Skip to main content

Food defence system in food industry: perspective of the EU countries


Nowadays, incidents related to intentional contamination of food products are a huge problem in the whole food supply chain. Therefore, it is necessary to raise awareness of food defence at every level of the food chain, from farm to fork, from government and academic institutions to retail chains, the media and consumers. The principles of food defence can be implemented at every level of the food chain. Food defence contributes to the mitigation of potential risks in intentional contamination and food fraud, which can have a harmful effect on humans and public health, business, economy, etc. The requirement for the implementation of food defence comes from retail chains. They require food companies to be certified according to the standards of the food safety system such as those supported by the Global Food Safety Initiative. Although food defence is an inevitable step in enhancing and strengthening the whole food safety system, on a global scale, an insufficient number of countries have incorporated food defence principles into their legal frameworks. The intention of this review article is to increase awareness of food defence in food industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. 1.


  1. Applebaum RS (2014) Terrorism and the nation’s food supply perspectives of the food industry: where we are, what we have, and what we need. J Food Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb15493.x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bénoliel I (2007) EU defending food chain against bio-attack. Eur Aff 8(1):70–74. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  3. BRC Global Standard (2012) BRC global standard for food safety. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  4. British Standards Institution (2014) PAS 96:2014 Guide to protecting and defending food and drink deliberate attack. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  5. European Commission (2014) MEMO/14/113 Horsemeat: one year after - > actions announced and delivered! Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  6. European Parliament Research Service (EPRS) Briefing (2014) Fighting food fraud. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  7. Europol (2015) Record seizures of fake food and drink in INTERPOL-Europol operation 16. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  8. Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy S (2013) Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents. J Food Prot 76(4):723–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Global Food Safety Initiative (2014) GFSI position paper on mitigating the public health risk of food fraud. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  10. Global Food Safety Initiative FORUM (2014) SGS—food safety modernization act (FSMA) updates and how Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) audits can help with compliance. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  11. GPO (2013) Proposed rules, part III, Food and drug administration, focused mitigation strategies to protect food against intentional adulteration. Fed Regist 78(247):78013–78061 (FR Doc No: 2013-30373). Accessed 24 Dec 2013

  12. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements For Registration of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use (2005) Q9 Quality risk management version 4. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  13. International Organization for Standardization (2005) Food safety management systems—requirements for any organization in the food chain. ISO 22000:2005. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  14. International Organization for Standardization (2009) Prerequisite programmes on food safety—part 1: food manufacturing. ISO 22002-1:2009. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  15. International Organization for Standardization (2009) Risk management—risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC 31010:2009. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  16. McEnttire J, Boateng A (2012) Industry challenge to best practice risk communication. J Food Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02630.x

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Halloran S (2014) DuPont industrial espionage case ends with convictions. Food Eng. Accessed 6 Mar 2014

  18. Safe Quality Food Institute (2014) SQF code a HACCP-based supplier assurance code for the food industry, edition 7.2. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  19. Sharma K, Paradakar M (2010) The melamine adulteration scandal. Food Sec 2(1):97–107. doi:10.1007/s12571-010-0057-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spink J (2014) GFSI direction on food fraud and vulnerability assessment (VACCP). Accessed 8 May 2014

  21. Spink J, Moyer DC (2011) Defining the public health threat of food fraud. J Food Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. US Food and Drug Administration (2002) Bioterrorism act. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  23. US Food and Drug Administration (2009) Economically motivated adulteration. 74 Fed Regist 64:15497–15499. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  24. US Food and Drug Administration (2014) Food defence. Accessed 1st Mar 2016

  25. Van der Meulen B (2015) Is current EU food safety law geared up for fighting food fraud? J Verbr Lebensm 10(S1):S19–S23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization (2007) The world health report—a safer future: global public health security in the 21st century. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

  27. World Health Organization (2008) Terrorist threats to food guidance for establishing and strengthening prevention and response systems, revision. Accessed 2nd Mar 2016

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Puhač Bogadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bogadi, N.P., Banović, M. & Babić, I. Food defence system in food industry: perspective of the EU countries. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 11, 217–226 (2016).

Download citation


  • Food defence
  • Food safety
  • Risk assessment
  • Intentional contamination
  • Food industry