Abstract
With an increasing interest in fabricating complex structures in architectural design, the concept of porosity has become a vital topic, opening up new avenues for tectonic thinking and functional demands in architecture. Porous structures typically consist of minute interstices or modular structural grids that allow fluids to pass through and are typically present on a micro scale. By adopting a biomimetic approach, which moves from the micro to the macro scale, the application of digital tools has enabled the design of functional building elements. For example, the 30 St Mary Axe tower by Foster and Partners imitates the shape and porosity of a Venus Flower Basket Sponge, resulting in enhanced endurance capabilities. Furthermore, porous structures can improve the building’s thermal, light, and air circulation conditions. However, porous structures have a highly complex topology that poses a challenge for the fabrication process, and is primarily limited to 3D printing and CNC milling manufacturing approaches, with the addition of casting and chemical processes depending on the material. In this research, we propose a novel design and manufacturing approach for porous structure fabrication that uses a hot knife tool with an industrial robot to cut expanded polystyrene materials. This approach offers a faster and more efficient way to fabricate porous structures than additive or milling techniques, with an integrated design approach that enables a range of design scenarios to be explored. Additionally, our method provides hands-on experience and practical testing of a large-scale prototype.










Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, D. and Sen, S., 2017. Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 75:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035
Ant Studio, Eco-Friendly Low Energy Cooling Installation for Industries, Accessed August the 2nd 2018 at http://www.ant-studio.org/new-gallery/qy4z4lq8uradkygqlbsj43lhbughe1
Archi[te]nsions, Spatial Porosity, A Connecting Social Condenser, Jyvaskyla, Finland 2015 accessed July 30th 2018 at http://architensions.com/projects/spatial-porosity/
Bain, J.D., 2011. Thermomechanical Hot Tool Cutting and Surface Quality in Robotic Foam Sculpting, University of Canterbury. Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.26021/2308
Bier, H., Mostafavi, S., Cloot, R., Hidding, A., Informed Porosity, A design to robotic production process for a small-scale pavilion, 2016, Accessed 16th April 2018 http://ex25.hyperbody.nl/index.php/Msc3workshop2G3:Frontpage
Branch Technology accessed the 27th Februray 2022 at https://branchtechnology.com/projects/
Carbon 3D, accessed the 27th February 2022 at https://www.carbon3d.com/products/m1-3d-printer/
Clifford, B., Ekmekjian, N., Little, P. and Manto, A., 2014. Variable carving volume casting. In Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2014:3–15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04663-1_1
Coutelieris, F.A. and Delgado, J.M.P.Q., 2012. Fundamentals of Porous Structures. In Transport Processes in Porous Media:5–21. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27910-2_2
Franco, J.T., This Innovative Cooling Installation Fights Soaring Temperatures in New Delhi, ArchDaily, Published May 14 2019, accessed 1.3.2023. at https://www.archdaily.com/878851/this-innovative-cooling-installation-fight-the-soaring-temperatures-at-the-borders-of-delhi
Frearson, A., Sliced Porosity Block by Steven Holl Architects, Dezeen, Accessed July 30th 2018 at https://www.dezeen.com/2013/01/14/sliced-porosity-block-by-steven-holl-architects-2/
Goodwin, R., 2011. Porosity: the architecture of invagination. RMIT University Press.
Gramazio, F. and Kohler, M., 2007. Digital Materiality in Architecture. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers
Han, R., Xu, Z. and Qing, Y., 2017. Study of Passive Evaporative Cooling Technique on Water-retaining Roof Brick. Procedia engineering, 180:986–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.258
Herzog, J., & de Meuron, P. Serpentine Gallery pavilion 2012: Herzog & de Meuron Ai WeiWei Amorim Accessed September 12th 2018 at https://amorimcorkcomposites.com/media/2885/serpetine-gallery.pdf
Hines, J., Ecophysiological Architecture, Accessed 16th April 2018 https://archinect.com/joseph-hines/project/ecophysiological-architecture
Holl, S., & Steiner, D., 2002. Idea and Phenomena, Lars Muller Publishers.
Hoppermann, M, Virlan, A, Toet, R, Mogan, M, Gottstein, J, Garcia, A, Roberts, S, Van Hoek, L, Kalachev, A, Kovrikova, O, Robotic Fabrication: Collaboration with Studio RAP, UNStudio, 2016 Building Holland Fair at RAI Amsterdam, accessed 1.3.2023 https://www.unstudio.com/en/page/5891/robotic-fabrication-collaboration-with-studio-rap
Jakus, A.E., Geisendorfer, N.R., Lewis, P.L. and Shah, R.N., 2018. 3D-Printing Porosity: A New Approach to Creating Elevated Porosity Materials and Structures. Acta biomaterialia, 72, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.039
Jovanović, M., Vučić, M., Reinterpreting Gyroids with Mathematics, Algorithms and Additive Manufacturing, Conference on Mathematics in Engineering Theory and Applications’ META, 27-29.6.2022, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad: 56–61.
Jovanović, M., Raković, M., Tepavčević, B., Borovac, B. and Nikolić, M., 2017. Robotic fabrication of freeform foam structures with quadrilateral and puzzle shaped panels. Automation in Construction, 74, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.003
Kolarevic, B., ed. 2003. Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. New York: Spon Press
Kotsopoulos, S.D., 2007, November. Design concepts in architecture: the porosity paradigm. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Semantic Web and Web 2.0 in Architectural, Product and Engineering Design-Volume 294:69–80. CEUR-WS. org.
Nkandu, M.I. and Alibaba, H.Z., 2018. Biomimicry as an alternative approach to sustainability. Architecture Research, 8(1):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20180801.01
Patsalides, Maria-Silena., Parametric HoneyComb Boundary / 3D Print, Digital Substance, 2011, Accessed 16th April 2018 https://digitalsubstance.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/parametric-honeycomb-boundary-3d-print/#comments
Pottmann, H., Eigensatz, M., Vaxman, A. and Wallner, J., 2015. Architectural geometry. Computers & graphics, 47:145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2014.11.002
Rust, R., Jenny, D., Gramazio, F. and Kohler, M., 2016. Spatial Wire Cutting: Cooperative robotic cutting of non-ruled surface geometries for bespoke building components. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on computer-aided architectural design research in Asia: living systems and micro-utopias: towards continuous designing (CAADRIA 2016):529–538. CAADRIA.
Sanchiz, G., 2005-06. Porous Cast. AA London Diploma Unit 4 (M. Hensel, A. Menges), Accessed 16th April 2018 at http://www.achimmenges.net/?p=4389
Søndergaard, A., Feringa, J., Nørbjerg, T., Steenstrup, K., Brander, D., Graversen, J., Markvorsen, S., Bærentzen, A., Petkov, K., Hattel, J. and Clausen, K., 2016. Robotic hot-blade cutting. In Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design, eds. Reinhardt, D., Saunders, R., & Burry, J.:150–164. Springer, Cham
Sousa, J.P., 2012. Material Customization: Digital Fabrication Workshop at ISCTE/IUL. In Digital Fabrication (pp. 573–578). Springer Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0123-7
Sousa, J.P., 2017. Robotic Technologies for Non-Standard Design and Construction in Architecture. Nexus Network Journal, 19(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-016-0312-x
Sousa, J.P. and Xavier, J.P., 2015. Symmetry-based generative design and fabrication: A teaching experiment. Automation in Construction, 51:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.11.001
Taco v0.70, ABB robot programming for Grasshopper, 2016, Accessed on April 17th 2018 http://blickfeld7.com/architecture/rhino/grasshopper/Taco/
Varela, P.A. and Sousa, J.P., 2015. Digital Flow in Stone Heritage Buildings-The Nasoni Keystone Experiment., Proceedings of the 33rd eCAADe Conference - Volume 1, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 16–18 September 2015:717–726. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2015.1.717
Ying, J., Lu, L., Tian, L., Yan, X. and Chen, B., 2018. Anisotropic porous structure modeling for 3D printed objects. Computers & Graphics, 70:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2017.07.008
Zhang, L., Pan, Z., Zhang, Y. and Meng, Q., 2018. Impact of climatic factors on evaporative cooling of porous building materials. Energy and Buildings, 173, 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.038
Zimmer, L., Mexico City’s Manuel Gea Gonzalez Hospital Has an Ornate Double Skin that Filters Air Pollution, Inhabitat, 2013 Accessed 18th April 2018 https://inhabitat.com/mexico-citys-manuel-gea-gonzalez-hospital-has-an-ornate-double-skin-that-filters-air-pollution/prosolve-torre-de-especialidaes1
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the company ABB for providing the licenses for the RobotStudio software. The authors would like to thank collaborators in this project (Ana Marjanović and Stefan Stojčić). This research (paper) has been supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development through the project no. 451-03-68/2020-14/200156: “Innovative scientific and artistic research from the FTS (activity) domain.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Vučić, M., Jovanović, M. & Raković, M. Fabricating Porous Structures using Robotic Hotwire Cutting. Nexus Netw J 25, 849–866 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00747-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00747-8

