Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular biological species identification of animal samples from Asian buffets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2015, the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit) initiated controls of Asian buffets to verify declaration of animal species. Especially Mongolian buffets, where raw meat of partly exotic animal species is offered with side dishes and sauces, enjoy high popularity in Germany. A total of 27 samples were collected in 5 Bavarian cities including nine mammalian meat, 1 frog, 3 crocodile, 10 fish, 1 squid, 2 shrimp, and 1 mussel sample. All samples were analyzed using molecular biological methods. The animal species was identified by DNA sequencing of the mitochondrial genes cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, cytochrome b or 16S ribosomal DNA with subsequent database mining. From the 27 samples, 5 were objectionable with either wrong or incomplete labelling. These included two fish samples, two samples falsely declared as zebra which were in fact beef, one guanaco sample which was depicted as camel and another guanaco sample which was marketed as llama. The results clearly show the need for continued surveillance of meat species in buffets covering a wide variety of meats and seafood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarado Bremer JR, Ditty JG, Turner JS, Saxton BL (2010) Molecular species identification of commercially important penaeid shrimp from the Gulf of Mexico using a multiplex haplotype-specific PCR assay. Biochem Syst Ecol 38(4):715–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayaz Y, Ayaz ND, Erol I (2006) Detection of species in meat and meat products using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Muscle Foods 17(2):214–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénard-Capelle J, Guillonneau V, Nouvian C, Fournier N, Le Loët K, Dettai A (2015) Fish mislabelling in France: substitution rates and retail types. PeerJ 2:e714

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bitanyi S, Bjornstad G, Ernest EM, Nesje M, Kusiluka LJ, Keyyu JD, Mdegela RH, Roed KH (2011) Species identification of Tanzanian antelopes using DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 11(3):442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brodmann PD, Nicholas G, Schaltenbrand P, Ilg EC (2001) Identifying unknown game species: experience with nucleotide sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and a subsequent basic local alignment search tool search. Eur Food Res Technol 212(4):491–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WM, George M Jr, Wilson AC (1979) Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76(4):1967–1971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BVL (2014) Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach § 64 LFGB, § 35 Vorl. Tabakgesetz, § 28 b Gentechnikgesetz. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin

  • Cai Y, Zhang L, Shen F, Zhang W, Hou R, Yue B, Li J, Zhang Z (2011) DNA barcoding of 18 species of Bovidae. Chin Sci Bull 56(2):164–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato ME, Alechine E, Cloete KW, Davison S, Corach D (2013) Where is the game? Wild meat products authentication in South Africa: a case study. Investig Genet 4:6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo V, Gonzalez I, Martin I, Rojas MA, Hernandez PE, Garci AT, Martin R (2008) Differentiation of European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic swine (Sus scrofa domestica) meats by PCR analysis targeting the mitochondrial D-loop and the nuclear melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) genes. Meat Sci 78(3):314–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3(5):294–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galimberti A, De Mattia F, Losa A, Bruni I, Federici S, Casiraghi M, Martellos S, Labra M (2013) DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int 50(1):55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Günther B, Raupach MJ, Knebelsberger T (2017) Full-length and mini-length DNA barcoding for the identification of seafood commercially traded in Germany. Food Control 73(Part B):922–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haye PA, Segovia NI, Vera R, MdlÁ Gallardo, Gallardo-Escárate C (2012) Authentication of commercialized crab-meat in Chile using DNA Barcoding. Food Control 25(1):239–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270(1512):313–321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PD, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(10):312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heintzman PD, Zazula GD, Cahill JA, Reyes AV, MacPhee RD, Shapiro B (2015) Genomic data from extinct North American Camelops revise camel evolutionary history. Mol Biol Evol 32(9):2433–2440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh YHP, Woodward BB, Ho SH (1995) Detection of species substitution in raw and cooked meats using immunoassays. J Food Prot 58(5):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, Watkinson D, Dumont P, Curry A, Bentzen P, Zhang J, April J, Bernatchez L (2008) Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One 3(6):18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (21571:2005). International Standard (ISO) 21571:2005 Foodstuffs — methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products — nucleic acid extraction

  • Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN (2007) Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4):544–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet JL, Pauly D (2008) Trade secrets: Renaming and mislabeling of seafood. Mar Policy 32(3):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappel K, Schröder U (2015) Species identification of fishery products in Germany. J Verbrauch Lebensm 10(1):31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappel K, Schröder U (2016) Substitution of high-priced fish with low-priced species: adulteration of common sole in German restaurants. Food Control 59:478–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaiskou N, Apostolidis AP, Triantafyllidis A, Kouvatsi A, Triantaphyllidis C (2003) Genetic identification and phylogeny of three species of the genus Trachurus based on mitochondrial DNA analysis. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 5(5):493–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(16):6196–6200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kyrova V, Surmanova P, Ostry V, Rehurkova I, Ruprich J, Jechova M (2016) Sea fish fraud? A confirmation of Gadoid species food labelling. Br Food J 119(1):122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton KKS, Martel AL, Hebert PDN (2014) Patterns of DNA barcode variation in canadian marine molluscs. PLoS One 9(4):e95003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ling KH, Nichols PD, But PP (2009) Fish-induced keriorrhea. Adv Food Nutr Res 57:1–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein JH, Amato G, Kolokotronis SO (2009) The real maccoyii: identifying tuna sushi with DNA barcodes — contrasting characteristic attributes and genetic distances. PloS One 4(11):7866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo A, Zhang A, Ho SYW, Xu W, Zhang Y, Shi W, Cameron SL, Zhu C (2011) Potential efficacy of mitochondrial genes for animal DNA barcoding: a case study using eutherian mammals. BMC Genom 12:84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani S, Griffiths AM, Velasco A, Kappel K, Jérôme M, Perez-Martin RI, Schröder U, Verrez-Bagnis V, Silva H, Vandamme SG, Boufana B, Mendes R, Shorten M, Smith C, Hankard E, Hook SA, Weymer AS, Gunning D, Sotelo CG (2015) Low mislabeling rates indicate marked improvements in European seafood market operations. Front Ecol Environ 13(10):536–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen PM, Bieler R, Kappner I, Rawlings TA (2006) Phylogeny of Veneroidea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) based on morphology and molecules. Zool J Linn Soc 148(3):439–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Colmenero M, Blanco O, Arias V, Martinez JL, Garcia-Vazquez E (2016) DNA authentication of fish products reveals mislabeling associated with seafood processing. Fisheries 41(3):128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolè S, Negrisolo E, Eccher G, Mantovani R, Patarnello T, Erickson DL, Kress WJ, Barcaccia G (2012) DNA barcoding as a reliable method for the authentication of commercial seafood products. Food Technol Biotechnol 50:387–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR, Martin A, Romano S, McMillan WO, Stice L, Grabowski G (1991) The simple fool’s guide to PCR, version 2.0, privately published document compiled by S. Palumbi. Dept. Zoology, Univ, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo AM, Ferrito V (2015) DNA barcoding species identification unveils mislabeling of processed flatfish products in southern Italy markets. Fish Res 164:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union L139:55 (30.04.2004)

  • Rimbach G, Möhring J, Ebersdobler HF (2010) Lebensmittel-Warenkunde für Einsteiger. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schäffer S, Zachos FE, Koblmüller S (2017) Opening the treasure chest: a DNA-barcoding primer set for most higher taxa of Central European birds and mammals from museum collections. PLoS One 12(3):e0174449

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shears P (2010) Food fraud — a current issue but an old problem. Br Food J 112(2):198–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherer SH, Sampson HA (2013) Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133(2):291–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore JA, Billah M, Binns M, Short RV, Allen WR (1999) Hybridizing old and new world camelids: Camelus dromedarius x Lama guanicoe. Proc Biol Sci 266(1420):649–656

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spink J, Moyer DC (2011) Defining the public health threat of food fraud. J Food Sci 76(9):R157–R163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staats M, Arulandhu AJ, Gravendeel B, Holst-Jensen A, Scholtens I, Peelen T, Prins TW, Kok E (2016) Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:4615–4630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staffen CF, Staffen MD, Becker ML, Löfgren SE, Muniz YCN, de Freitas RHA, Marrero AR (2017) DNA barcoding reveals the mislabeling of fish in a popular tourist destination in Brazil. PeerJ 5:e4006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DB, Castro Nallar E, Rathod J, Crandall KA (2017) DNA Barcoding analysis of seafood accuracy in Washington, D.C. restaurants. PeerJ 5:3234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hanni C (2005) Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 23(7):359–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tong JG, Chan TY, Chu KH (2000) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of metapenaeopsis (Decapoda: Penaeidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences of selected species from the Indo-West Pacific. J Crustacean Biol 20(3):541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi S, Aloufi AA, Ansari AA, Ghosh SK (2016) Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: an update. Saudi J Biol Sci 23(2):161–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vences M, Thomas M, van der Meijden A, Chiari Y, Vieites DR (2005) Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool 2(1):5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waiblinger HU, Bartsch D, Brockmeyer J, Bruenen-Nieweler C, Busch U, Haase I, Hahn A, Haarmann M, Hauser W, Huber I, Jany KD, Kirmse N, Lindeke S, Neumann K, Naumann H, Paschke A, Pietsch K, Pöpping B, Reiting R, Schroeder U, Schwägele F, Weller MG, Zagon J (2017) Methods of differentiating animal species in foods — status quo. Fleischwirtschaft Int 97(1):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1847–1857

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong EHK, Hanner RH (2008) DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int 41(8):828–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Miriam Schrempp, Marzena Maggipinto, Ulrike Hohenberger and Angelika Wahl for their excellent laboratory work. We also thank Dr. Azuka Iwobi for critically reading our manuscript. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Huber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spielmann, G., Gerdes, L., Miller, A. et al. Molecular biological species identification of animal samples from Asian buffets. J Consum Prot Food Saf 13, 271–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-018-1168-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-018-1168-7

Keywords

Navigation