New records of Dorcatherium guntianum (Tragulidae), stratigraphical framework, and diphyletic origin of Miocene European tragulids

Abstract

Seven hitherto unpublished Dorcatherium guntianum teeth from the Early Miocene of Germany are described. Morphology and size of the teeth are documented in detail and taxonomic affiliation is assessed based on comparisons to type materials of European tragulids. The fossils represent one of the earliest European Dorcatherium records and the oldest unequivocal evidence of D. guntianum from Germany. A review of the European Dorcatherium occurrence pattern suggests that a bunoselenodont and a selenodont lineage immigrated into Europe simultaneously from the East or Southeast, and corroborates the interpretation of the genus as being diphyletic. Moreover, our data add support to immigration scenarios that have been linked with the emerging freshwater wetlands, which formed as a result of the regression in the Western Paratethys.

Introduction

Tragulidae are a clade of ruminant artiodactyls that is considered to have branched off the ruminant stem lineage during the Late Eocene (Métais et al. 2001; Hernández-Fernández and Vrba 2005) or Late Oligocene to Early Miocene (Hassanin et al. 2012) based on morphological and/or molecular evidence. Among the living Ruminantia, tragulids are graded the most ancestral group (e.g. Webb and Taylor 1980; Janis and Scott 1987; Hernández-Fernández and Vrba 2005; Hassanin et al. 2012). In contrast to their Recent disjunct and restricted distribution in tropical Africa and Asia (Meijaard 2011), the Miocene fossil record reflects a wide distribution of these animals throughout the Old World, including Europe (Pickford 2001; Rössner 2007). The genus Dorcatherium constitutes a major part of the Miocene tragulid record (Janis 1984; Thenius 2000: 182; Pickford 2001; Rössner 2007) and the entity of tragulids from the Miocene of Europe (which is in urgent need of revision, however, this is beyond the scope of this paper) (Mottl 1961; Fahlbusch 1985; Gentry et al. 1999; Rössner 2007).

Dorcatherium guntianum is one of the tragulid species known from the Lower and Middle Miocene of central and Western Europe. Its frequent appearance, although with only a few specimens per fauna, made it a constantly listed species in the context of systematic exploration of the terrestrial Miocene. However, illustrations of D. guntianum specimens in the literature are rare (see synonymy list below) and usually only show a limited number of the skeletodental components. The most extensive configuration to date has been provided by Sach (1999 pl. 14 fig. 1-8). Interestingly, Roger (1902:5) refers to D. guntianum as the more abundant species compared to the congeneric D. crassum. However, other investigations conducted subsequently during the last century have not supported Roger’s (1902) conclusion. For example, among the most extensive D. crassum material described to date (Viehhausen, Germany, Rinnert 1956; Sandelzhausen, Germany, Rössner 2010; Sansan, France, Morales et al. 2012), no remains of D. guntianum occur, even though this material derives from strata, which fall within the range of D. guntianum. Indeed, there is a lot of collected, but hitherto unpublished D. guntianum material in various museum collections (personal observation GER, included in online resource 2), which might enhance the current knowledge in the near future. The most extensive collection of fossils of D. guntianum thus far comes from Hambach 6C (Lower Rhine Embayment, Germany, late European Land Mammal Zone MN5, Mörs et al. 2000; systematic description of the specimens not yet completed; Rössner and Mörs in prep.). The biochronological range of D. guntianum has been indicated in Fahlbusch (1985), Gentry et al. (1999), and Rössner (2007) as MN4 to MN6 (latest Early to middle Middle Miocene) based on literature search and collection data (Eronen and Rössner 2007). Recently, Seehuber (2009) presented evidence suggesting that this taxon even extends into MN8 (late Middle Miocene).

The species Dorcatherium guntianum was established by von Meyer (1846: 472), who recognized that it is morphologically equal but smaller than the type species Dorcatherium naui Kaup, 1833 (figured and described in Kaup 1832–1839 part V and plates 21–25). However, the species has not been systematically analysed to date, although it has been reported a typical faunal element of the European Miocene (Fortelius 2012).

In this paper we examine D. guntianum teeth found at the fossil site Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse (Reichenbacher et al. 1998: 137) (Figs. 1, 2), which has a well-known stratigraphical context (Reichenbacher et al. 1998), and is located geographically and stratigraphically close to the type locality of the species (Reisensburg, see below and Fig. 1). Within this well-known framework, these teeth constitute another unequivocal record of D. guntianum from the Miocene of Europe, and are important evidence of the Early Miocene tragulid dispersal and palaeobiogeography. The teeth thus provide a valuable addition to our knowledge of the evolutionary history of the species as well as of the European tragulids in general and allow that new hypotheses can be made with regard to phylogeny and immigration scenarios of these animals.

Fig. 1
figure1

Locations of the sites Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse (1) (described in this paper) and the nearby Reisensburg (2) type locality of D. guntianum

Fig. 2
figure2

Composite section of the roadcut at Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse. UFM Upper Freshwater Molasse

With this study we commemorate the late Jean-Pierre Berger, whom we remember as an excellent scientist and marvellous colleague, and who has devoted a substantial part of his scientific life to the understanding of the developmental history of Central European Basins with regard to geology and biology aspects. His spirit and passion strongly influenced research in this field over the past 25 years.

Materials and methods

In the years 1995 and 1996, road constructions for a new portion of the highway B16 around the town of Günzburg (Bavaria, Germany) gave access to a section of the basal deposits of the Upper Freshwater Molasse (Reichenbacher et al. 1998) (Fig. 2). This section, called Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse, has been logged, and is described and figured in detail in this study for the first time (Fig. 2). Several dozens of kilograms of samples have been taken by the authors from different places in the section (Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse samples 2, 4, 5, 6; see Fig. 2) and screen-washed. The residues have been picked and yielded mainly gastropod and microvertebrate remains, but also eight isolated teeth of Ruminantia, which have been compared to type materials covering the morphological/taxonomical range in question. Seven teeth are attributed to D. guntianum (from samples 4, 5, and 6) and are described in detail and figured in Fig. 3. One tooth (Fig. 4) belongs to a procervuline cervid (Pecora, Ruminantia, Artiodactyla) of unknown affinity (Procervulinae indet., BSPG 1995 XII 7; listed as Procervulus dichotomus in the appendix of Eronen and Rössner 2007), and is not further discussed here. To assess the significance of the new D. guntianum with regard to the dispersal of Miocene tragulids in Europe, spatiotemporal occurrences have been compiled from observations made in several collections (see ESM captions), NOW database (dataset downloaded November 1st 2012, Fortelius 2012), and literature (Alba et al. 2011; Stromer 1928; Giersch 2004).

Fig. 3
figure3

The seven D. guntianum teeth included in this study. BSPG 1995 XII 2 incomplete dex M1/2/3, a occlusal view, b labial view. BSPG 1995 XII 3 sin d3, c occlusal view, d labial view. e BSPG 1995 XII 4 dex m1/2, occlusal view. BSPG 1995 XII 5 sin incomplete d4, posterior portion, f occlusal view, g labial view. BSPG 1995 XII 9 sin m1/2, h labial view, i lingual view, j occlusal view. BSPG 1995 XII 6 dex D4, k occlusal view, l labial view, m posterior view. BSPG 1995 XII 8 sin d4, n lingual view, o occlusal view, p labial view. Scale bar 2 mm

Fig. 4
figure4

Single tooth of Procervulinae indet., BSPG 1995 XII 7 dex m1/2, a lingual view, b occlusal view, c: labial view. l = 11.7, aw = 6.7, pw = 8.3. Scale bar 2 mm

Measurement procedures follow Rössner (1995) (distances given in mm), and the terminology for the tooth crown elements follows Bärmann and Rössner (2011). All teeth are deposited at the Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie in Munich (BSPG) under acquisition collection number BSPG 1995 XII.

Section and geological context

The lithostratigraphical position of the fossil site Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse at the base of the Miocene Upper Freshwater Molasse (UFM) in the southern German Northern Alpine Foreland Basin (NAFB), as well as the general sedimentological and biostratigraphical frame, and a faunal list (excluding the procervuline cervid tooth, BSPG 1995 XII 7, Fig. 4) were published in Reichenbacher et al. (1998). The UFM is the youngest lithostratigraphic group of the Molasse sediments in the NAFB. It documents heterochronically from East to West the ultimate drying up of the Western Paratethys Sea in central Europe during the Early Miocene (Doppler 1989; Reichenbacher et al. 1998). It is widely distributed in the NAFB extension from Geneva to Vienna and composed of limnofluvial sediments.

The UFM is highly significant since it reports one of the most important sources of terrestrial fossils from the European Miocene (e.g. Rössner and Heissig 1999; Eronen and Rössner 2007; Abdul Aziz et al. 2008, 2010). The UFM documents the dawn of a vast freshwater wetland biome emerging subsequently after the Western Paratethys Sea regression (Doppler 1989 tab. 1; Reichenbacher et al. 1998). Deposits of the UFM are known to be rich in Dorcatherium remains, and represent one of the major provenances of this genus (Fahlbusch 1985; Rössner 2004, 2010; Eronen and Rössner 2007; Fortelius 2012).

The fossil site Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse is situated 800 m Northeast of the town of Günzburg between the Danube and the road bridge from Günzburg to Reisensburg over the newly built B 16 (48°27′40.0″N, 10°17′6.5″E). The road cut of the B 16 across the escarpment of a Pleistocene Danube terrace exposed the underlying sediments of the basal Upper Freshwater Molasse on both sides of the B 16 (Fig. 1). The lowermost three meters of the section (Fig. 2) were exposed on the western side of the road in a draining ditch, while the rest of the section was exhibited on the eastern side of the road cut. The section covers the sequence above the topmost stratum of the lowermost, partly calcareous strata of the UFM (Süßwasserkalk-Zone, Doppler 1989, tab. 1) to the basal, fluvial sands of the UFM (Fig. 2). It corresponds to the so called Limnic Series of the Upper Freshwater Molasse (Doppler 1989, tab. 1), which, close to the northern margin of the NAFB, is less thick than in its more southern parts. The Limnic Series rests on the transitional strata of the underlying local brackish deposits (Kirchberger Schichten). The small micromammal fauna (see below) allows to correlate the Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse site with the uppermost part of the European Land Mammal Zone MN4b (Central Paratethys Age Karpatian) (Heissig 1997, wherein the site is named Günzburg; Reichenbacher et al. 1998).

Depositional environment

Below the section (Fig. 2) a calcareous basis represents the final stage of the limnic transitional “Süßwasserkalk-Zone” composed of marly and calcareous strata of an early Karpatian delta into the brackish sea of the Upper Brackwater Molasse, which persisted longer in the West of the NAFB than in the East (Reichenbacher et al. 1998; Berger et al. 2005). The section represents the distalmost part of mostly overbank silt and clay deposits of an axial mica-sand-bearing stream coming from the East in a flat, swampy valley (Doppler and Schwerd 1996). The lack of paleosols in the basalmost grey-coloured deposits (Fig. 2, 0–5.7 m) indicates a more or less regular flooding of these lowlands (Schmid 2002). A brown horizon (Fig. 2, 2.0–2.2 m) is indicative of a rare period of drought, which allowed weathering, incipient soil formation, and the accumulation of organic remains (Schmid 2002). The sedimentology of the upper part of the section (Fig. 2) points to a more differentiated floodplain environment. Grey colours of fresh, unweathered material are replaced by light colours (Fig. 2, from 6.4 m onwards) with decreasing contents of silt. The variegated colour of green and brown parts in the upper part of these beds (Fig. 2, 9.9–2.9 m) are interpreted to be indicative of soil formation with oxidation from a dry surface along desiccation cracks (Schmid 2002). Occurrence of calcareous nodules (Fig. 2, 12.4–2.9 m), which postsedimentarily formed in a soil horizon, may have been the result of weathering processes or of resedimentation of coarse particles. Finally, the sandy sediments on top of the section reflect an increasing energy of the fluvial regime. They include the highest fossil concentration of the section within a lens of coarse sand (Fig. 2, 13.3–13.5 m), suggesting that fossils have been washed out from floodplain sediments by the meandering river. While the clay fraction was removed at the undercut slope, coarser particles (including fossils and concretions) have probably been deposited immediately on the slip-off slope or in depressions at the bottom of the river bed. The yellowish sands resting above an erosional surface (Fig. 2, 13.4 m and above) indicate the onset of the typical fluvial realm of the Older Series of the UFM (Dehm 1951). In a landscape of widely-meandering rivers, large floodplains and ephemeral lakes, nearly all sediments except fluvial sands were successively removed soon after their deposition and possibly soil formation, and thus only the sandy deposits remained. The ephemeral floodplains did not leave any sediment, except the reworked calcareous concretions and reworked fossils (Dehm 1952) in coarse sandy layers.

The UFM series of this section generally points to a regressive phase, in which the fluvial system was very distal and developed gradually to a somewhat less distal system. Since the silts and marls were deposited at the distal end of a fluvial system, these were probably sedimentated rather rapidly. This is corroborated by the occurrence of the same fauna throughout the lower and upper horizons.

Fossil content and biostratigraphy

A large number of indeterminable mollusc fragments constitute the major part of the fossil content. Vertebrate remains are mainly disarticulated bones of small reptiles and amphibians. Mammal remains are comparatively scarce, but biostratigraphically significant. A more detailed faunal list, including the D. guntianum teeth (Fig. 3) but excluding the procervuline cervid tooth (Fig. 4), has been published in Reichenbacher et al. (1998).

Some of the mammal taxa recorded from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse are important biostratigraphic markers. For example Ligerimys, a genus of rather large eomyids, disappeared from Central Europe towards the end of MN4b (Ziegler and Fahlbusch 1986). Several other taxa are replaced in the earliest faunas of MN5 by more advanced relatives. One of these, Megacricetodon collongensis is exclusively known from MN4b in Central Europe (Heissig 1989: fig. 7). This species is the most frequent rodent at Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse. In MN5, it is replaced by Megacricetodon bavaricus in later deposits of the UFM. Likewise, Galerix symeonidisi is replaced by G. exilis, Microdyromys praemurinus by M. miocaenicus, and Democricetodon aff. franconicus by D. mutilus (Fahlbusch 1964). Most of these taxa are also known from the site Rauscheröd (Ziegler and Fahlbusch 1986), which has a similar stratigraphic position in the eastern part of the NAFB, where marly sediments concordantly rest on the deltaic series of sands and gravels of the Upper Brackwater Molasse.

Systematic palaeontology

  • Mammalia Linnaeus, 1758

  • Eutheria Huxley, 1880

  • Laurasiatheria Waddell et al., 1999

  • Artiodactyla Owen, 1848

  • Ruminantia Scopoli, 1777

  • Tragulina Flower, 1883

  • Tragulidae Milne-Edwards, 1864

  • Genus Dorcatherium Kaup, 1833

  • Type species Dorcatherium naui Kaup, 1833

  • D. guntianum von Meyer, 1846

Synonymy (not comprehensive; terminology according to Matthews 1973).

  • v*.1846 Dorcatherium Guntianum; von Meyer, p. 472.

  • .1884 Hyaemoschus crassus Lart. Spec., Toula, p. 397f, pl. III, fig. 20 a-d.

  • 1886 Hyaemoschus guntianus H. v. Meyer; Schlosser pl. II fig. 12, 24, 26, 27; pl. VI fig. 22-23.

  • 1896 Hy. Guntianus, v. Meyer; Roger, p. 226.

  • 1898 Dorcatherium guntianum, H. v. M.; Roger, p. 32.

  • 1900 Dorcatherium guntianum, H. v. M.; Roger, p. 67f, pl. III fig. 11.

  • v 1900 Paläomeryx Meyeri, Hofm.; Roger, p. 63, pl. III fig. 10.

  • v 1902 Dorcatherium guntianum, H. v. M.; Roger, p. 4ff, pl. I fig. 3.

  • 1904 Dorc. guntianum; Roger, p. 19.

  • v 1905 Hyaemoschus Guntianus H. v. Meyer; Hofmann and Zdarsky, p. 588f pl. XV fig 15-17.

  • v 1934 Dorcatherium guntinum v. Meyer; Roman and Viret, p. 46, pl. VI fig. 17-19

  • ?1955 Dorcatherium guntianum Meyer; Crusafont et al., p. 186, pl. VIII fig. 4.

  • 1961 Dorcatherium guntianum H. v. Meyer; Mottl, p. 22ff pl. II fig. 1a-b.

  • ?1979 D. guntianum; Moyà-Solà, p. 56.

  • v 1985 Dorcatherium guntianum H. v. Meyer; Fahlbusch, pl. 2 fig. 10-11.

  • ?1987 Dorcatherium guntianum von Meyer, 1847; Ginsburg and Bulot, p. 70, fig. 15-16.

  • 1999 Dorcatherium guntianum H. von Meyer; Sach, p. 80ff, pl. 14 fig 1-8.

  • ?2001 cf. Dorcatherium guntianum H. v. Meyer; Sach and Heizmann, p. 39, pl. 5 fig. 7.

  • v 2009 Dorcatherium guntianum von Meyer, 1846; Seehuber, p. 180ff; pl. 22 fig. 1, 3, 4, 6; pl. 23 fig. 3.

Material considered (measurements see Table 1).

Table 1 Measurements (in mm, taken by GER) of Dorcatherium guntianum teeth studied herein
  • Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse, sample 4 (Fig. 3): BSPG 1995 XII 2 incomplete dex M1/2/3, Fig. 3a–b; BSPG 1995 XII 3 sin d3, Fig. 3c–d; BSPG 1995 XII 4 dex m1/2, Fig. 3e.

  • Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse, sample 5 (Fig. 3): BSPG 1995 XII 5 sin incomplete d4, Fig. 3f, g; BSPG 1995 XII 6 dex D4, Fig. 3k–m.

  • Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse, sample 6 (Fig. 3): BSPG 1995 XII 8 sin d4, Fig. 3n–p; BSPG 1995 XII 9 sin m1/2, Fig. 3h–j.

Provenance and age.

Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse, Upper Freshwater Molasse, Older Series (according to Dehm 1951), OSM unit A (according to Heissig 1997), Sedimentary cycle OSM 0 (according to Heissig 1997), latest European Land Mammal Zone MN4b (according to Reichenbacher et al. 1998), Central Paratethys Age Karpatian (Reichenbacher et al. 1998), Mediterranean Age Late Burdigalian.

Description.

All teeth are brachyodont with a selenodont ruminant morphology. Deciduous teeth are slightly lower crowned than the permanent ones. The d4s and m1/2s are characterised by an interior and exterior postmetacristid, as well as interior and exterior postprotocristid (Dorcatherium-fold, Tragulus-fold, M-structure, Σ-structure). A metastylid is absent in the latter. Labial columns of metaconid and entoconid are bent slightly towards anterior. Ectostylids are low, but pronounced. Internal postmetacristid, internal postprotocristid, and preentocristid fuse centrally. Internal postprotocristid and prehypocristid are unfused. Premetacristid and preprotocristid fuse anteriorly, constituting a rounded shape. Postentocristid and posthypocristid are unfused.

There is a small anterior and posterior cingulid and an additional labial cingulid in d4s. BSPG 1995 XII 8 (Fig. 3n–p) lacks a mesostylid, and the transition from mesofossa to anterior fossa is not narrowed. The anterior fossa is lined by two small labial conids, and two small lingual conids are connected to each other via cristids.

The d3 is slender and long, constituted by anterior conid, mesolabial conid, and posterolabial conid, all interconnected by crests. The anterior stylid is weak. The transverse cristid, posterolingual cristid and posterolingual stylid are short, parallel, and directed towards the posterolingual corner. The mesolingual conid is very small. The posterolabial conid is in an isolated and somewhat exposed posterior position.

The labial M-fragment shows a labially strong parastyle, mesostyle, and paraconus column. The labial end of premetaconulecrista does not contact with any of the labial cristae. There is no posterior fusion of postmetacrista and postmetaconulecrista, as well as no contact between postparacrista and premetacrista. The labial paraconus column is slightly bent towards posterior.

The D4 has a pronounced parastyle and trapezoid shape in contrast to upper ruminant molars in general. It exhibits a strong mesostyle and labial paraconus column. The anterior lobus is longer than the posterior lobus and the posterior lobus is wider than the anterior lobus. The postprotocrista is not fused with the premetaconule crista. Postparacrista is in contact with the mesostyle. A strong cingulum surrounds the protoconus basis. The cingulum around the metaconule is weakly developed.

Taxonomical affinities

The brachyodonty, together with several features of the lower molars and d4s (exterior postmetacristid, mesostylid absent), upper molar (prominent parastyle, mesostyle and paraconus column), D4 (pronounced parastyle, trapezoid shape, strong anterolingual cingulum), as well as d3 (shortness of transversal crests, absence of explicit lingual elements) are indicative of tragulids (e.g. Mottl 1961; Fahlbusch 1985; Janis and Scott 1987; Gentry et al. 1999; Rössner 2007). Among European Dorcatherium species the selenodont morphology of the tragulid teeth from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse lets exclude the affiliation to D. crassum, D. vindebonense or D. peneckei, since those are all bunoselenodont, but rather suggests affinities to D. naui, D. guntianum, D. puyhauberti or D. jourdani. The molars are comparably small and show largest similarity with the size of the type material of D. guntianum from Reisensburg (MN4b, Schlosser 1886) including the only but incomplete upper molar (BSPG 1995 XII 2) from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse with l = 8.7 (Figs. 5, 6, online resource 1), and thus are assigned to D. guntianum. Deciduous teeth of D. guntianum from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse show largest similarity in size with D. guntianum from Reisensburg and D. jourdani from Croix Rousse (?MN9, Déperet 1887). Thus, the proportional difference in size of permanent and deciduous cheek teeth in D. jourdani compared to D. guntianum, can be treated as a distinctive feature between both species.

Fig. 5
figure5

Bivariate plot of length and anterior width of upper and lower molars of D. guntianum from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse in comparison with European Dorcatherium type material. The only incomplete M from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse (BSPG 1995 XII 2, Fig. 3a, b, l = 8.7) corresponds to D. guntianum from Reisensburg type locality. All measurements taken by GER

Fig. 6
figure6

Bivariate plot of length and anterior width of upper and lower deciduous premolars of D. guntianum from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse in comparison with European Dorcatherium type materials. All measurements taken by GER

Discussion

Selenodont tragulid morphology and correspondence in size with teeth of the D. guntianum type series (sin P3, P4, M2 and M3 from Reisensburg of the Wetzler collection, Schlosser 1886; Dehm 1984, BSPG 1881 IX) (Figs. 5, 6; Table 1, online resource 1) indicate conspecific origin of the Dorcatherium teeth from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse with D. guntianum.

Based on the currently known temporal range of D. guntianum (MN4 to MN8, see above) the MN4b fossils of D. guntianum from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse described here represent one of the oldest known record of the species. Moreover, Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse is geographically close to the D. guntianum type locality Reisensburg. The stratigraphical and chronological positioning of the type locality remained controversial (Zöbelein 1983) prior to Reichenbacher (1993), Heissig (1997:538, tab. 1), and Reichenbacher et al. (1998: 136ff), who provided new data based on detailed biochronological analyses of the Reisensburg type section and the adjacent section of Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse. According to these authors, the deposits of at Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse are the oldest strata of the UFM yielding terrestrial vertebrates. They are correlated with the oldest part of the Reisensburg type section (Reichenbacher 1993). The underlying strata of the Reisensburg type section and Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse consist of freshwater limestones of the Karpatian (Süßwasserkalk-Zone according to Doppler 1989 fig. 2), and below the brackish Ottnangian Kirchberger Schichten, which represent part of the local transition from fully marine to fully continental conditions. As a result, the stratigraphic framework indicates that the D. guntianum fossils from Reisensburg und Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse represent the oldest known tragulid remains from the UFM, and that tragulids occurred in the NAFB together with the establishment of fully continental conditions.

Within a range of 10–30 km to the West of Reisensburg type section and the fossil site Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse several localities with even older Dorcatherium remains have been described. For example, the important vertebrate fossil site Langenau 1 (Sach and Heizmann 2001) is located in fluvial deposits, which are considered to represent the northern extension of the Kirchberger Schichten based on intercalations with marine clupeids (Osteichthyes) (Martini 1983; Böttcher 1987). Eggingen-Mittelhart 3 is positioned in the brackish Grimmelfinger Schichten, a channel fill incised in the Upper Marine Molasse underlying lithostrata of the Kirchberger Schichten (e.g. Reichenbacher et al. 1998; Doppler et al. 2005). Both localities are known for their vertebrate assemblages, including Dorcatherium (Sach and Heizmann 2001). While Langenau 1, containing D. cf. crassum, is correlated with MN4b, Eggingen-Mittelhart 3 contains D. crassum and cf. D. guntianum, has been biochronologically dated as MN4, but in between typical MN4a and MN4b faunas (Sach and Heizmann 2001 pl. 5 fig. 6, 7. These remains represent the hitherto earliest records of tragulids from the NAFB, but persuasive evidence of D. guntianum has not been provided from either of these sites to date.

No occurrence of Dorcatherium has been reported from Europe prior to MN4 (Rössner 1997). Dorcatherium fossils from MN4 (apart from those from Germany discussed above) have been described from Austria (Rössner 1998), France (e. g. Stehlin 1907; Roman and Viret 1934; Ginsburg and Bulot 1987; Ginsburg 1989), and Spain (Moyà-Solà 1979). Fossils from MN1 and MN3 come from Africa and Asia (Barry et al. 2005; Pickford 2001; Geraads 2010). Figure 7 provides an overview of the Dorcatherium occurrences in Europe. Consistent with the oldest records from the NAFB (see above), this overview identifies D. guntianum, together with D. crassum as the ancestral species of the Miocene tragulid dispersal in Europe, being sympatrical in the Middle Miocene with D. vindebonense and D. peneckei. Dorcatherium naui, D. jourdani, and D. puyhauberti are exclusive Late Miocene species, with the exception of recently discovered late Middle Miocene D. naui from Spain (Alba et al. 2011), Poland (see Alba et al. 2011), and Austria (Gross et al. 2011). Although Dorcatherium has been reported from many sites in Asia and Africa, no European Dorcatherium species has been recorded from outside Europe. This suggests that the place of speciation for both founder species of the Miocene tragulids in Europe (D. guntianum and D. crassum), each with a specific dietary adaptation (Kaiser and Rössner 2007), has to be assumed within Europe. However, with respect to the two hypothetical phylogenetic lineages within the genus, (i. e. a selenodont one (molars with sickle-shaped cones/conids; D. guntianum, D. naui, D. puyhauberti, D. jourdani), and a bunoselenodont one (molars with cones/conides intermediate in shape between fully rounded and fully sickle-shaped, D. crassum, D. vindebonense, D. peneckei) (Mottl 1961; Fahlbusch 1985; Qiu and Gu 1991; Sánchez et al. 2010), the question arises as to whether two species independently immigrated from Africa or Asia or one tragulid species split into two lineages soon after its arrival in Europe. Since the difference in further skeletodental features, such as the fused/unfused connection of malleolar and tibia and the premolar/deciduous premolar overall morphology (personal observation GR), is sufficiently anatomically profound, there is strong support for a diphyletic origin of European tragulids.

Fig. 7
figure7

Spatiotemporal occurrence pattern of European Dorcatherium based on literature data, NOW database (Fortelius 2012), and visited collections (see ESM 2 caption). Position of dots are symbolic and do not reflect the precise place of occurrence. Corresponding list of Dorcatherium occurrences is shown in ESM 2

However, it should also be mentioned that the literature and databases record of European Dorcatherium (see Fig. 7, and listed in ESM 2) is problematical in part, especially if details are considered. Although apomorphies in bone and tooth morphology allow for a clear discrimination of Dorcatherium from other ruminants, species affiliation always is to be viewed with care. Published studies often suffer from missing comparisons with type specimens, and many inventories mentioning Dorcatherium specimens without illustration of the fossil remains render it impossible to scrutinise identification. Heavy wear in teeth blurs differences of bunoselenodont and selenodont morphology. For instance, this caused a long standing confusion of similar-sized D. crassum and D. naui (see Roger 1896; Hofmann and Zdarsky 1905; Hünermann 1983; Alba et al. 2011), which unfortunately also gained foothold in databases (Fortelius 2012) and reference works (Gentry et al. 1999). Insufficient knowledge of premolar/deciduous dentition, as well as an increase in upper molar size from M1 to M3 with interspecific size overlaps has resulted in another quality of confusion. Upper molars of selenodont Dorcatherium species may even be mistaken for early cervids since styles and cingula are reduced in size. Although many questions remain unresolved and large numbers of specimens remain insufficiently studied, the type materials provide good reference points in the overall palaeobiogeographic distribution of bunoselenodont and selenodont morphotypes.

European tragulid occurrences are tightly and almost exclusively associated with limnofluvial deposits, indicating an adaptation of these animals to wet habitats. Tragulids are thus virtually unknown from the many karstic fissure filling sites of Europe (Thenius 1959; Rössner 2004), where superficial open water did not form a regular environmental component. This is in accordance with the habitat preferences of extant tragulids, i.e. gallery forests along rivers or wetlands in equatorial Africa and Asia, which comprise surface water supply as a necessity since these animals have a peculiar escape behaviour by hiding under water (Dubost 1978; Meijaard et al. 2010). During the Miocene the circum-Mediterranean and Paratethys realm passed through the emergence of vast freshwater wetlands as a result of regression events linked to plate tectonics (Rögl 1998). These processes must have produced a wealth of ideal biomes for tragulids to colonise and diversify as shown for the NAFB by Rössner (2004). The deposits and rich fossil record reflect highly differentiated ecotonal mosaic environments with patches of forests, standing as well as flowing water bodies, and manifold kinds of transitions (e.g. Eronen and Rössner 2007; Merceron et al. 2012).

Conclusions

The Dorcatherium guntianum remains from the fossil site Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse constitute a persuasive record of this Miocene Central and Western European species. Moreover, the stratigraphic frame of this provenance is well-studied, and thus we feel safe to conclude that the remains from Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse represent one of the oldest known records of the species and the oldest known reliable record from Germany. Although the diversification and evolutionary history of the Miocene European Dorcatherium is far from being completely understood, a diphyletic origin can be hypothesized based on the general occurrence pattern depicting the simultaneous appearance of D. guntianum and D. crassum in Europe. Immigration from the East and/or Southeast seems to have been facilitated by the formation of exhaustive wet habitats containing countless bodies of open freshwater.

Abbreviations

BSPG:

Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany

aw:

Anterior width

d:

Lower deciduous premolar

D:

Upper deciduous premolar

dex:

Dextral

l:

Length

m:

Lower molar

M:

Upper molar

pw:

Posterior width

sin:

Sinistral

w:

Width

GER:

Gertrud E. Rössner

References

  1. Abdul Aziz, H., Böhme, M., Rocholl, A., Prieto, J., Wijbrans, J. R., Bachtadse, V., et al. (2010). Integrated stratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar chronology of the early to middle Miocene Upper Freshwater Molasse in western Bavaria (Germany). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 99, 1859–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdul Aziz, H., Böhme, M., Rocholl, A., Zwing, A., Prieto, J., Wijbrans, J. R., et al. (2008). Integrated stratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar chronology of the early to middle Miocene Upper Freshwater Molasse in eastern Bavaria (Germany). International Journal of Earth Scieneces, 97, 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alba, D. M., Moyà-Solà, S., Robles, J. M., Casanovas-Vilar, I., Rotgers, C., Carmona, R., et al. (2011). Middle Miocene tragulid remains from Abocador de Can Mata: The earliest record of Dorcatherium naui from western Europe. Geobios, 44, 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bärmann, E. V., & Rössner, G. E. (2011). Dental nomenclature in Ruminantia: Towards a standard terminological framework. Mammalian Biology, 76, 762–768.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry, J. C., Cote, S., MacLatchy, L., Lindsay, E. H., Kityo, R., & Rajpar, A. R. (2005). Oligocene and early Miocene ruminants (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) from Pakistan and Uganda. Palaeontologia Electronica, 8, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, J.-P., Reichenbacher, B., Becker, D., Grimm, M., Grimm, K., Picot, L., et al. (2005). Eocene-Pliocene time scale and stratigraphy of the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) and the Swiss Molasse Basin (SMB). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 94, 711–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Böttcher, R. (1987). Neue Funde von Andrias scheuchzeri (Cryptobranchidae, Amphibia) aus der süddeutschen Molasse (Miozän). Stuttgarter Beiträge für Naturkunde, B, 131, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crusafont, M., De Villalta, J. F., & Truyols, J. (1955). El Burdigaliense Continental de La Cuenca del Vallés-Penedés. Diputación Provincial de barcelona, Memorias y Comunicaciones del Instituto Geológico, XII, 1–272.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dehm, R. (1951). Die Gliederung der jungtertiären Molasse nach Säugetieren. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, 1951, 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dehm, R. (1952). Über den Fossilinhalt von Aufarbeitungslagen im tieferen Ober-Miocän Südbayerns. Geologica Bavarica, 14, 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dehm, R. (1984). August Wetzler—Sein Wirken für Geologie und Paläontologie in Schwaben. Heimatliche Schriftenreihe Landkreis Günzburg, 2, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Déperet, C. (1887). Recherches sur les faunes de Vertébrés miocènes de la vallée du Rhône (pp. 45–313). IV: Archives de Musée d’Histoire Naturelle Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doppler, G. (1989). Zur Stratigraphie der nördlichen Vorlandmolasse in Bayerisch Schwaben. Geologica Bavarica, 94, 83–133.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doppler, G., & Schwerd, K. (1996). Faltenmolasse, Aufgerichtete Molasse und westliche Vorlandmolasse. In W. Freudenberger & K. Schwerd (Eds.), Erläuterungen zur Geologischen Karte von Bayern 1:500 000 (4th ed.). München: Bayerisches Geologisches Landesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doppler, G., Heissig, K., & Reichenbacher, B. (2005). Die Gliederung des Tertiärs im süddeutschen Molassebecken. Newsletter Stratigraphy, 41, 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dubost, G. (1978). Un apercu sur l’écologie du chevrotain africain Hyemoschus aquaticus Olgilby, Artiodactyle Tragulidé. Mammalia, 42, 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eronen, J. T., & Rössner, G. E. (2007). Wetland paradise lost: Miocene community dynamics in large herbivore mammals from the German Molasse Basin. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fahlbusch, V. (1964). Die Cricetiden der Oberen Süßwassermollasse Bayerns. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Neue Folge, 118, 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fahlbusch, V. (1985). Säugerreste (Dorcatherium, Steneofiber) aus der miozänen Braunkohle von Wackersdorf/Oberpfalz. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Historische Geologie, 25, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fortelius, M. (2012). New and old worlds database of fossil mammals (NOW). University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/science/now/.

  21. Gentry, A. W., Rössner, G. E., & Heizmann, E. P. J. (1999). Suborder Ruminantia. In G. E. Rössner & K. Heissig (Eds.), The Miocene land mammals of Europe (pp. 225–258). München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geraads, D. (2010). Tragulidae. In L. Werdelin & W. J. Sanders (Eds.), Cenozoic mammals of Africa (pp. 723–729). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giersch, S. (2004). Die Fauna aus den mittelmiozänen Krokodilschichten der Bohlinger Schlucht. Carolinae, 62, 5–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ginsburg, L. (1989). The faunas and stratigraphical subdivisions of the Orleanian of the Loire Basin (France). In E. H. Lindsay, V. Fahlbusch & P. Mein (Eds.), European neogene mammal chronology, NATO ASI Series, (A) 180, 157–176.

  25. Ginsburg, L., & Bulot, C. (1987). Les Artiodactyles sélénodontes du Miocène de Bézian à La Romieu (Gers). Bulletin de Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, 49 C, 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gross, M., Böhme, M., & Prieto, J. (2011). Gratkorn a benchmark locality for the continental Sarmatian s.str. of the Central Paratethys. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 100, 1895–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassanin, A., Delsuc, F., Ropiquet, A., Hammer, C., Jansen van Vuuren, B., Matthee, C., et al. (2012). Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes. CR Biologie, 335, 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heissig, K. (1989). The faunal succession of the Bavarian Molasse reconsidered—Correlation of the MN 5 and MN 6 faunas. In E. H. Lindsay, V. Fahlbusch, & P. Mein (Eds.), European Neogene mammal chronology. NATO ASI Series A 180 (pp. 181–192). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heissig, K. (1997). Mammal faunas intermediate between the reference faunas of MN 4 and MN 6 from the Upper Freshwater Molasse of Bavaria. In J.-P. Aguilar, S. Legendre & J. Micheaux (Eds.), Actes du Congrès BiochroM’97 (pp. 537–546), ÉcolePratique des Hautes Études Sciences de la Vie et de la terre, Mémoires et Travaux de l’Institut de Montpellier, 21. Montpellier.

  30. Hernández-Fernández, M., & Vrba, E. S. (2005). A complete estimate of the phylogenetic relationships in Ruminantia: A dated species-level supertree of the extant ruminants. Biological Reviews, 80, 269–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hofmann, A., & Zdarsky, A. (1905). Beitrag zur Säugetierfauna von Leoben. Jahrbuch der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt 1904, 54, 577–594.

  32. Hünermann, K. A. (1983). Dorcatherium (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Tragulidae), das fossile Hirschferkel von Feuerthalen/Flurlingen (Kt. Zürich) bei Schaffhausen und seine Lagerstätte. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft Schaffhausen, 32 Jg. 1981/84, 1–20.

  33. Janis, C. M. (1984). Tragulids as living fossils. In N. Eldredge (Ed.), Living fossils (pp. 87–94). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Janis, C. M., & Scott, K. M. (1987). The Interrelationships of higher ruminant families with special emphasis on the members of the Cervoidea. American Museum Novitates, 2893, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaiser, T., & Rössner, G. E. (2007). Dietary resource partitioning in ruminant communities of Miocene wetland and karst palaeoenvironments in Southern Germany. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 252, 424–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaup, J.-J. (1832–1839). Description d’ossements fossiles de mammifères inconnus jusqu’à présent, qui se trouvent au Muséum grand-ducal du Darmstadt (119 pp). Darmstadt: Heyer. [Part V and plates 21–25 were published in 1839].

  37. Kaup, J.-J. (1833). Mitteilungen an Professor Bronn. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, Jahrgang, 1833, 419–420.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martini, E. (1983). Die Fischfauna von Langenau bei Ulm (Unter-Miozän, Ottnang-Stufe). Stuttgarter Beiträge für Naturkunde, B, 91, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Matthews, S. C. (1973). Notes on open nomenclature and on synonymy lists. Palaeontology, 16, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meijaard, E. (2011). Family tragulidae (chevrotains). In D. E. Wilson & R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.), Handbook of the mammals of the world. 2. Hoofed mammals (pp. 320–334). Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Meijaard, E., Umilaela, & de Silva Wijeyeratne, G. (2010). Aquatic escape behaviour in mouse-deer provides insight into tragulid evolution. Mammalian Biology, 75, 471–473.

  42. Merceron, G., Costeur, L., Maridet, O., Ramdarshan, A., & Göhlich, U. B. (2012). Multi-proxy approach detects heterogeneous habitats for primates during the Miocene climatic optimum in Central Europe. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Métais, G., Chaimanee, Y., Jaeger, J.-J., & Ducrocqe, S. (2001). New remains of primitive ruminants from Thailand: Evidence of the early evolution of the Ruminantia in Asia. Zoologica Scripta, 30, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Morales, J., Sánchez, I. M., & Quiralte, V. (2012). Les Tragulidae (Artiodactyla) de Sansan. Mémoires du Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, 203, 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mörs, T., von der Hocht, F., & Wutzler, B. (2000). Die erste Wirbeltierfauna aus der miozänen Braunkohle der Niederrheinischen Bucht (Ville-Schichten, Tagebau Hambach). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mottl, M. (1961). Die Dorcatherien (Zwerghirsche) der Steiermark. Mitteilungen des Museums für Bergbau, Geologie, Technik, Landesmuseum Joanneum Graz, 22, 21–71.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moyà-Solà, S. (1979). Revisión del Género Dorcatherium Kaup, 1833 (Mammalia, Ruminantia, Tragulidae) de las Cuencas Miocénicas Catalanas. Butlletí informatiu, Diputació de Barcelona Institut de Paleontologia de Sabadell, XI, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pickford, M. (2001). Africa’s smallest ruminant: A new tragulid from the Miocene of Kenya and the biostratigraphy of East African Tragulidae. Geobios, 34, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Qiu, Z., & Gu, Y. (1991). The middle Miocene vertebrate fauna from Xiacaowan, Sihong County, Jiangsu Province. 8. Dorcatherium (Tragulidae, Artiodactyla). Vertebrata Palasiatica, 29, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reichenbacher, B. (1993). Mikrofaunen, Paläogeographie und Biostratigraphie der miozänenen Brack- und Süßwassermolasse in der westlichen Paratethys unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fisch-Otolithen. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 73, 277–374.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reichenbacher, B., Böttcher, R., Bracher, H., Doppler, G., von Engelhardt, W., Gregor, H.-J., et al. (1998). Graupensandrinne—Ries-Impakt: Zur Stratigraphie der Grimmelfinger Schichten, Kirchberger Schichten und Obere Süßwassermolasse (nördliche Vorlandmolasse, Süddeutschland). Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 149, 127–161.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rinnert, P. (1956). Die Huftiere aus dem Braunkohlenmiozän der Oberpfalz. Palaeontographica, A, 107, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roger, O. (1896). Verzeichnis der bisher bekannten fossilen Säugethiere. Bericht des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg in Augsburg, 32, 3–272.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Roger, O. (1898). Wirbelthierreste aus dem Dinotheriensande der bayerischen-schwäbischen Hochebene. Bericht des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg in Augsburg, 33, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Roger, O. (1900). Wirbelthierreste aus dem Dinotheriensande. Bericht des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg in Augsburg, 34, 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Roger, O. (1902). Wirbelthierreste aus dem Obermiocän der bayerisch-schwäbischen Hochebene. Bericht des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg in Augsburg, 35, 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Roger, O. (1904). Wirbeltierreste aus dem Obermiocän der bayerisch-schwäbischen Hochebene. V. Teil. Bericht des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben und Neuburg in Augsburg, 36, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rögl, F. (1998). Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean and paratethys Seaways (Oligocene to Miocene). Annalen des naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 99A, 279–310.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Roman, F., & Viret, J. (1934). La Faune de mamifères du Burdigalien de la Romieu (Gers). Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France (nouvelle Série), 21, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rössner, G. E. (1995). Odontologische und schädelanatomische Untersuchungen an Procervulus (Cervidae, Mammalia). Münchner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, A, 29, 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rössner, G. E. (1997). Biochronology of ruminant assemblages in the lower miocene of Southern Germany. In J.-P. Aguilar, S. Legendre & J. Micheaux (Eds.), Actes du Congrès BiochroM’97, ÉcolePratique des Hautes Études Sciences de la Vie et de la terre, Mémoires et Travaux de l’Institut de Montpellier, 21, 609–618.

  62. Rössner, G. E. (1998). Wirbeltiere aus dem Unter-Miozän des Lignit-Tagebaues Oberdorf (Weststeirisches Becken, Österreich): Ruminantia (Mammalia). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, A, 99, 169–193.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rössner, G. E. (2004). Community structure and regional patterns in late Early to Middle Miocene Ruminantia of Central Europe. In F. F. Steininger, J. Kovar-Eder & M. Fortelius (Eds.), The middle miocene environments and ecosystem dynamics of the eurasian neogene (EEDEN), Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 249, 91–100.

  64. Rössner, G. E. (2007). Family Tragulidae. In D. R. Prothero & S. E. Foss (Eds.), The evolution of artiodactyls (pp. 213–220). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rössner, G. E. (2010). Systematics and palaeoecology of Ruminantia (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the Miocene of Sandelzhausen (southern Germany, Northern Alpine Foreland Basin). In G. E. Rössner & U. B. Göhlich (Eds.), Fossil lagerstätte Sandelzhausen (Miocene southern Germany)—Contributions to the fauna II. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 84, 123–162.

  66. Rössner, G. E., & Heissig, K. (1999). The Miocene land mammals of Europe. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sach, V. (1999). Litho- und biostratigraphische Untersuchungen in der Oberen Süßwassermolasse des Landkreises Biberach a. d. Riß (Oberschwaben). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, B, 276, 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sach, V. J., & Heizmann, E. P. J. (2001). Stratigraphie und Säugetierfaunen der Brackwassermolasse in der Umgebung von Ulm (Südwestdeutschland). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, B, 310, 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sánchez, I. M., Quiralte, V., Morales, J., & Pickford, M. (2010). A new genus of tragulid ruminant from the early Miocene of Kenya. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 55, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Schlosser, M. (1886). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Stammesgeschichte der Huftiere und versuch einer Systematik der Paar- und Unpaarhufer. Morphologisches Jahrbuch, 12, 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Schmid, W. (2002). Ablagerungsmilieu, Verwitterung und Paläoböden feinklastischer Sedimente der Oberen Süßwassermolasse Bayerns. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Math.-Naturwiss. Klasse, N.F., 172, 1–247.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Seehuber, U. (2009). Litho- und biostratigraphische Untersuchungen in der Oberen Süßwassermolasse in der Umgebung von Kirchheim in Schwaben. Documenta Naturae, 175, 1–355.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Stehlin, H.-G. (1907). Notices paléomammalogiques sur quelques dépots miocènes des Basiins de la Loire et de l’Allier. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 4. séries, 7, 525–550.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stromer, E. (1928). Wirbeltiere im obermiocänen Flinz Münchens. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung, XXXII, 1–71.

  75. Thenius, E. (1959). Wirbeltierfaunen. In F. Lotze (Ed.), Handbuch der Stratigraphischen Geologie, III. Band 2.Teil, A. Papp, E. Thenius, Tertiär. Stuttgart: Enke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Thenius, E. (2000). Lebende Fossilien. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Toula, F. (1884). Über einige Säugethierreste von Göriach bei Turnau (Bruck a/M. Nord) Steiermark. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich-königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 34, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  78. von Meyer, H. (1846). Mittheilungen an Professor Bronn. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, Geognosie und Petrefaktenkunde, Jg, 1846, 462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Webb, S. D., & Taylor, B. E. (1980). The phylogeny of hornless ruminants and a description of the cranium of Archaeomeryx. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 167, 117–158.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ziegler, R., & Fahlbusch, V. (1986). Kleinsäuger-Faunen aus der basalen Oberen Süßwasser-Molasse Niederbayerns. Zitteliana, 14, 3–80.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zöbelein, H. K. (1983). Die Vorlandmolasse bei Günzburg a. d. Donau und Heggbach bei Biberach a. d. Riß im Rahmen des süddeutschen Jungtertiärs. Mitteilungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, 23, 151–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Damien Becker (Porrentruy) and Kirsten Grimm (Mainz) for the invitation to contribute to this volume in memory of the late Jean-Pierre Berger. GER acknowledges the support from G. Daxner-Höck (Vienna), F. Duranthon (Toulouse), B. Engesser (Basel), V. Fahlbusch (Munich), H. Furrer (Zurich), A.W. Gentry (London), L. Ginsburg (Paris), U.B. Göhlich (Vienna), E.P.J. Heizmann (Stuttgart), M. Hugueney (Villeurbanne), D. Kälin (Zurich), M. Köhler (Sabadell), H. Luginsland (Tübingen), P. Mein (Villeurbanne), S. Moyà-Solà (Sabadell), A. Prieur (Villeurbanne), B. Reichenbacher (Munich), M. Rummel (Augsburg), B. Sanchez (Madrid), O. Sandrock (Darmstadt), F. Schrenk (Darmstadt), D. Soria (Madrid), P. Tassy (Paris) during various visits to collections under their care. M. Focke, M. Schellenberger, and L. Geissler (all Munich) prepared figures. M. Krings (Munich) helped with language correction. E. Heizmann (Stuttgart) and B. Reichenbacher (Munich) gave essential comments on the manuscript and helped to improve it. Several collection visits were supported by funds from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Ro 1197/3-1).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gertrud E. Rössner.

Additional information

Editorial handling: D. Becker & D. Marty.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 252 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 3228 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rössner, G.E., Heissig, K. New records of Dorcatherium guntianum (Tragulidae), stratigraphical framework, and diphyletic origin of Miocene European tragulids. Swiss J Geosci 106, 335–347 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00015-013-0132-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Northern Alpine Foreland Basin
  • Early Miocene
  • Günzburg-Umgehungsstrasse
  • Upper Freshwater Molasse
  • Systematics
  • Palaeobiogeography