Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 3–14 | Cite as

Triennial 1951: Post-War Reconstruction and “Divine Proportion”

Research

Abstract

This research centres on the conference dedicated to the theme “Divina Proporzione” organised on the occasion of the 1951 Milano Triennale. Participating in the meeting were some of the most important art historians, architects, engineers, mathematicians and artists of the day: from a very young James Ackerman to Pier Luigi Nervi, from Le Corbusier to Carlo Mollino, from Lucio Fontana to Ernesto Rogers. That historic moment, even given the plurality of voices and approaches, represented the synthesis of a reflection that was as urgent as it was rich in implications, since it brought the concept of “proportion” into the very heart of post-war reconstruction.

Keywords

Milan Triennial Divine Proportion Le Corbusier James Ackerman Pier Luigi Nervi Carlo Mollino Ernesto Rogers modern architecture design theory theory of proportions Modulor 

References

  1. Ackerman , James S. (1949) Ars Sine Scientia Nihil Est: Gothic Theory of Architecture at the Cathedral of Milan. Art Bulletin 31: 84–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cimoli, Anna Chiara. 2004. L’archivio dell’architetto Francesco Gnecchi-Ruscone presso il C.A.S.V.A. Quaderni del C.A.S.V.A. series, no. 2. MilanGoogle Scholar
  3. Cimoli, Anna Chiara. 2005. Francesco Gnecchi-Ruscone. Dieci edifici e una torre di controllo. AL. Mensile di informazione degli Architetti Lombardi. 5 (May 2005): 42-45.Google Scholar
  4. Cimoli, Anna Chiara. 2007. Musei effimeri. Allestimenti di mostre in Italia 1949-1961. Milan: il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
  5. Cimoli, Anna Chiara and Fulvio Irace. 2010. De Divina Proportione. Pp. 138-147 in L’Italie de Le Corbusier, Proceedings of the XV Meeting of the Fondation Le Corbusier. Paris: Editions de la Villette.Google Scholar
  6. Cimoli, Anna Chiara and Fulvio Irace, eds. 2007. La divina proporzione. Triennale 1951. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
  7. Comba, Michela. 2007. De humana sproportione. Pp. XXI-CXIX in Carlo Mollino. Architetture di parole. Scritti 1933-1965. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  8. Le Corbusier. 1954 (2000). Le Modulor. A Harmonious Measure to the Human Scale Universally Applicable to Architecture and Mechanics. London: Faber and Faber. Rpt. Boston and Basel: Birkhauser, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Le Corbusier. 1958 (2000). Le Modulor 2 (Let the User Speak Next) Continuation of ‘The Modulor” 1948. London: Faber and Faber. Rpt. Boston and Basel: Birkhauser, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Rowe, Colin. (1947) The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa. Architectural Review 101: 101–104Google Scholar
  11. Rowe, Colin. (1950) Mannerism in Modern Architecture. Architectural Review 107: 289–299Google Scholar
  12. Vantongerloo, Georges. 1968. Symetrie et Proportion. Leonardo 3 (July 1968): 313-317.Google Scholar
  13. Wittkower, Rudolf. (1949) Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. The Warburg Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Wittkower, Rudolf. 1960. The Changing Concept of Proportion. Daedalus 89, 1 (Winter, 1960): 119-215.Google Scholar
  15. Zevi, Bruno. 1957. I sistemi proporzionali sconfitti a Londra. L’architettura. Cronache e storia 26 (December 1957): 508-509.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MilanoITALY
  2. 2.Faculty of DesignPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations