Abstract
Acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection evokes several distinct innate immune responses in host, but the virus usually propagates by circumventing these responses. Although a replication intermediate double-stranded RNA is produced in infected cells, type I interferon (IFN) induction and immediate cell death are largely blocked in infected cells. In vitro studies suggested that type I and III IFNs are mainly produced in HCV-infected hepatocytes if the MAVS pathway is functional, and dysfunction of this pathway may lead to cellular permissiveness to HCV replication and production. Cellular immunity, including natural killer cell activation and antigen-specific CD8 T-cell proliferation, occurs following innate immune activation in response to HCV, but is often ineffective for eradication of HCV. Constitutive dsRNA stimulation differs in output from type I IFN therapy, which has been an authentic therapy for patients with HCV. Host innate immune responses to HCV RNA/proteins may be associated with progressive hepatic fibrosis and carcinogenesis once persistent HCV infection is established in opposition to the IFN system. Hence, innate RNA sensing exerts pivotal functions against HCV genome replication and host pathogenesis through modulation of the IFN system. Molecules participating in the RIG-I and Toll-like receptor 3 pathways are the main targets for HCV, disabling the anti-viral functions of these IFN-inducing molecules. We discuss the mechanisms that abolish type I and type III IFN production in HCV-infected cells, which may contribute to understanding the mechanism of virus persistence and resistance to the IFN therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) mainly infects human hepatocytes, and triggers induction of cytokines and type I (IFN-α/β) and type III interferons (IFN-λ) (Fig. 1). Although cells expressing IFN receptors respond to the released IFN and amplify type I IFN production, IFN induction is not always robust in the infected cells due to the fact that HCV proteins inhibit host IFN-inducing pathways. IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), such as IRF-7, MAP3K14, RIG-I, IRF-2, and IRF-1 are known to inhibit HCV replication (Schoggins et al. 2011). In particular, type III IFNs are more produced than IFN-α/β in HCV-infected hepatocytes via the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) pathway to induce a set of ISGs (Thomas et al. 2012). Cytokines and chemokines are released from infected hepatocytes and myeloid cells in the liver. These mediators affect the formation of inflammatory environments and modify homeostasis of the host cell community, including the recruited bystander cells. Although these scenarios generally reflect the signs of patients with HCV, what occurs following initial virus entry into host cells remains obscure at the molecular level. HCV genome RNA is internalized via fusion and a portion of 3′-polyU/UC or 5′-triphosphate-short stem RNA acts directly as a ligand for RIG-I (Saito et al. 2008). The HCV genome functions as a messenger (m)RNA for HCV polyprotein production and, at the same time, HCV genome replicates in the cytoplasm (Lindenbach et al. 2007). Double-stranded (ds)RNA accumulating in infected cells is the main pattern molecule (PAMP) and, once liberated, provokes activation of innate immunity in myeloid cells. How host cells sense HCV RNA or dsRNA during infection and replicon transfection has been investigated, and has led to an understanding of the importance of the cytoplasmic RNA recognition pathways (Fig. 1), particularly, the MAVS pathway (Cheng et al. 2006; Li et al. 2005a, b). The current concept is that MAVS signals the kinases, TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and IκB kinase epsilon (IKKε), to phosphorylate IFN regulatory factors (IRF)-3 and IRF-7, resulting in the induction of type I IFN (Kawai and Akira 2009). Likewise, IRF-3 and nuclear factor (NF)-κB appear to participate in the induction of IFN-λ (Ding et al. 2012). Because RIG-I-like receptors are IFN-inducible genes, only trace levels are found in resting cells or those in the early stage of virus entry. Thus, how RIG-I/MDA5 captures internalized or replicating virus RNA to evoke an antiviral response in such situations remains unexplained.
There are many reports suggesting that Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) participates in the response to HCV dsRNA (Eksioglu et al. 2011; Khvalevsky et al. 2007; Li et al. 2012) (Fig. 1). Most of the relevant studies have been performed with hepatoma cell lines due to the lack of proper systems for reproducing the HCV life cycle in culture as well as the in vivo animal model to examine the HCV immune responses. Cell death accompanied with a cytopathic effect is another phenotype of infected hepatocytes (Lim et al. 2012). Hepatocyte death is characterized as apoptosis, but the possible involvement of the pathway with receptor-interacting protein (RIP) kinases in infection-induced cell death has not been strictly ruled out (Fig. 1). Necrosis-like cell death (necroptosis) might cause a source of infectious virions and lead to the pathogenesis of HCV-associated liver damage. Ligands of the death receptor family, including FasL and TRAIL, are likely to associate with hepatocyte death induced by HCV infection (Bantel and Schulze-Osthoff 2003; Saeed et al. 2011; Zhu et al. 2007); however, what triggers the induction of the effector cells is still undetermined. Apart from these cell death family proteins, it is accepted that TLR3 is an activator of the RIP1 pathway (Meylan et al. 2004), which clearly participates in macrophage necroptosis (He et al. 2011). TLR3 is up-regulated in macrophages/dendritic cells (Mf/DC) in an IFN-dependent manner (Tanabe et al. 2003) and recognizes internalized virus dsRNA in the endosome of these phagocytes (Matsumoto et al. 2011). TLR3 has been characterized as an inducer of cellular immune effectors (Matsumoto et al. 2011; Seya and Matsumoto 2009). In accordance with the current dogma, natural killer (NK)-ligand up-regulation or cross-presentation of DCs that occurs with the internalization of dead cell-derived dsRNA may bridge the missing link between HCV dsRNA and TLR3-derived DC maturation (Ebihara et al. 2008).
Dead cells are a source of damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) (Kono and Rock 2008). DAMP refers to an intracellular molecule with inflammation-inducing capacities when it is released out of the cell. DAMP does not belong to the cytokine family, but resembles PAMP in its functional properties toward activation of myeloid DCs and macrophages (Kono and Rock 2008). Its function may be associated with physiological responses related to HCV immune response in a broad sense, including regeneration and tumorigenesis. Recently, necrotic or necroptotic cell death has been closely connected with innate immune responses involving pattern sensing (Kono and Rock 2008; Nace et al. 2012). How HCV patterns are sensed and linked to the cellular immunity will be an intriguing issue. DAMP contains a number of cytosolic or nucleic molecules, as in Table 1, and in particular nucleic acids from infected cells. Thus, DAMP and dsRNA of viral origin are extrinsic patterns for sensors to evoke unique features of inflammation during HCV infection.
Herein, we discuss the interrelationship between these recent findings on innate immunity and HCV infection.
Blocking IFN Induction by HCV Proteins
Proteolytic Control of the IFN-Inducing Pathways by NS3/4A
HCV genome RNA serves as a single mRNA that encodes ~3,000 amino acids, consisting of 10 virus proteins (Lindenbach et al. 2007). Structural proteins (core, E1, and E2) are situated at the N-terminal region of this polyprotein (Fig. 2a). The HCV polyprotein is first cleaved between 191A and 192Y by signal peptidase to separate the core protein from E1 protein and the core is retained on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane (McLauchlan et al. 2002). Then, signal peptide peptidase scissors out the core protein by cleavage at 177F and 178L from the ER membrane (Okamoto et al. 2004). E1 and E2 are also released from the remaining structural protein complex by the proteolytic function of signal peptidase (McLauchlan et al. 2002). Non-structural proteins of HCV are fragmented into functional units by NS2 and NS3/4A proteases. Hence, the release of the structural proteins precedes the mature processing of non-structural (NS) proteins during the HCV polyprotein processing (Lindenbach et al. 2007). Notably, two structural proteins, core and E2, exhibit regulatory functions against type I IFN induction (Florentin et al. 2012; Mulhern and Bowie 2010).
NS3/4A protease is reported to be crucial, not only for the liberation of HCV NS proteins, but also for the regulation of host anti-viral reactions by proteolytic inactivation of host cytosolic proteins, which also interfere with homeostasis of live cells. It has been reported that NS3/4A proteolytically degrades MAVS (Cheng et al. 2006; Li et al. 2005b; Loo et al. 2006). In addition, NS4B protein has been reported to target STING to repress RIG-I-mediated type I IFN induction in hepatocytes (Nitta et al. 2012). Preceding the generation of these NS proteins, HCV core (Oshiumi et al. 2010a) and E2 proteins (Florentin et al. 2012) can suppress RIG-I-mediated type I IFN production in hepatocytes and plasmacytoid DC, respectively. In particular, the generation of core protein and NS3/4A are closely associated with suppression of the HCV-mediated host IFN biological response and the promotion of HCV replication. Since core protein is produced prior to NS3/4A in HCV-infected cells, many other functions of the core are expressed just before the proteolytic processing of HCV NS proteins within the cells.
NS3/4A cleaves MAVS (Cheng et al. 2006; Li et al. 2005b; Oshiumi et al. 2010a) and TICAM-1 (Li et al. 2005a). Hence, NS3/4A proteolytically controls at least two adaptor proteins as its substrates. In addition, Riplet is reduced in response to HCV replication (Oshiumi et al. 2010c). Whether or not Riplet is a substrate for NS3/4A is still under investigation.
MAVS Inactivation by NS3/4A
The current assumption is that the RIG-I family proteins, RIG-I and MDA5, sense viral RNA to induce type I IFN and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which in turn suppress viral infection. RIG-I and MDA5 possess the N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD), the central DExD/H-box helicase domain, and the C-terminal RNA-binding domain (CTD) (Fig. 1). According to crystal structure analysis, the basic region of CTD binds virus dsRNA irrespective of the presence of 5′-triphosphate (Yoneyama et al. 2004), while the CARD domain participates in interaction with the adaptor.
RIG-I recognizes HCV RNA, as well as its replication intermediate, dsRNA (Saito et al. 2008). Although MDA5 recognizes long dsRNA patterns, the role of MDA5 in HCV RNA recognition is unknown. MAVS is the key adaptor for RIG-I/MDA5-mediated IFN induction in HCV infection, although it is localized in the mitochondrial outer membrane apart from intact RIG-I molecules (Seth et al. 2005). RIG-I is not quantitatively sufficient at the protein level to capture the abundant dsRNA replicating in infected cells during the early stage; other molecules have to accept the overwhelmed dsRNA in other cytoplasmic regions (Oshiumi et al. 2010b). RIG-I is initially involved in a molecular complex (RIG-I granule), which contains many other molecules that make up a nucleocapture complex. E3 ubiquitin ligases are involved in the RIG-I granule. Ubiquitin ligases, TRIM25 (Gack et al. 2007) and Riplet (Oshiumi et al. 2009), are also situated in the RIG-I granule together with RIG-I and confer RNA-binding capacity on RIG-I through RIG-I ubiquitination (Fig. 1). TRIM25 ubiquitinates N-terminal lysines of RIG-I (Gack et al. 2007), while Riplet ubiquitinates C-terminal lysines of RIG-I (Oshiumi et al. 2009), either or both of these molecules enable RIG-I to interact with MAVS and confer mobility on mitochondria (Fig. 3). A recent report speculated that after RIG-I is up-regulated and ubiquitinated in the RIG-I granule, the 14-3-3ε is coupled with newly ubiquitinated RIG-I (Liu et al. 2012). Then, RIG-I moves from the granule to the mitochondrial membrane, a distinct membrane compartment linked to the ER, which is referred to as mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM) (Horner et al. 2011). MAM accumulates MAVS and may coordinate MAVS signaling of innate immunity from peroxisomes (Dixit et al. 2010) and mitochondria (Seth et al. 2005), while MAVS localized to MAM serves as a molecular platform for the IFN-inducing signal. MAVS is constitutively complexed with DDX3, which serves as an acceptor of dsRNA in resting (RIG-I-insufficient) cells (Oshiumi et al. 2010b). If this is the case, the location for RIG-I ubiquitination (i.e., RIG-I granule) may differ from the site at which RIG-I interacts with the MAVS–DDX3 complex for signaling. Validating this issue will be of great interest in understanding initial viral RNA recognition.
Our previous data suggested that three forms of MAVS are detected in HCV-replicating hepatocyte lines by imaging analysis, as follows: intact MAVS, sequestered MAVS, and proteolytically liberated MAVS (Oshiumi et al. 2010a). These forms of MAVS simultaneously exist in hepatocytes expressing the HCV replicon or those infected with HCV. The MAVS proteolytically released from mitochondria appear to have decreased ability to activate IRF-3. MAVS is also diminished in some HCV-infected cells to lose its IFN-inducing function (Oshiumi et al. 2010a), suggesting that NS3/4A is a protease that determines the inactivation state of MAVS in HCV-replicating hepatocytes. A recent report suggested that Riplet is depleted during HCV replication (Oshiumi et al. 2010c), indicating the possibility that participation of the expressed NS3/4A protease in degrading other molecules upstream of MAVS is more important for IFN regulation than clipping out of MAVS in infected cells (Fig. 1). Similarly, other factors independent of proteolytic control may be critical for dsRNA-mediated IFN inducibility, as demonstrated by Cheng et al. (2006).
Blocking of the DDX3-Augmented IFN Production by Core Protein
Three reports have independently showed that DEAD/H Box 3 (DDX3, also known as DBX) acts as a positive regulator for MAVS-mediated type I IFN induction (Table 2; Fig. 2b). Elevation of MAVS pathway-mediated type I IFN production by DDX3 is modally different in these three reports (Mulhern and Bowie 2010). Like RIG-I and MDA5, DDX3 is a member of the DExD/H-box family of RNA helicases and is ubiquitously expressed in a variety of cells (Kim et al. 2001). The DExD/H motif of the members in this family of proteins is predictive of a role in RNA-binding and RNA-dependent cellular processing (Schroder 2009). Schroder et al. (2008) showed that the vaccinia virus protein K7 binds DDX3 and inhibits pattern-recognition receptors-induced IFN-β promoter activation. They suggested that DDX3 interacts with IKKε to enhance IRF-3 activation, while K7 counters DDX3 activity of MAVS-mediated IFN-β induction. This IFN-enhancing function of DDX3 in IRF-3 activation is located at the N-terminus of DDX3, which is the same region of the protein targeted by K7 for IRF-3 inhibition. Structure analysis of K7 complexed with a peptide from the N-terminus of DDX3 (Oda et al. 2009) has confirmed this finding.
The second study indicated that DDX3 constitutively interacts with MAVS via the C-terminal region of DDX3 (Oshiumi et al. 2010b). The binding of DDX3 to MAVS is constitutive and not through the N-terminus, in contrast to the case of the virus-dependent interaction between DDX3 and IKKε (Schroder et al. 2008). RIG-I-induced IFN-β promoter reporter gene activity is inhibited by DDX3 small interfering RNA and enhanced by overexpression of DDX3 (Oshiumi et al. 2010b). Thus, DDX3 synergistically activates the IFN-β promoter together with MAVS. The C- and N-terminal regions of the DDX3 regulate MAVS-mediated IFN induction (Hogbom et al. 2007) (Fig. 1).
In contrast, Soulat et al. (2008) demonstrated a positive role for DDX3 in IFN-β promoter induction in another distinct manner. Specifically, DDX3 is shown to be a kinase substrate for TBK1 to synergistically enhance IFN-β promoter activation by TBK1. Furthermore, they demonstrated that DDX3 is recruited to the IFN-β promoter via its N-terminal region (Soulat et al. 2008). Together, these findings show that DDX3 is a positive regulator targeting the multiple sites of the RLR-induced IFN pathway. A role for DDX3 in cell cycle control and apoptosis has also been proposed in response to dsRNA (Schroder et al. 2008).
DDX3 facilitates viral replication in a variety of viruses, including HCV. The N-terminus of HCV core protein binds the C-terminus of DDX3 (Owsianka and Patel 1999). According to a recent finding, the HCV core protein participates in the suppression of DDX3-augmented MAVS signaling for IFN-β induction (Fig. 2b), which may also be related to the function of DDX3 described in the second study mentioned before (Oshiumi et al. 2010b). Unlike the DExD/H-box helicases, such as RIG-I and MDA5, DDX3 is constitutively expressed and co-localized with MAVS around mitochondria (Table 2). However, HCV core protein interferes with DDX3 function to enhance MAVS signaling by coupling with DDX3 to dissociate it from MAVS in the mitochondria. In hepatocytes with the HCV replicon, DDX3/MAVS-enhanced IFN-β-induction is largely abrogated, even when DDX3 is co-expressed. Whether DDX3 enhances IFN-λ induction like RIG-I remain untested. DDX3 is spotted with minimal merging with MAVS in confocal analysis, and partly assembles in the HCV core protein located near the lipid droplet (LD) in replicon-positive hepatocytes, although in some cells MAVS is diminished or disseminated apart from mitochondria. Thus, HCV core retracts DDX3 from MAM, where RIG-I moves from the RIG-I granule to assemble together with MAVS (Figs. 2b, 3).
Our consensus is that the binding of HCV core protein to DDX3 and suppressing DDX3–MAVS complex formation are crucial for inhibition of the MAVS pathway. However, multiple functions of DDX3 may be reflected in other functional aspects of core protein; specifically, the DDX3–core interaction is required for HCV replication (Ariumi et al. 2007). Although DDX3 promotes efficient HCV infection by accelerating HCV RNA replication, the processes appear independent of its interaction with the viral core protein (Angus et al. 2010). In addition, the association between DDX3 and core protein implicates DDX3 in HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma progression (Chang et al. 2006). Based on its core protein association and MAVS-regulatory properties, DDX3 appears to be switched by the core protein from an HCV-suppressing (i.e., IFN-inducing) mode to an HCV replication-supporting mode (Fig. 2b). The results enable us to conclude that HCV infection is promoted by modulating the dual function of DDX3.
Evidence is accumulating that HCV assesses many steps in the IFN-inducing pathway throughout the early and late infection stages, and suppresses IFN production by multiple means. Disruption of MAVS function by NS3/4A and core protein may be crucial in HCV-infected Huh7.5 cells, even though the cells harbor dysfunctional RIG-I (Binder et al. 2007). Type I IFN suppresses tumor progression by causing expression of p53 and other tumor-suppressing agents (Takaoka et al. 2005). E2 and NS4B may affect tumor progression by controlling type III IFN induction. These unique features of the HCV proteins require further confirmation and should be in the focus of investigation regarding HCV persistence, chronic infection, and progression to cirrhosis and carcinoma.
Inactivation of the TICAM-1 Pathway by NS3/4A
TICAM-1 pathway has been associated with chemokine production, apoptosis, necroptosis, and IL-12p40 production in hepatoma cell lines expressing TLR3 (Li et al. 2012); however, such immune responses are predominantly absent in primary cultured cells. This might be explained by the TLR3 signaling that is likely to be shut off in most normal hepatocytes, but executed in hepatocytes of the infectious liver during chronic states of HCV infection or exposure to dsRNA stimulation. Despite the constitutive expression of the adaptor molecule TICAM-1 in human hepatocytes, only trace amount of TLR3 is being expressed in comparison to RIG-I that is commonly expressed. This gives us an insight of the role played by other cytoplasmic dsRNA sensors such as DDX1/DDX21/DHX36 (Table 2), in the activation of TICAM-1 pathway (Zhang et al. 2011). It remains unknown whether these cytoplasmic dsRNA sensors participate in IFN-λ induction.
Although there are positive findings supporting the importance of TLR3 in the pathogenesis of HCV infection (Eksioglu et al. 2011; Khvalevsky et al. 2007; Li et al. 2012), the expression level of TLR3 is still a contentious issue. TLR3 protein is undetectable by immunostaining with monoclonal antibody (TLR3.7) against huTLR3 in uninfected human hepatocytes (Nakamura et al. 2008) or Huh-7 hepatoma cells that are commonly used for propagation of HCV (Wang et al. 2009). Only a few reports have shown evidence that TLR3 protein is weakly detected in resting primary cultured hepatocytes (Wang et al. 2009). On the other hand, several reports have suggested that the TLR3 at the messenger level was observed in cultured hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines by real-time polymerase chain reaction (Khvalevsky et al. 2007). Since TLR3 expression is partly regulated by p53, mutated p53 in Huh-7 cells as well as other hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines may attribute to the specific lacking of the TLR3 expression. In addition, Tanabe et al. (2003) demonstrated that the lack of TLR3 expression in Huh-7 cells may be due to other transcriptional regulations.
TLR3 expression appears to be up-regulated in cultured hepatocytes in response to polyI:C (Wang et al. 2009). Similarly, TLR3 is up-regulated in hepatocytes of patients with chronic HCV infection or polyI:C-injected mice (McCartney et al. 2009; Nakamura et al. 2008). These results lead to the assumption that TLR3 can be up-regulated in hepatocytes in an infectious milieu in response to the produced dsRNA or liberated type I IFN by HCV-infected hepatocytes via the RIG-I-mediated IFN-inducing pathway. A similar mechanism of secondary induction of the TLR3 expression by type I IFN may as well occur in hepatoma cells. Thus, HCV infection or malignant transformation allows hepatocytes to turn TLR3 positive, enabling the activation of the TICAM-1 pathway by external virus dsRNA. This would explain the finding that TLR3 is highly expressed in biliary epithelial cells and certain hepatoma cell lines (Harada et al. 2007; Nakamura et al. 2008). Li et al. (2012) showed that TLR3 senses HCV infection and induces ISG expression when TLR3 is over-expressed artificially in the Huh7.5 cells that are deficient in RIG-I signaling. They demonstrated that HCV replication is partially restricted when the cells are infected at a low multiplicity. However, such protective effect is dismissive when the infection is overwhelmed at high multiplicity partly due to the limitation of the TLR3.
TLR3 has a distinct feature from RIG-I as TLR3 can potentially sense viral dsRNA released into the extracellular environment by other cells. Considering the fact that NS3/4A protease that interferes with the host anti-viral reactions is only expressed within infected cells, TLR3-mediated immune responses might be triggered in the uninfected hepatocytes or other cell types. On top of that, it has been reported that TICAM-1 is also a substrate for NS3/4A protease in hepatoma cell lines (Li et al. 2005a). Ferreon et al. (2005), has confirmed this in the corollary biochemical studies. TICAM-1 and its signal pathway are intact within the cells around infected hepatocytes (Shimoda et al. 2011). This may contribute to the IFN responses observed in some patients.
TLR3 is highly expressed in biliary epithelial cells where biliary atresia occurs in response to the interaction between TLR3-stimulated monocytes and liver NK cells (Harada et al. 2007; Shimoda et al. 2008, 2011). However, it remains intriguing whether the up-regulated TRAIL or FasL in NK cells resulted from the IFN-signaling (Estornes et al. 2012) are responsible for the induction of cell death in hepatocytes. Nevertheless, TICAM-1-mediated cell death in some HCV-infected hepatocytes is also likely to occur via autophagy or trans-acting of dsRNA generated by HCV replication.
DAMP and dsRNA in HCV Pathology
Live or death signals are usually raised by viral dsRNA in virus-infected cells. Type I/type III IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α etc.) are liberated through IRF-3/7 and NF-κB activation as the output from virus-infected cells that are alive. In contrast, DAMP and cytoplasmic cytokines converted to active forms by caspase 1 eventually result from activation of inflammasome and often links to cell death events (Yeretssian 2012). TLR, Nod-like receptor and other cytosolic nucleic acid sensors are closely associated with PAMP/DAMP recognition (Table 2), therefore inflammation states are fundamentally modified by these factors (Bortoluci and Medzhitov 2010).
Replication of virus RNA allows hepatocytes to induce type III IFN, IL-7 and chemokines (Apolinario et al. 2005; Zeremski et al. 2007). HCV also regulates production of chemokines (Sillanpaa et al. 2008) and type III IFNs (Thomas et al. 2012) by infected cells. Polymorphisms around the IL-28B gene have been associated with clearance of HCV in human, indicating a role for type III IFNs rather than type I in HCV infection (Thomas et al. 2012), although little is known about the function of type III IFNs in intrinsic antiviral responses. IFNs and IL-7 released from HCV-infected hepatocytes possibly act on myeloid cells and lymphocytes expressing their receptors to induce IFN-γ (Sawa et al. 2009). Once type I/type III IFN and IFN-γ are systemically distributed, synergistic function of these IFNs allows the systemic cells to produce ISGs including CXCL10 (IP-10) and CCL5 (RANTES) (Larrubia et al. 2008; Zeremski et al. 2007). In addition, dsRNA-induced IL-7 forms a positive amplifying loop with T-cell-derived IFN-γ to promote macrophage recruitment and CXCR3 ligand (CXCL10) expression by these macrophages (Andersson et al. 2009). Since CXCR3 is mainly expressed on activated T and NK cells, these cytotoxic effectors gather around the inflammatory nest as well as secondary affected organs. HCV-related extrahepatic disorders are likely to occur in conjunction with ectopic T-cell immune response (Antonelli et al. 2008, 2009). In addition, these immunological aberrances may be modulated by viral factors. In fact, in mouse models, NS5A expression impairs clearance of other viruses from the liver due to the inhibition of IFN-γ production (Kanda et al. 2009). By any means, induction of IFN-γ in concert with activation of cellular immunity is a major array for live signal in HCV infection.
Necrosis-like cell death occurs contrarily in a cell type-specific manner as a result of death signal. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and its receptor, TNFR1, are implicated in this process. The coupling of RIP1 with RIP3, termed a necrosome, is responsible for the switching of apoptosis to necroptosis (Cho et al. 2009; He et al. 2009). Caspase 8 acts as a key protease for blocking the formation of the necrosome; the RIP1/RIP3 complex can assemble only in the absence of functional caspase 8. It has been reported that virus dsRNA often induces apoptosis in infected cells, which is known as cytopathic effect (Lim et al. 2012). TICAM-1 and RIP1 may be involved in the virus-derived apoptosis. Yet, possible involvement of RIG-I/MDA5 in cell death cannot be ruled out in some cases of viral infection (Eksioglu et al. 2011). In HCV-infected hepatocytes, how the TLR3/TICAM-1 pathway is involved in necroptotic inflammation is the next issue to be elucidated with respect to HCV pathogenesis (Fig. 1). HCV dsRNA and DAMP can be liberated from infectious hepatocytes, as well as virus particles. TNF-α and IL-6 are the pro-inflammatory cytokines released during HCV infection. Hence, a characteristic feature of the HCV-infected hepatocytes is that DAMP is released together with viral dsRNA from necroptotic HCV-infected cells to the surrounded environment. These factors stimulate nucleic acid sensors of myeloid DC/Mf in the draining region (Table 2). We expect that necroptosis will be of enormous interest in HCV infection following smoldering inflammation. Because each virus species harbors distinct strategies for escaping the innate dsRNA-sensing system, the physiological role of TLR3-mediated necroptosis should be analyzed in a HCV-specific fashion.
Cellular Immunity Induced by HCV-Infected Cell Debris
Once DC/Mf responds to these unusual innate stimulators, DAMP and dsRNA, cellular immunity is provoked against HCV Ag with irregular modification by these immune enhancers during HCV infection. NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) are known to be driven in myeloid DCs by stimulation with dsRNA, and in fact are the main effectors against HCV-infected hepatocytes based on several different systems (Ebihara et al. 2008; Saeed et al. 2011; Zhu et al. 2007). DCs express NK-activating ligands by recognizing dsRNA to activate NK cells (Ebihara et al. 2007), and cell damage is reported to play a role in the regulation of NK-activating ligands (Wen et al. 2008), thereby dsRNA and DAMP are involved in the elimination of HCV-infected cells. Subsequently, DCs cross-prime CD8 CTLs through incorporation of dsRNA and HCV Ag-mounted cell debris (Jin et al. 2007). FasL and TRAIL are major effectors for the ligands of death receptors. HCV-infected cells will be eliminated if the cells express high levels of MHC class I with HCV antigen.
Our laboratory has reported that a dsRNA analog (polyI:C) has strong ability to activate NK cells in vivo (Akazawa et al. 2007; Matsumoto and Seya 2008). Two main routes for NK cell activation have been reported. First, DCs secrete several cytokines, such as IL-12, IL-18, IL-15 and IFN-α/β in response to dsRNA, and these mediators act on NK cells (Lucas et al. 2007; Matsumoto et al. 2011). Second, DCs express NK-activating ligands on their cell surface and the ligands make a balance shift to activation of NK cells through cell–cell contact (Ebihara et al. 2010). In mouse studies, IL-15 and cell-surface NK-activating ligands are crucial in polyI:C-mediated NK cell activation (Ebihara et al. 2010; Lucas et al. 2007). A main NK-activating ligand induced by polyI:C is IRF-3-inducing NK-activating molecule (INAM) (Ebihara et al. 2010). In a human system with bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDC) and HCV-infected debris (a source of dsRNA), NK cells are activated by BMDC via the TLR3-TICAM-1 pathway in BMDC (Ebihara et al. 2008). Thus, INAM may be a factor that participates in HCV-derived NK activation.
However, how dsRNA and DAMP modify the maturation of DC in an infectious milieu to induce CD4 and CD8 T cells is largely unknown because the functional properties of DAMP generated in HCV-infected hepatocytes have not been well documented (Azuma et al. 2012). Once antigens are presented on MHC class II in DCs upon internalization of infectious debris, CD4 T cells (Longhi et al. 2009), including Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, and Tregs, are driven in a sophisticated manner. In this context, DAMP and dsRNA could act as the second signal of TLRs triggering DCs to induce cross-presentation, which leads to mounting Ag on MHC class I and subsequently induce the proliferation of CD8 T cells (CTL) (Caskey et al. 2011). Furthermore, the so-called innate lymphocytes may respond to intrinsic stimuli in an Ag-independent fashion. Thus, the function of nucleic acid sensors for DAMP and dsRNA in the presentation of exogenous antigen by DCs is an issue to be tackled (Caskey et al. 2011). Cross-presentation is enhanced by molecules, such as type I IFN and CD40, and by immune cells, including CD4 T cells, NK cells, and NKT cells (Matsumoto and Seya 2008). Yet, the role of type III IFN in T-cell cross-priming and innate lymphocyte activation are yet unknown. TLR3/TICAM-1 is a main pathway for inducing cross-presentation in response to dsRNA in DCs (Azuma et al. 2012). PolyI:C or virus dsRNA is an example of the TLR3 ligand, and their cross-presentation-inducing activity was first described by Schulz et al. (2005). The effective adjuvancy of polyI:C has been subsequently reported by Steinman group (Caskey et al. 2011; Longhi et al. 2009); however, no report has been definitively determined which DAMPs participate in cross-presentation and possess latent cross-priming (CTL-inducing) ability.
Why HCV circumvents the host immune system of both innate and acquired arms of the immune system remains an ambiguous question. Hepatocytes stand with unique properties with lipid droplet (LD) and the bile secretion system, where hepatocytes secrete bile into canaliculi, which flows into choledochus. HCV and hepatitis B virus induce smoldering inflammation, which is believed to be a nest of carcinogenesis. These viruses have no common properties in their viral-side factors, but the host factors including hepatocytes are common bases for triggering inflammation. Thus, the host factors are undoubtedly critical in inducing infection-driven inflammation and perhaps initiation of tumor progression (Seya et al. 2012). We speculate that persistent HCV infection, followed by inflammation, is caused by the immune aberration involved in HCV infections. The main factors in the innate arm of immunity are DAMP and dsRNA, each of which is reported to associate with smoldering inflammation. However, it is unknown what occurs in the liver if this combined stimulation is constitutively exerted in HCV-infected cells and myeloid cells in the liver. Examining the function of dsRNA and DAMP on chronic HCV infection with increasing studies in innate immunity, inflammation, and cell death, will help us extending our knowledge on vaccine and adjuvants against HCV infection and tumorigenesis. Further molecular analysis will provide a hint for therapeutic strategies for patients who do not respond to IFN therapy.
Abbreviations
- BMDC:
-
Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells
- CTL:
-
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes
- DAMP:
-
Damage-associated molecular pattern
- DC:
-
Dendritic cell
- dsRNA:
-
Double-stranded RNA
- IFN:
-
Interferon
- LD:
-
Lipid droplet
- MAM:
-
Mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes
- MAVS:
-
Mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein
- Mf:
-
Macrophages
- mRNA:
-
Messenger RNA
- NK:
-
Natural killer
- NS:
-
Non-structural
- RIG-I:
-
Retinoic acid-inducible gene I
- RIP:
-
Receptor-interacting protein
- STING:
-
Stimulator of IFN genes
- TICAM-1:
-
Toll-IL-1-homology domain-containing adaptor molecule-1
- TLR:
-
Toll-like receptor
- TNF:
-
Tumor necrosis factor
- TNFR1:
-
TNF-α receptor 1
References
Akazawa T, Ebihara T, Okuno M et al (2007) Antitumor NK activation induced by the Toll-like receptor 3-TICAM-1 (TRIF) pathway in myeloid dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:252–257
Andersson A, Yang SC, Huang M et al (2009) IL-7 promotes CXCR3 ligand-dependent T cell antitumor reactivity in lung cancer. J Immunol 182:6951–6958
Angus AGN, Dalrymple D, Boulant S et al (2010) Requirement of cellular DDX3 for hepatitis C virus replication is unrelated to its interaction with the viral core protein. J Gen Virol 91:122–132
Antonelli A, Ferri C, Ferrari SM et al (2008) Immunopathogenesis of HCV-related endocrine manifestations in chronic hepatitis and mixed cryoglobulinemia. Autoimmun Rev 8:18–23
Antonelli A, Ferri C, Ferrari SM et al (2009) Endocrine manifestations of hepatitis C virus infection. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 5:26–34
Apolinario A, Majano PL, Lorente R et al (2005) Gene expression profile of T-cell-specific chemokines in human hepatocyte-derived cells: evidence for a synergistic inducer effect of cytokines and hepatitis C virus proteins. J Viral Hepat 12:27–37
Ariumi Y, Kuroki M, Abe K et al (2007) DDX3 DEAD-box RNA helicase is required for hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J Virol 81:13922–13926
Azuma M, Ebihara T, Oshiumi H et al (2012) Cross-priming for antitumor CTL induced by soluble Ag + polyI:C depends on the TICAM-1 pathway in mouse CD11c+/CD8a+ dendritic cells. Oncoimmunology 1:581–592
Bantel H, Schulze-Osthoff K (2003) Apoptosis in hepatitis C virus infection. Cell Death Differ 10(Suppl 1):S48–S58
Binder M, Kochs G, Bartenschlager R et al (2007) Hepatitis C virus escape from the interferon regulatory factor 3 pathway by a passive and active evasion strategy. Hepatology 46:1365–1374
Bortoluci KR, Medzhitov R (2010) Control of infection by pyroptosis and autophagy: role of TLR and NLR. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:1643–1651
Caskey M, Lefebvre F, Filali-Mouhim A et al (2011) Synthetic double-stranded RNA induces innate immune responses similar to a live viral vaccine in humans. J Exp Med 208:2357–2366
Chang PC, Chi CW, Chau GY et al (2006) DDX3, a DEAD box RNA helicase, is deregulated in hepatitis virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma and is involved in cell growth control. Oncogene 25:1991–2003
Cheng G, Zhong J, Chisari FV (2006) Inhibition of dsRNA-induced signaling in hepatitis C virus-infected cells by NS3 protease-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8499–8504
Cho YS, Challa S, Moquin D et al (2009) Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1–RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell 137:1112–1123
Ding Q, Huang B, Lu J et al (2012) Hepatitis C virus NS3/4A blocks IL-28 production. Eur J Immunol 42:2374–2382
Dixit E, Boulant S, Zhang Y et al (2010) Peroxisomes are signaling platforms for antiviral innate immunity. Cell 141:668–681
Ebihara T, Masuda H, Akazawa T et al (2007) Induction of NKG2D ligands on human dendritic cells by TLR ligand stimulation and RNA virus infection. Int Immunol 19:1145–1155
Ebihara T, Shingai M, Matsumoto M et al (2008) Hepatitis C virus-infected hepatocytes extrinsically modulate dendritic cell maturation to activate T cells and natural killer cells. Hepatology 48:48–58
Ebihara T, Azuma M, Oshiumi H et al (2010) Identification of a polyI:C-inducible membrane protein that participates in dendritic cell-mediated natural killer cell activation. J Exp Med 207:2675–2687
Eksioglu EA, Zhu H, Bayouth L et al (2011) Characterization of HCV interactions with Toll-like receptors and RIG-I in liver cells. PLoS One 6:e21186
Estornes Y, Toscano F, Virard F et al (2012) dsRNA induces apoptosis through an atypical death complex associating TLR3 to caspase-8. Cell Death Differ 19:1482–1494
Ferreon JC, Ferreon AC, Li K et al (2005) Molecular determinants of TRIF proteolysis mediated by the hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease. J Biol Chem 280:20483–20492
Florentin J, Aouar B, Dental C et al (2012) HCV glycoprotein E2 is a novel BDCA2 ligand and acts as an inhibitor of IFN production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood 120:4544–4551
Gack MU, Shin YC, Joo CH et al (2007) TRIM25 RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for RIG-I-mediated antiviral activity. Nature 446:916–920
Harada K, Sato Y, Itatsu K et al (2007) Innate immune response to double-stranded RNA in biliary epithelial cells is ssociated with the pathogenesis of biliary atresia. Hepatology 46:1146–1154
He S, Wang L, Miao L et al (2009) Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell 137:1100–1111
He S, Liang Y, Shao F et al (2011) Toll-like receptors activate programmed necrosis in macrophages through a receptor-interacting kinase-3-mediated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20054–20059
Hogbom M, Collins R, van den Berg S et al (2007) Crystal structure of conserved domains 1 and 2 of the human DEAD-box helicase DDX3X in complex with the mononucleotide AMP. J Mol Biol 372:150–159
Horner SM, Liu HM, Park HS et al (2011) Mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes (MAM) form innate immune synapses and are targeted by hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14590–14595
Jelinek I, Leonard JN, Price GE et al (2011) TLR3-specific double-stranded RNA oligonucleotide adjuvants induce dendritic cell cross-presentation, CTL responses and antiviral protection. J Immunol 186:2422–2429
Jin B, Wang RY, Qiu Q et al (2007) Induction of potent cellular immune response in mice by hepatitis C virus NS3 protein with double-stranded RNA. Immunology 122:15–27
Kanda T, Steele R, Ray R et al (2009) Inhibition of intrahepatic gamma interferon production by hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A in transgenic mice. J Virol 83:8463–8469
Kawai T, Akira S (2009) The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition. Int Immunol 21:317–337
Khvalevsky E, Rivkin L, Rachmilewitz J et al (2007) TLR3 signaling in a hepatoma cell line is skewed towards apoptosis. J Cell Biochem 100:1301–1312
Kim YS, Lee SG, Park SH et al (2001) Gene structure of the human DDX3 and chromosome mapping of its related sequences. Mol Cells 12:209–214
Kono H, Rock KL (2008) How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol 8:279–289
Larrubia JR, Benito-Martinez S, Calvino M et al (2008) Role of chemokines and their receptors in viral persistence and liver damage during chronic hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol 14:7149–7159
Li K, Foy E, Ferreon JC et al (2005a) Immune evasion by hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease-mediated cleavage of the Toll-like receptor 3 adaptor protein TRIF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2992–2997
Li XD, Sun L, Seth RB et al (2005b) Hepatitis C virus protease NS3/4A cleaves mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein off the mitochondria to evade innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17717–17722
Li K, Li NL, Wei D et al (2012) Activation of chemokine and inflammatory cytokine response in hepatitis C virus-infected hepatocytes depends on Toll-like receptor 3 sensing of hepatitis C virus double-stranded RNA intermediates. Hepatology 55:666–675
Lim EJ, Chin R, Angus PW et al (2012) Enhanced apoptosis in post-liver transplant hepatitis C: effects of virus and immunosuppressants. World J Gastroenterol 18:2172–2179
Lindenbach BD, Thiel HJ, Rice CM (2007) Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Fields virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1117–1118
Liu HM, Loo YM, Horner SM et al (2012) The mitochondrial targeting chaperone 14–3-3ε regulates a RIG-I translocon that mediates membrane association and innate antiviral immunity. Cell Host Microbe 11:528–537
Longhi MP, Trumpfheller C, Idoyaga J et al (2009) Dendritic cells require a systemic type I interferon response to mature and induce CD4+ Th1 immunity with poly IC as adjuvant. J Exp Med 206:1589–1602
Loo YM, Owen DM, Li K et al (2006) Viral and therapeutic control of IFN-beta promoter stimulator 1 during hepatitis C virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6001–6006
Lucas M, Schachterle W, Oberle K et al (2007) Dendritic cells prime natural killer cells by trans-presenting interleukin 15. Immunity 26:503–517
Matsumoto M, Seya T (2008) TLR3: interferon induction by double-stranded RNA including poly(I:C). Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:805–812
Matsumoto M, Oshiumi H, Seya T (2011) Antiviral responses induced by the TLR3 pathway. Rev Med Virol. doi:10.1002/rmv.680
McCartney S, Vermi W, Gilfillan S et al (2009) Distinct and complementary functions of MDA5 and TLR3 in poly(I:C)-mediated activation of mouse NK cells. J Exp Med 206:2967–2976
McLauchlan J, Lemberg MK, Hope G et al (2002) Intramembrane proteolysis promotes trafficking of hepatitis C virus core protein to lipid droplets. EMBO J 21:3980–3988
Meylan E, Burns K, Hofmann K et al (2004) RIP1 is an essential mediator of Toll-like receptor 3-induced NF-kappa B activation. Nat Immunol 5:503–507
Morosky SA, Zhu J, Mukherjee A et al (2011) Retinoic acid-induced gene-I (RIG-I) associates with nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 (NOD2) to negatively regulate inflammatory signaling. J Biol Chem 286:28574–28583
Mulhern O, Bowie AG (2010) Unexpected roles for DEAD-box protein 3 in viral RNA sensing pathways. Eur J Immunol 40:933–935
Nace G, Evankovich J, Eid R et al (2012) Dendritic cells and damage-associated molecular patterns: endogenous danger signals linking innate and adaptive immunity. J Innate Immun 4:6–15
Nakamura M, Funami K, Komori A et al (2008) Increased expression of Toll-like receptor 3 in intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells at sites of ductular reaction in diseased livers. Hepatol Int 2:222–230
Nitta S, Sakamoto N, Nakagawa M et al (2012) Hepatitis C virus NS4B protein targets STING and abrogates RIG-I-mediated type-I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Hepatology. doi:10.1002/hep.26017
Oda S, Schroder M, Khan AR (2009) Structural basis for targeting of human RNA helicase DDX3 by poxvirus protein K7. Structure 17:1528–1537
Okamoto K, Moriishi K, Miyamura T et al (2004) Intramembrane proteolysis and endoplasmic reticulum retention of hepatitis C virus core protein. J Virol 78:6370–6380
Oshiumi H, Sasai M, Shida K et al (2003) TIR-containing adapter molecule (TICAM)-2, a bridging adapter recruiting to toll-like receptor 4 TICAM-1 that induces interferon-beta. J Biol Chem 278:49751–49762
Oshiumi H, Matsumoto M, Hatakeyama S et al (2009) Riplet/RNF135, a RING finger protein, ubiquitinates RIG-I to promote interferon-beta induction during the early phase of viral infection. J Biol Chem 284:807–817
Oshiumi H, Ikeda M, Matsumoto M et al (2010a) Hepatitis C virus core protein abrogates the DDX3 function that enhances IPS-1-mediated IFN-beta induction. PLoS One 5:e14258
Oshiumi H, Sakai K, Matsumoto M et al (2010b) DEAD/H BOX 3 (DDX3) helicase binds the RIG-I adaptor IPS-1 to up-regulate IFN-beta-inducing potential. Eur J Immunol 40:940–948
Oshiumi H, Miyashita M, Inoue N et al (2010c) The ubiquitin ligase Riplet is essential for RIG-I-dependent innate immune responses to RNA virus infection. Cell Host Microbe 8:496–509
Owsianka AM, Patel AH (1999) Hepatitis C virus core protein interacts with a human DEAD box protein DDX3. Virology 257:330–340
Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA (2011) Cytosolic surveillance and antiviral immunity. Curr Opin Virol 1:455–462
Saeed M, Shiina M, Date T et al (2011) In vivo adaptation of hepatitis C virus in chimpanzees for efficient virus production and evasion of apoptosis. Hepatology 54:425–433
Saito T, Owen DM, Jiang F et al (2008) Innate immunity induced by composition-dependent RIG-I recognition of hepatitis C virus RNA. Nature 454:523–527
Sawa Y, Arima Y, Ogura H et al (2009) Hepatic interleukin-7 expression regulates T cell responses. Immunity 30:447–457
Schoggins JW, Wilson SJ, Panis M et al (2011) A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature 472:481–485
Schroder M (2009) Human DEAD-box protein 3 has multiple functions in gene regulation and cell cycle control and is a prime target for viral manipulation. Biochem Pharmacol 79:297–306
Schroder M, Baran M, Bowie AG et al (2008) Viral targeting of DEAD box protein 3 reveals its role in TBK1/IKKepsilon-mediated IRF activation. EMBO J 27:2147–2157
Schulz O, Diebold SS, Chen M et al (2005) Toll-like receptor 3 promotes cross-priming to virus-infected cells. Nature 433:887–892
Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK et al (2005) Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell 122:669–682
Seya T, Matsumoto M (2009) The extrinsic RNA-sensing pathway for adjuvant immunotherapy of cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58:1175–1184
Seya T, Shime H, Takaki H et al (2012) TLR3/TICAM-1 signaling in RIP3 tumor necroptosis. Oncoimmunology 1:917–923
Shimoda S, Harada K, Niiro H et al (2008) Biliary epithelial cells and primary biliary cirrhosis: the role of liver-infiltrating mononuclear cells. Hepatology 47:958–965
Shimoda S, Harada K, Niiro H et al (2011) Interaction between Toll-like receptors and natural killer cells in the destruction of bile ducts in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 53:1270–1281
Sillanpaa M, Kaukinen P, Melen K et al (2008) Hepatitis C virus proteins interfere with the activation of chemokine gene promoters and downregulate chemokine gene expression. J Gen Virol 89:432–443
Soulat D, Burckstummer T, Westermayer S et al (2008) The DEAD-box helicase DDX3X is a critical component of the TANK-binding kinase 1-dependent innate immune response. EMBO J 27:2135–2146
Takaoka A, Taniguchi T (2008) Cytosolic DNA recognition for triggering innate immune responses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:847–857
Takaoka A, Yanai H, Kondo S et al (2005) Integral role of IRF-5 in the gene induction programme activated by Toll-like receptors. Nature 434:243–249
Tanabe M, Kurita-Taniguchi M, Takeuchi K et al (2003) Mechanism of up-regulation of human Toll-like receptor 3 secondary to infection of measles virus-attenuated strains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311:39–48
Thomas E, Gonzalez VD, Li Q et al (2012) HCV infection induces a unique hepatic innate immune response associated with robust production of type III interferons. Gastroenterology 142:978–988
Uematsu S, Akira S (2007) Toll-like receptors and type I interferons. J Biol Chem 282:15319–15323
Wang N, Liang Y, Devaraj S et al (2009) Toll-like receptor 3 mediates establishment of an antiviral state against hepatitis C virus in hepatoma cells. J Virol 83:9824–9934
Wen C, He X, Ma H et al (2008) Hepatitis C virus infection downregulates the ligands of the activating receptor NKG2D. Cell Mol Immunol 5:475–478
Yeretssian G (2012) Effector functions of NLRs in the intestine: innate sensing, cell death, and disease. Immunol Res 54:25–36
Yoneyama M, Kikuchi M, Natsukawa T et al (2004) The RNA helicase RIG-I has an essential function in double-stranded RNA-induced innate antiviral responses. Nat Immunol 5:730–737
Yoneyama M, Onomoto K, Fujita T (2008) Cytoplasmic recognition of RNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:841–846
Zeremski M, Petrovic LM, Talal AH (2007) The role of chemokines as inflammatory mediators in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat 14:675–687
Zhang Z, Kim T, Bao M et al (2011) DDX1, DDX21, and DHX36 helicases form a complex with the adaptor molecule TRIF to sense dsRNA in dendritic cells. Immunity 34:866–878
Zhu H, Dong H, Eksioglu E et al (2007) Hepatitis C virus triggers apoptosis of a newly developed hepatoma cell line through antiviral defense system. Gastroenterology 133:1649–1659
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. H. Takaki, M. Nakai, R. Takemura, S. Takahashi, L. C. Ring, A. Maruyama, J. Kasamatsu, H. Shime, and M. Azuma in our laboratory for their fruitful discussions. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture (Specified Project for Advanced Research, MEXT) and the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan, and by the Takeda and the Waxmann Foundations. Financial supports by a MEXT Grant-in-Project “the Carcinogenic Spiral”, “the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-44)”, and the Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID) are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
MAVS has been identified as the adaptor for RIG-I and MDA5 by four independent groups, and then also known as IPS-1, Cardif or VISA (Kawai and Akira 2009). TICAM-1 has been identified as the adaptor for TLR3 and TLR4 by two independent groups, and thus also described as TRIF (Oshiumi et al. 2003). In accordance with the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee-approved nomenclature, here we refer to these adaptor molecules as MAVS and TICAM-1, respectively.
About this article
Cite this article
Oshiumi, H., Funami, K., Aly, H.H. et al. Multi-Step Regulation of Interferon Induction by Hepatitis C Virus. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 61, 127–138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-012-0214-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-012-0214-x