Dealing with Scientific Integrity Issues: the Spanish Experience

Varia – Ethics


Integrity has been an important matter of concern for the scientific community as it affects the basis of its activities. Most countries having a significant scientific activity have dealt with this problem by different means, including drafting specific legal or soft law regulations and the appointment of stable or ad hoc committees that take care of these questions. This has also been the case in Spain. After the period of transition between dictatorship to a democratic regime, and, particularly, after the entrance in the European Union, scientific activity has increased in the country. As it could be expected, problems of misconduct have appeared and different institutions have been dealing with these matters. One of the best examples is that of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), the largest institution devoted to scientific research belonging to the Spanish Government. The experience of the CSIC’s Ethics Committee in dealing with conflicts related to scientific practices is discussed here.


Integrity Ethics Ethics committee 


  1. ALLEA. European Federation of Academies. Pieter Drenth, coordinator (2010) The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity:
  2. Beloqui A, Guazzaroni ME, Pazos F et al (2009) Reactome array: forging a link between metabolome and genome. Science 326:252–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beloqui A, Guazzaroni ME, Pazos F et al (2010) Retraction. Science 330:912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Science Foundation (2000) European Science Foundation Policy Briefing. In: Good Scientific Practice in Research and Scholarship. Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  5. European Science Foundation (2008) Stewards of Integrity. In: Institutional Approaches to Promote and Safeguard Good Research Practice in Europe. Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. Parc de Recerca Biomedica de Barcelona (2007) Code of Good Scientific Practices:
  7. Spanish Bioethics Committee (2011) Guidance on Codes of Good Scientific Practices:
  8. Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC (2013) Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? PLoSOne 8:e68397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© L. Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Wroclaw, Poland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Edifici CRAGBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations