I set forth and discuss E.U. Condon’s views on science and society, focusing specifically on Condon’s views on science and religion, science and government, and the necessity for world peace. Even disregarding his contributions to theoretical physics, Condon proves an interesting case study for several reasons. He had extensive experience in academia, industry, and government, and was a scientist who easily crossed the insider-outsider divide between scientists in Cold War America. Moreover, Condon was a person of the Progressive Left advocating World Government as necessary for peace and warning of the dangers of the militarization of American society as well as of science itself. Known for being outspoken, he became an inviting target for the forces of anticommunism in Cold War America. In March 1948, the House Un-American Activities Committee charged that Condon was “one of the weakest links in our atomic security.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Michael A. Day is Professor of Physics at Lebanon Valley College. He holds doctorates in both physics and philosophy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, M.A. E.U. Condon: Science, Religion, and the Politics of World Peace. Phys. perspect. 10, 4–55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-007-0337-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-007-0337-3
Key words:
- Edward U. Condon
- Isidor I. Rabi
- Arthur H. Compton
- J. Robert Oppenheimer
- Leo Szilard
- science and society
- science and religion
- science and government
- world peace
- unidentified flying objects