Abstract
The known examples of explicit equations for Riemann surfaces whose field of moduli is different from their field of definition, are all hyperelliptic. In this paper we construct a family of equations for non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces, each of them is isomorphic to its conjugate Riemann surface, but none of them admit an anticonformal automorphism of order 2; that is, each of them has its field of moduli, but not a field of definition, contained in \({{\mathbb R}}\) . These appear to be the first explicit such examples in the non-hyperelliptic case.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Ackermann, Arithmetische Fuchssche Gruppen der Signatur (2; –), Dissertation, Universität Dortmund, 2005.
Carocca A. et al.: Generalized Humbert Curves. Isr. J. Math. 64, 165–192 (2008)
C. J. Earle, On the moduli of closed Riemann surfaces with symmetries, Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces, pp. 119–130. Ed. L.V. Ahlfors et al. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton), 1971.
C. J. Earle, Diffeomorphism and automorphisms of compact hyperbolic 2-orbifolds, Preprint.
Fuertes Y., González-Diez G.: Fields of moduli and definition of hypereliptic covers. Arch. Math. 86, 398–408 (2006)
González-Diez G., Hidalgo R.A., Leyton M.: Generalized Fermat Curves. J. Algebra 321, 1643–1660 (2009)
Hidalgo R.A., Leyton M.: On uniqueness of automorphisms groups of Riemann surfaces. Revista Matematica Iberoamericana 23, 793–810 (2007)
Shimura G.: On the field of rationality for an abelian variety. Nagoya Math. J. 45, 167–178 (1972)
R. Silhol, Moduli problems in real algebraic geometry, Real Algebraic Geometry, pp. 110–119. Ed. M. Coste et al. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Partially supported by projects Fondecyt 1070271 and UTFSM 12.09.02.
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00013-012-0378-y
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hidalgo, R.A. Non-hyperelliptic Riemann surfaces with real field of moduli but not definable over the reals. Arch. Math. 93, 219–224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-009-0025-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00013-009-0025-4