Skip to main content
Log in

Aesthetic Measures of Algiers’ Colonial Facades

  • Research
  • Published:
Nexus Network Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research presents an analytical tool to quantitatively assess and compare the aesthetic value of facades, by focusing on their formal order (O) and complexity (C). A total of fifteen facades of the colonial building heritage (19th–20th centuries) of Algiers old city center were aesthetically assessed and compared. The method uses Birkhoff’s aesthetic measure and calculates the aesthetic value for each facade. These values were ranked and compared using statistical analysis. The results lead to classify the evaluated facades into four sets according to the importance of their aesthetic values: very high, high, average and low. The results can serve to elaborate a guideline of design principles to help operating on this site. However, this research shows some limitations and suggests the need for further research into aesthetic preference. A valuation survey is necessary to improve this method and to test Birkhoff’s formula empirically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, Christopher. 2002. The Nature of Order. Book one: the Phenomenon of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Alexander, Christopher. 2012. The Battle for the Life and Beauty of the Earth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almi, Said. 2002. Urbanisme et Colonisation. Présence Française en Algérie. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1966. Toward a Psychology of Art. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1977. Dynamique de la Forme Architecturale. Bruxelles Liège: Pierre Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, Daniel E., Ogilvie J. C., and Parham L. C. C. 1968. The Dimensionality of Visual Complexity, Interestingness, and Pleasantness. Canadian Journal of Psychology 22: 376-387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, Daniel E. 1970. Novelty, Complexity and Hedonic Value. Perception and Psychophysics 8: 279-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, George D. 1933. Aesthetic Measure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C. 1936. An Evaluation and Test of Birkhoff’s Aesthetic Measure Formula. The Journal of General Psychology 15: 231-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denkowska, Sabina, Grabiska Ewa J., and Marek Katarzyna. 1994. Application of Birkhoff’s Aesthetic Measure to Computer Aided Design of Vases. Machine Graphics and Vision 7: 69-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Yadolah. 2007. Statistique: Dictionnaire Encyclopédique. Paris: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elsheshtawy, Yasser. 1997. Urban Complexity: Toward the Measurement of the Physical Complexity of Streetscapes. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 14: 301-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, Hans J. 1941. The Empirical Determination of an Aesthetic Formula. Psychological Review 48: 83-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, Gustav Theodor. 1876. Vorschule der Aesthetic. Leipzig: Druck und Verlag von Breitkopf und Härtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, G. W. 1955. Aesthetic Measure applied to Color Harmony: an Experimental Test. The Journal of General Psychology 52: 205-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Tom, Smith Sandy, and Lim Bill. 2000. The Complexity of Tall Building Facades. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17: 206-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Thomas R., and Shier Ronda L. 2000. Complexity, Age, and Building Preference. Environment and Behavior 32: 557-574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, Thomas, Schubotz Ricarda I., Höfel Lea, and Von Cramon Yves D. 2006. Brain Correlates of Aesthetic Judgment of Beauty. NeuroImage 31: 486-487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutamanis, Alexandros. 1990. Development of a Computerized Handbook of Architectural Plans. Delft: Delft University of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krier, Rob. 1992. Elements of Architecture. London: Academy Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Bill, and Heath Tom. 1993. The Complexity of Tall Building Facades. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17: 206-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moles, Abraham. 1966. Information Theory and Esthetic Perception. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadal, Marcos. 2007. Complexity and Aesthetic Preference for Diverse Visual Stimuli. Doctoral thesis. Departament de psicologia. Universitat de Les Iles Baleares.

  • Nasar, Jack. 1994. The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors. Environment and Behavior 26: 377-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reussner, A. 1931. Lespès (René)-Alger. Étude de Géographie et d’histoire Urbaines. Revue de l’histoire des Colonies Françaises 80: 202-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigau, Jaume, Feixas Miquel, and Sbert Mateu. 2007. Conceptualizing Birkhoff's Aesthetic Measure using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity. In Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, ed. Cunningham D. W., Meyer G., and Neumann L., 105-112. Banff: Eurographics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Joseph A. 1908 (2010). The Vision of Unity. Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

  • Saklofske, H. D. 1975. Visual Aesthetic Complexity, Attractiveness and Diversive Exploration. Perceptual and Motor Skills 41: 813-814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, Nikos A. 2000. Hierarchical Cooperation in Architecture, and the Mathematical Necessity for Ornament. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17: 221-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, Nikos A. 2011. Why Monotonous Repetition is Unsatisfying. Meandering Through Mathematics. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1109/1109.1461.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2020.

  • Staudek, Tomàs. 1999. On Birkhoff’s Aesthetic Measure of Vases. Berno: FI MU Report Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinio, Pablo P. L., and Leder Helmut. 2009. Just How Stable are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry, Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization. Acta Psychologica 130: 241– 250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Geert, Eline, and Wagemans Johan. 2019. Order, Complexity, and Aesthetic Preferences for Neatly Organized Compositions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000276. Accessed 17 November 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Meiss, Pierre. 2002. De la Forme au Lieu. Lausanne : Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Ralf. 1995. On the Aesthetics of Architecture. Aldershot: Hantshire Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This article is the outcome of a research supported by the DGRSDT (Direction Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Developpement Technologique, Algeria). We wish to thank Laboratoire Ville, Architecture et Patrimoine of EPAU-Algiers, for their precious support in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kahina Meddahi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meddahi, K., Boussora, K. Aesthetic Measures of Algiers’ Colonial Facades. Nexus Netw J 23, 667–688 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00546-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00546-z

Keywords

Navigation