Abstract
Nelson Goodman’s highly influential book Languages of Art argued that that all visual experience is merely a cultural construct. In presenting his thesis Goodman relied on a series of geometrical arguments intended to show that the geometrical construction of perspective does not rely on the geometry of light rays. In this article I analyze the geometrical validity of Goodman’s arguments.
Article PDF
References
Carrier., David. (1980) Perspective as a Convention: On the Views of Nelson Goodman and Ernst Gombrich. Leonardo 13: 283–287
Doesschate, Genesius Ten. 1964. Perspective, Fundamentals, Controversials, History Nieuwkoop: B de Graaf, 1964, 46–56.
Gombrich, Ernst. 1960. Art and Illusion. A Study of Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon.
Gombrich, Ernst. 1987. Western Art and the Perception of Space. Pp. 16–28 in Space in European Art, Council of Europe Exhibition, Kokuritsu Seiyo Bijutsukan (ed.) Tokyo: Yomiuri Shinbunsha.
Goodman., Nelson. (1968) Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company
Goodman. (1978) Ways of Worldmaking. Hassocks: The Harvester Press
Hoffman., Donald. (1998) Visual Intelligence. Norton, New York
Ittelson., William H. (1952) The Ames Demonstrations in Perception. Hafner Publishing, London
Kubovy., Michael. (1986) The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mcconkie, George. 1979. On the role of and control of eye movements in reading. Pp. 37–48 in Processing of Visual Language, Paul Kolers, Ernst Merald and Herman Bouma, eds. New York: Plenum Press.
Mcconkie George., David Zola. (1979) Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception and Psychophysics 25: 221–224
Mitrović, Branko. 2010. A Defence of Light. Ernst Gombrich, the Innocent Eye and Seeing in Perspective. Journal of Art Historiography 3. http://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/media_183173_en.pdf. Last accessed 20 September 2012.
Panofsky Erwin. 1927. Die Perspektive als symbolische Form. In Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 1924–1925, Fritz Saxl, ed. Leipzig and Berlin 1927; rpt. in Erwin Panofsky, Deutschsprachige Aufsätze, Karen Michels and Martin Warnke, eds. Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1998, vol. 2, 664–757.
Pirenne., Maurice Henri. Léonard. (1970) Optics, Painting & Photography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pylyshyn., Zenon. (1999) Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 22: 341–423
Pylyshyn, Zenon. 2006. Seeing and Visualizing. It’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press
Todorović. Dejan. (2009) The effect of the observer vantage point on perceived distortions in linear perspective images. Attention, Perception, Psychophysics 71: 183–193
Todorović., Dejan. (2008) Is pictorial perception robust? The effect of the observer vantage point on the perceived depth structure of linear perspective images. Perception 37: 106–125
Todorović., Dejan. (2005) Geometric and perceptual effects of the location of the observer vantage point for linear-perspective images. Perception 34: 521–544
Topper., David. (1984) On the Fidelity of Pictures: A Critique of Goodman’s Disjunction of Perspective and Realism. Philosophia 14: 187–197
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Mitrović, B. Nelson Goodman’s Arguments Against Perspective: A Geometrical Analysis. Nexus Netw J 15, 51–62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0133-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-012-0133-5