7), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    James Chadwick, “Possible existence of a neutron,” Nature 129 (1932), 312.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Faust (ref. 17), pp. 9, 20; 188, 213–214.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Casimir, Haphazard Reality (ref. 6), p. 120.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Journal of Jocular Physics, Vol. I (October 7, 1935), NBA, p. [1].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibid., title page; reproduced in Barbara Lovett Cline, The Questioners: Physicists and the Quantum Theory (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1965); reprinted as Men Who Made a New Physics: Physicists and the Quantum Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), p. 216.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanetaka Ariyama, “Niels Bohr on His Fiftieth Birthday,” Journal, Vol. 1 (ref. 23), pp. [1–4].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ETH-Bibliothek, Zurich, Switzerland, “The Pauli Effect, Anecdotes,” website <http://www.library.ethz.ch/exhibit/pauli/effekt_pauli_e.html>.
  27. 27.
    [Léon Rosenfeld], “La Plainte du Neutrino,” Journal, Vol. 1 (ref. 23), p. [35].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. Weisskopf, “Komplementäre Philosophie des Witzes,” ibid., pp. [24–25].Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Casimir, “Über eine weniger bekannt Bohr’sche Theorie und ihre experimentelle Bestätigung,” ibid., p. [23].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Casimir, Haphazard Reality (ref. 6), pp. 98–99.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Journal, Vol. 1 (ref. 23), p. [36].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oskar Klein, “On Political Quantization,” unpublished manuscript submitted to the Journal, Vol. 1 (ref. 23), NBA.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hulthén to Pauli, November 13, 1945, quoted in Charles P. Lenz and Karl von Meyenn, ed., Wolfgang Pauli, Writings on Physics and Philosophy. Translated by Robert Schlapp (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994), p. 50.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stefan Rozental, “The Forties and the Fifties,” in S. Rozental, ed., Niels Bohr: his life and work as seen by his friends and colleagues (Amsterdam: North Holland and New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967), pp. 148–190, on p. 174.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. Rosenfeld, “My Initiation (paraphysical recollections),”Journal of Jocular Physics, Vol. II (October 7, 1945), NBA, pp. [1–4]; idem, “Niels Bohr,” expanded and corrected Second Edition (1961), in Robert S. Cohen and John J. Stachel, ed., Selected Papers of Léon Rosenfeld [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XXI] (Dordrecht, Boston, London: D. Reidel, 1979), pp. 313–326.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ibid., p. [4]; 320 (paraphrased).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    G. Gamow, Mr Tompkins in Wonderland or Stories of c, G, and h. Illustrated by John Hookham (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1939).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Niels Bohr, [“Preface”], in G. Gamow, Mr. Tompkins i Drømmeland. (København: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag 1942), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    R.A. Alpher, H. Bethe, and G. Gamow, “The Origin of Chemical Elements, Physical Review 73 (1948), 803–804.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gamow to Klein, undated (probably 1948), NBA.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Klein to Gamow, undated (probably 1948), NBA.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Journal of Jocular Physics, Vol. III (October 7, 1955), NBA.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Lindhard, “To all members of CERN Standardization of Papers,” ibid., pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ibid., p. 10.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    H.B.G. Casimir, “Broken English,” Ibid., pp. 14–18; reprinted in Haphazard Reality (ref. 6), pp. 122–125.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ibid., p. 14; 122.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Casimir, Haphazard Reality (ref. 6), p. 122.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Journal, Vol. III (ref. 42), pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    George Gamow, “The Heart on the Other Side,” in Frederik Pohl, ed., The Expert Dreamers (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, 1962), pp. 51–61.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R.E.P., “The Atom that Bohr Built,” Journal, Vol. III (ref. 42), pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ibid., p. 48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Physics and StatisticsUniversity of the Sciences in PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations