Skip to main content
Log in

Functionally dense relation algebras

  • Published:
Algebra universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We give a new proof of a theorem due to Maddux and Tarski that every functionally dense relation algebra is representable. Our proof is very close in spirit to the original proof of the theorem of Jónsson and Tarski that atomic relation algebras with functional atoms are representable. We prove that a simple, functionally dense relation algebra is either atomic or atomless, and that every functionally dense relation algebra is essentially isomorphic to a direct product \({\mathfrak{B} \times \mathfrak{C}}\) , where \({\mathfrak{B}}\) is a direct product of simple, functionally dense relation algebras each of which is either atomic or atomless, and \({\mathfrak{C}}\) is a functionally dense relation algebra that is atomless and has no simple factors at all. We give several new structural descriptions of all atomic relation algebras with functional atoms. For example, each such algebra is essentially isomorphic to an algebra of matrices with entries from the complex algebra of some group. Finally, we construct examples of functionally dense relation algebras that are atomless and simple, and examples of functionally dense relation algebras that are atomless and have no simple factors at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chin L.H., Tarski A.: Distributive and modular laws in the arithmetic of relation algebras. Univ. California Publ. Math. (N.S.) 1, 341–384 (1951)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Givant S.: The Structure of Relation Algebras Generated by Relativizations. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 156. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsch R., Hodkinson I.: Complete representations in algebraic logic. J. Symbolic Logic 62, 816–847 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirsch R., Hodkinson I.: Relation Algebras by Games. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 147. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hodkinson I.: Atom structures of cylindric algebras and relation algebras. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 89, 117–146 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jónsson B.: Relation algebras and Schröder categories. Discrete Math. 70, 27–45 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jónsson B., Tarski A.: Boolean algebras with operators. Part I. Amer. J. Math. 73, 891–939 (1951)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jónsson B., Tarski A.: Boolean algebras with operators. Part II. Amer. J. Math. 74, 127–162 (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Maddux R.D.: Some sufficient conditions for the representability of relation algebras. Algebra Universalis 8, 162–172 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Maddux R.D., Tarski A.: A sufficient condition for the representability of relation algebras. Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 23, A–447 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Monk J.D.: Completions of Boolean algebras with operators. Math. Nachr. 46, 47–55 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt G., Ströhlein T.: Relations and Graphs. Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Givant.

Additional information

Presented by I. Hodkinson.

This research was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund grant No T81188, and by Mills College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andréka, H., Givant, S. Functionally dense relation algebras. Algebra Univers. 68, 151–191 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-012-0197-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00012-012-0197-9

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords and phrases

Navigation