Weed resistance development and management in herbicide-tolerant crops: experiences from the USA

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS "DECISION MAKING AND SCIENCE"

Abstract

The evolution of weeds in USA agroecosystems predates herbicide tolerant (HT) crops by several decades. However, given the unprecedented adoption of genetically engineered (GE) HT crops, particularly in maize, cotton and soybean and the concomitant use of glyphosate, the evolution of glyphosate-resistant (GR) biotypes of agronomic important weeds now represents a significant threat to the sustainability of the GE HT trait and the herbicide. Notably, GR biotypes of horseweed (Conyza canadensis), common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus), Palmer pigweed (Amaranthus palmeri), giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) have increased dramatically in frequency in conjunction with the adoption of crop production systems based on GE HT crops. Furthermore, other shifts in weed communities have been observed. It must be emphasized that the GE HT crops did not directly cause these weed shifts. The industry was responsible initially for these changes in weed communities given their initial positions that the glyphosate-resistant weed problems were unlikely to evolve and the recommendations to use glyphosate exclusively for weed management. However, decisions by growers to use glyphosate must be factored in as imparting selection pressure on the weed communities resulting in weed management problems, particularly when university recommendations strongly suggested not to use glyphosate in this manner. The key is now to provide growers with sufficient information to convince them to adopt integrated weed management programs and utilize best management practices. Given the presumed and real benefits of convenience and simplicity of the GE HT crop production systems; this will be a difficult task.

Keywords

Glyphosate Glyphosate-resistant crops Glyphosate-resistant weeds Management 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The author Micheal D. K. Owen declares that the manuscript was not sponsored and that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arntzen CJ, Coghlan A, Johnson B, Peacock J, Rodemeyer M (2003) GM crops: science, politics, and communication. Nat Rev Genet 4:839–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett SCH (1983) Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ Bot 37:255–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckie HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benbrook CM (2003) Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the United States: the first eight years. http://www.biotechinfo.net/technical_pap_6.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2004
  5. Boerboom C, Sprague C, Owen M (2009) A grower’s conundrum: Implementing integrated weed management in a HRC world. In: Proceedings of the 6th international IPM symposium, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw LD, Padgette SR, Kimball SL, Wells BH (1997) Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 11:189–198Google Scholar
  7. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops; a review. J Environ Qual 35:1633–1658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis VM, Kruger GR, Stachler JM, Loux MM, Johnson WG (2009) Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations resistant to glyphosate, ALS-inhibiting, and multiple (glyphosate + ALS-inhibiting) herbicides. Weed Sci 57:494–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Wett JMJ, Harlan JR (1975) Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 29:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duke SO (2005) Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manage Sci 61:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duke SO, Powles SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manage Sci 64:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ervin DE, Carriere Y, Cox WJ, Fernandez-Cornejo J, Jussaume RA Jr, Marra MC, Owen MDK, Raven PH, Wolfenbarger LL, Zilberman D (2010) The impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. National Research Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Falk JS, Shoup DE, Al-Khatib K, Peterson DE (2005) Survey of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) response to protox- and ALS-inhibiting herbicides in Northeast Kansas. Weed Technol 19:838–8461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foes MJ, Liu L, Vigue G, Stoller EW, Wax LM, Tranel PJ (1999) A kochia (Kochia scoparia) biotype resistant to triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 47:20–27Google Scholar
  15. Foresman C, Glasgow L (2008) US grower perceptions and experiences with glyphosate-resistant weeds. Pest Manage Sci 64:388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gianessi LP, Reigner NP (2007) The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production. Weed Technol 21:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson KD, Johnson WG, Hillger DE (2005) Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol 19:1065–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green JM, Owen MDK (2010) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem. doi:10.1021/jf101286h
  19. Heap I (2010) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed 05 Jan 2011
  20. Johnson WG, Gibson KD (2006) Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: an Indiana grower perspective. Weed Technol 20:768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson WG, Davis VM, Kruger GR, Weller SC (2009a) Influence of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems on weed species shifts and glyphosate-resistant weed populations. Eur J Agron 31:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson WG, Owen MDK, Kruger GR, Young BG, Shaw DR, Wilson RG, Wilcut JW, Jordan DL, Weller SC (2009b) U.S. farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 23:308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruger GR, Johnson WG, Weller SC, Owen MDK, Shaw DR, Wilcut JW, Jordan DL, Wilson RG, Bernards ML, Young BG (2009) U.S. grower views on problematic weeds and changes in weed pressure in glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean cropping systems. Weed Technol 23:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Llewellyn RS, Lindner RK, Pannell DJ, Powles SB (2002) Resistance and the herbicide resource: perceptions of Western Australian grain growers. Crop Protect 21:1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Llewellyn R, Lindner Robert, Pannel David, Powles Stephen (2004) Grain grower perceptions and the use of integrated weed management. Aust J Exp Agric 44:993–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maertens KD, Sprague CL, Tranel PJ, Hines RA (2004) Amaranthus hybridus populations resistant to triazine and acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Res 44:21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsh SP, Llewellyn RS, Powles SB (2006) Social costs of herbicide resistance: the case of resistance to glyphosate. In: 50th annual conference of the Australian agricultural and resource economics society, Manly Pacific Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  28. Moss SR, Rubin B (1993) Herbicide-resistant weeds: a worldwide perspective. J Agric Sci 120:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neve P (2007) Challenges for herbicide resistance evolution and management: 50 years after Harper. Weed Res 47:365–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orson JH (1999) The cost to the farmer of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol 13:607–611Google Scholar
  31. Owen MDK (1997) Risks and benefits of weed management technologies. In: De Prado R, Jorrin J, Garcia-Torres L (eds) Weed and crop resistance to herbicides. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  32. Owen MDK (2008) Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manage Sci 64:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Owen MDK (2009) The evolution of herbicide resistant weeds in Iowa: description, implications and solutions. In: Proceedings of the integrated crop management conference, Ames, IA, Iowa State University, pp 65–70Google Scholar
  34. Owen MDK (2009b) Herbicide-tolerant genetically modified crops: resistance management. In: Ferry N, Gatehouse AMR (eds) Environmental impact of genetically modified crops. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 113–162Google Scholar
  35. Owen M, Boerboom C, Sprague C (2009) Convenience and simplicity? An illusion and a detriment to integrated weed management. In: Proceedings of the 6th international IPM symposium, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  36. Patzoldt WL, Tranel PJ, Hagar AG (2005) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci 53:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peterson DE (1999) The impact of herbicide-resistant weeds on Kansas Agriculture. Weed Technol 13:632–635Google Scholar
  38. Powles SB (2008) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manage Sci 64:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan GF (1970) Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci 18:614–616Google Scholar
  40. Scott BA, VanGessel MJ, White-Hansen S (2009) Herbicide-resistant weeds in the United States and their impact on extension. Weed Technol 23:599–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaw DR, Givens WA, Farno LA, Gerard PD, Jordan D, Johnson WG, Weller SC, Young BG, Wilson RG, Owen MDK (2009) Using a grower survey to assess the benefits and challenges of glyphosate-resistant cropping systems for weed management in U.S. corn, cotton, and soybean. Weed Technol 23:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steckel LE, Gwathmey CO (2009) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) growth, seed production, and interference in cotton. Weed Sci 57:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster TM, Sosnoskie LM (2010) Loss of glyphosate efficacy: a changing weed spectrum in Georgia cotton. Weed Sci 58:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Werth JA, Preston C, Taylor IN, Charles GW, Roberts GN, Baker J (2008) Managing the risk of glyphosate resistance in Australian glyphosate-resistant cotton production systems. Pest Manage Sci 64:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations