Abstract.
I argue that there are strong reasons for resisting as a principle of science the concept of “anthropic selection.” This concept asserts that the existence of “observers” in a universe can be used as a condition that selects physical laws and constants necessary for intelligent life from different laws or physical constants prevailing in a vast number of other universes, to thereby explain why the properties of our universe are conducive to intelligent life. My reasons for limiting “anthropic selection” to the realm of speculation rather than permitting it to creep into mainstream science include our inability to estimate the probabilities of emergence of “observers” in a universe, the lack of testability through direct observation of the assumed high variability of the constants of nature, the lack of a clear definition of an “observer,” and the arbitrariness in how and to what questions anthropic selection is applied.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larson, R.G. Perspectives on Current Issues Is “Anthropic Selection” Science?. Phys. perspect. 9, 58–69 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-007-0333-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00016-007-0333-7
Keywords.
- anthropic selection
- anthropic principle