Abstract
This study examined internal and external quality traits of organic and cage-system table eggs in different household storage conditions. Baseline values for internal and external quality traits were obtained for 60 fresh eggs per production system, and the remaining eggs were then divided into six groups according to storage conditions. Eggs were kept at two different temperatures (room temperature and refrigerator temperature) with three subgroups (with stretch-wrap, without stretch-wrap and washed). At 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, 15 eggs were selected from each group, and internal and external quality traits as well as weight loss were measured. Lowest egg weight loss occurred in eggs stored in the refrigerator with stretch-wrap (0.99%, p < 0.05), whereas the highest loss was seen in eggs which were washed and stored at room temperature (4.04%, p < 0.05). Mean albumen height of fresh eggs was 7.54 mm. At the end of 28 days of storage, this value was lowest in the eggs which were washed and kept at room temperature (2.08 mm) and highest in the eggs kept in the refrigerator (6.79 mm). Keeping eggs refrigerated significantly reduced the pH increase of both yolk and albumen (p < 0.05) and resulted in better quality traits than keeping them at room temperature. In view of these findings, it can be stated that keeping eggs in the refrigerator without washing, and with stretch cover until use had significantly positive effects regarding egg freshness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altan Ö (2015) Egg: Formation, Quality and Bioactive Components. Ege University Printing House
Brandao MD, Santos FF, Machado LS, Verinaud MS, Oliveira JM et al (2014) The effect of eggshell apex abnormalities on table egg quality during storage in 2 seasons of the year. Poult Sci 93:2657–2662. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03991
Castellini C, Perella F, Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A (2006) Welfare, productivity and qualitative traits of egg in laying hens reared under different rearing systems. Poster at: XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, 10–14 September
Copur G, Camci O, Sahinler N, Gul A (2008) The effect of propolis eggshell coatings on interior egg quality. Arch Geflugelkd 72(1):35
Drabik K, Chabroszewska P, Vasiukov K, Adamczuk A, Batkowska J (2018) Glycerin as a factor for moderating quality changes in table eggs during storage. Archiv Tierzucht 61(3):285
Düzgüneş O, Eliçin A, Akman N (2003) Animal Breeding (4th edition). Ankara University Agricultural Faculty
Hidalgo A, Rossi M, Clerici F, Ratti S (2008) A market study on the quality characteristics of eggs from different housing systems. Food Chem 106(3):1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.019
Holt PS, Davies RH, Dewulf J, Gast RK, Huwe JK et al (2011) The impact of different housing systems on egg safety and quality. Poult Sci 90(1):251–262. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00794
Jia F, Yan W, Yuan X, Dai R, Li X (2019) Modified atmosphere packaging of eggs: Effects on the functional properties of albumen. Food Packag Shelf Life 22:100377
Jones D, Ward G, Regmi P, Karcher D (2018) Impact of egg handling and conditions during extended storage on egg quality. Poult Sci 97:716–723. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex351
Karoui R, Kemps B, Bamelis F, Keteleare BD, Decuypere E et al (2006) Methods to evaluate egg freshness in research and industry. A review Eur Food Res Technol 222:727–732
Kasapidou E, Mitlianga P, Sossidou E (2014) Quality of the family poultry products in Greece. Eur Poultry Sci 78. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2014.8
Keener K, McAvoy K, Foegeding J, Curtis P, Anderson K et al (2006) Effect of testing temperature on internal egg quality measurements. Poult Sci 85:550–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.550
Kouba M (2003) Quality of organic animal products. Livest Prod Sci 80:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00318-4
Kralik Z, Grčević M, Kralik G, Hanžek D, Zelić A (2017) Quality of table eggs on the Croatian market. Poljoprivreda 23(1):63–68. https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.23.1.10
Leleu S, Messens W, De Reu K, De Preter S, Herman L et al (2011) Effect of egg washing on the cuticle quality of brown and white table eggs. J Food Prot 74(10):1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-013
Liu YC, Chen TH, Wu YC, Lee YC, Tan FJ (2016) Effects of egg washing and storage temperature on the quality of eggshell cuticle and eggs. Food Chem 211:687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.056
Minelli G, Sirri F, Folegatti E, Meluzzi A, Franchini A (2007) Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Ital J Anim Sci 6:728–730. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.728
Nongtaodum S, Jangchud A, Jangchud K, Dhamvithee P, No HK et al (2013) Oil coating affects internal quality and sensory acceptance of selected attributes of raw eggs during storage. J Food Sci 78(2):329–335
Özdamar K (2013) SPSS ile Biyoistatistik. Yenilenmiş 9. Baskı. Nisan Kitabevi, Eskişehir
Pištěková V, Hovorka M, Večerek V, Strakova E, Suchý P (2006) The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J Anim Sci 51(7):318–325. https://doi.org/10.17221/3945-CJAS
Pius O, Olumide A (2017) Preservation of quality of table eggs using vegetable oil and shea butter. Int Lett Nat Sci 63:27–33. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.63.27
Pujols KD, Osorio L, Carrillo EP, Wardy W, Torrico DD et al (2014) Comparing effects of α-vs β-chitosan coating and emulsion coatings on egg quality during room temperature storage. Int J Food Sci Technol 49(5):1383–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12468
Rakonjac S, Bogosavljević-Bošković S, Pavlovski Z, Škrbić Z, Dosković V (2014) Laying hen rearing systems: a review of major production results and egg quality traits. World Poultry Sci J 70(1):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933914000087
Rocha JSR, Baiao NC, Barbosa VM, Pompeu MA, Fernandes MNS et al (2013) Negative effects of fertile egg storage on the egg and the embryo and suggested hatchery management to minimize such problems. World Poultry Sci J 69:35–44
Regulations EC (2008) Regulation (EC) No 589/2008-marketing standards for eggs. 97–114
Sarica M, Erensayin C (2018) Poultry science: production. Nutrition and Diseases, Bey Ofset, Ankara
Sarica M, Onder H, Yamak US (2012) Determining the most effective variables for egg quality traits of five hen genotypes. Int J Agric Biol 14:235–240
Scott T, Silversides F (2000) The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality. Poult Sci 79:1725–1729. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1725
Sekeroğlu A, Gök H, Duman M (2016) Effect of egg shell color and storage duration on external and internal egg quality traits of ATAK-S layer hybrids. Cienc Investig Agrar 43:327–335. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202016000200015
Stadelman W, Cotterill O (1995) Egg science and technology. Food Products Press, an imprint of the Haworth Press, Inc.,10 Alice Street, Binghamton, New York
Suresh P, Raj K, Nidheesh T, Pal G, Sakhare P (2015) Application of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of table eggs under tropical room conditions. J Food Sci Technol 52:6345–6354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1721-7
Turkish Food Codex (2017). Turkish Ministry of Agirculture and Food, Food Codex, Egg Declaration. Declaration No: 2017/42
Yilmaz A, Bozkurt Z (2009) Effects of hen age, storage period and stretch film packaging on internal and external quality traits of table eggs. Sci Papers Animal Sci Biotechnol 42:462–469
Acknowledgements
This study received support from the Ondokuz Mayis University Project Office (Project numbers: PYO.ZRT.1904.17.006 and PYO.ZRT.1904.17.007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamak, U.S., Sarica, M., Erensoy, K. et al. The effects of storage conditions on quality changes of table eggs. J Consum Prot Food Saf 16, 71–81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-020-01299-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-020-01299-6