May polypropylene films be a sufficiently effective functional barrier for foods packed in recycled paperboard and stored at room temperature?

  • Maurus Biedermann
  • Sandra Biedermann-Brem
  • Koni Grob
Short communication
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

Bags or films of biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) are widely used for packing dry foods in paperboard boxes. At room temperature, BOPP films may perform adequately as functional barrier against the migration of substances from recycled paperboard into foods. However, among other factors, the barrier efficiency strongly depends on temperature. With a glass transition temperature of around 0 °C, it still has some residual crystalline structure, but gradually loses it with every degree of rising temperature. For example, we show that at 22 °C the barrier is about 4.5-times longer effective than at 28 °C. From our results we conclude that BOPP films optimized with regard to barrier properties may adequately protect packed food against contaminants from recycled paperboard for fairly long time periods, provided temperatures are in the lower range of room temperatures.

Keywords

Glass transition Barrier test Migration from recycled paperboard Internal bag Storage temperature 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biedermann M, Grob K (2013) Assurance of safety of recycled paperboard for food packaging through comprehensive analysis of potential migrants is unrealistic. J Chromatogr A 1293:107–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Dima G, Zurfluh M, Biedermann-Brem S, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Grob K (2013a) Migration of mineral oil from printed paperboard into dry foods; survey of the German market. Part II: further development during storage. Eur Food Res Technol 236:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biedermann M, Ingenhoff JE, Zurfluh M, Richter L, Simat T, Harling A, Altkofer W, Helling R, Grob K (2013b) Migration of mineral oil, photoinitiators and plasticisers from recycled paperboard into dry foods: a study under controlled conditions. Food Addit Contam A 30:885–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biedermann-Brem S, Grob K (2014) Barriers against the migration from recycled paperboard into food: measuring efficiency by surrogate components. Packag Techn Sci 27:713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biedermann-Brem S, Richter L, Simat TJ, Grob K (2014) Internal bags with barrier layers for foods packed in recycled paperboard: recent progress. Eur Food Res Technol 239:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biedermann-Brem S, Biedermann M, Grob K (2016) Required barrier efficiency of internal bags against the migration from recycled paperboard packaging into food: a bench mark. Food Addit Contam A 33:725–740Google Scholar
  7. Biedermann-Brem S, Biedermann M, Grob K (2017) Taped barrier test for internal bags used in boxes of recycled paperboard: update of the method. Packag Techn Sci. 30:91–102. doi: 10.1002/pts.2278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diehl H, Welle F (2015) How to determine functional barrier performance towards mineral oil contaminants from recycled cardboard. Food Packag Shelf Life 5:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiselier K, Grob K (2012) Barriers against the migration of mineral oil from paperboard food packaging: experimental determination of breakthrough periods. Packag Techn Sci 25:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grob K (2014) Update on recycled paperboard and its compliance for food contact. An interdisciplinary statement. J Verbr Lebensm 9:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kantonales Labor Zürich (Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of Zürich)ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations