Abstract
Holographic quantum error correcting codes (HQECC) have been proposed as toy models for the AdS/CFT correspondence, and exhibit many of the features of the duality. HQECC give a mapping of states and observables. However, they do not map local bulk Hamiltonians to local Hamiltonians on the boundary. In this work, we combine HQECC with Hamiltonian simulation theory to construct a bulk-boundary mapping between local Hamiltonians, whilst retaining all the features of the HQECC duality. This allows us to construct a duality between models, encompassing the relationship between bulk and boundary energy scales and time dynamics.
It also allows us to construct a map in the reverse direction: from local boundary Hamiltonians to the corresponding local Hamiltonian in the bulk. Under this boundary-to-bulk mapping, the bulk geometry emerges as an approximate, low-energy, effective theory living in the code-space of an (approximate) HQECC on the boundary. At higher energy scales, this emergent bulk geometry is modified in a way that matches the toy models of black holes proposed previously for HQECC. Moreover, the duality on the level of dynamics shows how these toy-model black holes can form dynamically.
References
J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].
X.D. Ahmed Almheiri and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in Ads/CFT, JHEP04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE].
F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev.D 46 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormalization, arXiv:1209.3304 [INSPIRE].
Z. Yang, P. Hayden and X.L. Qi, Bidirectional holographic codes and sub-AdS locality, JHEP01 (2016) 175 [arXiv:1510.03784] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden et al., Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharyya, Z.S. Gao, L.Y. Hung and S.N. liu, Exploring the tensor networks/AdS correspondence, JHEP08 (2016) 086 [arXiv:1606.00621] [INSPIRE].
T.J. Osborne and D.E. Stiegemann, Dynamics for holographic codes, arXiv:1706.08823 [INSPIRE].
T. Cubitt, A. Montanaro and S. Piddock, Universal quantum Hamiltonians, Proce. Natl. Acad. Sci.115 (2018) 9497 [arXiv:1701.05182].
M.P. Woods and A.M. Alhambra, Continuous groups of transversal gates for quantum error correcting codes from finite clock reference frames, arXiv:1902.07725 [INSPIRE].
P. Faist et al., Continuous symmetries and approximate quantum error correction, arXiv:1902.07714 [INSPIRE].
A.L.M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causality and holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP12 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1408.6300] [INSPIRE].
K.G. Wilson, Renormalization group and critical phenomena. I: renormalization group and the Kadanoff scaling pictre, Phys. Rev.B 4 (1971) 3174.
K.G. Wilson, The renormalization group and critical phenomena. II: phase space cell analysis of critical behavior, Phys. Rev.B 4 (1971) 3184.
R. Oliveira and B. Terhal, The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice, Quant. Inf. Comput.8 (2005) 0900 [quant-ph/0504050].
G. Gour and N.R. Wallach, All maximally entangled four-qubit states, J. Math. Phys.51 (2010)112201 [arXiv:1006.0036].
E.M. Rains, Quantum codes of minimum distance two, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor.45 (1999) 266 [quant-ph/9704043] [INSPIRE].
F. Huber, O. Guene and J. Siewert, Absolutely maximally entanged states of seven qubits do not exist, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 200502 [arXiv:1608.06228].
W. Helwig, Absolutely maximally entangled qudit graph states, arXiv:1306.2879.
S. Bravyi and M. Hastings, On complexity of the quantum Ising model, Comm. Math. Phys.349 (2017)1 [arXiv:1410.0703] [INSPIRE].
J. Beckenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev.D 7 (1973) 2333.
S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Comm. Math. Phys.43 (1975) 199.
P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the alpha-bits of black holes, arXiv:1807.06041 [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, Commun. Math. Phys.354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
S. Nezami and M. Walter, Multipartite entanglement in stabilizer tensor networks, arXiv:1608.02595 [INSPIRE].
A. Felikson and P. Tumarkin, Hyperbolic Coxeter polytopes, http://www.maths.dur.ac.uk/users/anna.felikson/Polytopes/polytopes.html.
J. Tits, Groupes et géométries de Coxeter, (1961)
M.W. Davis, The geometry and topology of Coxeter groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (2007).
E.B. Vinberg, Hyperbolic reflection groups, Russian Math. Surveys40 (1985) 31.
P. Abramenko and K. Brown, Buildings theory and applications, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Germany (2008).
A.M. Cohen, Finite Coxeter groups, lecture notes (2008).
J. Weeks, Kaleidotile, http://geometrygames.org/KaleidoTile/index.html.
D. Aharonov and L. Zhou, Hamiltonian sparsification and gap-simulation, arXiv:1804.11084.
S. Piddock and A. Montanaro, The complexity of antiferromagnetic interactions and 2d lattices, Quant. Inf. Comput.17 (2015) 636 [arXiv:1506.04014].
R. Guglielmetti, CoxiterWeb, https://coxiterweb.rafaelguglielmetti.ch.
W. Helwig and W. Cui, Absolutely maximally entangled states: existence and applications, arXiv:1306.2536.
D. Goyeneche et al., Absolutely maximally entangled states, combinatorial design and multi-unitary matrices, Phys. Rev.A 92 (2015) 032316 [arXiv:1506.08857] [INSPIRE].
W. Helwig et al., Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing, Phys. Rev.A 86 (2012)052335 [arXiv:1204.2289] [INSPIRE].
R. Cleve, D. Gottesman and H.-K. Lo, How to share a quantum secret, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 648 [quant-ph/9901025] [INSPIRE].
V. Gheorghiu, Standard form of qudit stabilizer groups, Phys. Lett.A 378 (2014) 505 [arXiv:1101.1519].
H. Kurzweil and B. Stellmacher, The theory of finite groups: an introduction, Springer, Germany (2004).
D. Gottesman, Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction, Ph.D. thesis, Caltech, Pasadena, U.S.A. (1997).
I. Reed and G. Solomon, Polynomial codes over certain finite fields, J. Soc. Industr. Appl. Math.8 (1960) 300.
G. Seroussi and R. Roth, On MDS extensions of generalized Reed-Solomon codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor.32 (1986) 349.
M. Grassl and M. Roetteler, Quantum MDS codes over small fields, IEEE Proc. Int. Symp. Inf. Theor. (2015) 1104 [arXiv:1502.05267].
T. Kohler and T. Cubitt, Translationally invariant universal classical Hamiltonians, J. Stat. Phys.176 (2019) 228 [arXiv:1807.01715].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1810.08992
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kohler, T., Cubitt, T. Toy models of holographic duality between local Hamiltonians. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)017
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2019)017
Keywords
- AdS-CFT Correspondence
- Black Holes