Abstract
Despite the widespread prevalence of genetically modified foods (GMFs) in the United States, majority of Americans are not equipped with adequate knowledge to help them make appropriate choices with regards to GMFs. Since the internet is the public’s principle source of information regarding GMFs, it is critical that the online information be presented in an easy to understand manner. This study aimed to evaluate the readability of 100 online articles pertaining to GMFs, as well as evaluate the effect of the nature of online information source on the readability of the articles. One hundred websites accessed by using the search term “genetically modified foods” on a cleared internet browser were subjected to 5 readability tests. Independent t-test was done to evaluate if readability scores were statistically influenced by the source information. More than three-fourths of the study sample yielded readability scores that were 4 − 5 grade levels above what is recommended. Almost a third of the websites (n = 37) were commercially sourced and yielded scores that deemed them more difficult to read than the other sources (.edu, .org, .govextensions), although not statistically significant, as analyzed by independent t-tests (α = 0.05). Online information pertaining to GMFs is presented at a difficult reading level, highlighting the need to develop digital information that is comprehensible to a wider audience, equipping them to make well-informed choices related to GMFs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad A, Munawar N, Khan Z et al (2021) An Outlook on Global Regulatory Landscape for genome-edited crops. Int J Mol Sci 22(21):11753. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222111753
APHIS (2021) About the SECURE rule. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/biotech-rule-revision/secure-rule/secure-about/340_2017_perdue_biotechreg Accessed August 20, 2022
Basch CH, Mohlman J, Hillyer GC, Garcia P (2020) Public Health Communication in Time of Crisis: readability of On-Line COVID-19 information. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 14(5):635–637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.151
Blagoevska K, Ilievska G, Jankuloski D et al (2021) The controversies of genetically modified food. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 854 012009 https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012009/pdf Accessed 20 August 2022
CDC (2010) Simply Put A guide for creating easy-to-understand materials. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/pdf/simply_put.pdf Accessed 20 August 2022
Center for Plain Language (2017) What is readability and why should content editors care about it? https://centerforplainlanguage.org/what-is-readability/#~:text=The%20average%20American%20is%20considered,guidelines%20in%20the%20medical%20industry. Accessed 20 August 2022
Contreras UJS, Gardner CM (2022) Environmental fate and behaviour of antibiotic resistance genes and small interference RNAs released from genetically modified crops. J Appl Microbiol 10:1111. /jam.15741
Cui K, Shoemaker SP (2018) Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: a Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study. NPJ Sci Food 2:10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4
Epstein. R (2002) Redesigning the World: ethical questions about Genetic Engineering. In: Sherlock R, Morrey JD (eds) Ethical issues in Biotechnology. Rowman and Littlefield, Boulder, Oxford, pp 47–70. http://online.sfsu.edu/rone/GEessays/Redesigning.htm. Accessed August 20, 2022
ERS USDA (2021) ERS charts of note. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/charts-of-note/?topicId=a2d1ab41-13b3-48b5-8451-688d73507ff4 Accessed August 20, 2022
Ethan D, Meleo-Erwin Z, Fera J, Garcia P, Basch CH (2020) Readability of online information on Celiac Disease: a brief report. J Consumer Health Internet 24(2):126–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2020.1752028
Food and Drug Administration, Crops GMO, Food A, Beyond (2022) https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/gmo-crops-animal-food-and-beyond Accessed 20 August 2022
Gatew H, Mengistu K (2019) Genetically modified foods: a review of genetic engineering. J Life Sci Biomed 9(6):157–163
Hallman WK, Hebden WC, Aquino HL (2003) Public Perception of Genetically Modified Foods: A National Study of American Knowledge and Opinion. (Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University: New Brunswick, 2003). Report Number RR-1003-1004
Harvard University (2015) Same science, different policies: regulating genetically modified foods in the US and Europe. https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/same-science-different-policies/ Accessed 20 August 2022
Hefferon KL (2015) Nutritionally enhanced food crops: progress and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 16(2):3895–3914
McKenzie JF, Neiger BL, Thackeray R (2017) Planning, Implementing, and evaluating Health Promotion Programs: a primer. Pearson, York
McPhetres P, Rutjens BT, Weinstein N, Brisson JA (2019) Modifying attitudes about modified foods: increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes. J Environ Psychol 64:21–29
Meleo-Erwin Z, Basch C, Fera J, Ethan D, Garcia P (2019) Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery. Health Promotion perspectives 9(2):56–160
Meyer A, Dastgheib-Vinarov S (2021) The Future of Food? CRISPR-Edited Agriculture https://www.fdli.org/2021/11/the-future-of-food-crispr-edited-agriculture/#_edn24 Accessed August 24, 2022
National Institutes of Health (2021) Clear and simple https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/clear-simple Accessed August 20, 2022
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2020) More than half of american households used the internet for Health-Related activities in 2019. NTIA Data Show. https://www.ntia.gov/blog/2020/more-half-american-households-used-internet-health-related-activities-2019-ntia-data-show#:~:text=More%20than%20Half%20of%20American,National%20Telecommunications%20and%20Information%20Administration Accessed August 20, 2022
Pakseresht A, Edenbrandt AK, Lagerkvist CJ (2021) Genetically modified food and consumer risk responsibility: the effect of regulatory design and risk type on cognitive information processing. PLoS ONE 16(6):e0252580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252580
Pew Research Center (2016) Public opinion about genetically modified foods and trust in scientists connected with these foods. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/12/01/public-opinion-about-genetically-modified-foods-and-trust-in-scientists-connected-with-these-foods/. 29. Accessed 20 August 2022
Raza SH, Zaman U, Ferreira P, Farías P (2021) An experimental evidence on Public Acceptance of genetically modified Food through Advertisement Framing on Health and Environmental benefits, objective knowledge, and risk reduction. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(10):5264. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105264
Readable.io. n.d (2022) “Measure Text Readability – Readability and Keyword Density Analysis and Tools – Unique Readability Tools to Improve Your Writing!” Accessed August 20, http://www.readable.io/
Report Linker (2020) Global Agricultural Biotechnology Industry: Global Agricultural Biotechnology Market to Reach US$66.2 Billion by the Year 2027https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-agricultural-biotechnology-industry-301092902.html Accessed 20 August 2022
Sieck CJ, Sheon A, Ancker JS, Castek J, Callahan B, Siefer A (2021) Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health. NPJ Digit Med 4(1):52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
Turnbull C, Lillemo M, Hvoslef-Eide TAK (2021) Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review. Front Plant Sci 12:630396. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.630396
USDHHS, Nd Health Literacy in Healthy People 2030 https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030 Accessed 20 2022
Van Der Meer P, Angenon G, Bergmans H et al (2021) The Status under EU Law of Organisms Developed through Novel Genomic Techniques. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2021:1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.105
World Health Organization (2022) Food, genetically modified https://www.who.int/health-topics/food-genetically-modified#tab=tab_1 Accessed 20 August 2022
Wunderlich S, Gatto KA (2015) Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md. 6:842–851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SB contributed to data collection, JF contributed to data analysis, LS contributed to study design and conceptualization. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation and revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Competing/Conflicting interests
None of the authors have any conflicts of interests to declare.
Compliance with ethical standards
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals: No; Since the study did not involve participation of human subjects, it was not reviewed by Lehman College’s Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent
N/A.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Samuel, L., Basch, S.I. & Fera, J. Information seeking about genetically modified foods: readability of online information. J Consum Prot Food Saf 18, 83–88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-023-01413-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-023-01413-4