Skip to main content
Log in

Improving accuracy and intelligibility of decisions

  • CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS "DECISION MAKING AND SCIENCE"
  • Published:
Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intelligible and accurate risk-based decision-making requires a complex balance of information from different sources, appropriate statistical analysis of this information and consequent intelligent inference and decisions made on the basis of these analyses. Importantly, this requires an explicit acknowledgement of uncertainty in the inputs and outputs of the statistical model. The aim of this paper is to progress a discussion of these issues in the context of several motivating problems related to the wider scope of agricultural production. These problems include biosecurity surveillance design, pest incursion, environmental monitoring and import risk assessment. The information to be integrated includes observational and experimental data, remotely sensed data and expert information. We describe our efforts in addressing these problems using Bayesian models and Bayesian networks. These approaches provide a coherent and transparent framework for modelling complex systems, combining the different information sources, and allowing for uncertainty in inputs and outputs. While the theory underlying Bayesian modelling has a long and well established history, its application is only now becoming more possible for complex problems, due to increased availability of methodological and computational tools. Of course, there are still hurdles and constraints, which we also address through sharing our endeavours and experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston C, Steven A, Farthing B, Mengersen K (2010) Summarising and monitoring key characteristics of chlorophyll levels derived from satellite images. (submitted)

  • Barrett S, Whittle P, Mengersen K, Stoklosa R (2009) Biosecurity threats: the design of surveillance systems, based on power and risk. Environ Ecol Stat 17:503–519. doi:10.1007/s10651-009-0113-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO (2003) Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? Stat Sci 18(1):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J, Smith A (2000) Bayesian theory. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman M, Mittinty M, Whittle P, Mengersen K (2010) Comparing biosecurity risk assessment systems. ACERA project 0709. Australian Centre for Excellence in Risk Analysis, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon P (2006) Bayesian statistical modelling, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1002/9780470035948

  • Donald M, Mengersen K, Tose S, Sidhu J, Cook C (2011) Incorporating parameter uncertainty into quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). J Water Health 9:10–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison AM (2004) Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecol Lett 7(6):509–520. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00603.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk M, Alston C, Pettitt A, McGrory C, Walsh C, Mengersen K (2010) Recent Bayesian approaches for spatial inference with application to environmental modeling. Biometrics (Accepted November 2009)

  • FAO-IPPC (2002) International standard for phytosanitary measures no. 14, The use of integrated measures in a systems approach for pest risk management. FAO-International Plant Protection Convention, Rome

  • Field SA, Tyre AJ, Jonzén N, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP (2004) Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds. Ecol Lett 7(8):669–675. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00625.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrad F, Barrett S, Murray J, Stoklosa R, Whittle P, Mengersen K (2011a) Ecological aspects of biosecurity surveillance design for the detection of multiple invasive animal species. Biol Invasions 13:803–881. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9870-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrad FC, Barrett S, Murray J, Parkes J, Stoklosa R, Mengersen K, Whittle P (2011b) Improved design method for biosecurity surveillance and early detection of nonindigenous rats. NZ J Ecol 35(2):1–13. http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/new_issues/NZJEcol_JarradIP.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Hamilton G, Fielding F, Mengersen K (2010) An integrated Bayesian Network approach to Lyngbya majuscule bloom initiation. Marine Environ Res 69:27–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Low Choy S, O’Leary R, Mengersen K (2009) Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models. Ecology 90(1):265–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low Choy S, Murray J, James A, Mengersen K (2010) Indirect elicitation from ecological experts: from methods and software to habitat modelling and rock-wallabies. In: O’Hagan A, West M (eds) The Oxford handbook of applied Bayesian analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 511–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcot BG, Steventon JD, Sutherland GD, McCann RK (2006) Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Can J For Res 36:3063–3074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanaway M, Mengersen K, Reeves R (2010) Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of early detection surveillance for plant pest invasions. Environ Ecol Stat doi:10.1007/s10651-010-0152-x

  • Strickland CM, Simpson DP, Turner IW, Denham R, Mengersen KL (2011) Fast Bayesian analysis of spatial dynamic factor models for multitemporal remotely sensed imagery. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 60:109–124. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00739.x

  • Vose D (2008) Risk analysis: a quantitative guide. 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle P, Quinlan M, Mumford J, Mengersen K (2010) Beyond compliance: integrated systems approach for pest risk management in SE Asia. Summary of a meeting funded by Project Preparation Grant (PPG) 328 from the WTO Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF)

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors K. Mengersen and P. Whittle declare that the research is funded by a variety of agencies and that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Whittle.

Additional information

Conference Proceedings: “Decision Making and Science—The Balancing of Risk Based Decisions that Influence Sustainability of Agricultural Production”. 7th and 8th October 2010 in Berlin, Germany. Sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mengersen, K., Whittle, P. Improving accuracy and intelligibility of decisions. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 6 (Suppl 1), 15–19 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0694-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-011-0694-3

Keywords

Navigation