Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is the major cause of sexually transmitted disease in the world. The aim of this study was to determine the best method of DNA extraction for detecting C. trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in sexually active women (n = 80) attending Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Endocervical swabs were collected from 80 women, 22 of whom were asymptomatic and 58 symptomatic. Three different DNA extraction methods were used in this study (phenol-chlorophorm, proteinase K, and boiling). DNA yield was evaluated by spectrophotometry, agarose gel, and PCR. The internal control was assayed by β-globin primers (PCO4, GH20). The DNA cryptic plasmid was selected as the target for C. trachomatis and samples were examined by PCR using specific KL1 and KL2 primers. It was shown that DNA extraction by boiling was the most sensitive with the highest yield of DNA. Of the 80 samples, 17 (21.25%) showed positivity for C. trachomatis by PCR. The highest rate of C. trachomatis infection was found in the group aged between 35 and 45 years old and those who used withdrawal or an intrauterine device as methods of contraception. It was demonstrated that DNA extraction by boiling was the least expensive and a very rapid method that gave the highest DNA yield. The infection rate in the sexually active women, including symptomatic and asymptomatic, was 21.25%, with a presumably high prevalence compared with other studies done in this field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- IUD:
-
Intrauterine device
- PID:
-
Pelvic inflammatory disease
References
Chamani-Tabriz L, Tehrani MJ, Akhondi MM et al (2007) Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in Iranian women attending obstetrics and gynaecology clinics. Pak J Biol Sci 10:4490–4494
Chen XS, Yin YP, Chen LP et al (2006) Sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Fuzhou, China. Sex Transm Dis 33:296–301
Crotchfelt KA, Pare B, Gaydos C et al (1998) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia trachomatis assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women. J Clin Microbiol 36:391–394
den Hartog JE, Morré SA, Land JA (2006) Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening. Hum Reprod Update 12:719–730
Fallah F, Kazemi B, Goudarzi H et al (2005) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from Urine Specimens by PCR in Women with Cervicitis. Iranian J Publ Health 34:20–26
Gopalkrishna V, Aggarwal N, Malhotra VL et al (2000) Chlamydia trachomatis and human papillomavirus infection in Indian women with sexually transmitted disease and cervical precancerous and cancerous lesions. Clin Microbiol Infect 6:88–93
Hashemi FB, Pourakbari B, Yazdi JZ (2007) Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with cervicitis in Tehran, Iran. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2007:1–5
Lan J, Walboomers JM, Roosendaal R et al (1993) Direct detection and genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scraps by using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol 31:1060–1065
Lehmann M, Groh A, Rödel J et al (1999) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in cervical samples with regard to infection by human papillomavirus. J Infect 38:12–17
Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW et al (1993) Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol 31:1753–1758
Manavi K (2006) A review on infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:941–951
Mascellino MT, Ciardi MR, Oliva A et al (2008) Chlamydia trachomatis detection in a population of asymptomatic and symptomatic women: correlation with the presence of serological markers for this infection. New Microbiol 31:249–256
Miller WC, Ford CA, Morris M et al (2004) Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. JAMA 291:2229–2236
Nisyrios G (2006) Should the Australian Defence Force screen for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection? ADF Health 7:20–21
Patel A, Rashid S, Godfrey EM et al (2008) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae genital infections in a publicly funded pregnancy termination clinic: empiric vs. indicated treatment? Contraception 78:328–331
Santos C, Teixeira F, Vicente A et al (2003) Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical smears of sexually active women in Manaus-AM, Brazil, by PCR. Braz J Infect Dis 7:91–95
Shi SR, Datar R, Lin C et al (2004) DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: heat-induced retrieval in alkaline solution. Histochem Cell Biol 122:211–218
Van Bergen J, Gotz HM, Richardus JH et al (2005) Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanization and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex Transm Infect 81:17–23
Zaeimi Yazdi J, Khorramizadeh MR, Badami N et al (2006) Comparative assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Iranian women with cervicitis: a cross-sectional study. Iranian J Publ Health 35:69–75
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Jenab, A., Roghanian, R., Golbang, N. et al. Comparison of Three Methods of DNA Extraction in Endocervical Specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection by Spectrophotometry, Agarose Gel, and PCR. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 58, 227–234 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-010-0076-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-010-0076-z